CUC, 12 Jan 200411/18/03Belinda Wilkes, CDO Cycle 5 Chair+Pundit Questionaire  Circulation: 15 people (12 chairs, 3 pundits)  Responses: 8 (7 chairs,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEOSS Data Sharing Principles. GEOSS 10-Year Implementation Plan 5.4 Data Sharing The societal benefits of Earth observations cannot be achieved without.
Advertisements

Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Data Management and Communication (DMAC) Standards Process Julie Bosch NOAA National Coastal Data Development.
Implementation Council Meeting Structure and Resources Background: The Implementation Council (Council) roles and responsibilities are described in the.
THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STEP 1 PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL STAGE PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE FIRST TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING.
INDEPENDENT SECTOR FACULTY AND STAFF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND DOCUMENTATION MAY 20, 2013 cIcu Project.
From Paper to Paperless Straight-through Electronic Disclosure and Abolition of Paid Announcement Requirement (The Electronic Disclosure Project) Press.
CUC Oct 2013 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 15 Peer Review  June 2013, Hilton Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 15  13 topical panels,
Chubaka Producciones Presenta :.
CXC Response to June 04 Report 1.Bakeout Status: Paul Plucinsky 2.CIAO upgrade information: Jonathan McDowell 3.DS9 and visualization scripts: Jonathan.
19 Oct 2005Chandra Users' Committee Cycle 7 Peer Review: June 2005  747 proposals, 12 panels, 101 reviewers  Hilton, Logan Airport.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Apr 2007 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 9  661 submitted proposals  *5.5 oversubscribed.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11 Peer Review Proposal Numbers:  668 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
2012 JANUARY Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Chandra Users' Committee, 27 April 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12  CfP Release: Dec  GTO Deadline: 11 March 2010  GO Deadline: 18 March.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2006 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 8  725 submitted proposals  *6.4 oversubscribed.
Planning a Mentoring Program A CALENDER FOR A FIRST-YEAR TEACHERS’ PROGRAM.
Users' Committee, 25 Oct 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12 Peer Review  June 2010, Hilton, Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 12 
Director's Office Chandra Users’ Committee, Sept 2007 Chandra Cycle 9  661 submitted proposals  *5.5 oversubscribed (based on time)  48 LP, 10.
Chandra Users’ Committee, 6-7 Apr 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11  CfP Release: Dec  POG, final A Eff : 15 Jan 2009  GTO: 43 proposals.
25 June 2002Chandra Users’ Committee, Belinda Wilkes XMM/Chandra Schedules AO date 15 Dec 2002 Deadline 15 March 2003 Peer Review ~15 June 2002 AO date.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2008 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 10  639 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
CXC Chandra Users' Committee Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle proposals *6.4 oversubscribed (based on time) GTO for review: due 3 rd April.
P Pathophysiology Calendar. SundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday January 2012.
CUC, 29 June 2004Belinda Wilkes, Assistant Director CXC Response to Jan 2004 CUC Report 1,2: relate to peer review (Belinda) 3: high-risk science category:
Welcome New - Leadership Update /Clerks’ section Example agenda items term 5/6 Clerks Briefing Term 5/6 –Constitution and regulation changes –Policy Update.
MONDAYTUESDAYWEDNESDAYTHURSDAYFRIDAYSAT/SUN Note: You can print this template to use as a wall calendar. You can also copy the slide for any month to add.
School Year Calendar You can print this template to use it as a wall calendar, or you can copy the page for any month to add it to your own presentation.
School Year Calendar You can print this template to use it as a wall calendar, or you can copy the page for any month to add it to your own presentation.
2007 Monthly Calendar You can print this template to use it as a wall calendar, or you can copy the page for any month to add it to your own presentation.
You can print this template to use it as a wall calendar, or you can copy the page for any month to add it to your own presentation. If you’d like to change.
CXC Implementing 2007 NRC Portals of the Universe Report Chandra X-ray Center Recommended Best Practices Roger Brissenden and Belinda Wilkes 25 April 2012.
© 2008 California State University, Fullerton Account Management & Reporting Tools Financial Services Division of Administration & Finance.
Credentials Committee Orientation. Responsibilities of the Committee Review the credentials of all applicants to the Medical Staff and privileges requests.
Making the difference to your business Employee Consultation Forum Meeting 24 th July 2012.
July 2008 CPS2 Waiver SDT Technical Workshop for Draft BAL-001-TRE-01 Judith A. James Reliability Standards Manager TRE.
CUC Oct 2012 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 14 Peer Review   June 2012, Hilton, Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 14  13 topical.
WORD JUMBLE. Months of the year Word in jumbled form e r r f b u y a Word in jumbled form e r r f b u y a february Click for the answer Next Question.
Kuali Coeus Proposal Development Module Kuali.Colostate.edu.
DATE POWER 2 INCOME JANUARY 100member X 25.00P2, FEBRUARY 200member X 25.00P5, MARCH 400member X 25.00P10, APRIL 800member.
Exec/Board Paris February 2008 WP3.1 Infrastructure Roadmap: Progress Report.
Compliance Update September Control Performance Highlights  NERC CPS1 Performance ERCOT’s August score was ERCOT’s CPS1 scores show significant.
Grants and Contracts Jim Butterfield and Kathy Blackwood October 5, 2004.
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
Kuali Coeus Proposal Budget Module Kuali.Colostate.edu.
Thesis Defense and Submission 1 Spring  Register for Spring semester  Deadline to submit thesis to GPS: Friday, April 22 nd at NOON  Deadline.
NASA Herschel Science Center - page 1 PACS NHSC Cycle 1 Open Time Proposal Planning Workshop 3-4 June 2010 ESA AO and NASA Funding Call Phil Appleton and.
Title III Application Process Maria Garcia-Morales (717) Title III Program Manager Pennsylvania Department of Education.
July 2007 SundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday
A Year in the Life Of a State Data Coordinator December, 2013.
Project Operating Guide. Purpose of Projects To advance the mission of the organization To provide value to ICIS Members.
ELECTRONIC BID SUBMISSION An Excel sheet as pictured below will be sent to you via .
Agenda MC Aug 13.
GEOSS Data Sharing Principles
Dictation practice 2nd Form Ms. Micaela-Ms. Verónica.
TIMELINES PHOTOS This is an example text
TIMELINES PHOTOS This is an example text
P-Card Bookkeeper Training
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
13-block rotation schedule
SPR&I Regional Training
Due Dates subject to change. Watch for dashboard updates.
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
Neopay Practical Guides #2 PSD2 (Should I be worried?)
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
Habitat Changes and Fish Migration
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Habitat Changes and Fish Migration
Presentation transcript:

CUC, 12 Jan /18/03Belinda Wilkes, CDO Cycle 5 Chair+Pundit Questionaire  Circulation: 15 people (12 chairs, 3 pundits)  Responses: 8 (7 chairs, 1 pundit)  In your opinion (somewhat speculative given that the observations have yet to be made), is the Cycle 5 allocation between normal, LP, and VLP likely to produce science at the high levels expected from Chandra? Was the time allocated between normal, LP, and VLP proposals appropriate? If not, what should the allocation be?  8: balance good for Cycle 5 1)Comment: panel had freedom to move time between LP and VLP and voted not to do so 2)Recommend: review, using metrics, in Cycle 7 + 3)Recommend: monitor science balance of VLPs

CUC, 12 Jan /18/03Belinda Wilkes, CDO Cycle 5 Chair+Pundit Questionaire (cont) With respect to your panel, was the quality of the lower-ranking approved LP or VLP proposals (those just above the pass/fail line) higher or, at least as high, as the highest-ranking, but unapproved, normal proposals (those just below the pass/fail line)? 7: approved VLP/LP higher quality than just failing GO, 1 disagreed 2 said opposite: failing LP was of higher quality than passing GO Agreed that standards should be higher for LP/VLP given large time allocation

CUC, 12 Jan /18/03Belinda Wilkes, CDO Cycle 5 Chair+Pundit Questionaire (cont)  In your opinion, was there a significant difference (other than observing time) in the nature of the LP and VLP programs? For example, did the VLP proposals address science questions that would not have been addressed properly otherwise or, was the nature of the approved programs different in some way, such as the VLP being more of an archive or "Legacy" nature than the LPs.  5 Y, 2 N, general feeling that Legacy value is higher and that proposals which were similar but longer than GOs did not fare as well.

CUC, 12 Jan /18/03Belinda Wilkes, CDO Cycle 5 Chair+Pundit Questionaire (cont)  Do you have any recommendations regarding the peer review process for consideration in planning future cycles?  Generally happy with organisation  Big Project Panel: –more pre-defined structure for BPP, work w/chair in advance –Allow time to read highly ranked LP/VLP, add 1 day?! –Mandate proper presentation of highly ranked proposals  Topical panels: –circulation of panel member names < review –List of proposals by secondary and primary reviewer –LAN in panel rooms –Projector for spreadsheet –Pre-plan discussion order within panels –Telecon is hard –Specific allocation for high-risk proposals

CUC, 12 Jan /18/03Belinda Wilkes, CDO Changes in Cycle 6  Operations/observation planning: –Pitch angle restrictions – impact on time constrained observations > 50 ksecs –Ability to link archive and observing proposals –Bakeout: see later in agenda  Peer Review planning: –Website: >track reviewer status, travel + address information >personalized access to proposals, reports etc >access to Non-disclosure forms, review information –Proposal distribution: CD and/or hardcopy, to be collected at review –Reports: TBD, we hope to move away from diskettes

CUC, 12 Jan /18/03Belinda Wilkes, CDO IIR OBSERVATION (1)  CONTROL OF OBSERVERS’ PROPOSAL INFORMATION –Proper measures may not have been taken to fully protect and control information provided in the investigators’ proposals. >Current review process could allow inappropriate dissemination of sensitive information (e.g., salaries, intellectual capital). –Cycle 5 review did not verify collection/disposal of proposer CD’s –Requirement for individual salary data is concern of proposers –RECOMMENDATION: Investigate additional controls to reduce the possibility of inappropriate dissemination of sensitive data, including minimizing proposal distribution, verification of proper disposal of proposal data, and elimination or masking of individual salary information.

CUC, 12 Jan /18/03Belinda Wilkes, CDO Response to IIR “Observation”  CXC will review procedures and controls for safeguarding sensitive information, areas to be considered include: –Completeness of procedures for safeguarding proprietary information –Increased training for all involved in peer review –Earlier collection of non-disclosure forms >Minimize number of people with access –Restricting transfer of electronic files –Verifying destruction of hardcopies and CDs –Methods for investigating misuse of information –Budget reviewers need for information –Physical security  Timescale: completed to support Cycle 6 review

CUC, 12 Jan /18/03Belinda Wilkes, CDO CXC User Communication  Website: information, documentation, software etc. Website  Helpdesk search, submission, answer questions Helpdesk  USINT: observation planning USINT  Electronic Bulletins and Announcements: as needed, approximately monthly Electronic Bulletins and Announcements  Newsletter: annual (electronic and hardcopy) Newsletter  AAS Exhibit: twice a year  Workshops: –CIAO : 5 to date, ~25 people per workshopCIAO –Calibration: annual since 2001Calibration  Electronic announcements of data readiness

CUC, 12 Jan /18/03Belinda Wilkes, CDO Helpdesk Statistics MonthTicket Activity During MonthTicket Status as of End of Month EnteredClosedNet Change in MonthActiveDeferredTotal October November December January February March April May June July August September

CUC, 12 Jan /18/03Belinda Wilkes, CDO Topic Distribution of Helpdesk Tickets

CUC, 12 Jan /18/03Belinda Wilkes, CDO Observation Planning: USINT  Procedures – posted on web pageposted on web page –All Observers/PIs are contacted to confirm observational parameters –Allowed changes are made at CXC and confirmed with Observer/PI –Restricted changes (e.g. instrument, coordinates, constraints) must be justified and approved by CDO. CDO review includes check for conflicts with other programs

CUC, 12 Jan /18/03Belinda Wilkes, CDO Cost Review Results (FDS) budget requestno. ofbudget approved /fair-shareproposals f-s intermediate as-requested