Recurring Findings of Accreditation Assessments Karen S. Varnado, Supervisor LELAP April 18, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accident Investigation vs. First Report of Injury.
Advertisements

Roles and Monitoring Best Buddies Canada 2005 National Leadership Conference Be the change you want to see in the world. Gandhi.
Why Lab. Certification? Laboratory certification tries to insure that the laboratory is qualified and capable of analyzing the sample and obtaining quality.
LABORATORY CERTIFICATION & DATA QUALITY MICHAEL W. MILLER, Ph.D. NJ-DEP Office of Quality Assurance
Electronic verification audit log
Annual Management Review June Flowers, Flowers Chemical Labs Florida Society of Environmental Analysts - FSEA St. Petersburg, FL, May 2009.
Presented by YOUR NAME THE DATE
Internal Audits Presented by Charles N. Dyer Laboratory Association of New Hampshire March 29, 2011 © 2011 Danbury Assessment & Training Services.
ORGANIZATION. 2 Problem scenario  Develop an organizational chart for your laboratory showing lines of authority from the head of the organization to.
ORGANIZATION. 2 Purchasing & Inventory Assessment Occurrence Management Information Management Process Improvement Customer Service Facilities & Safety.
ISO Culture SHOQ Quiz 1. This program must be run in MS PowerPoint and requires sound. 2. Click “View” and then “Slide Show”. 3. Click “Continue”
ICASAS305A Provide Advice to Clients
Quality Management System
11-1 Quality Improvement Model Purpose: To provide a sequence of steps to improve any process so that the customers will realize the highest quality and.
1. Definition of a Reconciliation 2. Importance of a Reconciliation 3. When to Prepare a Reconciliation 4. Items Needed to Prepare a Reconciliation 5.
Computer Security: Principles and Practice
The Quality Improvement Model
1 HIV Drug Resistance Training Module 9: A Systems Approach to Laboratory Quality.
Hazard Identification and Control Courtesy of the Public Education and Conferences Section Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Division (OR-OSHA)
Five Star Quality Consultants Implementing ISO 9001 Corrective and Preventive Action.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Corrective Action.
Training. Why Train? skills and knowledge needed by new staff update skills of old staff assure conformity to standards teach the proper use of SQA procedures.
Experiences of a Newly Accredited Laboratory
The Information Component: Help Desk Performance Measures
Laboratory Data Integrity Ashraf Mozayani, PharmD, PhD Texas Southern University Barbara Jordan-Mickey Leland School of Public Affairs Forensic Science.
Mississippi State Department of Health
[Facility Name] [Presenter Name] [Date]. Objectives 2 After this session, you will be able to 1. describe Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and Plan-Do-Study-Act.
1 Accreditation and Certification: Definition  Certification: Procedures by which a third party gives written assurance that a product, process or service.
Presented to President’s Cabinet. INTERNAL CONTROLS are the integration of the activities, plans, attitudes, policies and efforts of the people of an.
Creating a Risk-Based CAPA Process
Quality Assurance Program Presenter: Erin Mustain 1.
© EAGLE Registrations Inc CONFIDENTIAL 1 Experience Speaks of Lessons Learned ASQ Illiana February 15, 2011.
Occurrence Reports. An occurrence report is a document used to record an event when it occurs Occurrences are reported each time an occurrence occurs.
Trindel Insurance Fund Department Safety Representative Training Safety Incident & Hazard Reporting.
1 FSIS Notice Notice of Reassesment for E. Coli O157:H7 Control And Completion of Checklist for all beef operations.
Overall Quality Assurance, Selecting and managing external consultants and outsourcing Baku Training Module.
ISO NON-CONFORMANCE, CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTION.
Under the Microscope: Increasing the Quality of Your Wagner Peyser Program.
QA Best Practices Tool Kit Task Force The Back Story QA Summit The Healthcare Documentation Quality Assessment and Management Best Practices Tool Kit.
Performance Appraisal Appraisal for: non repetitive jobs Key Result Area for: repetitive jobs.
Session #13 FSA Assessments: An Opportunity to Improve Compliance Julie Arthur David Bartlett.
LEADS/EMS DATA VALIDATION IPS MeteoStar December 11, 2006 WHAT IS VALIDATION? From The Dictionary: 1a. To Make Legally Valid 1b. To Grant Official.
Most Common Deficiencies Cheryl O. Morton Managing Director, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC.
1 Kevin O’Connor Airworthiness Surveyor Civil and Military Design, Production & Continuing Airworthiness Root Cause Analysis Project…
George E. Detsis Manager, Analytical Services Program United States Department of Energy Office of Health, Safety and Security Office of Sustainability.
© Food – a fact of life 2009 Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) HACCP is a system which looks for and prevents potential problems before they.
Responsibilities of Test Facility Management, Study Director, Principal Investigator and Study Personnel G. Jacobs Belgian GLP Monitorate Zagreb, 17 December.
Computer Security: Principles and Practice First Edition by William Stallings and Lawrie Brown Lecture slides by Lawrie Brown Chapter 17 – IT Security.
WVONGA Annual Fall Meeting Wheeling, West Virginia September 11, 2013 Gerald L. Kirkpatrick, P.G. Bryce E. Stearns The Dirty Dozen 12 Ways Your Environmental.
Service Requests How to Get Ahead and Stay Ahead Presenters: Sylvia Reyna, Napa County Department of Child Support Services,
Root Cause Analysis Roger Brauninger
Core Competencies Training for Supervisors
Causal Analysis & Resolution (CAR) Support Category
Core Competencies Training for Supervisors
The Risk Assessment in the Food Industry
Florida Bureau of Victim Compensation
Which conditions are obviously contributing to the symptoms?
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
Laws Relating to Accreditation, the use of NGABs, and Enforcement
Corrective and Preventive Actions
Director, Quality and Accreditation
Finance Brief May 2016.
Instructor Notes There is no DVD associated with this topic.
Topics in Microbiology Quality Assurance Project Plan Essentials
See the possibilities TM.
Corrective Action Response Guidelines For TCEQ Accredited Laboratories
A New Concept for Laboratory Quality Management Systems
Quality Assurance in Clinical Trials
Denis Ward American TCB
Presentation transcript:

Recurring Findings of Accreditation Assessments Karen S. Varnado, Supervisor LELAP April 18, 2007

Corrective Action Process Resolving findings and deficiencies the first time and eliminating repeat findings

Repeat Findings Assessments are a snapshot of the laboratory operation. They are not intended to find everything. Assessments are a snapshot of the laboratory operation. They are not intended to find everything. Re-occurring findings and deficiencies are a big problem. Re-occurring findings and deficiencies are a big problem. Assessors and accrediting authorities do not take kindly to laboratories not taking comprehensive corrective actions. Assessors and accrediting authorities do not take kindly to laboratories not taking comprehensive corrective actions. The Quality Systems approach to corrective actions requires that findings be fixed in all areas of the operation. The Quality Systems approach to corrective actions requires that findings be fixed in all areas of the operation.

Repeat Findings It is management’s responsibility to take each finding and make sure that it is not occurring in any other area of the laboratory. It is management’s responsibility to take each finding and make sure that it is not occurring in any other area of the laboratory. Corrective action must address the problem in all areas and for all applicable staff. Corrective action must address the problem in all areas and for all applicable staff. For example: For example: Error correction practices found in the microbiology area quite likely are occurring in other areas of the laboratory. Error correction practices found in the microbiology area quite likely are occurring in other areas of the laboratory. Temperature readings of the refrigerator in the metals extraction area are not taken and recorded each day. Temperature readings of the refrigerator in the metals extraction area are not taken and recorded each day.

Quality System Indicators Internal audits are one of the most important tools that management has to determine how the operation is functioning. Internal audits are one of the most important tools that management has to determine how the operation is functioning. Corrective actions are the best mechanism for Corrective actions are the best mechanism for Continuous improvement Continuous improvement Assuring that you are not fixing the same problems time after time – and re-inventing the wheel Assuring that you are not fixing the same problems time after time – and re-inventing the wheel Spotting trends and establishing a preventive action process Spotting trends and establishing a preventive action process Maintaining accreditation requirements Maintaining accreditation requirements Using the CAP is mandatory – it is not optional. Using the CAP is mandatory – it is not optional.

Corrective Action Process The problem with most corrective action processes are The problem with most corrective action processes are They only look at the short term – the quick fix. They only look at the short term – the quick fix. These “solutions” don’t last. (Repeat findings) These “solutions” don’t last. (Repeat findings) The process is not used for all corrections – lacks a comprehensive approach. The process is not used for all corrections – lacks a comprehensive approach. It is only used by select management – not a “grass roots” program. It is only used by select management – not a “grass roots” program. It does not address the root cause. It does not address the root cause. All staff are not trained and encouraged to use the process. All staff are not trained and encouraged to use the process. There is no follow through and monitoring. There is no follow through and monitoring.

Closing Corrective Actions Steps to successfully addressing and closing corrective actions Analyze – define the root cause. Determine if a random event or a system failure. Analyze – define the root cause. Determine if a random event or a system failure. Make operational changes (if warranted). Make operational changes (if warranted). Document the changes (memo/policy/change order/training notes). Document the changes (memo/policy/change order/training notes). Train all appropriate staff. Document the training. Train all appropriate staff. Document the training. Update SOPS to reflect proper practice. Update SOPS to reflect proper practice. Verify that the changes have been implemented and are effective. Verify that the changes have been implemented and are effective.

Symptoms vs. Root Cause Most assessment findings are symptoms of something more basic. Most assessment findings are symptoms of something more basic. Findings usually can be linked to a failure of the Quality System. Findings usually can be linked to a failure of the Quality System. Most findings occur in more than one area of the operation. Most findings occur in more than one area of the operation. Symptoms usually roll up into Quality System deficiencies. Symptoms usually roll up into Quality System deficiencies. Finding the root cause can be confusing and complex. Finding the root cause can be confusing and complex.

Root Cause Analysis Clearly define the deficiency. Refer to the Standard. Clearly define the deficiency. Refer to the Standard. Ask some questions … Ask some questions … Why did this occur? Why did this occur? What contributed to the event? What contributed to the event? How did this happen? How did this happen? Has this occurred before? Has this occurred before? Where did the previous solution fail? Where did the previous solution fail? Which of the foundation systems is affected? Which of the foundation systems is affected? Fix the symptom … fix the system. Fix the symptom … fix the system. Document the solution and monitor the change. Document the solution and monitor the change.

Root Cause Analysis Root Cause Analysis Root Cause Analysis Error corrections are not performed according to the quality manual and the NELAC Standard in the QA department, metals extractions and sample receiving. Error corrections are not performed according to the quality manual and the NELAC Standard in the QA department, metals extractions and sample receiving. Two of the four analysts in the volatile organics area do not follow the requirements of the SOP. The analysis does not match the test method requirements. Two of the four analysts in the volatile organics area do not follow the requirements of the SOP. The analysis does not match the test method requirements.

Root Cause Analysis Root Cause Analysis Root Cause Analysis The data on the report does not match the data on the bench sheet, and the assessor could not get the same calculation results from the raw data as from the working spreadsheet. The data on the report does not match the data on the bench sheet, and the assessor could not get the same calculation results from the raw data as from the working spreadsheet. The laboratory has failed three of the last PT samples for Silver. No documented corrective actions were provided. The laboratory has failed three of the last PT samples for Silver. No documented corrective actions were provided.

Contact If you have any questions, please contact: If you have any questions, please contact: Karen S. Varnado, Supervisor Karen S. Varnado, Supervisor LELAP LELAP P.O. Box 4314, Baton Rouge, LA P.O. Box 4314, Baton Rouge, LA Phone: Phone: Fax: Fax: