EEP Data Flow Kevin H. Miller CVS-EEP Vegetation Monitoring Workshop Wake Technical Community College Northern Campus June 9, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DRAFT Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop July 23, 2007.
Advertisements

Project Overview Statewide Storm Water Management Plan (SSWMP) A collection of program recommendations, procedures and new guidance material. Purpose.
Managing Environmental Compliance for ODOT’s OTIA III State Bridge Delivery Program: Many Regulations – One Framework Michelle Eraut Environmental Program.
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
Chris Dandurand, P.Eng Kiewit Infrastructure Group Large Hydro Perspective on the Permitting Process & Environmental Approvals.
Capacity Building for RCDs The Santa Cruz Countywide Partners in Restoration (PIR) Permit Coordination Program Prepared for the California Association.
Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
Environmental Project Commitments The Alberta Experience
MINING OPERATIONS ON NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND APPROVING, MONITORING, AND RECLAIMING OPERATIONS MINING OPERATIONS ON NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND APPROVING,
NATURAL RESOURCE STEWARDSHIP FOR HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATIONS Presented by: (Leader’s Name/Agency)
Bill Orme, Senior Environmental Scientist, State Water Board Liz Haven, Asst. Deputy Director, Surface Water Regulatory Branch, State Water Board Dyan.
EEP Update Kevin H. Miller CVS-EEP Vegetation Monitoring Workshop Wake Technical Community College Northern Campus June 10, 2009.
Chapter Florida’s Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM)
Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRIT) Eastgate Shopping Center Chapel Hill, NC September 9, 2008.
Wetland Reclassification Maquam Bog and Munson Flats Megan Euclide Christina Martin Meghan Shanahan Zachary Walker.
Breaching the Mahar Regional School Dam Presentation to Ralph C. Mahar Regional School Committee GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. February 9, 2011.
Compensatory Mitigation in Coastal Louisiana Keith Lovell, Administrator Office of Coastal Management Department of Natural Resources 10/03/121.
Trends in Stormwater Permitting Joyce Brenner, P.E. Chief of Stormwater Policy, Planning, and Permitting Division of Environmental Analysis Caltrans Headquarters.
Chicago Wilderness: An Ecosystem Management Plan Katy Berlin Shelly Charron Lisa DuRussel NRE 317 April 11, 2001.
An Overview of the EEP-CVS Data Flow Charts Steven D. Roberts Vegetation Senior Specialist
Advantages of Monitoring Vegetation Restoration With the Carolina Vegetation Survey Protocol M. Forbes Boyle, Robert K. Peet, Thomas R. Wentworth, and.
EEP wants to do a better job creating natural ecosystems. CVS provides improved reference data, target design, monitoring, and data management and analysis.
An Overview of Recent Changes To the EEP Restoration Plan and Mitigation Plan Templates Steven D. Roberts Vegetation Senior Specialist
Hydraulic Screening and Analysis Needed for USACE Review
Range Practices 1 Objectives and Range Practices under FRPA & Objectives & Objectives The Focus is on Results.
West Virginia University Natural Stream Restoration Program An Interdisciplinary Program Focusing on Research, Education, and Professional Services in.
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act 404(b)(1) Guidelines Field Exercise
Climate Change: An Aquatic Perspective and State Management Needs Gary Whelan MI DNR Fisheries Division September 2008.
Heartland Network Heartland Network Natural Resource Monitoring Program.
Ecology and environment, inc. International Specialists in the Environment The McKinstry Creek & Riparian Area NYSDOT Rt. 219 Mitigation Project Analysis.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Jan 2005 Kissimmee Basin Projects Jan Kissimmee Basin Projects Kissimmee River Restoration Project (KRR) Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long Term Management.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 2012 Changes to Stream Mitigation Procedures and Guidelines Mike Moxey USACE, Mobile District IRT Chair May.
Module 11 STEPS 4 & 5 Conduct Reconnaissance Study & Report Certification Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Review of the Nipissar Lake Replenishment Project, Rankin Inlet, Nunavut September 25, 2014 NWB Hearing Presentation Type A Water License Amendment Application.
Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.
WATERSHED INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT Module 7, part A – Issues and Description.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
Circuit Rider Training Program (CRTP) Circuit Rider Professional Association Annual General Meeting and Conference August 30, 2012.
March 3, 2010 Working together to restore North Carolina’s natural communities.
Western Lake Erie Basin Partnership Presented by: Name, Title Your Organization DATE YOU PRESENTED The Meeting you presented at.
DOE ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP Natural Resource Trusteeship John J. Bascietto
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Inter-Agency Coordination BLM PILOT VERNAL & GLENWOOD SPRINGS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & U.S. Bureau of Land.
Conceptual Modeling as a Tool for Developing a Watershed Management Plan An aid to understanding linkages Barbara Washburn California Watershed Assessment.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Multi-institutional collaborative program. Established in 1988 to document the composition and status of natural vegetation of the Carolinas. Provides.
Current and planned tools and resources. Multi-institutional collaborative program Established in 1988 to document the composition and status of natural.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center 2010 Southern Regional Cooperative Soil.
Multi-institutional collaborative research program. Established in 1988 to document the composition and status of natural vegetation of the Carolinas.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) CVS/EEP Vegetation Monitoring Protocol.
Planning Habitat Restoration for Dredging Projects WEDA Midwest Chapter Conference Green Bay, Wisconsin April 27, 2012 Jack Brunner.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Clearing and Site Preparation and Site.
Aquatic Invasive Species Grant Workshop Aquatic Invasive Species Grants Overview.
Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop.
Department of Environmental Quality Coastal Habitat Protection Plan (CHPP) 2 Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Management Commission.
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
4FRI Biophysical Monitoring Indicators: Assigning Metrics of Success (or Failure) 4FRI Landscape Strategy & Science and Monitoring Working Groups –
Data Collection & Management: Observational Data Plan (ODP) & Data Management Plan (DMP) Sarai Piazza Craig Conzelmann.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
The Yin and Yang of Monitoring: Lessons Learned From Development of Monitoring Programs on Federal and Private Lands Brett Wolk Colorado Forest Restoration.
Overview of Everything You Need to Know About Mitigation.
Source: Stream Corridor Restoration Manual WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.
Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services
Wildlife Program Amendments CBFWA Members Meeting – Sept
Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services
ERIE Summer Workshop Series: Watershed restoration
Environmental Priorities Environmental Impact Assessment
Presentation transcript:

EEP Data Flow Kevin H. Miller CVS-EEP Vegetation Monitoring Workshop Wake Technical Community College Northern Campus June 9, 2009

Begin with the End in Mind Close-out!

Outline Vegetation Success –Rules and Guidelines –Close-out Summary Problems Affecting or Preventing Close-out –Examples of Vegetation Problems –Reducing Vegetation Problems at Close-out CVS-EEP Process Flow Charts –developing monitoring plans –data flow –resources

Vegetation Success Rules and Guidelines Planted stem totals for stream and wetland are: Year 3=320, Year 4=288, Year 5=260 –Stream Mitigation Guidelines (2003) US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington NC District Planted Stem total for year 5=320, with 2 or more canopy tree species being “hardwood” species –NC Administrative Code NCAC 15A 02B.0100,.0200, and (May 1, 2007) NC Division of Water Quality Ground cover must be sufficient to retrain erosion within 21 days –Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (As amended through 2007); NC Sedimentation Control Commission Can’t harm any Endangered or Threatened species or their habitats –Endangered Species Act of 1973 (As amended through 2008); US Fish and Wildlife Service various individual permit conditions

Vegetation Success Rules and Guidelines Ecological Performance Standards –new compensatory mitigation rule (Federal Register Vol. 73, No. 70, pp , April 10, 2008) –33 CFR Parts 325 and 3332 (USACE); §332.5 –40 CFR Part 230 (USEPA); § –part of approved “mitigation plan” (restoration plan) –based on the best available science –may be based on functional assessments, hydrology or other “aquatic resource characteristics” –prefer use of reference to reflect the range of variability resulting from natural processes and anthropogenic disturbances –should account for expected stages of development to allow early problem detection and adaptive management –vegetation community structure

Vegetation Success Close-out Summary Goal: to document project (vegetation) success based on design, as-built and monitoring data –Complicating factors have included: obtaining information from DOT missing documents inconsistent formats different monitoring protocols documented planted stem failure –We can prevent many of these problems! training, better planting, use of templates, standard protocols, etc

Physical Problems Affecting or Preventing Close-out Affecting? Preventing: –Exotic invasive species that are obviously having a detrimental affect on the buffer –Poor planted stem survival along with little or no natural stems –Bare soil and erosion –Encroachment damage

Reducing Vegetation Problems at Close-out Improving Vegetation Success –training EEP staff and contractors exotic invasive species project evaluation species identification planting plan development Improving Planting Plans –training and resources intended to increase project manager capability produce better planting plans facilitate buffer maintenance and repair contracts increase contractor/designer accountability

Reducing Vegetation Problems at Close-out Resources under development –“high risk” species list –geodatabase tool for tracking problems –standard contract templates –contracting procedures –collaborations with municipalities –and more

CVS-EEP Process Flow Charts Everyone scoping, collecting and delivering CVS- EEP monitoring data should be familiar with and follow the flow charts. Apply to vegetation monitoring data collected using the CVS-EEP protocol Outline monitoring plan development and CVS Level selection Describe data management process for both baseline and subsequent years’ data pdf

Vegetation Monitoring Plan Development

Red arrows and text indicate error identification and correction steps. EEP Staff Responsible Baseline Data Flow

Post Baseline Data Package

Red arrows and text indicate error identification and correction steps. Post Baseline Data Flow

Data Related Guidance for EEP Monitoring Contracts General Scoping Advice –Using CVS baseline data collection should reduce monitoring time/costs in years 1-5 Common Issues Related to Data Collection –Archived data will be distributed to monitoring contractors annually by CVS prior to June –Collect year 1 vegetation data in September –Coordinate data delivery with acting Vegetation Monitoring Specialist (until we have a real one)

Questions?

NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC (919) Kevin H. Miller Research and Grants Coordinator (acting Vegetation Specialist)