European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Introduction to The New EU Chemicals Policy REACH Framing a Future Chemicals Policy Boston 27 April.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
December 2005 EuP Directive : A Framework for setting eco-design requirements for energy-using products European Commission.
Advertisements

Interactions between IED and REACH Exploring the opportunities for cooperation Valletta, Malta October 2013 Geert Dancet Executive Director Conference.
1 INTRODUCTION What is Happening with REACH Hong Kong
1. European Commission Status GHS Implementation in the European Community Global Thematic Workshop on Strengthening Capacities to Implement the GHS Johannesburg.
1. European Commission GHS Implementation Status in the European Community FORUM V Budapest UNITAR Side event 27 September 2006 Wolfgang Hehn European.
REACH and SDS Requirements Presented by Paula Laux Senior Regulatory Specialist Wercs Professional Services.
Toxics Use Reduction Institute Chemicals Policy in Europe: New Directions Rachel Massey Policy Analyst April 2006.
European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Legislating in the EU Introducing REACH EU Lobbying for Turkish Industry 5 December 2005 Cristina.
The impacts of EU Legislation REACH on Textile & Clothing Industries ITKIB Seminar – 28 October 2008, Istanbul Otto Linher – REACH unit This presentation.
Forsigtighedstilgang – gevinst eller stopklods Precautionary Principle good or bad for innovation Bjorn Gaarn Hansen Head of Unit: Chemicals Directorate:
The Substitution Approach in the “White Paper on the Future EU Chemicals Policy” European Conference on Substitution of Hazardous Chemicals Hamburg, 13.
Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Improving the efficiency of the regulatory process Rob Mason Head of Regulatory Policy Chemicals.
Future legislation on chemicals and REACH processes Jens Tørsløv European Chemicals Bureau Institute for Health and Consumer Protection Joint Research.
1 REACh Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals and Restriction! Ohio Valley SOT Wednesday, August 26, 2009 REACh: The New Toxicology Frontier.
REACH Registration, Evaluation & Authorisation of Chemicals T. Pearson.
Nano-Safety: Some Future Perspectives Conference on Nano-Safety April, Slovenia, Ljubljana Bjorn G. Hansen dHoU Chemicals, DG ENV, European Commission.
More on REACH Andrew Fasey 15 November 2005 Univ of Virginia, USA.
REACH in the eyes of a downstream user The changing market of cosmetic ingredients Aleksandra Sołyga-Żurek Warsaw, 23.XI.2011.
REACH: Protecting Your Supply Chain Georjean L. Adams EHS Strategies, Inc. November 17,
European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals REACH Key issues for the paper industry CEPI Open Seminar – European Paper Week 1 December 2005.
Experiences with registrations - 5 years on the road On the REACH Road 23 November 2011 Kevin Pollard ECHA – Dossier Submission and Dissemination.
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell.
Preparing for REACH implementation: The RIP process Dimosthenis A. Sarigiannis, PhD Institute for Health and Consumer Protection DG Joint Research Centre.
Animal Welfare EU Strategy Introduction Community Action Plan The Commission's commitment to EU citizens, stakeholders, the EP and.
Presentation 4: How can I know if nanomaterials are used in my workplace?
REACH New requirements for introduction of chemicals on EU market Jana Kovačičová Centre for Chemical Substances and Preparations Bratislava, Slovakia.
REACH and CLP What formulators need to know. Purpose of this presentation This presentation, with notes, was prepared by ECHA, the European Chemicals.
EU Regulation 1907/2006 on the Registration Evaluation and Authorisation of CHemicals REACH Lunch & Learn Beach Ballroom, Aberdeen 29 th August 2007 R.
European Commission REACH European Chemicals Policy Experts Tour USA, October 2003 Robert Donkers, Delegation of the European Commission to the U.S.
SEMINAR “The impacts of EU Legislation REACH on Textile & Clothing Industries” October 28, 2008 ITKIB – Istanbul By Adil ELMASSI Director Environmental.
10/19/20151 Preparing for REACH the new EU chemicals regulation Standard Presentation for Industry Audiences Brussels - January 2007 European Commission,
Communication in the Supply Chain
HERA STAKEHOLDERS WORKSHOP-11 JULY FUTURE CHEMICALS POLICY and HERA Anne-Marie Rodeyns, A.I.S.E. Deputy Director 11 July 2002.
Twinning Project RO2004/IB/EN-09 Implementation and Enforcement of the Environmental Acquis at National Level and Coordination of the 8 Regional Twinning.
1 REACH, the Future EU policy for Chemicals European Conference in Eretria April 27, 2004 Tony Musu – European Trade Union Technical Bureau/ETUC.
REACH, 12 Nov Supply chain communication Tatjana Humar –Jurič, M.Sc. Semira Hajrlahović Mehić, LL.M.
The European Engineering Industries Association How Downstream Users REACH? Impacts and challenges of REACH for EU Cutlery, Flatware, Holloware, and Cookware.
NOVÁ STRATEGIE EU V OBLASTI CHEMICKÝCH LÁTEK REACH Karel Bláha Odbor environmentálních rizik Ministerstvo životního prostředí.
& H AS HEALTH AND SAFETY AUTHORITY REACH and Downstream Users Marie McCarthy REACH GI Inspector Health and Safety Authority.
Employment and Chemical risks Tony Musu, ETUI-REHS Developing trade union activities on sustainable development and employment Torino, 27 October 2006.
EPA essential principles for reform of chemicals management legislation – lessons from REACH Dr Veerle Heyvaert London School of Economics Chemical Regulation:
REACH: Driver of Innovation Andrew Fasey 15 November 2005 Univ of Virginia, USA.
REACH Regulation Basic requirements 1 Semira Hajrlahović Mehić, LL.M., B. Sc. Tatjana Humar-Jurič, M.Sc.
REACH Activities in progress in ITALY UNICHIM - Milano
Overview & Implications for Affinia Registration, Evaluation, and Authorisation of Chemicals.
ETUC Conference on REACH March 2005 Improving REACH ETUC proposals for REGISTRATION Werner SCHNEIDER DGB, Germany.
Can REACH become the New Global Model? Helsinki Chemicals Forum 20 May 2010 Jukka Malm, Director ECHA – Directorate of Assessment.
REACH: state of art and base definitions WERCS 2007 US User group Albany 27/06/2007 Dr. Erwin Annys Sr. Advisor Product & Innovation Policy.
Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry European Commission The New Legislative Framework - Market Surveillance UNECE “MARS” Group meeting Bratislava,
ECHA activities relating to Nanomaterials
REACH: state of art and base definitions Dr. Erwin Annys Sr. Advisor Product & Innovation Policy WERCS 2007 EU User group Napoli 31/05/07.
Presentation for GBSO Networking Meeting REACH Regulation: Implications for businesses and the network.
REACH & CLP Downstream user overview 1. Purpose of this presentation 2 This presentation, with notes, was prepared by ECHA, the European Chemicals Agency,
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
Introduction to REACH Flavie Guérin U.S. Mission to the EU 15 November 2011.
2echa.europa.eu/reach-2018 Purpose of this presentation This presentation, with notes, was prepared by ECHA, the European Chemicals Agency, to assist.
REACH & CLP Downstream user overview 1. Purpose of this presentation 2 This presentation, with notes, was prepared by.
Position of the Japanese Government and Possible impact of the REACH on Japanese trade relations with the EU.
Potential Impact on the Cotton Industry
ดูแลด้วยความรับผิดชอบ
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
REACH Regulation (EC) No.1907/2006
Introduction to The New EU Chemicals Policy REACH
22/02/2019 REACH REACH update.
The proposed legislation
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program
Conclusions from the Review of REACH
Update on EU draft Regulation
Presentation transcript:

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Introduction to The New EU Chemicals Policy REACH Framing a Future Chemicals Policy Boston 27 April 2005 Eva Sandberg DG Environment, European Commission

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals A Tiered Approach What is REACH?  Single coherent system for new (non phase-in) and existing (phase–in) chemicals  Elements:  Registration of substances ≥ 1 tonne/yr (staggered deadlines)  More information and communication through the supply chain  Evaluation of some substances by Member States  Authorisation only for substances of very high concern  Restrictions - the safety net  Agency to manage system  Focus on priorities:  high volumes (early deadline)  greatest concern (CMRs early) HIGH level of health and environmental protection with the goal of achieving sustainable development.

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Scope REACH covers  Manufacture, import, placing on market and use of substances  Substances “on their own”, in preparations or in articles

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals European Chemicals Agency  Day to day management of REACH  Technical, scientific and administrative aspects  Responsibilities:  Registration - reject or require completion of registration  Evaluation - ensure a harmonised approach; take decisions.  Substances in articles - require registration  Authorisation/restrictions - facilitate process; suggest priorities.  Secretariat for Forum and Committees  Deal with appeals - registration, R&D, evaluation, confidentiality

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals AIM: Ensure industry adequately manages the risk from its substances Registration: general  Method:  manufacturer/importer obtains adequate information;  > 10 tonnes/year: performs chemicals safety reports (inc RRM)  electronic submission to Agency (completeness check)  certain non-confidential information in central, largely public, database.  Scope  substances produced/imported  1 tonne/year  intermediates - reduced requirements.  exemptions - other law, Annex II/III; polymers (review); PPORD  deemed as Registered - biocides, pesticides, notified substances (67/548)  Consortia encouraged No formal acceptance. No registration: no manufacture or import

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals REACH = large-scale information collection ≠ large-scale testing. Registration: information  Information requirements - smart/targeted:  exposure often taken into account.  new testing as a last resort – existing data, (Q)SAR, read across.  Low volume chemicals (1-10 tonnes/year):  mostly in-vitro.  Higher volume chemicals:  testing only if existing information/validated alternative methods not sufficient.  Testing programmes - agreed by the competent authorities

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Yr 0Yr 0 +3Yr 0 + 6Yr >1000 t + CMR t t t Registration: Deadlines SIA

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Generation of Information Annex IX = F L E X I B I L I T Y  (Q)SARs  Use of category approaches  Analogs, read across  Available data (non-EU, GLP, non-GLP)  Exposure based waiving (Annexes VII and VIII)  Historical human data  Data sharing (existing and new) Testing (in vitro, in vivo) as a last resort

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Chemicals Safety Assessment  To be performed for all substances (per substance or per group of substances) subject to registration if above 10 tonnes/ per year Per substance or per group of substances  To be documented in a Chemical Safety Report  Part of the registration dossier  Exemptions for substances in preparations below certain concentration limits  Defined in Annex I  Includes  Human health hazard assessment  Environmental hazard assessment  PBT and vPvB assessment

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Downstream Users (DU)  Manufacturer/importer CSR to cover all uses identified by downstream users.  DU benefit from choice of:  supplier carrying out assessment, or  for confidentiality reasons doing own assessment.  If using suppliers CSR just have to:  implement supplier’s RRM for identified uses  If carrying own CSR will have to:  perform assessments only for ‘unidentified uses’ (using supplier hazard information)  inform Agency of ‘unidentified uses’ ≥ 1 tonne

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Substances in Articles  Meet the criteria for classification as dangerous  > 1 t/yr per article type per M/I  Not registered further up the supply chain Intended to be released General obligation to register  Known to be released and  Quantity released may adversely affect human health or the environment Obligation to notify the Agency Agency may require registration 11 years and 3 months after entry into force (2017+)

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Data sharing  Information > 10 years – freely available  Non-phase-in substances (= new):  Already registered?  Agency enables contact - 50% cost sharing  Studies involving vertebrate animals not repeated  Phase-in substances (= existing):  Potential registrants of same substance: ‘SIEF’  Sharing mandatory (vertebrate animals), if participant refuses to share = sanctions  Equal sharing of costs Avoidance of unnecessary animal testing + save costs

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Consortia IndividualChoice« One for all » Identity of M/I Identity of the substance Information on manufacture and use Statement whether information has been generated by testing on vertebrate animals Guidance on safe use Chemical Safety Report Summaries or robust study summaries of information derived from application of Annexes V bis IX Proposals for testing where required by application of Annexes V bis IX Classification and labelling

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Information through the supply chain  What?  Expanded SDSs – info from Chemical Safety Reports  Exposure scenarios as Annex  Information on authorisations, restrictions, registration number etc.  Information up the supply chain on new hazards and if received info is challenged.  Result?  more information on risks  downstream users brought into the system  dialogue up/down the supply chain - encouraged/stimulated  Encourage communication  Improve risk management

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Provide confidence that industry is meeting obligations Prevent unnecessary testing Evaluation Dossier evaluationSubstance evaluation Check test proposalsCompliance Output: Further information decisions Info to other parts of REACH/other legislation Examine any information on a substance

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Authorisation  SVHC (CMR, PBT, vPvB, ‘serious and irreversible effects’)  Prioritised (progressively authorised as resources allow)  each substance given individual deadline and use allowed until decision taken.  Applicant to show:  adequate control of risks  if risks not all under control, evidence that social and economic benefits outweigh the risks  Socio-economic authorisation - normally time-limited  substitution plan considered  DU can use suppliers authorisation  Other M/I may get a letter of access to an authorisation AIM: Ensure risks from Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) are properly controlled or that they are substituted.

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Authorisation Granting  Commission shall grant an authorisation if the risks are adequately controlled as documented in the Chemical Safety Report  If not, it may be granted if the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk and if there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies Authorisations are Risk based!

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Safety net Restrictions  Community wide concern  MS/COM initiated  Fast track possible e.g. CMR substances for consumers  Agency Committees examine:  the risk, and  the socio-economic aspects involved  Commission - final decision through comitology  Carry-over of existing restrictions (76/769/EEC)  POPs

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals C and L  Current legislation:  C&L all substances placed on market;  some substances harmonised in Annex I of 67/548  REACH: Inventory  managed by Agency  contains C and L info for all marketed substances:  no tonnage limit  deadlines – 3 years  supplied through registration or separately  Industry co-operate to resolve differences in C&L  EU harmonisation:  CMRs  respiratory sensitisers

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals C and L: GHS  GHS not included in current proposal  Studies on differences and impact on down-stream legislation carried out  Implementation foreseen next phase  Proposal for a regulation either part of REACH or separate  Will replace Directives 67/548 and 99/45

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Progress in decision-making Nov 2003: Proposal submitted to Parliament and Council Decision making in EP and Council:  Political agreement between MS: end 2005?  Parliament 1 st reading: October 2005? REACH in force: 2007?

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Key issues 1. Prioritisation (Registration)  Right balance  Short/long term impacts tonnes: Testing requirements 3. OSOR  Mandatory sharing of all data  Workability of agreement 4.Authorisation/substitution 5.Agency  Stronger role in evaluation 6. Substances in Articles  Balance between protection, workability and WTO concerns

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Benefits (1): Economic and Strategic  Simplification  Level playing-field for new and existing substances  Improved innovation (encourage substitution, not forced)  higher demand for safer substances  higher registration thresholds (as compared to new substances)  more R&D flexibility  Better information through REACH will give enhanced implementation of current law e.g.  Occupational Health Safety law  Integrated Pollution and Prevention Control  Water Framework Directive  Waste legislation

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Benefits (2): Health benefits  Illustrative Scenario (COM IA, 2003) respiratory and bladder cancers, skin and respiratory disorders  Health benefits of € 50 billion (order of magnitude)  UK Regulatory Impact Assessment  18 and 37 cancer death reduced per year →positive cost- benefit ratio of the regulation  EU-OSHA (European Agency for Safety and Health at work)  Occupational skin diseases cost EU € 600 million / year (= 3 million lost wd)

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Benefits (3): Environmental Benefits Examples:  EC JRC: Pollution prevention  Costs of dredging and clean-up contaminated soil/sewage sludge of at least €11 billion in the next decade for the EU15 alone (€ billion)  Nordic Council  Costs associated to PCB pollution between €15 up to 75 billion (up to 2018)  Finnish Ministry of Environment  Remediation of contaminated soil future clean-up costs for Finland up to €1.2 billion in the next two decades. Benefits are difficult to estimate but significant and undisputed* * NL workshop on REACH IA

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals The knowledge gap REACH is designed to fill Costs  Impact Assessment:  Direct costs: €2 billion (range € billion).  Total costs (inc to downstream users): € billion  Substance loss: 1-2% (to be further investigated)  60 % of direct costs from testing  An indication of the amount of information industry has about its chemicals? Less than 0.1 % of yearly turnover over 11 years

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Benefits significantly outweigh costs Conclusion - REACH will ensure:  High level of protection  Burden of proof on those creating risks  better use of resources  Improved knowledge  information for downstream users  Improved innovation  Substitution of dangerous substances  particularly through authorisation  Better:  reaction to emerging risks  consumer confidence

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals - Re-focus Current Activities - Preparing for REACH - Strategic Partnerships - Setting up the Agency “Working together, preparing for REACH” Aligning Dir. 67/548 and Reg. 793/93 with REACH Developing Guidance Documents and Software Tools for efficient, transparent and consistent implementation Finland : Practical aspects COM: Organisation The interim strategy has 4 basic work elements: Interim Strategy The Interim Strategy prepares ALL stakeholders for a Sustainable REACH Implementation

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals Information