PARTICIPATION IN THE DESIGN AND R&D ACTIVITIES FOR A FUTURE LINEAR COLLIDER: A. Faus-Golfe IFIC - Valencia Accelerator and Detector aspects FPA2005-02935.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Collimation Simulations and Optimisation Frank Jackson ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Advertisements

The ILC low power option Andrei Seryi SLAC ILC08 and LCWS08 November 17, 2008 Photo: Dan Chusid, 2003.
BDS Change Request: Support of Single L* Optics Configuration Shared by both Detectors Glen White, Nick Walker Sept MDI/CFS Ichinoseki.
Beam Delivery Simulation Development & BDS / MDI Applications L. Nevay, S. Boogert, H. Garcia-Morales, S. Gibson, J. Snuverink, L. Deacon Royal Holloway,
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
Monochromatization for Higgs production A.Faus-Golfe IFIC - LAL March1FCC Week 2015.
Overview of Beam Delivery System Final Focus Optics Collimator Final Doublet Extraction/Dump Others S.Kuroda ( KEK ) MDI meeting at SLAC 1/6/2005.
Transport formalism Taylor map: Third order Linear matrix elementsSecond order matrix elements Truncated maps Violation of the symplectic condition !
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
Multi-OTR Project meeting C. Alabau Pons J. Alabau Gonzalvo C. Blanch J.V. Civera A.Faus-Golfe J.J. Garcia Garrigos (IFIC-Valencia)
ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.
ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.
1 August 12, 2005 Running 2mrad IR in e-e- mode: BDS constraints A.Seryi August 12, 2005.
European Design Study Towards a TeV Linear Collider WP 2 : Beam Delivery System Co-ordinator: Deepa Angal-Kalinin CCLRC, Daresbury Laboratory.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project “Slow” Feedback Requirements: Deflections and Luminosity Linda Hendrickson IPBI Meeting, SLAC June 26, 2002.
BDSIM simulations/results: Synchrotron Radiation and Muons Motivation and History Tracking results Synchrotron Radiation Tracking of Halo Muons News from.
Working Group 3 Summary M. Sullivan / Y. Funakoshi.
Status of BDSIM Developments at RHUL L. Nevay, S. Boogert, H. Garcia-Morales, S. Gibson, R. Kwee-Hinzmann, J. Snuverink Acknowledgments: R. Bruce, S. Redaelli.
1 ATF2 Tuning and its application to ILC and CLIC FFS/IR region ASTeC and MAN : working together on tuning methods for the ATF2 and ILC IR/extraction design.
GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.
Beam Delivery System Review of RDR(draft) 1.Overview 2.Beam parameters 3.System description 3.1 diagnostic, tune-up dump, machine protection MPS.
Loss maps of RHIC Guillaume Robert-Demolaize, BNL CERN-GSI Meeting on Collective Effects, 2-3 October 2007 Beam losses, halo generation, and Collimation.
UK/EU Plans for ATF2 G.A. Blair ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-0ff meeting, Annecy, 8 th October 2006 Overview EUROTeV UK.
CLIC main detector solenoid and anti-solenoid impact B. Dalena, A. Bartalesi, R. Appleby, H. Gerwig, D. Swoboda, M. Modena, D. Schulte, R. Tomás.
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) Jürgen Pfingstner Orbit feedback design for the CLIC ML and BDS Orbit feedback design for the CLIC ML.
Ijaz Ahmed Ijaz Ahmed Helmut Burkhardt Andrea Latina Beam-Halo Generation Study in CLIC CLIC Beam Dynamics Meeting, CERN: 13/02/08.
New Progress of the Nonlinear Collimation System for A. Faus-Golfe J. Resta López D. Schulte F. Zimmermann.
European Organization for Nuclear Research International Linear Collider INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON FUTURE LINEAR COLLIDERS ЛЦВС14 Vinča Institute of Nuclear.
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
WP: Parameters and design. Plans from IFIC, Valencia Javier Resta López on behalf of the IFIC accelerator group ( IFIC (CSIC-UV),
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, Status report of offset and angle studies with Guinea-Pig Status report of offset and angle studies.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
BDS Andrei Seryi, Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Emmannual Tsesmelis, Rogelio Tomas, Andrea Latina, Daniel Schulte Detectors Civil engineering.
1 BNL LARP Accelerator Physics Program Resources BNL role in national program BNL Accelerator Physics Program.
Global Design Effort ILC Crab Cavity Overview and requirements Andrei Seryi SLAC on behalf of ILC Beam Delivery and Crab-Cavity design teams Joint BNL/US-LARP/CARE-HHH.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Slide 1 FP7: Collimator Wakefields program Building on the achievements in EuroTeV to provide a comprehensive system of knowledge of wakefield effects.
Collimation Baseline Configuration and Collimation Studies Frank Jackson ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory.
CLIC Machine-Detector Interface Working Group (MDI) Emmanuel Tsesmelis CERN TS/LEA CLIC-ACE of 3 September 2008.
Global Design Effort CLIC-ILC BDS & MDI work Materials for discussion Daniel Schulte, Rogelio Tomas and Emmanuel Tsesmelis for CLIC team Andrei Seryi for.
Collimation for the Linear Collider, Daresbury.1 Adam Mercer, German Kurevlev, Roger Barlow Simulation of Halo Collimation in BDS.
ILC-GDE Meeting Beijing Feb Effect of MDI Design on BDS Collimation Depth Frank Jackson ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory Cockcroft Institute.
Inputs from GG6 to decisions 2,7,8,15,21,27,34 V.Telnov Aug.24, 2005, Snowmass.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Tor Raubenheimer Beam Delivery System Design Differences American Linear Collider Physics Meeting SLAC January 8.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann LET Beam Dynamics Workshop, Lumi scans with wakefields in Merlin Lumi scans with wakefields in Merlin Isabell-A.
GUINEA-PIG: Beam-beam interaction simulation status M. Alabau, P. Bambade, O. Dadoun, G. Le Meur, C. Rimbault, F. Touze LAL - Orsay D. Schulte CERN - Genève.
Main and Drive Beam Dynamics Working Group Caterina Biscari, Daniel Schulte Attending people ~ 20 ± 5 Presentations ~ 18 (7 from CERN) CL IC 07.
Freddy Poirier ILC project Meeting Integrated Luminosity Performance Study on the ILC – WP6 (A snapshot of the European LC workshop at Daresbury) Freddy.
BDS, Start to End Simulation, Simulation Codes Summary D. Schulte.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Electromagnetic Background From Spent Beam Line Michael David Salt (Cockcroft Institute – Optics, Backgrounds) Robert Appleby (CERN.
Luminosity at  collider Marco Zanetti (MIT) 1. Intro,  colliders basics Luminosity at  colliders Sapphire simulation Alternative approaches Luminosity.
Status of ATF2 linear collider focus prototype emphasizing France-China joint contributions Philip Bambade Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire Université.
1 Updated comparison of feedback implementation for e + e - and e - e - modes of operation with realistic errors in the BDS M. Alabau Pons, P. Bambade,
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
1 April 1 st, 2003 O. Napoly, ECFA-DESY Amsterdam Design of a new Final Focus System with l* = 4,5 m J. Payet, O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
FCC-ee Interaction Region design
Collimation Simulations and Optimisation
Estimating the effects from non-linearities in the ATF extraction line
In collaboration with P. N. Burrows, A. Latina and D. Schulte
Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡
Beam Delivery Systems and the Machine-Detector Interface Terms of Reference for the CLIC-ILC Collaboration Working Group B. Parker (BNL), D. Schulte.
New algorithms for tuning the CLIC beam delivery system
CLIC Study Aim Conceptual design report in 2010
CLIC-ILC BDS & MDI work.
NEW DESIGN OF THE TESLA INTERACTION REGION WITH l* = 5 m
The 2mrad horizontal crossing angle IR layout for the ILC
Overview of MDI design II
Presentation transcript:

PARTICIPATION IN THE DESIGN AND R&D ACTIVITIES FOR A FUTURE LINEAR COLLIDER: A. Faus-Golfe IFIC - Valencia Accelerator and Detector aspects FPA

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe2 Outline Scientific project  Main goals Accelerator Physics Machine Detector Interface Detectors Personnel & Task See Carlos Lacasta’s Talk

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe3 Scientific project: Main Goals Our project pretends to initiate/consolidate the participation of the IFIC to the ILC effort in both aspects: Machine Detector Interface Machine Detector

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe4 The IFIC participation has already started with: A feasibility study of a non-linear collimation system for CLIC in 2002 in collaboration with CERN. A doctoral thesis started in the beginning of 2004: ”Design and Performance Evaluation of a Nonlinear Collimation System for CLIC and LHC” (CERN doctoral students program) Participation in the European Project CARE-ELAN in the beginning of 2004 Participation in the specific design study EUROTeV, approved in late 2004 Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe5 Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects Feasibility of a non-linear collimation system for – Design Optics – Non-linear impact on the BDS – Cleaning efficiency – Spoiler survival – Application to other collimation systems (LHC, ILC)

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe6 Ongoing work: Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects Design Optics –Optics with bends between the skews shows better performance from the collimation efficiency point of view but there is no complete cancellation of the geometric aberration and the luminosity is very poor –New optics with no bends between the skews to avoid the luminosity degradation keeping good collimation efficiency [T.Asaka, A.Faus-Golfe, J.Resta López, D. Schulte and F. Zimmermann “Alternatives Design for Collimation system” To be published ] See A. Faus-Golfe talk in Nanobeam 05 and CLIC BDS Day

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe7 1 st optics solution: Sk Sp No bends between the skews Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe8 2 nd optics solution: Sk Sp Bends between the skews Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe9 Ongoing work: Collimation survival –install perfect spoiler & perform simulations with MAD and PLACET [T.Asaka, J. Resta López “Characterization and Performance of the CLIC BDS with MAD, SAD and PLACET” ELAN (2005)] –consider real spoiler with scattering, install absorbers, optimize absorber locations, run BDSIM or SIXTRACK or MARS simulations (linear system already contains spoilers and absorbers) [Drozhdin et al, “Comparison of the TESLA, NLC and Beam Collimation system performance” CLIC Note 555 (2003)] Chromatic properties & Luminosity performance & Beam size at the spoiler vs sextupole strength & average momentun off-set See J. Resta López talk in CLIC BDS Day Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe10 Optics lattice MAD Placet SAD … Entrance: IP: Multiparticle tracking Beam-beam interaction Guinea-Pig performance transport Lie Importance of the benchmarking of codes Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe11 Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe12 Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe13 Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe14 Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe15 Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe16 Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe17 Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe18 Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe19 Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe20 Scientific Project: Main Goals Machine Detector Interface Design study of the disrupted and energy degraded beam after the IP. Impact in the tracking performance. Simulations based on realistic beam conditions including the halo: identify and estimate losses in the spent beam transport line study of installation of relevant post-IP beam diagnostic (luminosity, energy and energy spread and polarisation monitors) Collaboration: A doctoral thesis started in the beginning of 2005: ”Design and Performance Evaluation of the MDI system for the ILC” (EU doctoral students program)

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe21 Ongoing work: Beam parameters for e - e - mode operation at the ILC –e - e - shows sharper deflection curves (feedback slower) and faster luminosity drop with offset (more stringent constraints on residual offset) that makes feedback very difficult –Alternative beam parameters: increase of  y (steepness can be reduced at the expense of a factor 2 in L) and decrease  x (smoother deflection curve and partly recovered L at the expense of a factor 2 in  b ) [C.Alabau, P.Bambade and A.Faus-Golfe, “Beam-Beam parameters for e - e - mode operation at ILC” To be published ] See C. Alabau talk in ECFA Study on Physics and detectors for ILC Scientific Project: Main Goals Machine Detector Interface

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe22 e - e - Deflection Angles (σ x =σ xo ) Increasing  y Scientific Project: Main Goals Machine Detector Interface e - e - Luminosity (σ x =σ xo ) e - e - Beamstrahlung Loss (σ x =σ xo ) - better deflection curve - similar beamstrahlung energy loss - lower luminosity (factor 2)

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe23 e - e - Deflection Angles (σ x =0.5σ xo ) e - e - Luminosity (σ x =0.5σ xo ) - better deflection curve / luminosity - greater beamstrahlung energy loss e - e - Beamstrahlung Loss (σ x =0.5σ xo ) problems for physics? problems for beam extraction (maximum ~5-6%) Scientific Project: Main Goals Machine Detector Interface Decreasing  x

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe24 Personnel & Tasks TASK PERSONNEL Feasibility of a non-linear collimation system A. Faus-Golfe Particle tracking along BDS J. Resta Lopez Machine Detector Interface A. Faus-Golfe J. Fuster Verdú C. Alabau Pons R&D on Si Detectors C. Lacasta Llacer Participation on the design of tracking system J. Fuster Verdú Post-doc I. Carbonell Mechanical Eng.

1-3/12/05A.Faus-Golfe25 Other related Project: Accelerator aspects Further work: Beam Instrumentation for TBL at CTF3/CLEX: – Mechanics See F.Toral and Y. Kubyshin talks