IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 Comparative Survey Research and Study Documentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Data Archiving.
Advertisements

DLI Training Nesstar Workshop
13 February 2009ESDS – whats in it for librarians? Royal Statistical Society The strange case of the local data librarian - a peculiarly Edinburgh perspective!
The Economic and Social Data Service (ESDS) Kevin Schürer ESDS/UKDA ESDS Awareness Day 5 December 2003.
Karen Dennison Accessing international survey data collections via ESDS British Academy, Tuesday 14 March 2006 ESDS International.
New Services for Data Creators and Providers Louise Corti, Head ESDS Qualidata/ Outreach & Training Alasdair Crockett, ESDS Data Services Manager.
ESDS Qualidata Libby Bishop, ESDS Qualidata Economic and Social Data Service UK Data Archive ESDS Awareness Day Friday 5 December 2003Royal Statistical.
Metadata Management at GESIS-ZA Reiner Mauer GESIS – Data Archive and Data Analysis CESSDA-Expert Seminar Odense, September 11th 2008.
Dr. Markus Quandt GESIS – Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences Workshop: Persistent Identifiers for the Social Sciences University Club, Bonn, February.
Providing collections, tools and services for digital humanities A national library perspective Clément Oury Head of Digital Legal Deposit Bibliothèque.
IASSIST / IFOD: Mobile Data and the Life Cycle – Tampere, Finland May 26-29, 2009 Lifecycle & Comparative Studies Metadata Needs of the Future CESSDA RI.
Implementation of the CoP in SLOVENIA Cooperation with data users Genovefa RUŽIĆ Deputy Director-General.
Data Citation for the Social Sciences Mary Vardigan ICPSR CODATA Conference on Data Attribution and Citation August 22-23, 2011.
Galia Angelova Institute for Parallel Processing, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Visualisation and Semantic Structuring of Content (some.
Increased efficiency by harmonizing metadata and quality European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics (Helsinki, 5-7 May 2010) Blagica Novkovska.
Promoting Classroom Use of Public Opinion Data Developed by The Roper Center of the University of Connecticut Public Opinion.
IES - Institute for Environment and Sustainability SDIU – Spatial Data Infrastructures Unit Ispra - Italy
The MetaDater Model and the formation of a GRID for the support of social research John Kallas Greek Social Data Bank National Center for Social Research.
Antonella De Robbio, Dario Maguolo Mathematics Library – University Library System University of Padova – ITALY Mathematics Subject Classification and.
NARA – Roper Center Collaboration: USIA Office of Research Surveys Michael Carlson National Archives and Records Administration Marc Maynard.
Information System for Quality Documentation A Short Presentation for the ESTP Course “Data Dissemination and Publication of Statistics” by Sonia Vittozzi.
The education variables in the European Social Survey: Advantages in using the DDI for documentation Hilde Orten and Hege Midtsæter Norwegian Social Science.
IPUMS to IHSN: Leveraging structured metadata for discovering multi-national census and survey data Wendy L. Thomas 4 th Conference of the European Survey.
Monguz Kft. Various aspects of metadata structuring, construction and the business logic characteristics of integrated library systems. The highest level.
ISO as the metadata standard for Statistics South Africa
Data Documentation Initiative (DDI): Goals and Benefits Mary Vardigan Director, DDI Alliance.
Chapter 9 Database Planning, Design, and Administration Sungchul Hong.
DOI Registration for Social and Economic Data da|ra Brigitte Hausstein GESIS Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, Berlin.
Quantitative data and the Irish Social Science Data Archive James McBride Director, Irish Social Science Data Archive.
Dissemination and communication as an integral part of European statistics Seminar on emerging trends in data communication and statistics, New York
Marina Signore Head of Service “Audit for Quality Istat Assessing Quality through Auditing and Self-Assessment Signore M., Carbini R., D’Orazio M., Brancato.
Archival information system ARHiNET Croatian national archival information system Vlatka Lemić Croatian State Archives, Croatia.
Access to official statistical micro data at the Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia and cooperation with the Slovenian Social Science Data.
Data Management in Scholarly Journals and possible Roles for Libraries – Some Insights from EDaWaX Sven Vlaeminck | Leibniz-Information Centre for Economics.
Metadata management: DDI and Nesstar at the Czech Social Science Data Archive Jindrich Krejci & Yana Leontiyeva Data without Boundaries, Ljubljana 24 &
Information Asset Registries of Latvia Secretariat of e-government affairs Riga | 26 th October, 2007.
Process Description and Quality Guidelines – Two Birds with One Stone European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Q2014 Rudi Seljak, Tina Steenvoorden.
DDI AND EXPERIENCES AT ICPSR Prepared for Expert Seminar Finnish Social Science Data Archive Tampere, Finland September 1-2, 2000.
Eurostat SDMX and Global Standardisation Marco Pellegrino Eurostat, Statistical Office of the European Union Bangkok,
Modernization of official statistics Eric Hermouet Statistics Division, ESCAP
Collection of Pan-European Terminology Resources through Cooperation of Terminology Institutions EUROTERMBANK Andrejs Vasiļjevs, Tilde, Latvia.
1 The NORC Data Enclave for Sensitive Microdata Timothy M. Mulcahy Senior Research Scientist, NORC/University of Chicago,
ICSTI Conference Innovation infrastructure of the CR Pavel Švejda Association of Innovative Entrepreneurship of the CR Prague,
Presented By Margaret Hellen Atiro Uganda Bureau of Statistics at the United Nations Regional Seminar on Census Data Archiving 20 – 23 Sep 2011, Addis.
SDMX Basics course, March 2016 Eurostat SDMX Basics course, March Introducing the Roadmap Marco Pellegrino Eurostat Unit B5: “Data and.
Statistical process model Workshop in Ukraine October 2015 Karin Blix Quality coordinator
1 Recent developments in quality related matters in the ESS High level seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia countries Claudia Junker,
Data Stewardship Lifecycle A framework for data service professionals Protectors of data.
4–6 September 2013, Vilnius, Lithuania High-Level Seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia Countries QUALITY FRAMEWORK AT.
Bjørn Henrichsen Social Sciences and the Humanities in Europe Brussels, December 12-13, 2005 Director Norwegian Social Science Data Services Social Science.
Role of Metadata in dissemination of census data Regional Seminar on dissemination and spatial analysis of census data, Nairobi, September, 2010.
Reviewing the concept of the UNECE Statistical Yearbook
RECENT TRENDS IN METADATA GENERATION
Structural and reference metadata in the European Statistical System
Streamlining the Statistical Production in TurkStat Metadata Studies in TURKSTAT High Level Seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia Countries.
ELectronic Research Funding Information System
European Commission’s Forth Framework Telematics Applications Program
Data Management: Documentation & Metadata
GESIS Research Data Center Eurobarometer GESIS
Generic Statistical Business Process Model (GSBPM)
11. The future of SDMX Introducing the SDMX Roadmap 2020
Catalogue of statistical products
Enabling direct data access to social science research data
DDI-RDF Discovery Vocabulary _ Use Cases and Vocabularies
National Update - Finland
A Question Database for the German Longitudinal Election Study
Introducing the GSBPM Steven Vale UNECE
The EES 2009 & PIREDEU In search of a more ‘permanent’ solution
The role of metadata in census data dissemination
Trust & Understanding Building Bridges: Mapping the XML
Presentation transcript:

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 Comparative Survey Research and Study Documentation Needs The Data Archive Perspective Brigitte Hausstein GESIS/Central Archive for Empirical Social Research, Cologne/Berlin

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 Topics 1. Comparative Survey Research 2. Study Documentation and Metadata 3. Documenting a Comparative Survey Series

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 Comparative Survey Research  identify  analyse  explain similarities and differences across societies Comparative research methods are used in cross-cultural studies to:

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 Comparative Survey Research “… are methodological and strategically much more important than other studies: They offer a much better basis for serious and systematic consideration of comparability comparability and equivalence issues, issues, of questions about the logic of cross-national and cross-culture research research design, and of the organizational options options in such undertakings.” Rokkan (1969): Comparative surveys

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 Comparative Survey Research  Eurobarometer  European/World Values Survey (WVS/EVS)  International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) More recently:  European Social Survey (ESS)  Central and Eastern Eurobarometer (CEEB)  Candidate Countries Barometer (CCEB)  New Democracy Barometer (NDB)  Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES)  Latinobarometer  Afrobarometer  Asiabarometer

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 Study Documentation 1. Internal project documentation (data producers) 2. Secondary analysis (data users) Exhaustive enough for others  to evaluate or replicate the findings  to be able to use the data for their own research

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 Data Producer: Codes of Best Practice Manuals for survey quality management and Codes of Best Practice provided by professional associations such as:  American Association for Public Opinion Research (  ESOMAR (  British Market Research Quality Standard Association (

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 Study Documentation Social science data archives have Social science data archives have standard requirements for documentation of studies that are related to their role as holders and publisher of data.

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 Bridge between Data Producers and Users 1. Users rarely engaged in creation of a data set 2. Other research purpose than intended by the creators (secondary analysis) 3. Use of data many years after they were created 4. Comparing and combining data from different sources

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 Adding Value to Data Collections  Cleaning procedures to ensure their integrity  Software dependencies are stripped away  Comprehensive computer-readable metadata are developed  Integration and harmonization of data from comparative surveys  Electronic search and retrieval systems (catalogues)  Interactive statistical laboratories

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 Why High Quality Metadata?  Metadata is vital for any research discovery  Metadata provides the maps that are needed to navigate a complex data source  Bridge between data producers and users  Metadata might provide links to reports, further studies, relevant persons and institutions

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 Main Components of Metadata 1. Catalogue/study description 2. Codebook/data dictionary 3. User Guide Over the years many initiatives to create metadata standards

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 Data Documentation Initiative (1) 1994: International program to produce a metadata specification for the description of social science data resources 2000: First official version of the DDI Specification 2003: Version : Version 3.0

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 Data Documentation Initiative (2) DDI is an effort to establish an international criterion and methodology for content  presentation  transportation and  preservation of metadata about datasets in social sciences. Development of a Document Type Definition (DTD) for “marking up” codebooks

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 Documenting Comparative Survey Series ZA CODEBOOKEXPLORER May 2004 Version 3.2 W.Zenk-Möltgen Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung an der Universität zu Köln, Germany  European Values Survey Database 1999  Central and Eastern Eurobarometer  Candidate Countries Barometer  Childhood, Youth and Growing Up  Continuity Guide to German National Elections  European Voter

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 CEEB CodebookExplorer CD ROM Version Study View CEEB TREND View Country View

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 CEEB CodebookExplorer CD ROM Version

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 CEEB CodebookExplorer CD ROM Version

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 CEEB CodebookExplorer Internet Version

IISP Conference: From National Archives towards United Structure of Social Science. Moscow, December 9, 2005 Thanks for your attention!