International Conference on Industrial and Applied Mathematics Zurich, Switzerland, July 2007 Shekhar Guha United States Air Force Research Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
24.6 Diffraction Huygen’s principle requires that the waves spread out after they pass through slits This spreading out of light from its initial line.
Advertisements

Consider Refraction at Spherical Surfaces:
The Asymptotic Ray Theory
Chapter 2 Propagation of Laser Beams
Nonlinear Optics Lab. Hanyang Univ. Chapter 2. The Propagation of Rays and Beams 2.0 Introduction Propagation of Ray through optical element : Ray (transfer)
 Light can take the form of beams that comes as close
Course outline Maxwell Eqs., EM waves, wave-packets
Lenses in the Paraxial Limit
So far Geometrical Optics – Reflection and refraction from planar and spherical interfaces –Imaging condition in the paraxial approximation –Apertures.
Foundations of Physics
Optics 1. 2 The electromagnetic spectrum Visible light make up only a small part of the entire spectrum of electromagnetic waves. Unlike sound waves and.
Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE Fall 2013 Notes 22 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves 1.
Overview from last week Optical systems act as linear shift-invariant (LSI) filters (we have not yet seen why) Analysis tool for LSI filters: Fourier transform.
Lesson 3 METO 621. Basic state variables and the Radiative Transfer Equation In this course we are mostly concerned with the flow of radiative energy.
1 Introduction to Optical Electronics Quantum (Photon) Optics (Ch 12) Resonators (Ch 10) Electromagnetic Optics (Ch 5) Wave Optics (Ch 2 & 3) Ray Optics.
Light: Geometric Optics
Aperture Pupil (stop) Exit Pupil Entrance Pupil.
Geometric Optics of thick lenses and Matrix methods
Aberrations  Aberrations of Lenses  Analogue to Holographic Model  Aberrations in Holography  Implications in the aberration equations  Experimental.
IVB. Geometric optics 2. Reflection 1. Wave front and rays 3. Refraction: Snell’s Law index of refraction: rays wave fronts Example: n1n1 n2n2 n3n3 inout.
CS485/685 Computer Vision Prof. George Bebis
Fiber Optics Defining Characteristics: Numerical Aperture Spectral Transmission Diameter.
Design Realization lecture 25 John Canny 11/20/03.
IV. Optics Nature of light. Spectrum of electromagnetic waves.
Physics 1502: Lecture 29 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Midterm 2: Monday Nov. 16 … –Homework 08: due Friday Optics –Index of Refraction.
The Ray Vector A light ray can be defined by two co-ordinates: x in,  in x out,  out its position, x its slope,  Optical axis optical ray x  These.
Dry Laser Cleaning and Focusing of Light in Axially Symmetric Systems Johannes Kofler and Nikita Arnold Institute for Applied Physics Johannes Kepler University.
Imaging Science FundamentalsChester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science Mirrors and Lenses.
Pat Arnott, ATMS 749 Atmospheric Radiation Transfer CH4: Reflection and Refraction in a Homogenous Medium.
Chemistry 330 The Mathematics Behind Quantum Mechanics.
Geometric Optics September 14, Areas of Optics Geometric Optics Light as a ray. Physical Optics Light as a wave. Quantum Optics Light as a particle.
1 ECE 480 Wireless Systems Lecture 3 Propagation and Modulation of RF Waves.
1 Optical Diffraction Theory and Its Applications on Photonic Device Design.
1 Chapter 6 More on geometrical optics February 4 Thick lenses Review: Paraxial imaging from a single refracting spherical surface: Thin lens equation:
1 EEE 498/598 Overview of Electrical Engineering Lecture 11: Electromagnetic Power Flow; Reflection And Transmission Of Normally and Obliquely Incident.
Sebastian Thrun CS223B Computer Vision, Winter Stanford CS223B Computer Vision, Winter 2005 Lecture 2 Lenses and Camera Calibration Sebastian Thrun,
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECEG105 Optics for Engineers Course Notes Part 7: Diffraction Prof. Charles A. DiMarzio Northeastern.
Focusing of Light in Axially Symmetric Systems within the Wave Optics Approximation Johannes Kofler Institute for Applied Physics Johannes Kepler University.
In describing the propagation of light as a wave we need to understand: wavefronts: a surface passing through points of a wave that have the same phase.
Chapter 23 Ray Optics Why doesn’t this work with real spoons?
Optical Density - a property of a transparent medium that is an inverse measure of the speed of light through the medium. (how much a medium slows the.
AP Physics IV.C Geometric Optics. Wave Fronts and Rays.
The elastic wave equationSeismology and the Earth’s Deep Interior The Elastic Wave Equation  Elastic waves in infinite homogeneous isotropic media 
Lenses and imaging MIT 2.71/ /10/01 wk2-a-1 Huygens principle and why we need imaging instruments A simple imaging instrument: the pinhole camera.
Doc.: IEEE /0431r0 Submission April 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Polarization Model for 60 GHz Date: Authors:
Lenses and Imaging (Part I) Why is imaging necessary: Huygen’s principle – Spherical & parallel ray bundles, points at infinity Refraction at spherical.
Ultrasonic İmaging.
Nature of Light Physics 1.
 Simply put, “Refraction” means bends.  When discussing light beams, light bends when it goes from one medium (glass, water, air, etc.) to another. 
Prof. Charles A. DiMarzio Northeastern University Fall 2003 July 2003
Wave Dispersion EM radiation Maxwell’s Equations 1.
Final Exam Lectures EM Waves and Optics. Electromagnetic Spectrum.
July © Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECEG105/ECEU646 Optics for Engineers Course Notes Part 2: Geometric Optics (Reflection,
ECEG105 & ECEU646 Optics for Engineers Course Notes Part 2: Geometric Optics (Reflection, Refraction, Thin Lenses) Prof. Charles A. DiMarzio Northeastern.
Chapter 1. Ray Optics.
Spherical Aberration. Rays emanating from an object point that are incident on a spherical mirror or lens at different distances from the optical axis,
1 REFRACTION OF LIGHT. 2 Chapter 18 Objectives: 1) Define refraction of light including examples. 2) Know which direction a light ray bends as it travels.
DISPERSIVE POWER OF A GRATING Dispersive power of a grating is defined as the ratio of the difference in the angle of diffraction of any two neighbouring.
Geometrical Optics.
WIR SCHAFFEN WISSEN – HEUTE FÜR MORGEN Motion in an Undulator Sven Reiche :: SwissFEL Beam Dynamics Group :: Paul Scherrer Institute CERN Accelerator School.
Announcements Exam 3 starts Thur noon, and continues through Mon close, in the Testing Center. It will include both conceptual questions and homework style.
Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. The implementation of the angular spectrum of plane waves method in the finite.
July © Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECEG105/ECEU646 Optics for Engineers Course Notes Part 4: Apertures, Aberrations Prof.
Electromagnetics II.
Boian Andonov Hristov, Prof. (Ph.D) Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
Mirrors, Plane and Spherical Spherical Refracting Surfaces
Scalar theory of diffraction
Diffraction P47 – Optics: Unit 7.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 6)
Presentation transcript:

International Conference on Industrial and Applied Mathematics Zurich, Switzerland, July 2007 Shekhar Guha United States Air Force Research Laboratory Leo Gonzalez General Dynamics Information Technology Qin Sheng Baylor University Description of light focusing by a spherical lens

Outline 1.Motivation and Background 2. Some specific examples of light propagation through a spherical lens

Nanostructures Moth-eye AR surface Trapped Atom Beams IR FPA Motivation Enhanced Transmission of Nanohole Arrays CCD Micro-lenses High Resolution Imaging Commercial DVDs Nanoscale structures are widespread (Optical elements are inserted near focal plane)

Light Propagation Theories Rays – Geometrical optics and application of Snell’s Law through surfaces Waves – Solution of wave propagation equation with initial and boundary conditions known Hybrid - Combination of ray and wave optics Fields – FDTD Method solving for EM fields from linear Maxwell’s Equations

“Holy Grail” We would like to know the exact complex electromagnetic field for every point in space for propagation of light through linear and nonlinear optical regions i. e., solve the wave equation for all space.

Challenges For feature sizes close to the wavelength of light, vector nature of the E-M fields becomes important The presence of small features in the beam of light alters the field distributions, so the boundary conditions for propagation equation become unknown For feature sizes much larger than the wavelength of light, diffraction calculations become computationally intensive. For propagation over small distances, computation also becomes challenging A ‘general’ wave-propagation theory describing light propagation through commonly used optical elements is not easily available

Goal To determine the field distribution of light refracted by a lens using full diffraction theory Ray picture inadequate Nijboer-Zernike diffraction theory of aberration assumes small angles Kirchhoff vector diffraction formalism is used to describe light propagation, starting from a curved surface Focusing by small-f-number lenses in the presence of aberrations S. Guha, Optics Letters 25 (19), pp , 2000 Previous work: Ray Theory + Diffraction:

Diffraction Integral Method Surface 1 Surface 2

Green’s Function Method From Green’s scalar theorem, where U and V are continuous functions of position, and are solutions of the wave equation, (lots of math, and some assumptions) we get the complete Rayleigh-Sommerfeld diffraction integral:

S r’ r Field values at r can be obtained from the known values on a general surface S  Stratton – Chu Integrals For a flat surface, the third term goes to zero and the more familiar terms of the Kirchhoff diffraction theory are obtained

Rayleigh-Sommerfeld Solution x1x1 x2x2 y1y1 y2y2 z = 0 z = z where

(Fresnel Approximation) Paraxial Approximation

f number of a lens = focal length diameter f 2a f# = f / 2a Paraxial approximation is valid when the longitudinal distance is large compared with the transverse distances: True for slow system, i.e f# >> 1 Not true for fast system f# ~ 1 Validity of the Paraxial Approximation

Fourth term To satisfy Maxwell’s equation at the boundary, a fourth term is needed: Stratton (1941) Kottler (1923)

Incident fields: Transmitted fields: r      1 z 1 2 Conversion from Cartesian to Spherical Coordinates

parameter p 2 = 2  n R 1 / Spherical Surface Normalized coordinates and dimensionless parameters used to simplify the integrals

Expressions for the fields are functions of  ’ and  ’

Values of the Integrands

n2n2 n1n1 1.Single spherical surface n2n2 2. Single spherical lens Focusing of light by curved surfaces n

 m = 5 deg  m = 20 deg On-axis Intensities n = 1.5 p 2 = 10 6 From geometric optics, f = n/(n-1) p 2 = 10 6 n = 1.5

 m = 5 deg  m = 20 deg p 2 = 10 6 Longitudinal Field Strengths For large aperture, the longitudinal field can be quite strong

Comparison of the Different Terms

Plane wave incident at an angle Angle of incidence  Coordinate transformation from x’,y’,z’ to x’’,y’’,z’’ through angle  Integrations performed in  ’’  and  ’’ coordinates

p 2 = deg 7 deg 15 deg Coma for a small diameter lens

p 2 = deg 7 deg 15 deg Coma for a larger diameter lens

A Plano-Convex Lens Newport Catalog

2 Expressions for the fields are functions of  ’ and  ’ Computational challenge arises from large value of p 2 R 1 = 1 cm

Computational challenge    2    1 z 2 1 Questions: 1.For a given  2,  2, how many integration terms are needed on surface 1? For each  2,  2 : Need 6000 x 4000 values of  1,  1, i.e., 40 sec Need values of  2, i.e., 40 sec x x 4 = 50 days ~ 0.5 day using 100 processors 2. How many  2,  2 values are needed? z3z3

 4 Nodes (512 processors/node)  2048 Processors (2.9 Peak TeraFLOPS)  1 Gigabyte Memory per Compute Processor (512 GB/Node, 2048 GB/Total)  25.5 Terabyte Workspace  MIPS R16000 (700 MHz)  Operating System: IRIX UNIX SGI Origin 3900 (hpc11) Computational resource

 =  m Single surface Geometric focus: 1.94 z 2 1

Fields at the second surface Real part Imaginary part Highly oscillatory fields (period ~ degrees)

On axis intensity after the lens S3S3 Geometric focus: 1.7 On axis Intensity

The Finite-Difference Method z r r = m h z = n g m = 0 to m 1 n = 0 to n 1 (h and g are chosen to be small) n Under cylindrical symmetry: m

Interface is discontinuous AND curved, so the FD method cannot be applied directly Light focusing by a lens using FD method

z–stretching adaptation on the interface To handle curved surfaces, one to one stretching coordinate transformation is used:

Transformation of curved surface to rectangular

Focusing of light described through F-D method

The electromagnetic field components of light refracted by a curved surface were calculated using integral as well as differential method The calculations were extended to the case of two refracting surfaces, providing the field distributions for a commercially available lens, for the first time to our knowledge Extension to non-spherical rotationally symmetric surfaces is straightforward Summary