1 Radar Networks Nova Spivack CEO & Founder Radar Networks Making Sense of the Semantic Web.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction Lesson 1 Microsoft Office 2010 and the Internet
Advertisements

Classification & Your Intranet: From Chaos to Control Susan Stearns Inmagic, Inc. E-Libraries E204 May, 2003.
Prof. Dimitar Trajanov 08 Jun 2011, CERTH, Greece Semantic Sky: Cloud services.
Laurie E Damianos, MITRE September 2008 Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. MITRE Case # ©2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights.
1 The Social Graph Meets the Semantic Web Lew Tucker, CTO Radar Networks.
WEB 2.0. What we are speaking about… Transformation of WEB, the WEB 2.0 –New generation of websites… –Importance of Open Data… –Importance of Users… –Web.
Ontologies? Semantic Web? OWL? – Making sense of it all
Alfresco and the Semantic * Web Ezequiel Foncubierta Head of Technology at Zaizi * se man tic adj.—Of or relating to meaning in language.
Microsoft and Web 2.0 In the enterprise. A working definition of Web 2.0.
Information and Business Work
What is the Internet? Internet: The Internet, in simplest terms, is the large group of millions of computers around the world that are all connected to.
© Copyright 2008 STI INNSBRUCK Semantic Web Introduction Lecture I Dieter Fensel (contribution from Ioan Toma)
Future Software Architectures Combining the Web 2.0 with the Semantic Web to realize future Web Communities Maarten Visser
ReQuest (Validating Semantic Searches) Norman Piedade de Noronha 16 th July, 2004.
Semantic Web Presented by: Edward Cheng Wayne Choi Tony Deng Peter Kuc-Pittet Anita Yong.
 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved What Is Web 2.0?  Web 1.0 focused on a relatively small number of companies and advertisers.
© InLoox ® InLoox PM Web App product presentation The Online Project Software.
Semantic Web Technologies Lecture # 2 Faculty of Computer Science, IBA.
In Dialogue with the Web Torbjörn Lager, Dept. of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science University of Gothenburg.
Web ©Minder Chen, 2014 Web 2.0 and Beyond Minder Chen, Ph.D. Professor of MIS Martin V. Smith School of Business and Economics CSU Channel Islands.
Ontologies: Making Computers Smarter to Deal with Data Kei Cheung, PhD Yale Center for Medical Informatics CBB752, February 9, 2015, Yale University.
DYNAMICS CRM AS AN xRM DEVELOPMENT PLATFORM Jim Novak Solution Architect Celedon Partners, LLC
An ontology of computing. What is an ontology? An ontology is a specification of a conceptualization. A specification of a representational vocabulary.
Information Integration Intelligence with TopBraid Suite SemTech, San Jose, Holger Knublauch
Semantic Web outlook and trends May The Past 24 Odd Years 1984 Lenat’s Cyc vision 1989 TBL’s Web vision 1991 DARPA Knowledge Sharing Effort 1996.
Semantic Web author: Michał Dettlaff. Tim Berners-Lee director of W3C created the World Wide Web in 1990 proposed the idea of Semantic Web Tim Berners-Lee.
Web 2.0 September Definition Web 1.0 ► ► Static Web pages, the use of search engines, and surfing Web 2.0 ► ► Web-only applications, information.
Web 2.0: Concepts and Applications 6 Linking Data.
November 2003 Presented to “Commercializing RDF” Semantic Software Solutions for Enterprise Web Management International World Wide Web Conference 2004.
What is the Internet? Internet: The Internet, in simplest terms, is the large group of millions of computers around the world that are all connected to.
Nobody’s Unpredictable Ipsos Portals. © 2009 Ipsos Agenda 2 Knowledge Manager Archway Summary Portal Definition & Benefits.
Semantic Web Applications GoodRelations BBC Artists BBC World Cup 2010 Website Emma Nherera.
Use of Electronic and Internet advertising options Standard 3.4.
The Read Write Web Chapter One Presentation By Shontae Dandridge October 20, 2011.
RSS Basics and Beyond RSS Basics and Beyond Tips and Tricks for Getting the Most out of Syndicated Content.
RDF and triplestores CMSC 461 Michael Wilson. Reasoning  Relational databases allow us to reason about data that is organized in a specific way  Data.
Future Learning Landscapes Yvan Peter – Université Lille 1 Serge Garlatti – Telecom Bretagne.
1 Metadata –Information about information – Different objects, different forms – e.g. Library catalogue record Property:Value: Author Ian Beardwell Publisher.
Oracle Database 11g Semantics Overview Xavier Lopez, Ph.D., Dir. Of Product Mgt., Spatial & Semantic Technologies Souripriya Das, Ph.D., Consultant Member.
You sexy beast. Ok, inappropriate. How about: Web of links to Web of Meaning Hello Semantic Web!
Internet Architecture and Governance
SPINNING THE SEMANTIC WEB APPLICATIONS FOR THE MODERN ERA LIBRARIES
OWL Representing Information Using the Web Ontology Language.
Introduction to the Semantic Web and Linked Data Module 1 - Unit 2 The Semantic Web and Linked Data Concepts 1-1 Library of Congress BIBFRAME Pilot Training.
User Profiling using Semantic Web Group members: Ashwin Somaiah Asha Stephen Charlie Sudharshan Reddy.
Of 33 lecture 1: introduction. of 33 the semantic web vision today’s web (1) web content – for human consumption (no structural information) people search.
Web Review The Web Web 1.0 Web 2.0 Future of the Web Internet Programming - Chapter 01:XHTML1.
1 © Xchanging 2010 no part of this document may be circulated, quoted or reproduced without prior written approval of Xchanging. MOSS Training – UI customization.
THE SEMANTIC WEB By Conrad Williams. Contents  What is the Semantic Web?  Technologies  XML  RDF  OWL  Implementations  Social Networking  Scholarly.
Blogging. Website and blog A website, also written as web site,or simply site, is a set of related web pages typically served from a single web domain.
Semantic Web Technologies Brief Readings Discussion Class work: Projects discussion Research Presentations.
Lecture 11 Emergent Knowledge Management Practices Md. Mahbubul Alam, PhD Associate Professor Dept. of AEIS 1.
Lessons learned from Semantic Wiki Jie Bao and Li Ding June 19, 2008.
A Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action Jeff Heflin and James Hendler IEEE Intelligent Systems December 6, 2010 Hyewon Lim.
Social Information Processing March 26-28, 2008 AAAI Spring Symposium Stanford University
Semantic Web 06 T 0006 YOSHIYUKI Osawa. Problem of current web  limits of search engines Most web pages are only groups of character strings. Most web.
Future Communications from Affiliate Manager to Affiliate presented by Carsten Cumbrowski at eComXpo October 24-26, 2006.
Chapter 8: Web Analytics, Web Mining, and Social Analytics
The Semantic Web & Content Managment Systems Ole Gulbrandsen, CTO Stand: E7049.
Semantic Web. P2 Introduction Information management facilities not keeping pace with the capacity of our information storage. –Information Overload –haphazardly.
 GEETHA P.  Originally coined by Tim O’Reilly Publishing Media  Second generation of services available on www.  Lets people collaborate and share.
Semantic Web Technologies Readings discussion Research presentations Projects & Papers discussions.
Overview of the Semantic Web Ralph R. Swick World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) 17 October 2009.
Data mining in web applications
Internet Business Associate v2.0
Lecture 7 Ch.8 Web 2.0 and Social Media.
Overview of the Semantic Web Ralph R
From the Information Super Highway to the Cloud
InLoox PM Web App product presentation
Making Sense of the Semantic Web
Presentation transcript:

1 Radar Networks Nova Spivack CEO & Founder Radar Networks Making Sense of the Semantic Web

2 Radar Networks About This Talk Making sense of the semantic sector Making the Semantic Web more useable Future outlook Twine.com Q & A

3 Radar Networks The Big Opportunity… The social graph just connects people People Groups The semantic graph connects everything… sCompanies Products Services Web Pages Multimedia Documents Events Projects Activities Interests Places Better search More targeted ads Smarter collaboration Deeper integration Richer content Better personalization

4 Radar Networks The third decade of the Web A period in time, not a technology… Enrich the structure of the Web Improve the quality of search, collaboration, publishing, advertising Enables applications to become more integrated and intelligent Transform Web from fileserver to database Semantic technologies will play a key role

5 Radar Networks The Intelligence is in the Connections Connections between people Connections between Information Social Networking Groupware Javascript Weblogs Databases File Systems HTTP Keyword Search USENET Wikis Websites Directory Portals Web PC Era RSS Widgets PC’s Office 2.0 XML RDF SPARQL AJAX FTP IRC SOAP Mashups File Servers Social Media Sharing Lightweight Collaboration ATOM Web 3.0 Web 4.0 Semantic Search Semantic Databases Distributed Search Intelligent personal agents Java SaaS Web 2.0 Flash OWL HTML SGML SQL Gopher P2P The Web The PC Windows MacOS SWRL OpenID BBS MMO’s VR Semantic Web Intelligent Web The Internet Social Web Web OS

6 Radar Networks Beyond the Limits of Keyword Search Amount of data Productivity of Search Databases Web PC Era Web 3.0 Web 4.0 Web 2.0 The World Wide Web The Desktop Keyword search Natural language search Reasoning Tagging Semantic Search The Semantic Web The Intelligent Web Directories The Social Web Files & Folders

7 Radar Networks A Higher Resolution Web Coldplay Band Palo Alto City Jane Person IBM Company Dave Person Bob Person Design Team Group Stanford Alumnae Group IBM.com Web Site 123.JPG Photo Dave.com Weblog Sue Person Joe Person Dave.com RSS Feed Lives in Publisher of Friend of Depiction of Member of Married to Member of Member of Fan of Lives in Subscriber to Source of Author of Member of Employee of Fan of

8 Radar Networks Five Approaches to Semantics Tagging Statistics Linguistics Semantic Web Artificial Intelligence

9 Radar Networks The Tagging Approach Pros Easy for users to add and read tags Tags are just strings No algorithms or ontologies to deal with No technology to learn Cons Easy for users to add and read tags Tags are just strings No algorithms or ontologies to deal with No technology to learn Technorati Del.icio.us Flickr Wikipedia

10 Radar Networks The Statistical Approach Pros: Pure mathematical algorithms Massively scaleable Language independent Cons: No understanding of the content Hard to craft good queries Best for finding really popular things – not good at finding needles in haystacks Not good for structured data Google Lucene Autonomy

11 Radar Networks The Linguistic Approach Pros: True language understanding Extract knowledge from text Best for search for particular facts or relationships More precise queries Cons: Computationally intensive Difficult to scale Lots of errors Language-dependent Powerset Hakia Inxight, Attensity, and others…

12 Radar Networks The Semantic Web Approach Pros: More precise queries Smarter apps with less work Not as computationally intensive Share & link data between apps Works for both unstructured and structured data Cons: Lack of tools Difficult to scale Who makes all the metadata? Radar Networks DBpedia Project Metaweb

13 Radar Networks The Artificial Intelligence Approach Pros: Smart in narrow domains Answer questions intelligently Reasoning and learning Cons: Computationally intensive Difficult to scale Extremely hard to program Does not work well outside of narrow domains Training takes a lot of work Cycorp

14 Radar Networks The Approaches Compared Make the software smarter Make the Data Smarter Statistics Linguistics Semantic Web A.I. Tagging

15 Radar Networks Two Paths to Adding Semantics “Bottom-Up” (Classic) Add semantic metadata to pages and databases all over the Web Every Website becomes semantic Everyone has to learn RDF/OWL “Top-Down” (Contemporary) Automatically generate semantic metadata for vertical domains Create services that provide this as an overlay to non-semantic Web Nobody has to learn RDF/OWL -- Alex Iskold

16 Radar Networks In Practice: Hybrid Approach Works Best Tagging Semantic Web Top-down Statistics Linguistics Bottom-up Artificial intelligence

17 Radar Networks The Semantic Web is a Key Enabler Moves the “intelligence” out of applications, into the data Data becomes self-describing; Meaning of data becomes part of the data Apps can become smarter with less work, because the data carries knowledge about what it is and how to use it Data can be shared and linked more easily

18 Radar Networks The Semantic Web = Open database layer for the Web User Profiles Web Content Data Records Apps & Services Ads & Listings Open Data Mappings Open Data Records Open Rules Open Ontologies Open Query Interfaces

19 Radar Networks Semantic Web Open Standards RDF – Store data as “triples” OWL – Define systems of concepts called “ontologies” Sparql – Query data in RDF SWRL – Define rules GRDDL – Transform data to RDF

20 Radar Networks RDF “Triples” the subject, which is an RDF URI reference or a blank nodeRDF URI referenceblank node the predicate, which is an RDF URI referenceRDF URI reference the object, which is an RDF URI reference, a literal or a blank nodeRDF URI referenceliteral blank node Source: SubjectObject Predicate

21 Radar Networks Semantic Web Data is Self-Describing Linked Data Data Record ID Field 1 Value Field 2 Value Field 3 Value Field 4 Value Definition Ontologies

22 Radar Networks RDBMS vs Triplestore SPO Person Table f_name jim nova chris lew ID l_name wissner spivack jones tucker Colleagues Table SRC-ID TGT-ID SubjectPredicateObject 001isAPerson 001firstNameJim 001lastNameWissner 001hasColleague isAPerson 002firstNameNova 002lastNameSpivack 002hasColleague isAPerson 003firstNameChris 003lastNameJones 003hasColleague isAPerson 004firstNameLew 004lastNameTucker

23 Radar Networks Merging Databases in RDF is Easy SPO SPO SPO

24 Radar Networks The Web IS the Database! Application AApplication B Coldplay Band Palo Alto City Jane Person IBM Company Dave Person Bob Person Design Team Group Stanford Alumnae Group IBM.com Web Site 123.JPG Photo Dave.com Weblog Sue Person Joe Person Dave.com RSS Feed Lives in Publisher of Friend of Depiction of Member of Married to Member of Member of Fan of Lives in Subscriber to Source of Author of Membe r of Employee of Fan of

25 Radar Networks Are RDF/OWL the Only Way to Express Semantics? Other contenders: String tags Taxonomies and controlled vocabularies Microformats Ad hoc [name, value] pairs Alternative semantic metadata notations

26 Radar Networks One Semantic Web or Many? The answer is….Both The Semantic Web is a web of semantic webs Each of us may have our own semantic web…

27 Radar Networks Why has it Taken So Long? The Dream of the Semantic Web has been slow to arrive The original vision was too focused on A.I. Technologies and tools were insufficient Needs for open data on the Web were not strong enough Keyword search and tagging were good enough…for a while Lack of end-user facing killer apps Lots of misunderstanding to clear up

28 Radar Networks Crossing the Chasm… Communicating the vision Focus on open data, not A.I. Technology progress Standards & tools finally maturing Needs were not strong enough Keyword search and tagging not as productive anymore Apps need better way to share data Killer apps and content Several companies are starting to expose data to the Semantic Web. Soon there will be a lot of data. Market Education Show the market what the benefits are

29 Radar Networks Future Outlook 2007 – 2009 Early-Adoption A few killer apps emerge Other apps start to integrate 2010 – 2020 Mainstream Adoption Semantics widely used in Web content and apps Next big cycle: Reasoning and A.I. The Intelligent Web The Web learns and thinks collectively

30 Radar Networks The Future of the Platform… 1980’s -- The desktop is the platform 1990’s -- The browser is the platform 2000’s -- The Web is the platform 2010’s -- The Graph is the platform 2020’s -- The network is the platform 2030’s -- The body is the platform…?

31 Radar Networks A Mainstream Application of the Semantic Web…

32 Radar Networks What is Twine? Twine is a new service for managing & sharing information on the Web Works for content, knowledge, data, or any other kinds of information Designed for individuals and groups that need a better way to organize, search, share and keep track of their information

33 Radar Networks How Twine Works 1.Collect or author structured or unstructured information into Twine via , the Web or the desktop 2.Twine creates a knowledge web automatically Understands, tags & links information automatically Automatically does further research for you on the Web Organizes information automatically 3.Provides semantic search, discovery & interest tracking 4.Helps you connect with other people & groups to grow and share knowledge webs around common interests

34 Radar Networks Use-Cases Individuals Collect & author information about interests Share with your friends & colleagues Find and discover things more relevantly Groups & Teams Manage content & knowledge related to common interests, goals, or activities Leverage and contribute to collective intelligence Collaborate more productively

35 Radar Networks Contact Info Visit to sign up for the invite beta wait-listwww.twine.com You can me at My blog is at Thanks!

36 Radar Networks Rights This presentation is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. Details: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. If you reproduce or redistribute in whole or in part, please give attribution to Nova Spivack, with a link to