SNS Machine Protection System Final Design Review Introduction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SNS Integrated Control System SNS RDB Requirements, wish list, status A little history l Oracle RDB used exclusively by accelerator physics group l JERI.
Advertisements

01/11/2002SNS Software Final Design Review1 V123S Event Link Encoder, Transmission System and PLL Receiver Thomas M. Kerner (BNL) SNS Global Controls.
CLS Machine Status Displays System Analyst - Controls Canadian Light Source Inc. web: Perimeter.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Shielding Workshop S. Buda Personnel Protective Systems March 27, 2007.
The applications of FA-M3 PLC used in SSRF ZHOU Dayong
Welcome to SNS The Next Large EPICS Project
Oak Ridge SNS Experimental Facilities X /arb 1 SNS MPS Review Target-MPS Review WBS Ron Battle Target Controls, Target Systems Experimental.
Paul Chu FRIB Controls Group Leader (Acting)
SNS Integrated Control System SNS Machine Protection System EPICS Workshop April 27, 2005 Coles Sibley.
Dayle Kotturi SLC April 29, 2004 Outline Motivation Key Components Status Update SLC / EPICS Timing Software Tasks Hardware.
NSLS/BNL PLC Choice Elliott Wolin 6-Jan-2010 Following are a few slides from a much longer presentation BNL chose Allen-Bradley – three month evaluation.
BI SW for LINAC4 On behalf of BE/BI/SW BI software development process Specifications List of BI Systems – Not covered: PSB ring systems Conclusions Lars.
Reliability Modeling of an ADS Accelerator SNS-ORNL/Myrrha Linac (MAX project) EuCARD 2, GENEVA (20-21 March 2014 ) CERN.
SNS Integrated Control System MPS - Commissioning Plans 1. Quick MPS System Overview 2. Run Permit System 3. Fast Protect Auto Reset 4. Fast Protect Latched.
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
ORNL-SNS Diagnostic Group SNS Beam Loss Monitors and HARPs Machine Protection System FDR September 11,2001 Presented by Saeed Assadi.
SNS Integrated Control System EPICS Collaboration Meeting SNS Machine Protection System SNS Timing System Coles Sibley xxxx/vlb.
IMMW14, Ferney Voltaire, September 2005 (slide 1/35) Experience with configurable acquisition software for magnetic measurement.
Tuning an Accelerator for 1 MW C. Peters WAO 12 August 8 th, 2012.
LIPAc status report EPICS Integration and Commissioning + RFQ LCS status at INFN/LNL Alvaro Marqueta LIPAc Project Team on behalf of the LIPAc Control.
SNS Integrated Control System SNS Timing Master LA-UR Eric Bjorklund.
Stephen Schuh Vacuum Controls SCR and 16 November 2005 Vacuum Controls System Concept Review and Preliminary Design Review.
HINS 6-Cavity Test 3 Month Plan Jan 12, Current Schedule 2-3 day shutdown scheduled to start Jan 18 (Wednesday) to upgrade BPM system and reinstall.
Adrian Oates Daresbury Laboratory ALICE Control System July 08.
SNS Integrated Control System Timing Clients at SNS DH Thompson Epics Spring 2003.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SNS BLM System Overview Detectors, Measurements, Simulations Alexander Zhukov Saeed Assadi SNS/ORNL.
Issues in Accelerator Control Bob Dalesio, December 23, 2002.
MICE Hydrogen Control System MICE Safety Review Meeting 4 th Oct 2011 PJ Warburton - Daresbury Lab.
Timing Requirements for Spallation Neutron Sources Timing system clock synchronized to the storage ring’s revolution frequency. –LANSCE: MHz.
Machine Protection at the 1MW CEBAF Electron Accelerator and Free Electron Laser Facility Kelly Mahoney Presented at the Workshop for.
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
NCSX CD-4/MIE block diagrams April 18, 2007 P. Sichta rev 0.
ICFA-HB 2004 Commissioning Experience for the SNS Linac A. Aleksandrov, S. Assadi, I. Campisi, P. Chu, S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, G. Dodson, J. Galambos,
PIP Status Report Linac Startup plans 12/05/2012.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SCL Vacuum Control System Upgrade Derrick Williams
Stéphane Gabourin on behalf of TE/MPE-EP MPP Linac4 – 9 th July 2015 BIS installation in Linac4 For 50 MeV operation.
NML Machine Protection System (MPS) Arden Warner Fermilab August 2 nd, 2007.
Training LHC Powering - Markus Zerlauth Powering Interlocks Markus Zerlauth AB/CO/MI.
André Augustinus 18 March 2002 ALICE Detector Controls Requirements.
EtherCAT based RF Interlock System for SwissFEL LLRF 2015 Abstract As part of the overall development effort for SwissFEL's RF and LLRF systems, the RF.
PXIE Beam Instrumentation Status Update – Preparing for MEBT 1.1 Beam Vic Scarpine Feb. 9, 2016.
SNS linac beam commissioning By Michael Plum Spallation Neutron Source Oak Ridge National Laboratory ESS Workshop on beam commissioning April 8-9, 2014.
Personnel Safety Systems Stuart Birch Senior Engineer, Personnel Safety Systems November 6 th, 2014.
Mitigation Devices External Interface ICS Nick Levchenko Lund Date:
Machine Protection Systems (MPS) Arden Warner, and Jim Steimel Project X Machine Advisory Committee March 18-19, 2013.
BIS main electronic modules - Oriented Linac4 - Stéphane Gabourin TE/MPE-EP Workshop on Beam Interlock Systems Jan 2015.
HB2008 – WG F: 27 Aug. S. Childress – Diagnostics_2MW 1 NuMI Beam Diagnostics and Control Steps to 2 MW S. Childress Fermilab.
PXIE warm front end status A. Shemyakin PIP-II technical meeting 3 May 2016.
M. Munoz April 2, 2014 Beam Commissioning at ESS.
Failure Analysis Tools at DESY. M. Bieler, T. Lensch, M. Werner, DESY ARW 2013, Melbourne,
Design process of the Interlock Systems Patrice Nouvel - CERN / Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse CLIC Workshop Accelerator / Parameters.
PIP-II Beam Instrumentation Vic Scarpine PIP-II Machine Advisory Committee Meeting March 2016.
ESS Beam Diagnostics Overview Andreas Jansson / BI Group Beam Diagnostics Mini-workshop
ESS Front End diagnostic
Reliability and Performance of the SNS Machine Protection System Doug Curry 2013.
SNS Status Report Karen S. White 10/15/08.
LCLS-II 2K Cold Box Controls Design Review
LINAC4 50 MeV phase BIS STATUS
BE-BI Software for LINAC4
CSNS Accelerator Control and Beam Instrumentation JIN Dapeng, XU Taoguang … June 9, 2015
SNS Timing System EPICS Workshop April 28, 2005 Coles Sibley
LCLS Event System - Software
Operator Training Requirements
RF Local Protection System
BCM-BIS Interface Szandra Kövecses
System Architecture of MPSVac and MPSID
MPS commissioning at ESS
(Beam) Commissioning Plan
Operation of Target Safety System (TSS)
Rack installation and local tests for the MEBT Chopper Rack
Presentation transcript:

SNS Machine Protection System Final Design Review Introduction Dave Gurd Tuesday, September 11, 2001

Review Committee Members Kelly Mahoney (Jefferson Lab) Chair Mike Thuot (LANL) Ken Reece (SNS/ORNL) George Dodson (SNS/ORNL)

Presenters Coles Sibley Cognizant Engineer Saeed Assadi Ron Battle

Scope (2) – Personnel Safety Systems are not under Review Today Target Protection System Personnel Protection System “High QA” System Machine Protection – Latched Machine Protection – Auto reset Run Permit (Software Layer)

Scope This is the Final Design Review for the SNS Machine Protection System Hardware. The Software System that uses this hardware will be reviewed separately, and at a later time. The “High QA System” discussion is a Preliminary Design Review” only, preparatory to a planned Project Change Request.

System under review is in WBS 1.9.2 (Global Systems) ICWG 1.3 1.4 1.4 Cryo 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 Front End Linac (JLAB, ORNL) Ring Target Instruments Facilities Controls (LBNL) (LANL) (BNL) (ORNL) (ORNL, ANL) (ORNL, CM) 1.9.3 1.9.4 1.9.10 1.9.5 1.9.6 1.9.8 1.9.9 Front End Linac Cryo Ring Target Facilities Personnel Controls Controls Controls Controls Controls Controls Safety 1.9.2 “Global” Controls: (Network, Timing, Protection, Control Room, Labs, Applications, System Software) 1.9.1 Integration & Management

Charge to the Committee Is the Scope well defined and understood? Are all the Requirements understood and well-defined? Is the hardware proposed flexible enough to do what is required? Are all of the Interfaces – internal and with other systems – appropriate and well-defined? Does the Design presented meet the requirements? Issues? Anything missing? Anything dumb? Are there any Safety or QA issues requiring attention? Is the Cost and Schedule credible with respect to the design and to the project schedule? Are there any major Unresolved Issues? Bottom Line: Can we proceed with Procurement and Fabrication?

Schedule 10:00 – 10:15 Intro Dave Gurd 10:15 – 12:00 MPS C. Sibley 10:15 – 10:35 MPS Overview (Latched and Auto Reset) 10:45 – 11:45 MPS Software, MPS Hardware, Altera Code 11:45 – 12:00 Cost, Schedule 12:00 – 1:00 Lunch 1:00 – 1:15 Target Protection Ron Battle 1:15 – 1:30 Diagnostics Saeed Assadi 1:30 – 2:00 HQA System C. Sibley 2:00 – 2:15 Cost Schedule C. Sibley

Machine Protection System Final Design Review September 11, 2001 Coles Sibley 2000-0xxxx/vlb

Related Documents High QA MPS Description (Sibley) Interface Requirements Document for MPS and Front End Equipment (Sibley) SNS MPS VME/PMC Module Design (Sibley) MPS System Requirements Document (Sibley) MPS Interface Requirements Document (Sibley) SNS Beam Loss Policy (Dodson) ASD Control of Beam Power (K. Reece) Preliminary Safety Assessment Document (PSAD) Copper damage from fast Beam Loss (Shafer) Front End Cutoff Devices (Staples) Have hard copies available

Questions for Committee Mode Masking is critical. Are Hardware / Software protections presented adequate? Are we Interlocking ourselves to TOTAL SAFETY- NO BEAM? Availability verses reliability? Flexibility vs. reliability? (Commissioning) Should corrector power supply ON status be an MPS Input? Presently NO. Will keep real estate available for the future. Are Redundant PLC’s and Current sensors required? Is FPS-Latched OK for redundancy? Is Voltage and current read back OK verses 2 Zero Flux? Layout of inputs indicates a better arrangement is 16/0, or 0/16 instead of 8/8. Very minimal coding change.

Machine Protection System (10:00 – 12:00) Machine Protection System Overview Mode and timing info throughout MPS Talks MPS Software Overview MPS Hardware, Firmware Cost Schedule Acronyms FPS Fast Protect System FPL Fast Protect Latched FPAR Fast Protect Auto Reset BLM Beam Loss Monitor

Machine Protection is a Global Subsystem ICWG include JLAB 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.4 Cryo 1.9 Front End Linac Ring Target Instruments Facilities (JLAB, ORNL) Controls (LBNL) (LANL) (BNL) (ORNL) (ORNL, ANL) (ORNL, CM) 1.9.3 1.9.4 1.9.5 1.9.6 1.9.7 1.9.8 1.9.10 1.9.9 Front End Linac Ring Target Instrument Facilities Cryo Personnel Controls Controls Controls Controls Controls Controls Controls Safety 1.9.2 “Global” Controls - 1.9.2.3 Machine Protection 1.9.1 Integration & Management

MPS Design Assumptions Four layers of protection! High QA (Hardware) PLC Hardware / Software (Fast Protect System) Software (Run Permit System) Machine Protection System is not a “Safety Class” or “Safety Significant” System. SNS will be built and commissioned in Phases, MPS must accommodate this schedule, (Flexible and Reliable). Reliability – The Machine Protection System must inhibit the beam when required. It must fail in a SAFE state. Availability – The machine availability should be as high as possible. The MPS must be easy to configure and have a “friendly” operator interface. False trips must be minimized.

MPS - Layered Protection

SNS Accelerator Timing Sequence

Mode Definitions Machine Modes Beam Modes PPS /Beam Permit Ion Source D-Plate Linac Dump Injection Dump Ring Extraction Dump Target Beam Modes Off Standby (RFQ RF gate) Diagnostics (10 usec) Diagnostics (50 usec) Diagnostics (100 usec) Full Pulse Width (1 msec) Low Power (7.5 kW) Medium Power (200 kW) Full Power (2 MW)

Background - SNS Events (Prioritized) 5 thru 36 - Operating Mode (same as RTDL frame data) Hardware / Software from PLC through EPICS Beam dump, power limit, Pulse length limit Injection rates limited by dump power and pulse width DTL for commissioning only

MPS Fast Protect System Fast Protect Auto Reset (20 microseconds) Inhibits beam for duration of macro pulse by disabling FPS_PERMIT_LINK_B carrier to the front end. Restores Fast Protect link for next pulse if fault restored to normal. Fast Protect Latched System (20 microseconds) Latches fault conditions until fault clears and Operator resets condition. FPS_PERMIT_LINK_A carrier interrupted and inhibits beam through front end devices. Run Permit System (1 second) Coordinates machine mode changes. Scans IOC configurations for Software Configuration errors. EPS interface for masking equipment inputs. High QA MPS (2 Pulses) Latched in Hardware Redundancy through FPLS inputs Identical Systems, different reset

Copper Damage from Fast Beam Loss (R. Shafer) Time to reach thermal stress at front surface – column 3 Estimated time to reach the thermal stress limit at the Bragg peak - column 5 Conclusion Based on these estimates, it is apparent that significant damage can occur in the DTL unless the MPS Fast Protect can shut down the beam in less than about 5 microseconds for beam losses at E<= 7.5 MeV. For the CCL (E>87 MeV), 20 microseconds is adequate. There is no risk of damaging the RF structures during commissioning with single 52-mA, 600-ns long minipulses.

MPS Response Time (Estimate) Fiber speed = 0.65C Copper speed = 0.65C MPS Board delay = 75 nsec

MPS Fast Protect System Layout Master oscillator signal to carrier links Input Links will be discussed Add estimated time range

MPS Master Four shutdown devices

Front End Shut Off Devices MPS HQA - PPS Only if MPS detects fault HQA- 65 kV power supply OK HQA - RFQ Power supply (Interlock) OK, but 5 min. recovery FPL - 65 kV fast switch OK, 100 msec’s FPL - RFQ Power supply OK, but 5 min. recovery FPAR - RFQ RF drive OK, Off, move gate, ON FPAR - LEBT Chopper Fails unsafe* – BUT Fast MEBT Chopper Could damage chopper RF Reference line Long recovery LEBT Valve Power limit, Not a beam stop Beam Stop none +/- 40 kV lens supplies Not 100 % RF Plasma Source PS Thermal instabilities RF plasma source gate OK for short time * PAC 2001 paper, SNS Beam Chopping and its Implications for Machine Protection, L. Doolittle, C. Sibley

Fast Protect – Auto Reset ALARA – Pulse Width Modulation Tuning Aid, ALARA Concentrates Permit Inputs Inputs Bypassed by Mode Inhibits carrier link to disable Beam Inputs: Loss Monitors Software trip points, bypass RF Low level Controls (Maybe latched) Software maskable Auto mask sets (Wire Scanner)

Beam Loss Monitors (Saeed’s Talk) Integration Time – Set in Hardware Trip point limits – Software adjustable - EPICS Dose Rate Calibration Masking Capabilities – Software Masks Wire Scanner Masks – Auto mask sets for each W.S. Placement – Near Quadrupoles, Redundant coverage HV Supply – 1 HV supply takes down every other BLM Configuration Control Commissioning vs. Run Periods

EDM EPICS Loss Monitor display

Auto Reset Inputs

Fast Protect - Latched System Concentrates Permit Inputs Inhibits carrier link to disable beam Devices bypassed by Jumper or PLC and Software Configuration determined on a case by case basis Inputs Bypassed by machine mode (event link) System Configuration Control Equipment maintained in locked racks Documentation control of changes System verification after changes

Fast Protect - Latched Inputs Power supply status NO-Fault signal removed when interlock chain dropped or power supply receives OFF command Valve Status No Fault signal when valve is open and NOT closed (intermediate states are faults) Linac RF Status RF Enabled Signal. Could be auto reset input Target Status Input comes from the target control system. Response should be faster than target shutdown signal. Time Stamp verifies MPS ACTED FIRST

Fast Protect – Latched Inputs Dump Status Passive Dump Status from PLC Vacuum Status Poor integrated vacuum levels Timing System Status Ring RF required for IDMP, RING, EDPM, and target modes Local Oscillator allowed for LDMP, Dplate, and Ion Source modes PPS Input PPS search status will latch off beam Beam Collimator’s Water cooling LEBT Chopper Required for Ring Operation

Fast Protect - Latched Inputs Loss monitors (Near BCM’s, HIGH QA) Current monitors Integrated current monitors Pulse Width violations Idmp over current monitor HARP Beam current intensity SEM With each HARP Beam Position Monitors Beam off target/dump violation Wire scanners, Faraday cups “Home” Limit switches

Fast Protect - Latched Inputs Beam Loss Accounting system Software integrated loss EPICS Alarm Inputs EPICS Alarms for any PV can trigger latched input on a board level or input signal level. Injection Kickers Power supply status Waveform errors Kicker pair matching Extraction Kickers PS Status Kickers Charged Ring RF

Latched Inputs Includes Corrector Power Supplies

Number of MPS Systems

MPS Input Bypass Mechanisms Mode Mask Global database contains operating mode dependant devices. Devices not required for present mode are masked through hardware. Masks changed with database reconfiguration and IOC reboot. Jumper / Key / PLC Bypass Software bypass requires set of closed contacts from a jumper, key, or PLC contacts. Software Bypass If hardware configuration allows, input bypassed through software with appropriate EPICS Access Security permissions. The installation of bypass jumpers will be determined on a case by case basis by committee. Configuration control is monitored by RPS through EPICS.

Wire Scanner (Layered) Protection Application Requests W.S. Mode, receives “SW KEY” Run permit won’t allow long pulse until APP releases key Program crashes, etc. require manual intervention, verification MODE changed to 10, 50, or 100 usec as appropriate IOC Receives Request for scan Motor Record is locked by mode (Allowed by low PW MODE) MODE == SHORT_PULSE, scan starts MPS Hardware input masked by MODE (Not software) Limit switch will cut off beam if not masked by MODE MASK MODE changes while wire off stops -> Beam cut off Motor breaks -> Manual intervention required to get wire out of beam

MPS Conclusion Several layers of protection, Defense in Depth System is flexible, easy to add / delete sensors as required Ability to mask through software will increase availability Easy to run during phased installation. Hardware enabling SW masks allows configuration control where required, flexibility to mask at will, with same hardware.