Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Sciences BERAC Meeting April 30, 2003 Teresa Fryberger Office of Biological and Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy FASTOS – June FASTOS – June 2005 WELCOME!!
Advertisements

Norman D. Peterson Director, Government Relations September 9, 2013
Nuclear Energy University Programs Fuel Cycle Technologies, Separations and Waste Forms Program August 10, 2011 Terry Todd, National Technical Director.
1 Transuranic Waste Processing Center Karen Deacon, Deputy Federal Project Director Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management.
1 Status of DOE Cleanup in Idaho Presentation to the “LINE Commission” By Rick Provencher Manager, DOE Idaho Operations Office April 7, 2012 Idaho Falls,
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
Progress on Cleanup of the INL Site for the INL Retired Employees Association Bob Iotti, President and CEO September 2008.
BER Long Term Measures As discussed at the last BERAC meeting with Joel Parriott (OMB) and Bill Valdez (DOE/SC) BERAC is on the hook for evaluating BER’s.
1 EM Update and Perspective David Huizenga Senior Advisor for Environmental Management 2012 DOE Project Management Workshop April 3, 2012.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Advanced Scientific Computing Research Program NERSC Users Group Meeting Department of Energy Update June 12,
Safety and Security Aspects of the Management of High Level Waste and Spent Fuel Ramzi Jammal Executive Vice-President and Chief Regulatory Operations.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee Meeting.
Environmental Remediation Sciences (SC – 23.4) Spring 2005.
Gerald Whitney Operating Experience Program Coordinator Presented May 5, 2010 DOE OEC Workshop - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory "Lessons from the.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Sciences (SC – 23.4) BER Advisory Committee Fall 2005.
BERAC Charge A recognized strength of the Office of Science, and BER is no exception, is the development of tools and technologies that enable science.
1 Geosciences Research Initiative All technologies envisioned to meet future energy and environmental demands require advances in fundamental.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond Orbach February 25, 2003 Briefing for the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee FY04 Budget.
BSSD Response to the Committee of Visitors June 2008 review report The COV was charged to assess the processes used to: –solicit, review, and recommend.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Under Secretary for Science U.S. Department.
Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research J Michael Kuperberg, Ph.D. Dan Stover, Ph.D. Terrestrial Ecosystem Science AmeriFlux.
Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research G. L. Geernaert Climate and Environmental Sciences Division Workshop on Community Modeling.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The National Research Program: Overview and Data preservation challenge Don Campbell NRP Central.
Jhon Carilli Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLW) Activity Lead
Ecology’s Perspective on the Draft TC & WM EIS Suzanne Dahl and Jeff Lyon Nuclear Waste Program Washington State Department of Ecology.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science BERAC Meeting September 5, 2008 J. Michael Kuperberg Acting.
Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy
1 Facilitating Reuse at RCRA Sites: Innovative Technologies for Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup Introduction Walter W. Kovalick Jr., Ph.D. Associate.
Designing the Microbial Research Commons: An International Symposium Overview National Academy of Sciences Washington, DC October 8-9, 2009 Cathy H. Wu.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Office of Biological & Environmental Research Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee Roland.
Stewardship Principles “[S]tewardship is a pervasive concept and not simply a set of measures to be implemented once remediation is complete.... “Today’s.
Environmental Remediation Science DOE Office of Science BER Advisory Committee July 11, 2006 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Office of Biological.
SCIENCE for EM Cleanup? Kevin D. Crowley Director Board on Radioactive Waste Management The National Academies.
Grand Challenges for Biological and Environmental Research: A Long- Term Vision Overview of the Report from the March 2010 Workshop Gary Stacey BERAC Chair.
M E Environmental Management safety  performance  cleanup  closure The U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management Intergovernmental Meeting.
Recruiting an Associate Director of Science for Biological and Environmental Research Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Under Secretary for Science U.S. Department.
11 Presented by: Kevin Smith, Manager September 29, 2015 ORP’s Path to Reinvigorating Technology Development DOE National Cleanup Workshop EM Technology.
Reprocessing in the U.S.: A Waste of Time Edwin S. Lyman Senior Staff Scientist Union of Concerned Scientists July 20, 2009.
National Cleanup Workshop Managing Large Capital Projects Ken Picha Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tank Waste and Nuclear Material.
Funding Long-Term Stewardship James D. Werner, Director of Long-Term Stewardship Office of Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy Resources.
Environmental Remediation Science Division PART Review Long-term measure: by 2015 ERSD will “provide sufficient scientific understanding to allow a significant.
Opportunities for Research in the Dynamics of Water Processes in the Environment at NSF Pam Stephens Directorate of Geosciences, NSF Directorate of Geosciences,
EM Budget--- Past/Present/Future Mark W. Frei U.S. Department of Energy October 14, 2005.
Committee membership Chris Somerville (Chair) Michelle S. Broido (BERAC Chair) John Pierce Margaret Riley Mel Simon.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science The Office of Science Role in Environmental Cleanup Dr. James.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy J. Michael Kuperberg Acting Division Director Environmental Remediation Sciences Division DOE, Office of Science,
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Meeting FY 2009 Budget.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science DOE HBCU Program George Seweryniak DOE/SC-31 HBCU Program Manager Dec
Waste Program Monitoring Technology Needs and the 21M 2 Effort ETC Brownbag Thursday, May 19, 2005 Daniel Powell, U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation.
Using an Environmental Management System for Managing DOE’s Legacy DOE Order Workshop 26 February, 2003.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Jerry Elwood Director, Climate Change Research Division, Office.
BER Funding Profile (dollars in thousands) Biological and FY 2002 FY 2003 Environmental Research Conference President’s Request Life Sciences 192,573210,878.
BESAC Meeting 7 July 2015 Perspectives from the Office of Science Dr. Patricia M. Dehmer Acting Director, Office of Science.
1 X Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management 2015 Site Status Report Presented by Vanna Gaffney.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Leveraging the Management Review Process of ISO and OHSAS for Facility-level and Institutional-level.
Argonne National Laboratory Experience and Perspectives on Environmental Remediation Karen P. Smith Environmental Science Division Argonne National Laboratory.
1 OFFICE OF ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING RESEARCH The NERSC Center --From A DOE Program Manager’s Perspective-- A Presentation to the NERSC Users Group.
Experimental Facilities DivisionOak Ridge October 13-15, 2003 Data Visualization and Analysis Ian Anderson Director, Experimental Facilities October 13-15,
BER Long Term Measures As discussed at a previous BERAC meeting with Joel Parriott (OMB) and Bill Valdez (DOE/SC) BERAC is on the hook for evaluating BER’s.
 closure E M Environmental Management  cleanup  performance safety STRATEGY MEETING NATIONAL SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL PROGRAM Bringing Innovation to Spent.
1 EM Update Presented to the National Governors Association Federal Facilities Task Force Dr. Inés Triay Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental.
Progress in EM’s Footprint Reduction for the Oakland Projects Office Projects Rich Schassburger November 16, 2010.
The Challenge of Getting What You Asked For Integrated Safety Management Summit Knoxville TN August 24-27, 2009 Presented By: Patrice McEahern HNF
South Carolina Nuclear Advisory Council SRS Update and FY 2017 Budget Service ● Safety ● Security ● Stewardship ● SRNL ● Sustainability April 14, 2016.
Scrum BUT Research Adapting Agile principles in a research environment Gary Morgan Chief Science and Technology Office March 16, 2009 PNNL-SA
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Presentation to the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (BESAC) Dr. Raymond L. Orbach, Director November.
Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLW) Disposition at the
Radioecology in Practice: Examples From the Savannah River Site
Presentation transcript:

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Sciences BERAC Meeting April 30, 2003 Teresa Fryberger Office of Biological and Environmental Research

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Associate Director Ari Patrinos Life Sciences Division Marv Frazier, Director Medical Sciences Division Michael Viola, Director Climate Change Research Division Jerry Elwood, Director Environmental Remediation Sciences Division Teresa Fryberger, Director Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER)

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Outline  Background—DOE cleanup problems  Environmental Sciences Division  Strategic Planning so far

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management The DOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) was created in 1989 to Address the environmental legacy from over 50 years of nuclear weapons research, production, and testing - some of the most technically challenging and complex work of any environmental program in the world

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Legacy: Nuclear Weapons Production SOURCE: Accumulation from 50 years of nuclear weapons production by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessors

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy DOE Environmental Legacy

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy DOE Environmental Legacy DOE Problem Wastes - Examples -403,000 cubic meters of high level waste (HLW) -250,000 cubic meters of solid transuranic wastes (TRU) -4.4 million cubic meters of low level waste (LLW) -Non-radioactive hazardous wastes and mixed wastes -5,000 – 7000 contaminated facilities

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy DOE Environmental Legacy DOE Environmental Problems -5,700+ individual plumes contaminating soil and groundwater -7.8 Km 2 plume at SRS Km 2 plume of CCl 4 at Hanford -710,000 m 3 of soil at NTS -1.5 million m 3 of soil at Fernald

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy The Legacy Continues  More contamination and waste will be identified as characterization continues  Decontamination wastes???  Secondary waste streams from clean-up operations  Long-term stewardship of sites where residual contamination remains

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Why Do We Need Basic Research for the Cleanup?  We have never done this before  To provide a technical basis for making decisions  To provide new approaches to cut costs, or sometimes just to provide approaches  To resolve technical problems as the cleanup progresses

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Hanford in the mid 1940s

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy  Single Shell Tanks -149 tanks -35M gallons of wastes -190K tons of chemicals -132M curies of radioactivity -75% Sr-90, 24% Cs “leakers”  Double Shell Tanks -28 tanks -20M gallons of wastes -55K tons wastes -82M curies of radioactivity -72% Cs-137, 27% Sr-90 Hanford High Level Tank Wastes EXAMPLE

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy High-Level Tank Wastes: how was it created? DOE Spent Fuel Reprocess Acid Waste Underground Storage Tanks 403,000 m 3 Sludge (Oxides, Hydroxides, Carbonates Sr, Cs,TRU) Saltcake and Supernate ( Nitrates, Nitrites, Cs, Sr, Tc) “Neutralization”

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Volume!!! Cost!!! Quality!!! ? 0.03% Radionuclides Treatment of HLW Tanks TRUs Cs,Sr,Tc LLW HLW Glass Separate Cs,Sr, (Tc)? Alkaline High Level Waste Liquid Sludge TRUs, Sr, Cs, Tc, Metals $1-2M/glass log

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Hanford High Level Waste Science issues:  Chemistry of high pH solutions to predict waste behavior  Tailored separations processes to  Cut costs  Reduce volume  Improve waste form performance  Designer materials for wasteforms  Improve performance  Reduce volume/costs  Remote characterization and online monitoring tools

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Hanford High Level Wastes 65 Known Leakers Subsurface Contaminants: Cesium Strontium Uranium Technetium Cyanides Chromium Cobalt Nitrates What happens during retrieval?? What does it mean to say “we’re done”??

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Understanding Contaminant Transport  Science issues:  Modeling/Prediction  Complexity  Scaling  Characterization/monitoring  In situ remediation/immobilization  Surficial Transport  Trophic Transfer

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Galvin Commission, 1995 “ There is a particular need for long term, basic research in disciplines related to environmental cleanup … Adopting a science-based approach that includes supporting development of technologies and expertise … could lead to both reduced cleanup costs and smaller environmental impacts at existing sites and to the development of a scientific foundation for advances in environmental technologies.” From the 1995 Galvin Commission Report On the Department of Energy Laboratories

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Sciences Division

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Sciences Division  STAFF  Judy Nusbaum  Anna Palmisano  Paul Bayer  Roland Hirsch, Medical Applications Div.  Brendlyn Faison, Hampton University  Henry Shaw, LLNL  3-4 new slots (hopefully)

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy The Environmental Management Science Program (EMSP) is developing the scientific basis for risk-based decision making and “breakthrough” approaches to cleaning up the nuclear weapons complex. Bioremediation Research (NABIR) provides the understanding of how microbes that naturally exist in soils can stabilize metals and radionuclides. Studies span the range of microbial genetics of all the way to field studies at actual contaminated sites. The Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL) is serving environmental users from around the world by providing the leading edge of computational and experimental capabilities for understanding processes at the molecular level. The Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (SREL) is studying the ecological impacts of remediation activities in real time at the Savannah River Site while providing hands-on educational programs at the Site. D. radiodurans reduces uranium complexation ions with tetramethoxycalix[4]arene of cesium Environmental Remediation Sciences R&D for solutions to DOE’s long-term environmental cleanup challenges

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Sciences: FY03 Budget (thousands of $) NABIR$24,720 EMSP $29,900 EMSL $38,000 (operations) SREL $ 6,800 Misc. $10,100 Total $109,500 Largest program of its kind anywhere! Minus ~12M for unfunded Congressional earmarks in FY03!

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy NRC Recommendation: “…that DOE develop a strategic vision for its Environmental Quality (EQ) R&D portfolio. This vision should provide the framework for developing the science and technology necessary to address EQ problems that extend beyond the present emphasis of short-term “compliance” and should incorporate the principal of continual improvement.” A Strategic Vision for DOE Environmental Quality R&D(National Academy Press, 2001) Strategic Planning for Environmental Remediation Sciences

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Strategic Planning  2 Strategic Planning workshops (July and September, 2002)  Involved scientists from all relevant disciplines, other DOE offices, other agencies  Used NRC Reports on EM Science needs as a basis  Formation of BERAC Subcommittee  1 st meeting in April 2003  Reviewed Strategic Plan Draft  Draft II is on its way!

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Sciences: Mission Enable scientific advances that help solve currently intractable environmental problems or otherwise provide break-through opportunities for DOE environmental missions, while also contributing to the general advance of the scientific fields involved.

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Sciences: Goals  Provide science to inform decisions about environmental remediation and stewardship  Advance scientific foundations that enable innovative remediation technologies and methodologies  Synthesize and integrate across disciplines to foster new scientific approaches that match the complexity of the problems

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy ERSD Characteristics  Primary focus is on a subset of DOE-EM relevant issues  That are currently “intractable”  Where science can have the greatest impact  Highly interdisciplinary – integrates results from biology, geology, chemistry, ecology, etc.  Committed to developing and supporting a suite of field research sites  Develop a “toolbox” of characterization and monitoring tools.

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy  Improve our understanding of contaminant fate and transport by investigating and linking relevant processes  Focus on interdisciplinary hypothesis-driven field studies to address complexity, scaling, and validation of models and lab results  Understand nature’s tools for cleaning up the environment — harness the cleanup potential of microorganisms and geochemistry Environmental Remediation Sciences Program Emphasis

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Sciences Program Emphasis (continued)  Help develop the next generation of computational and experimental capabilities for understanding contaminant behavior  Provide the basis for new characterization and monitoring capabilities  Provide the basis for new separations and waste management options

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Collaborating/Coordinating  Interagency Steering Committee on Multimedia Environmental Modeling  National Science and Technology Council committees  Collaborations/Joint Research Calls with  EPA, NSF, NIEHS…  Other BER: Genomes to Life, Ecology, Microbial Genome  Other DOE: Environmental Management, Basic Energy Sciences, Advanced Scientific Computing, Yucca Mountain Project

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Director Raymond L. Orbach Principal Deputy Director James F. Decker Deputy Director for Operations Milton D. Johnson Chief of Staff Jeffrey T. Salmon Office of Basic Energy Sciences Associate Director Patricia M. Dehmer Office of Biological and Environmental Research Associate Director Aristides Patrinos Office of High Energy and Nuclear Physics Associate Director S. Peter Rosen Office of Fusion Energy Sciences Associate Director N. Anne Davies Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research Associate Director C. Edward Oliver Geosciences Heavy Element Chem. Analytical & Separations Chemistry User Facilities: synchrotron light sources, (nanoscience centers, neutron source) Climate Change Genomes to Life Microbial Research Ecology Bioremediation Low Dose Radiation EM Science Program User Facility: EMSL Computation Initiatives: Genomes to Life (Contaminant Flow and Transport) The Office of Science Program Offices and Environmental Capabilities

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Programmatic Challenges  Integrating the science across the division programs  Fostering interdisciplinary research teams  Nurturing truly innovative ideas  Getting our science used

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Getting our science used  Work directly with cleanup staff at sites to identify and collaborate on the field research sites.  Work on specific site problems  Sponsor frequent technical exchange workshops with sites  Develop a strategy to “advertise” our successes.

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Opportunities  to “revolutionize” environmental studies— bringing much-needed rigor and the new tools of genomics, nanoscience, and computing to bear.  to have far-reaching impacts on the way environmental issues are approached.  to apply to a broader set of problems (e.g. water quality, future energy options, waste minimization, mining and industrial wastes)