SOI BiCMOS an Emerging Mixed-Signal Technology Platform Tak H. Ning
Outline Evolution of Silicon Technology CMOS for Mixed Signal -- Why and Why Not? Why SOI BiCMOS for Mixed Signal? Some Recent Developments Summary
Evolution of Silicon Technology CMOS + ? CMOS BiCMOS PMOS/NMOS BIPOLAR 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 CMOS First bipolar invented First transistor MOSFET (1963) (1947) (1960)
What Happened to BiCMOS? Previous BiCMOS aimed primarily for digital applications CMOS was low power but very slow Digital BiCMOS goal was to add bipolar to speed up CMOS circuits PENTIUM 1 was BiCMOS! CMOS speed improved by scaling Need for digital BiCMOS disappeared by early 1990’s
Devices Capable of e-Commerce Worldwide Technology required: computing + communication
High-Speed CMOS Trends Power supply voltage ~ 1 V Gate oxide thickness ~ 1 nm Short channel length but high off current Not suitable for many analog applications gate Gate oxide source drain Channel length
Technology Drivers and Trends System needs Faster, smaller, lower power, more reliable It is a mixed-signal world! CMOS for computing For communication : RF and analog CMOS, if it can be done Silicon bipolar, if CMOS cannot do it Non-silicon only if unavoidable
Analog Transistors Typical MOSFET Typical bipolar Bipolar is preferred
Why BiCMOS? Systems need Integration for better systems Status: CMOS for high density and low power digital functions Bipolar for RF and analog functions Integration for better systems Faster, smaller, lower power, more reliable Status: ALL major semiconductor companies either shipping or developing BiCMOS
Why Not BiCMOS? Cost, Cost, and Cost Circuit design challenges: Process complexity Need to evaluate cost versus benefit Circuit design challenges: CMOS voltages scale (up to a point) Bipolar voltages do not scale
Why SOI BiCMOS? SOI CMOS is here; bipolar is needed Isolation Cost? Devices automatically isolated from one another Reduced substrate-coupling noise Cost? SOI wafer cost adder Cost saving associated with isolation Opportunities for innovation
Why SiGe-Base Bipolar? A much better RF and analog transistor Higher current gain Larger Early voltage Smaller transit times E B C n+ p+ p+ n n+ n+ subcollector
Improvement Factor: (SiGe)/(Si)
The Challenge of BiCMOS Bipolar MOSFET G E B C n+ p+ p+ S D n n+ ~ 0.2 mm n+ subcollector ~ 2 mm Buried layer thickness issue Isolation issue
The Challenge of SOI BiCMOS Bipolar SOI CMOS Buried oxide subcollector
SOI BiCMOS SOI BiCMOS has been around for years! What’s new?
SOI BiCMOS -- for Mainframes SOI for reducing soft-error rate No power/speed advantage for CMOS Source: Hitachi, 1992 IEDM
SOI BiCMOS -- for Mixed Signal SOI on high-resistivity substrate 1 mm Si; no SOI advantage for CMOS Source: Hitachi, IEEE TED, vol. 49, 2002
Bipolar Transistors: from Bulk to Thin SOI E E B C n+ B n+ C p+ p+ p+ n n+ 0.1mm n n+ n+ n+ subcollector buried oxide substrate of SOI ~ 2 mm Bulk Thin SOI Fully depleted collector SOI bipolar
Fully-Depleted-Collector SOI Bipolar Electrons drift across depleted collector region towards reachthrough Source: J. Cai et al., 2002 Symp. VLSI Technology
SOI Vs. Bulk SiGe Bipolar Device Subcollector Experiment SOI bipolar IBM’s Production SiGe Bipolar
Measured I-V Characteristics
Measured Cutoff Frequency
What About Cost? Cost adder: Cost subtracters: SOI substrate Cost subtracters: No subcollector No epi No deep trench Must look at cost versus benefit
Complementary BiCMOS fT of npn = 25 GHz fT of pnp = 2.5 GHz No SOI NPN PMOS NMOS INDUCTOR No SOI fT of npn = 25 GHz fT of pnp = 2.5 GHz Source: NEC, 1998 IEDM
SOI Complementary BiCMOS pnp npn nMOS pMOS E E G G B B p+ n+ C p+ C S D D S n+ p+ n+ n+ p+ p n n+ n+ p+ p+ p+ n+ n+ p n buried oxide substrate of SOI npn, pnp, and CMOS on same thin SOI
Advantage of Complementary Bipolar Source: Hitachi, IEEE TED, 1995
Summary Mixed-Signal Technology Performance SOI BiCMOS CMOS Time
Summary Silicon technology evolution continues at rapid pace CMOS development is rapidly reaching its limits Opportunities around the corner of the redbrick wall SOI BiCMOS likely to emerge as preferred technology platform for mixed-signal applications