How to Implement the CalARP Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“TI” Ohhhh….. (TIO) (No TIO is not a person!) What is it all about?
Advertisements

EPCRA Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Suzanne Powers
HAZARD COMMUNICATIONS / E N V I R O N H & S T R A I N I N G P R O G R A M HAZARD COMMUNICATION PROGRAM OSHA Standard 29 CFR The OSHA hazard communication.
1 OSHA FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (OSHA) OF 1970 George Mason University College of Nursing and Health Science Regulatory Requirements.
BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT CONTROL Willie Hannigan.
Jack Harrah Governor’s Office of Emergency Services
Risk Management Program Quality Assurance Program Plan David R. Taylor US EPA Region 9 Quality Assurance Office.
Laschone P. Garrison State of Connecticut, Department of Public Health.
School Safety Training
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
California Accidental Release Prevention Program California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP) Program.
Erika White September 11,  1984: Methyl isocyanate release at Union Carbide in Bhopal, India - 2,000 immediate fatalities  1985: M ethylene chloride.
1 OSHA Hazard Communication Standard Occupational Safety and Health Standards for the General Industry OTI 501 LABEL MSDS HCP.
Solano County Department of Environmental Management Environmental Health Services Division Hazardous Materials.
Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous & Explosive Chemicals Contractor Pre-Qualification, Emergency Preparedness, Incident Investigation, Audits.
Inspection Records and Reports NC DWR, Raleigh Regional Office 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh NC (919)
ISO 9001 Auditor Training Rita D’Angelo AFDO San Diego, March, 2015
Medicaid Hospital Utilization Review and DRG Audits: Frequently Asked Questions The Department of Medical Assistance Services Division of Program Integrity.
1 Inspection of LCPs: System for Inspection. ECENA Training Workshop Bristol, March 2008.
Emergency Action Plans Miriam Gradie Anderson Planning Specialist 608/ Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Notice of Privacy Practices Nebraska SNIP Privacy Subgroup July 18, 2002 Michael J. Brown, MHA, CPA Vice-President, Administrative & Regulatory Affairs,
EPCRA1 The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)
■ This Training Module is designed to educate Management on FMCSA Compliance Review (CR).
Process Safety Management
After the Sanitary Survey
Tim Date, Manager Risk Management Planning Unit
Overview of the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Southern Plains Area USDA/ARS.
The Campaign for McMaster University Environmental & Occupational Health Support Services and Central Joint Health and Safety Committee Developed from.
GW Lupton, Management Analyst Risk Management Planning Unit State Emergency Response Commission Risk Management Plan: Protecting the Community Florida.
Department of Homeland Security Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standard (CFATS) Impact on Washington University Bruce Backus Environmental Health & Safety.
Construction and Demolition Inert Processing Operations Compliance First: Evaluation of Solid Waste Facilities’ State Standards Training Provided By: California.
Ert 312 LECTURE 4 OSHA & DOSH.
Clean Air Act Section 112(r) Federal Program Update U.S. EPA Pacific Southwest Region Emergency Prevention and Preparedness February 15, 2007 CUPA Training.
ISO 9001: 2000 Certified Audit Process What to do.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Airports Division Eastern Region Grant Closeout Guidance 33 rd Annual Airports Conference Patricia.
This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium This project is funded by the European Union Projekat finansira.
SUMMARY OF INFORMAL COMMENTS Temporary Waiver of Terms Regulations May 2006.
VPP Introduction Challenge for the Future of Safety Developed from VPP website information.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training Session 9: Stores and Supplies Management.
Charter School 2015 Annual Finance Seminar Grant Management Office of Grants Fiscal September 11, 2015.
Determining and Citing Violations - A Basis for Enforcement Mickey Pierce DTSC February 7, 2006.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
HIPAA PRACTICAL APPLICATION WORKSHOP Orientation Module 1B Anderson Health Information Systems, Inc.
Declaring Beneficial Use in Water Use Groups R
Florida Accidental Release Prevention and Risk Management Planning (ARP/RMP) Act State Emergency Response Commission Preparing for Facility Risk Management.
Rhonda Anderson, RHIA, President  …is a PROCESS, not a PROJECT 2.
Coordinated Review Effort (CRE) School Year Karen Franklin, SNS Distance Learning October 1, 2015.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
OSHA – What to Expect When You’re Inspected (Following Federal Guidelines)
Title V, Preliminary Completeness Review. What do I need to do?  I need to find out if the application contains the required information.  Initial Title.
06/01/20161 Benny Hoff TÜV NORD Sweden AB AFS 2002:1 Use of pressure equipment.
Changes to Contested Case Hearing Requirements and Procedures Janis Hudson Environmental Law Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
1 OSHA Hazard Communication Standard General Industry LABEL MSDS.
Safety and Health Program Don Ebert- Risk Manager (509)
Conservation Development and Planning Department Code Compliance Flow Chart for County Code (Zoning & Land Use) Violations COMPLAINT RESEARCH AND PRIORITIZE.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
NAPA COUNTY Conservation Development and Planning Department Code Compliance Flow Chart Building Code Violations 1 COMPLAINT Written complaint (form, letter,
Lowell Randel Global Cold Chain Alliance/ International Institute of Ammonia Refrigeration.
Leon Wirschem, REHS/HMS County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Division
(AFTER-THE-FACT ORDERS) Confirming Orders. Purchasing Policies Use of confirming Requisitions and Purchase Orders without an approved University payment.
NJDOE Testing for Lead in School Drinking Water
CO Chemical Safety Workshops for Regulated Facilities
Let Auditing Be Your Superpower
FDPIR Management Evaluations
GMP Inspection Process
Solano County Department of Environmental Management Environmental Health Services Division Hazardous Materials.
Background First ERP written in 1991 Revised in 1998
Process Safety Management
Region 4 Air Directors Spring Meeting May 20, 2015
Cupa violation Review BAESG Meeting May 20, 2019 Matthew Burge
Presentation transcript:

How to Implement the CalARP Program Presented by Beronia Beniamine Senior Hazardous Materials Specialist Stanislaus County

Introduction Help Administrating Agencies in establishing and implementing the CalARP program Guidance to develop a strategy to adequately implement the CalARP program. Stanislaus County

Definition of AA Administrating Agencies (AA) are the local agency authorized by OES to implement and enforce the CalARP program in California. AAs also known as Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA), Participating Agency, or Designated Agency. Stanislaus County

Regulations Federal Risk Management program (FEDRMP) –Title 40 of CFR, Part 68 Federal OSHA Process Safety management Program (OSHA PSM)-Title 29 of the CFR Part 1910.119 California Accidental Release Prevention Program (CalARP) – California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 2, Chapter 4.5, Article 1 through 11. Stanislaus County

Stationary Source Any buildings, structures, equipment, installations, or substances emitting stationery activities which belongs to the same industrial group, which are located on one or more contiguous properties, which are under the control of the same person (or persons under common control), and from which an accidential release may occur. Stanislaus County

Risk Management Plan Risk Management Plan (RMP) is a document that must be a true and accurate reflection of a facility’s compliance with the elements of the CalARP Program. It summarizes the facility’s accidental release prevention program implementation activities. Each facility with one or more covered processes, must prepare and submit a single RMP that includes all covered processes. (Note: If an RMP is required by the FedARP Program, the “single” RMP may need to be crafted to meet AA documentation requirements.) Stanislaus County

Process Process means any activity involving a regulated substance including any use, storage, manufacturing, handling, or on-site movement of such substances, or combination of these activities. A process can be as simple as a single storage vessel or a group of drums or cylinders in one location or as complicated as a system of interconnected reactor vessels, distillation columns, receivers, pumps, piping, and storage vessels Stanislaus County

Program Description The program consists of two major components: 1. The Risk management Plan (RMP) Review process 2. The audits-inspections of the program Stanislaus County

How To Establish the CalARP Program Review Steps There are 4 major steps that need to be considered in establishing the CalARP program: Step 1: -Notification -Orientation Meeting Stanislaus County

Review Steps Step 2: -Initial Review -Initial Public Notice Step 3: -Informal Review -Completeness Review Stanislaus County

Review Steps Step 4: -Public Review -Evaluation Review Stanislaus County

Notification Send an initial notification letter to Stationary Source (SS) with more than the threshold of a regulated substance. A business plan inventory information, Air Districts , Building departments, or other permit issuing agencies might be helpful in identifying RMP facilities. Note in the initial notification letter that the SS will have one year from the initial notification letter to submit the RMP plan. You can suggest a date for the orientation meeting or you can call the SS to schedule one. Stanislaus County

Orientation Orientation meeting might be helpful in opening a dialogue between the SS and the agency. Some of the items that need to be discussed at the orientation meeting: Description of the RMP process The description of the covered process(es) RMP fees Program Level Timeline for the RMP process During the meeting, make sure to : Bring a copy of the Guidance, County or OES Request that the facility will inform you of their HAZOP meeting schedule Stanislaus County

Initial Review SS will submit the RMP to the AA for review AA will do the the Initial Review to determine that all the required elements pursuant to sections 2745.3 through 2745.9 are documented in the RMP plan and it contains appropriate level of detail. written notice or verbal notice should be provided to the SS if deficiencies were found. Always keep copies of the checklist in the facility's file. Stanislaus County

Initial Public Notice After the initial review is completed, the AA will publish a notice in a local newspaper of general circulation that the RMP has been submitted and the AA has initiated the process for government and Public review. Always keep a copy of the initial public notice in the facility file. Wording in the Initial Public Notice can be very simple such as: “Pursuant to the California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 2, Risk Management Plan(s) RMP have been submitted to “Name of AA” by the following (Name of companies) . The department has initiated the process for government and public review.” A letter will be sent out to SS verifying the receipt of their RMP plan and the date of when the public notice will be published. Stanislaus County

Informal Review/ Completeness Review AA will start the informal review to determine that the RMP is complete. During the informal review, the SS is allowed to receive a feedback from the AA prior to the completeness review. If there are deficiencies, then the AA will notify the SS and a 60 days (facility may request a one-time 30 days extension) time frame will be given to correct those deficiencies. Stanislaus County

Type of Deficiencies There are two types of deficiencies: Omission Deficiencies- Is the result of the exclusion of a local, State , and Federal requirement or failure to submit detailed information. Error of Fact- Is a result of misstatement by the SS. Vagueness, or insufficient evidence may be misleading to the RMP reviewer. AA may provide a verbal notice to the SS of any deficiencies. Stanislaus County

Completeness Review If deficiencies are identified, a letter will be sent out to the SS notifying them of the deficiencies and assigning a date to correct the deficiencies. Typically 60 days will be given , however, the SS may request a one-time extension. Failure to correct deficiencies during specified time frame shall be subject the owner/operator of a stationary source to to the penalties specified in Section 25540 and 25541 of HSC Once all the deficiencies are corrected, the RMP should be accepted as complete. If the SS fails to submit the revised RMP, then enforcement action must be considered. Stanislaus County

Formal Public Review Within 15 days after the RMP is accepted as complete, RMP should be made available to the public for review and comments. A Public Notice will be published in the local newspaper 45 days must be given for public to review and comment. Stanislaus County

Public Notice Public Notice must describe the RMP and state the location where it may be reviewed. Be posted in a local newspaper for a period specified by the AA. Must notify anyone that has specifically requested to be notified. Stanislaus County

Example of Public Notice “Pursuant to the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.95, Section 25535.2, facilities that handle regulated substances above certain thresholds are required to prepare risk management plans. The goal of a risk management program is to prevent chemical accidents that could cause harm to the public and the environment and to reduce the potential impact of accidental releases. The risk management plan contains an off-site consequence analysis that evaluates specific potential release scenarios including worst-case and alternative scenarios; a history of accidental releases; an integrated prevention program to manage risk; an emergency response program; and a management system to oversee the implementation of the risk management program. The risk management plans for the following facilities are available for public review and comment at the Stanislaus County Department of Environmental Resources, 3800 Cornucopia Way, Suite C, Modesto until March 17, 2000.“  List companies names and addresses……. Stanislaus County

Audits RMP auditing is the chief administrative control through which implementation and enforcement are ensured. Audits are periodically performed on the RMP to review its adequacy and it can be accompanied by inspection. When is determined that an audit is necessary then: Provide advance notice to the SS, SS need to make all the necessary documentation available for review and verification at the time of auditing. Send the audit-inspection checklist via e-mail to the person in charge of the RMP implementation. Stanislaus County

Audits Based on the checklist, the AA will send a “Preliminary determination of Necessary RMP Revisions”, it shall include the basis for the revisions and include a timetable for the implementation. The AA will expect to receive a written response within 90 days. Upon consultation with the SS, the AA will issue the final determination of necessary RMP revisions. Failure to make the revisions within 30 days after the final determination was received, the SS is in violation of Article 3, Chapter 4.5, and Division 2 of 19CCR. Stanislaus County

Inspection Inspection are site visits to check the accuracy of the RMP data and implementation of the CalARP Program elements. Inspections are performed every 3 years and are for the purpose of ensuring facility compliance with the CalARP Program. The following are some steps that need to be taken by the inspector: Set up an appointment with the facility at least 5 days in advance. Review the RMP prior to the inspection. Complete the RMP Formal Evaluation Review, using the Evaluation Review checklist. Upon arrival at the site, identify yourself and ask for the RMP coordinator or the designated alternate. Stanislaus County

Inspection Hold an opening conference, describe how the inspection will proceed. The inspector should have a simple sketch of the process to be able to identify all equipment and operational controls listed in the RMP plan. The inspector should ask any questions that may pertain to accidental release risk. Note discrepancies on the CalARP/RMP inspection form or violations of the Uniform Fire Code and other applicable regulations. Stanislaus County