Evaluating Socio-Economic Development - the ever-evolving EVALSED Guide www.evalsed.info Elliot Stern Presentation to Conference: Evaluating Public Interventions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Academic Network of European Disability experts (ANED) – VT/2007/005.
Advertisements

Assessment of administrative and institutional capacity
Technical meeting with the Regional representative offices in Brussels Brussels, 17 March 2009 The INTERACT II Programme – Knowledge Management and Capitalisation.
1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Evaluation: Setting Outcome Indicators and Targets Seminar: 15 March 2011, La Hulpe Veronica Gaffey Acting Director.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Draft guidance on monitoring and evaluation : Concepts and recommendations.
Guide to statistics in European Commission Development Co-operation
The Operational P The Operational Programme adopted by the European Commission The ESPON 2013 Programme EUROPEAN UNION Part-financed by the European Regional.
1 Stakeholder Engagement in Relu Jeremy Phillipson Assistant Director, Relu Programme.
1 Final Report Results of the on-line Public Consultation of the Conclusions of the 5th Cohesion Report Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward.
Regional Policy Meta-Evaluation Some Reflections Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 12/13 November 2012 Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation DG for Regional.
Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.
Good Evaluation Planning – and why this matters Presentation by Elliot Stern to Evaluation Network Meeting January 16 th 2015.
Regional Trajectories to the Knowledge Economy: A Dynamic Model IKINET-EURODITE Joint Conference Warsaw, May 2006.
SAFER CITIES MODEL. SAFER CITIES TOOLS SAFER CITIES TRAINING MANUAL AND TOOLKIT Overall development objective is to facilitate effective strategy development.
LEADER -The acronym ‘LEADER' derives from the French words "Liaison Entre Actions de Développement de l'Économique Rurale“ which means, ‘Links between.
Luis Vives Foundation STRUCTURAL FUNDS AND SOCIAL COHESION CII – Coalition Buildings Among Third Sector Organizations Speaker: José Manuel Fresno Luis.
15 April Fostering Entrepreneurship among young people through education: a EU perspective Simone Baldassarri Unit “Entrepreneurship” Forum “Delivering.
The evaluation of quality of the training offer at territorial level The evaluation of quality of the training offer within territorial systems Isfol –
DAC Network on Development Evaluation Illuminating development challenges and results.
1 Monitoring and evaluation after 2013 – some first ideas, mainly for ERDF / CF Evaluation network DG REGIO 14 th October 2010.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA MINISTRY OF PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK Evaluation Central Unit Development of the Evaluation.
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 LESSONS FROM THE THEMATIC EVALUATION OF THE TERRITORIAL EMPLOYMENT PACTS Veronica Gaffey, DG Regional.
Developing a Socio-Economic Dataframe AIM: Construct, test and refine a framework for the collection and management of socio- economic fisheries data Make.
Project “Ex-ante evaluation of programming documents and strengthening evaluation capacity for EU funds post-accession” (EUROPAID/130401/D/SER/HR) Project.
JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT Rebecca Cohen Policy Specialist, Chief Executive’s.
Assessment on the implementation of the Mediterranean Strategy for Sustainable Development Dr Nicola Cantore Overseas Development Institute,
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
WHAT IS YOUNG LIVES? Young Lives is an international research project that is recording changes in child poverty over 15 years and the factors affecting.
Measuring what matters. ‘ Statistics are the bedrock of democracy, in a country where we care about what is happening. We must measure what matters -
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
What, how and when 1 2 General Aims of ‘Youth in Action Programme ’ Promote young people’s active citizenship in general and their European.
Ministry of the Environment and Territory Directorate for Development and Environmental Research Ministry of Economy and Finance Department for Development.
Communication Paper on Smart Regulation COM(2010) 543, 8 October 2010 Presentation by Savia Orphanidou 3 rd November 2010.
CONDUCTING A PUBLIC OUTREACH CAMPAIGN IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Conducting a Public Outreach Campaign.
European Commission Joint Evaluation Unit common to EuropeAid, Relex and Development Methodology for Evaluation of Budget support operations at Country.
1 Cohesion Policy Ongoing Evaluation Budapest, 7 May 2010 Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation DG for Regional Policy European Commission.
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
P R O F I T ( ) Policy Responses Overcoming Factors in the Intergenerational Transmission of Inequalities Priority 7, STREP CIT2-CT
ROMANIA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION National Centre for Development of Vocational Education and Training Implementation Unit of Phare.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Enterprise Directorate General European Commission Kurt König Head of Unit “Communication and Awareness” Innovation Directorate
Future outlook and next steps for ESPON The ESPON 2013 Programme OPEN DAYS Bruxelles, 10 October 2007.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education Project updates Marcella Turner-Cmuchal.
OUR FOCUS FOR 2011 TO 2012 The CfWI produces quality intelligence to inform better workforce planning, that improves people’s lives.
Homelessness The added value of transnational cooperation for local authorities.
The Programme is funded by Erasmus+ under
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Project Cycle Management
Evaluation : goals and principles
The GEO-6 Matrix Drafting Approach
UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics, Belgrade,
Macro-regional strategies Rapporteur: Etele Baráth Dr
ESF and IB New ESF priority which recognises the need to support the strengthening of institutional and administrative capacity in Convergence regions.
UNICEF Plan for Global Evaluations
ESF Evaluations by MS Antonella Schulte-Braucks
THE independent evaluation office of Undp Independence, credibility and use IPDET, 30 June 2014 Indran A. Naidoo Director.
EuropeAid F3 Roberto Ridolfi, Head of Unit F3
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
ESF Conference: Summary of Key Learning's in Working Group 1: Implementing the YEI and the ESF to support the Youth Guarantee: developing partnerships.
ETS WG role and working methods
Tools for evaluating local policies in Europe
The approved ESPON 2013 Programme
Project intervention logic
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating Socio-Economic Development - the ever-evolving EVALSED Guide Elliot Stern Presentation to Conference: Evaluating Public Interventions in Romania November 2nd 2006

EVALSED Guide Evolution of the Guide  The Means Collection 1999 developed by C3E Lyon  Guide to Socio Economic Development 2003 developed by Tavistock Institute, GHK Consulting and IRS (Instituto per la Ricerca Sociale) Milan  The Revised Guide focusing on evaluation capacity and an interactive ‘community of practice’ being developed by GHK & a network of experts

EVALSED Guide Philosophy of EVALSED:  Evaluation is an integral part of effective management and policy making – it is not a free standing activity nor is it just about accountability  Evaluation is not just about technique – it is also an institutionalised activity that needs to be integrated into the operations of all involved actors – which is why evaluation capacity is so important  The aim is effective socio-economic development not good evaluation on its own

EVALSED Guide Intended Users  Policy makers who have an interest in evaluation  Public sector managers and civil servants who commission evaluations  Programme managers who will wish to use evaluation in programmes management and planning  Programme partners involved as stakeholders  Evaluators wishing to broaden methods and strategies

EVALSED Guide The GUIDE is already being used widely:  The EVALSED site has over 5000 visits per month,  Each visitor clicks on about 10 pages and views about 5.5  Italy, UK and Poland largest users Usage does not include translations:  Translations are now complete not only in Romania but also in the Czech Republic, Italy and Poland  Others translations are planned

EVALSED Guide  Currently consists of a GUIDE targeted at non-technical readers  ‘Sourcebooks’ that are more specialist covering: Themes and Policy Areas; Methods and Techniques; Capacity Building  Glossary of evaluation terms

EVALSED Guide  Section 1: Contribution of Evaluation to Socio-Economic Development  Section 2: Designing and Implementing Evaluation for Socio- Economic Development  Section 3: Developing Capacity for Socio-Economic Evaluation  Section 4: Choosing Methods & Techniques - Using Evidence

EVALSED Guide  Section 1: The benefits of evaluation; rationales and purposes for evaluation; the nature of evaluation capacity; the theories that underpin interventions; the current policy context; a review of the main types and source ideas of evaluation; the role of evaluation in the policy cycle; and how evaluation strengthens socio- economic development

EVALSED Guide  Section 2: The main processes for designing and implementing evaluations; involving stakeholders; defining evaluation questions and criteria; preparing terms of reference; managing evaluations; quality assurance and evaluation standards; and ensuring evaluations are useful and used.

EVALSED Guide  Section 3: Evaluation capacity as part of institutional capacity; the role of civil society; how to develop capacity; the architecture of evaluation systems - centralised and decentralised models; strengthening evaluation demand and evaluation supply including the role of evaluation societies; institutionalising evaluations

EVALSED Guide  Section 4: Identifies the main factors that influence choices of methods and techniques - especially policy and stakeholder priorities and evaluation question being asked; discusses quantitative and qualitative approaches; methods for different types of programmes/ interventions; different programme stages; different evaluation stages - e.g. Scoping, obtaining information, drawing conclusions etc; how primary and secondary data is obtained; and how indicator systems are created

EVALSED Guide Sourcebook 1:Themes and Policies Themes: Sustainable development; increasing institutional and administrative capacity; equal opportunities; local and territorial development; social inclusion; information society Policy areas : Agriculture; transport; employment; enterprise and innovation; justice; energy etc.

EVALSED Guide Sourcebook 2: Methods and Techniques Organised under headings: Planning and structuring, e.g. Formative evaluation, logic models, stakeholder consultation Obtaining data, e.g. Surveys, observation, focus groups Analysing data, e.g. Econometric models, expert panels, delphi techniques Evaluative judgements, e.g. Cost benefit analysis, expert panels, gender impact analysis

EVALSED Guide Sourcebook 3: Capacity Development National cases: Italy, Ireland, Netherlands - all now updated  New cases (nearly complete): Spain, Czech Republic and Poland  Plus a new cross cutting regional and cross border synthesis

EVALSED Guide Latest review tasks  Finalise additional national cases  Review case examples – and we are accumulating practical examples of innovative evaluations, specific terms of reference, examples of evaluation use  Just finished revising capacity development guidance to reflect emerging experience in new member states  Introduce resources, interactivity, forum – an electronic ‘community of practice’

EVALSED Guide Interactivity  Overall purpose is to create a more dynamic interactive and useful site that will support a community of practice among those who evaluate socio-economic development

EVALSED Guide  Specific interactive elements  A resource library that can accept documents, examples and methods that will be tagged or catalogued so that others can retrieve  An online ‘forum’ or bulletin board for exchange on specific topics  FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions) to accumulate forum know- how  Occasional asynchronous ‘conferences’ on selected topics – some suggestions: indicators and data sources, participative methods of evaluation, causality and explanation

EVALSED Guide  The aim is to create a dynamic resource that will be an ‘evolving object’ rather than something always about to become obsolete and requiring revision!  To ensure that evaluation is both methodologically and even theoretically ‘fit for purpose’ whilst reinforcing management and policy-making systems so that they use evaluations well  But the overall aim is to support better socio-economic development that will contribute to the economic opportunities and quality of life of Europe’s citizens