Mechanics/Cooling U.S. Silicon Strip Upgrade Meeting M. Gilchriese August 12, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 st Petal Prototype Fabrication completed October 27, 2008.
Advertisements

Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03.
Lecture 2 SANDWICH COMPOSITES
Professor Joe Greene CSU, CHICO
ME 450 Group Adrian Conrad Chris Cook Thomas Hylton Nathan Wagers High Pressure Water Fixture Conceptual Design Analysis December 10, 2007.
High Temperature Composites Rutgers University Federal Aviation Administration Advanced Materials Flammability Atlantic City, NJ October 24, 2001.
Wall Form Design Example (Continued)
1 CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 10: Strength of Materials Strains Professor Joe Greene CSU, CHICO Reference: Statics and Strength of Materials, 2.
Dean R Walters Chamber and Bellows Jan. 5, Summary Chamber The plan is to construct a chamber made of 316LN stainless steel with.
Tube to Foam Interface (Tim). Outline Discuss what’s known about the tube to foam interface – Describe problem – Issues – Theoretical Calculations – Anecdotal.
Outer Stave Prototype Update E. Anderssen, M. Cepeda, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman, J. Silber LBNL W. Miller, W. Shih Allcomp, Inc ATLAS.
VG1 i T i March 9, 2006 W. O. Miller ATLAS Silicon Tracker Upgrade Recent Study Topics Full length model with wafers, hybrids and cable as dead weight.
Thermally Conductive Carbon Foam Properties
M. Gilchriese Mechanics Labor and Disk Sectors US Pixel Meeting November 2001.
Pixel Upgrade Local Supports Based on Thermally Conducting Carbon Foam E. Anderssen, M. Cepeda, S. Dardin, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman,
Velo Module 0 minus minus Paula Collins. Investigating Module 0 thermal performance Baseline module design combines elements of different CTE (and Young’s.
M. Gilchriese Update on Pixel Prototype Mechanics/Cooling Structures at LBNL February 1, 2008 M. Cepeda, S. Dardin, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese and.
Mechanical Properties
Recent Mechanical Barrel Stave Development BNL; S. Duffin, A. Gordeev, D. Lynn, G. Mahler: LBNL; C. Haber, M. Gilchriese: Yale; W. Emmett, A. Martin, P.
M. Gilchriese Integrated Stave Mechanics/Cooling Backup ATLAS Upgrade Workshop Valencia December 2007 M. Cepeda, S. Dardin, M. Gilchriese, C. Haber and.
M. Gilchriese Upgrade Stave Assembly and Robotics August 3, 2007 LBNL.
SLHC Pixel Layout Studies S. Dardin, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman LBNL November 4, 2008.
M. Gilchriese Integrated Stave Mechanics/Cooling June 5, 2008 CERN.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Shear Load with Stainless Steel Bushing and Frictionless Shim-Flange Interface Two cases of shim plates were investigated.
November 16, 2001 C. Newsom BTeV Pixel Modeling, Prototyping and Testing C. Newsom University of Iowa.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
M. Gilchriese ATLAS Upgrade Mechanics/Cooling and System Design by LBL January 2008.
Back up stave test program status Eric VIGEOLAS Pixel week December 2000 Pre production status Assembling phase comments Geometrical control Stave Qualification.
M. Gilchriese SLHC Pixel Local Supports Based on Thermally Conducting Carbon Foam E. Anderssen, M. Cepeda, S. Dardin, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese,
M. Gilchriese - November 12, 1998 Status Report on Outer Support Frame W. Miller Hytec, Inc E. Anderssen, D. Bintinger, M. Gilchriese LBNL.
Thermally Conductive Carbon Foam Properties M. Gilchriese, M. Cepeda - LBNL W. Miller, W. Shih, R. Ramirez-Allcomp.
Physical Properties of Matter
VG1 i T i March 9, 2006 W. O. Miller ATLAS Silicon Tracker Upgrade Upgrade Stave Study Topics Current Analysis Tasks –Stave Stiffness, ability to resist.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
M. Gilchriese - April 2001 Disk Sector Status. M. Gilchriese - April Technical Status Three prototypes to current dimensions(8-sector disks) except.
ATLAS PIXEL SYSTEM OVERVIEW M. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory March 11, 1999.
Thermo-mechanical petal status Sergio Díez Cornell 23Jan 2015.
M. Gilchriese U.S. Pixel Mechanics Overview M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory April 2000.
M. Gilchriese Disk Sector Production Pixel Local Supports Production Readiness Review.
W.O. Miller i T i VG 1 Two Pixel Configurations Under Study First: A Monolithic Integrated Structure First: A Monolithic Integrated Structure –Axial array.
Public Health Lessons from HACCP-Based Inspection Models Project Presentation by Loren D. Lange August 7, 2007 United States Department of Agriculture.
M. Gilchriese Stave Prototype Status Summary July 5, 2006.
Pixel Upgrade Carbon Foam and Outer Stave Update E. Anderssen, M. Cepeda, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, T. Johnson, J. Silber Lawrence Berkelely National.
M. Gilchriese - December 2000 Disk Sector Status E. Anderssen, M. Gilchriese, F. Goozen, N. Hartman, T. Johnson, F. McCormack, J. Wirth and D. Uken Lawrence.
Thermal Model of Pixel Blade Conceptual Design C. M. Lei 11/20/08.
M. Gilchriese Work Plan W. Miller iTi M. Cepeda, S. Dardin, M. Gilchriese, C. Haber, R. Post LBNL February 6, 2007.
A hollow stave Ian Wilmut – August LBL stave At the March UG week LBL showed a prototype asymmetric stave. This prompted consideration of the strip.
M. Gilchriese Towards Fabrication of a Mechanical Prototype Stave.
Some Comments on the Use of CGL for the Foam-Pipe Interface 1 D. Lynn (BNL), LBNL Mechanical Meeting, Sep 2012 We have been using CGL exclusively in the.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
Stave Tooling & Plans for Future Stave-building (Tim)
C. Haber / M. Gilchriese Integrated Stave Electrical/Mechanics/Cooling Update February 6, 2008.
Experiences and Issues with Carbon Foam at BNL & Yale BNL: David Lynn, Marc-Andre Pleier, Anatoli Gordeev, Russ Burns, Ken Sexton Yale: Paul Tipton, Will.
1 Disk Sectors Integrated support and cooling for disk modules. Each sector has 6 modules Number of sectors is 2x9+4x8=50. Fabrication of all sectors in.
B [OT - Mechanics & Cooling] Stefan Gruenendahl February 2, 2016 S.Grünendahl, 2016 February 2 Director's Review -- OT: Mechanics &
Strip Stave Status & Plans at Yale Yale: Paul Tipton, Will Emmet, Tom Hurteau.
Design for a 2 MW graphite target for a neutrino beam Jim Hylen Accelerator Physics and Technology Workshop for Project X November 12-13, 2007.
M. Gilchriese Upgrade Stave Mechanics(Only) Status September 16, 2006.
TS Cool Down Studies TSu Unit Coils (24-25) N. Dhanaraj and E. Voirin Tuesday, 10 March 2015 Reference: Docdb No:
"Drawer Mechanics - MiniDrawer"
Ti/SS transitions A.Basti INFN-PISA*
Strip Petals: Local supports and prototype tests
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Development of a low material endplate for LP1 and ILD
LBL Status August 5, 2008.
T2K Upgrade First look at TPC contraints (WAGASCI Constraints)
FEA Analysis of the LHCB Velo RF foil
New Proposed Foam Developments
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Presentation transcript:

Mechanics/Cooling U.S. Silicon Strip Upgrade Meeting M. Gilchriese August 12, 2008

Overview Work since June 6 review by LBL/W. Miller Status of stress studies/prototypes Petal prototype, in collaboration with Valencia Overlap with pixel mechanics/summary of pixel plans LBL strip mechanics plans and schedule with currently expected resources

Since June Review For some months prior to the June review, almost out of $, could only maintain some design effort(W. Miller) (including for pixels) + document for review LBL provided some additional funds about one month ago => restarted prototype effort (also for pixels) and buying materials for future prototypes. These funds must be spent by end FY08. Strip work has been concentrated on stress issues (described next), collaborating with Valencia on petals and BNL/Yale interchanges.

Stave Prototype Construction Stress concern is tube contracts as T is lowered, facing nominally expands slightly and this can put shear stress on foam(and adhesives). Does this cause cracking/failure? Aluminum tube coupled to foam or facing using compliant, gel-like adhesive CGL-7018 – Used for pixels. Shear modulus(G) is temperature, age(since dispense) and radiation dependent. Detailed data do not exist, simple tests for pixels decade ago suggest G ≤ about 1 MPa cold and after irradiation. Vendor spec on shear strength is < 2.1 MPa(about 300 psi) but this does not take into account temperature or radiation and concept of shear strength for this stuff is not so easy to define Foam to facing also used CGL, except on one side of one prototype, where we used EG7658, a compliant adhesive, with G  100 Mpa and shear strength of about 7 Mpa. But properties are temperature dependent(gets stiffer at lower temperature) and not well known. EG7658 also used for pixels, in high radiation region, to join Al to Al CGL-7018 EG7658

Strip Stave Prototype Results All three prototypes(about 34 cm long) were thermal cycled 50 times from about 20C to about -35C Thermal performance afterwards was same as before thermal cycling But about all this shows is that there is no catastrophic failure. Stress concentrated very close to end of tube(see later slides), very local failure only(in last few mm where tube exits) would not be observable in these tests. We have also thermal cycled a pixel prototype(about 6 cm long) that has similar construction albeit with a different type of foam and have looked directly (visually and thermally) at the edge where the tube exits. No effect seen, but very limited experience so far Its worth noting that there is experience outside HEP that is relevant. Space radiator panels in which metallic tubes are either brazed or hard- bonded to POCO foam in a panel structure. These see T excursions of hundreds of C. Some pictures on next page, ask for references.

Outside HEP

Modeling Measurements of POCO foam properties not in good agreement. Data for pixel low-density foam candidates hardly exist Adhesive properties not well known, particularly at low T Results for stress also depend strongly on assumed bond-line thickness, concept of bond-line between porous foam and tube not well defined Will show some results but bottom line is that have to make measurements and then adjust model to agree and see if it makes sense.

Foam Properties We have not done an exhaustive compilation. POCO foam Young’s modulus GPa Likely not uniform(remember thermal conductivity is not uniform) and difference between compression and tension. Tensile strength ~ 1-2MPa Compressive strength ~3MPa? Plastic behaviour?

Models Example below shows the normal stress in the z-direction on the POCO foam with E=0.5 GPa (worst?) and with G=1.4 MPa for both tube and facing adhesive. To show that foam near tube is in compression and in tension near facing Comparison of (simplified) 60 cm and 4cm model demonstrates peak stresses near end ~ same => can use short model Facing Facing adhesive Foam Tube adhesive Tube

Example Results – Peak Values Values depend on bond-line thickness (4 mil here) Adds some confidence to prototype results but not definitive, in my opinion Hard to understand margin from this

Stress Samples and Testing Made small stress samples – Visually inspect and thermal cycle from +25 to -30 fifty times – No cracks in foam observed after T cycle….but maybe can’t see Will measure stress/strain directly on these samples (and others) by pulling on tube relative to facings => direct measure of strength of tube/adhesive and foam interface.

What Should be Done Next? Ideally, careful program of measurement of samples of foam and adhesives, including temperature dependence to extract moduli and strengths. Adjust model to achieve agreement with data. Will take time (~year) and not so easy to understand but should be done In parallel, build prototypes and test Full-length, thermal cycle necessary to convince people Note for strips, could use POCO HTC (or CVDed POCO) that has higher strength and higher K but also twice density, which would increase X0 by ~ 0.1

Connection to Pixels We are pursuing pixel concept that has many similarities with strip stave except that low-density, thermally conducting foam is used throughout Even more important to understand stress issues. Foam more fragile

Comment on ~ 3mm Strip Stave To achieve close to 3mm thickness of stave I believe requires tube/foam concept Cannot cut foam to “knife edge” Prototype made (although tube 4.9mm OD) in this way and thermal performance good. Did machining test with POCO foam to see what 3mm looks like (also a trial for pixels). Could be done (a bit messy). Tube exposed to facing. “Masking” small region on top/bottom of tube to prevent adhesive from connecting tube to facing difficult(impossible?) = > compliant adhesive But analysis different than case of foam surrounding tube. Must model adhesive and contact with facing….not done by us

Petal

Petal Overview Valencia is doing the overall design, FEA and detailed design of prototype and tooling (or almost all tooling). Will be conservative construction, basically same as LBL short prototype stave but in petal shape Our role restricted to – Comments on the design of the prototype – Fabrication at LBL of 1 – 2 full-size prototype petals – Hand off fabrication knowledge to Valencia… – No design or FEA responsibility Expect Valencia to take petal core(s), instrument and test, starting ~ November.

Petal Content and Status Honeycomb ordered(for other prototypes as well), delivery end September. Make and cut plates (3 ply K13D2U, one started) by September - > facings Expect stainless tube from Yale. Bend at LBL Expect foam from Yale. If we can get foam soon and know tube diameter, can cut at LBL before end September. If delayed into October, Yale may have to do it ($ problem in FY09) Assemble at LBL, with Valencia personnel in attendance, at least for first petal. No earlier than October. Exact schedule TBD. 2 nd petal fabrication at LBL depends on how all this goes($ problem in FY09). Cheapest to do both at once.

One Page Summary of Pixel Mechanics Plan Have made and tested thermal performance of 4 small prototypes with foam from 3 vendors and will make more small prototypes as vendors develop foam. All good so far and thermally concept looks promising Detailed design optimization(thru FEA) of facings(carbon fiber, orientation, thickness, is carbon-carbon better…) foam(K), tubes (including Ti, SS) to be done thermally and mechanically. Foam and adhesive properties, including understanding related adhesives (eg. diamond loaded instead of AlN) Models and small prototypes to understand stress issues Allcomp, Inc via SBIR plans to make ~ ½ length stave with their foam that would be instrumented and thermally tested at LBL Significant overlap with strips in some parts (mostly stress issues) but also a lot of work to be done, more than for strips

Current LBL Strip Mechanics Plans FY09 mechanics(pixels+strips) budget currently ~ 70% of FY08 Continue stress calculations and prototypes. How long this will take? Guess ~ early 2009 for initial stress understanding validated by sufficient prototypes(for strips, much longer for pixels) Fabricate 1, hopefully 2, petal prototypes by ~ November 2008 Hand-off petal fabrication knowledge to Valencia by ~ end 2008 Compare thermal FEA between W. Miller and Yale(Emmet) and hand-off by ~ September. Continue advisory role on design/prototypes ~ end 2008 Retain part of FY09 funding for pixel work, don’t spend all on strips, which means phase out of strip work Concentrate on pixel mechanics from 2009 onwards