Development of a Health Effects-based Priority Ranking System for Air Emissions Reductions from Oil Refineries in Canada Stephanie Gower, Stephen McColl,John.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
Advertisements

Halûk Özkaynak US EPA, Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, RTP, NC Presented at the CMAS Special Symposium on Air.
Kentucky Division for Air Quality Taimur Shaikh Ph.D.
TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.
Markus Amann The RAINS model: Modelling of health impacts of PM and ozone.
Workshop Framework: Addressing the 3 Questions Jay Barclay, Quentin Chiotti, John Shortreed and Stephanie Gower Policy Analysis Tools for Air Quality &
Working together for clean air Puget Sound Area Ozone Modeling NW AIRQUEST December 4, 2006 Washington State University Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Washington.
Classification of Air Pollutants
Copyright The Solution Foundry. All rights reserved. WELCOME TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS 101.
Maureen L. Cropper University of Maryland and World Bank
Environmental Health: Risk Assessment and Risk Management Michael Brody, PhD Senior Environmental Scientist 2 December 2011 Almaty, Kazakhstan.
JANUARY 20, 2009 MUSEUM OF INDUSTRY. AGENDA What is Active Pictou County? The Partners Background Trends and Rationale Consultation Process Community.
Application of a Human Health Risk Assessment Software to Support Revitalisation Decisions at Post-industrial Sites E.Wcislo, J.Dlugosz, M.Korcz Institute.
Transportation-related Air Pollutants Health Effects and Risk Linda Tombras Smith, PhD Chief, Health and Exposure Assessment Branch Research Division October.
A Smart Tool for a Sustainable Future. Chicago skyline PM 2.5 < 10 μg/m 3.
BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Dawn A. Ioven Senior Toxicologist U.S. EPA – Region III 4 April 2012.
Risk Assessment for Air Pollution Control Permits Joel Leon, Bureau of Technical Services April 9, Presented by – ACE academy New Jersey Department.
Earth System Sciences, LLC Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases Doug Blewitt, CCM 1.
The Use of the Risk Screening Environmental Indicators (RSEI) Program to evaluate 13 Counties of Northwest Florida TRI & RSEI Evaluations.
Environmental Health Informatics William Sonntag Office of Environmental Information U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Economic valuation of health concerns in North Chennai using a Comparative risk assessment framework Sri Ramachandra Medical College & Research Institute.
Did the recession impact recent decreases in observed sulfate concentrations? Shao-Hang Chu, US EPA/OAQPS/AQAD October, 2011.
Workshop U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Pacific Northwest National Laboratory November 15-17, 2005 GENII Version 2.0 Overview and.
Preparation of Control Strategies October 18, 2007 NAAQS RIA Workshop Darryl Weatherhead, Kevin Culligan, Serpil Kayin, David Misenheimer, Larry Sorrels.
INCORPORATING UNCERTAINTY INTO AIR QUALITY MODELING & PLANNING – A CASE STUDY FOR GEORGIA 7 th Annual CMAS Conference 6-8 th October, 2008 Antara Digar,
RISK ASSESSMENT. Major Issues to be considered in designing the Study 1.- Emission Inventory What is the relative significance of the various sources.
CPHA 2014 Cumulative Impacts of Air Pollution Mapped at a Neighbourhood Level Stephanie Gower Toronto Public Health May 27, 2014 Co-authors: Ronald Macfarlane,
Quantitative Assessment of Cumulative Impacts: Challenges and Progress Lauren Zeise Cal/EPA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment CAPCOA Workshop:
Air Resources Board Research Division Economic Valuation of Air Quality Benefits Bart Croes, Chief Research Division.
Critical Loads and Target Loads: Tools for Assessing, Evaluating and Protecting Natural Resources Ellen Porter Deborah Potter, Ph.D. National Park Service.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Environment Canada Meteorological Service of Canada Environnement Canada Service Météorologique du Canada Two aspects of Environmental Information Air.
P. Otorepec, M. Gregorič IVZ RS Use of rutinely collected air pollution and health data on local level for simple evaluation of health impact.
GIS Applications for Air Quality Management Robert Wu 吳震球 South Coast Air Quality Management District SCCAEPAApril 26, 2008.
Measurement and Targeting – Design and Implement Programs to Track Results and Accountability National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 Wednesday,
HC Screening State of the Science Reports Update to the ICG February 14th/05 Presented by: Bette Meek Existing Substances Division Health Canada.
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
Chapter 15.3 Risk Assessment 2002 WHO report: “Focusing on risks to health is the key to preventing disease and injury.” risk assessment—process of evaluating.
ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH INDICATORS FOR EUROPE: A PILOT STUDY OF INDICATORS OF AIR POLLUTION & HEALTH D Dalbokova, 1 M Sadeh, 2 M Krzyzanowski, 1 P Wilkinson.
Health Benefits of Improvements in Air Quality: Background and Analysis Options Prepared for Northwest Power and Conservation Council by Abt Associates.
1 Overview Community Health Modeling Working Group Meeting Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May 6, 2003.
An Overview of the Objectives, Approach, and Components of ComET™ Mr. Paul Price The LifeLine Group All slides and material Copyright protected.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency March 2, 2011 John Seltz.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
HF Modeling Task Mike Williams November 19, 2013.
Air Pollution Research Group Analysis of 1999 TRI Data to Identify High Environmental Risk Areas of Ohio by Amit Joshi.
The Male’ Declaration Proposal for Phase III. Looking back to think ahead Policy Dialogue Background Materials Ministerial agreement Capacity building.
Comparison of NAAQS RIA and Risk Assessments - Bryan Hubbell.
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
Stephen F. Austin State University February 27, 2014 Justin Cherry, P.E. Reece Parker TCEQ Air Permits Division.
NJDEP Air Toxics Program Olga Boyko NJDEP Division of Air Quality Health Effects of Air Pollution Workshop Bordentown, NJ July 30, 2008.
EJSCREEN: Environmental Justice Screening Tool 1.
Air Toxics & Public Health Committee Update Heidi Hales Monitoring and Assessment Committee Meeting Troy, NH April 24, 2007.
1 Diesel Risk Assessment & 1 st Level Screening Worksheets Joel Leon Bureau of Technical Services October 16, 2012.
State ecological monitoring system of Moscow-City.
1 European air indicator reporting Process and experience © iStockphoto.com/cmisje.
From Surveillance to Intervention to Policy Change: Air Pollution Models & Public Health Mark Werner, Ph.D. Wisconsin Division of Public Health
N Engl J Med Jun 29;376(26): doi: 10
Risk Assessment for Air Pollution Control Permits
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
WESTAR Increment Recommendations
Which method is most appropriate for assessing exposure?
17th Annual CMAS Conference Sadia Afrin and Fernando Garcia Menendez
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Regional Environmental Health Specialist
Presentation transcript:

Development of a Health Effects-based Priority Ranking System for Air Emissions Reductions from Oil Refineries in Canada Stephanie Gower, Stephen McColl,John Hicks, John Shortreed, Lorraine Craig Stephanie Gower, Stephen McColl, John Hicks, John Shortreed, Lorraine Craig University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada In Canada, the National Air Issues Coordinating Committee (NAICC) is currently engaged in a process to determine how best to reduce air emissions from oil refineries. The NFPRER (National Framework for Petroleum Refinery Emission Reduction) is being developed with the input of stakeholders including industry, NGOs, and regulatory jurisdictions. One component of this framework is the development of a tool to help prioritize air emissions for reduction based on estimated health impacts. Background Future Research Further testing and validation Incorporating uncertainty analysis Sensitivity and importance analysis Examine implications of predictions for each refinery site Perform “what if” scenario analysis for priority exposure reductions (i.e how much % reduction required to move a substance down by one ranking level) To obtain the HEIDI II model program, user’s guide and technical report, please visit Users select the refinery of interest from the Inputs sheet: Identification of 20 quadrants /zones surrounding the Chevron Refinery in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 20 “Zones” were defined around each refinery. These were delineated by circular radii at 1, 2.5, 5, 10, and 25 km from the centre of the refinery site, divided into northeast, southeast, southwest, and northwest quadrants. In each zone, the following were determined: Predicted concentration of each emitted chemical according to air dispersion model Population of youth (0-19 years), adults (20-59 years), and seniors (60+ years) Predicted case incidence of disease associated with each emitted chemical Predicted incidence can be summed across zones to calculate total predicted incidence in the region of the refinery resulting from each of its air emissions Geographical Exposure Mapping HEIDI II: Modular Structure Air Exposure Module Health Effects Module Health Impacts Module NPRI annual emissions - air toxics - PM and PM precursors (NOx, SOx), Refinery-related air concentrations - carcinogenic air toxics - non-carcinogenic air toxics - PM2.5 Meteorology Concentration-Response factors (by age groups) Site-specific background air concentrations Predicted population case-incidence rates (sum across radial zones, by age groups) - cancer - non-cancer - cardiorespiratory illness related to CACs RANKING by number of incident cases RANKING by severity simple DALYs RANKING by severity complex DALYs Radial Zone populations Dispersion to Radial Zones sex-age group apportionment of disease morbidity and mortality Air degradation Modelling Dose-Response in HEIDI II HEIDI II: Health Effects Indicators Decision Index HEIDI II is an Excel spreadsheet-based model that prioritizes a series of air toxics and criteria air contaminants commonly emitted from Canadian oil refineries. It was developed according to the fundamental concepts of a Level 4 LCIA (life cycle impact analysis) as described by Pennington and Bare (2001). HEIDI II also incorporates several software switches that allow variation of model input parameters such as stack height (metres) average daily sunlight hours (for calculating photodegradation). If a refinery reports emissions of zero for any chemicals, the user may opt to specify a percent of regulatory reporting thresholds as input in place of notional zero (below reporting threshold) values. Annual reported emissions: Environment Canada’s NPRI (National Pollutant Release Inventory) for Canada’s 20 active oil refineries Air dispersion: using a generic ISC3/AERMOD approach Photodegradation rates: SRC (Syracuse Research Corporation) database Ambient background levels of each substance: Environment Canada monitors Toxicity parameters for each substance for children, adults and seniors: Health Canada, EPA, CalEPA Population living in areas surrounding refinery: Canada Census data at dissemination area level (smallest geographical census subdivisions available) Data Sources HEIDI II uses a linear non-threshold approach to model dose-response for carcinogens and criteria air contaminants (CACs) A linearized transform of log dose:probit approach was used to model dose-response for substances that may exhibit threshold-type behaviour. Substances that are included in HEIDI II Selected by a group of stakeholders including industry, Health Canada (government), and NGOs HEIDI II ranks substances emitted from each refinery in order of greatest predicted impact on human health, using one of three different methods: Ranking by Predicted Incidence Ranking by Predicted Simple DALYs Ranking by Predicted Simple DALYs (Disability Adjusted Life Years) Ranking by Predicted Complex DALYs Model Output Model Input Parameters Acknowledgments of Support Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) CCME Health Prioritization Sub-group References Pennington, D.W., and Bare, J.C. (2001). Comparison of chemical screening and ranking approaches: The waste minimization prioritization tool versus toxic equivalency potentials. Risk Analysis, vol. 21, No. 5, Using the DALY approach, priority rankings can be calculated within each of the three chemical classes, or across all three classes together. Sample Output