- 1 - Lavutslippsutvalget 06/03-06 What makes technology change? Barriers for change within the construction and real estate sector What are they and how could they be managed? Stein Rognlien Statsbygg
- 2 - Energy Use in the Building Sector A brief overview of the distribution of demand for residential and commercial buildings: For heating Residential Commercial Total energy use Heating by el.
- 3 - Politics vs. Real Life It was a political objective/goal that new commercial buildings from 1997 onwards should use less energy than older ones. But the result has been the exact opposite … (…) … the aim was a reduction in the energy consumption by 20 %. The buildings in Enova’s energy registration show an increase of about 20 % E. Arnstad, director of Enova in NRK 4/3-05
- 4 - Energy Consumption-Commercial Buildings
- 5 - Political Guidelines/- Resolutions Significance for the Construction– Real Estate Sector renewable energy sources shall, in a “normal year”, produce enough electrical power to meet demands use of electricity for heating purposes shall be reduced significantly new renewable energy sources (wind, biomass, solar) shall in the future meet a significantly larger part of the total energy consumption increase in water as a carrier for heating by 4 TWh/year before 2010 use of oil for heating purposes (in buildings) shall be reduced by at least 25 % production of energy from waste shall to a significant degree replace fossil fuels provide a (political) framework that makes it possible to establish gas power plants with “CO 2 handling”
- 6 - Conflicts as to Objectives/Goals (total) lack of political prioritisation district heating vs. low energy buildings gas (to electricity) vs. (new) renewable solutions centralised vs. decentralised energy supply energy flexibility vs. energy efficiency timetable as to ”face out”/”face in”of solutions energy from biomass; stationary or transport waste; a disposal problem or an energy source change of direction as to R&D
- 7 - Construction-Real Estate Sector the building sector actors will not ”voluntarily” make efforts that really matters as to sustainable energy solutions unless they are economically rewarded there is no gains as such for the participants of the building sector to be energy efficient consumer orientation/- demand it is a process, not a product low risk profile/almost adverse as to risk
- 8 - Public Directive There is a public directive in Norway called “Utredningsinstruksen”. The directive is to ensure : adequate preparations and control with all public reforms, change of rules and regulations etc. that all relevant and essential economic, administrative and other consequences are accounted for that economical consequences are assessed as to both expenses and income for those who are affected, including governmental, county and local governments together with business sectors and individuals that community economic evaluations are done evaluation of all essential uncertainties and their effects/consequences (benefit/costs) on the proposed actions
- 9 - The Way Forward ? define the primary objective(s) as clearly and as unambiguous as possible set up a R&D project with the necessary experts that in a holistic way look at (all) the main different routes/pathways to the goal(s) find the consequences connected to the different pathways as demanded by “Utredningsinstruksen” make a choice/ a decision as to the way(s) forward
- 10 -
Analysis of Consequences Choices made today will have large consequences for the future. It is now essential to define and evaluate the risks/uncertainties as to the different pathways/choices that will take us from a carbon intensive to a sustainable energy system: economic factors/economic consequences technical factors social issues interdependencies between pathways/solutions robustness of solutions lock-in effects/-situations/path dependencies timetable as to “phase in”/”phase out” contingency plans