National Data Buoy Center Presented to the QARTOD III Workshop November 2, 2005 Wave Data Quality Control Chung-Chu Teng.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SECONDARY VALIDATION OF WATER LEVEL DATA (1) PRIMARY VALIDATION: –BASED ON KNOWLEDGE OF INSTRUMENTATION AND METHODS OF MEASUREMENT WITH ASSOCIATED ERRORS.
Advertisements

NERACOOS: Unlocking the power of data Riley Young Morse | Gulf of Maine Research Institute.
Argo a year ago. 500 floats. Regional coverage only.
May 2004Iridium Users Workshop, Seattle National Data Buoy Center’s Experiences with Real-Time Data Retrieval from Remote Stations using Iridium; and Data.
Argo Real-time Quality Control Process NOAA/AOML: Y.-H. DANESHZADEH, R. MOLINARI, R. SABINA, C. SCHMID CIMAS/UM: E. FORTEZA, X. XIA, H. YANG.
Initial Automated Quality Checks for Oil Platform Current Data Don Conlee, Richard Bouchard, Steve Collins and Dave Gilhousen National Data Buoy Center.
NDBC Real Time Wave Data Processing and QC/QA
The Logistic Requirements for Wave Field Measurement Prof. Dr.-Ing. Chia Chuen Kao Director, Coastal Ocean Monitoring Center, National Cheng Kung University.
THE SCAR MET-READER PROJECT Steve Colwell and John Turner British Antarctic Survey.
Operational Quality Control in Helsinki Testbed Mesoscale Atmospheric Network Workshop University of Helsinki, 13 February 2007 Hannu Lahtela & Heikki.
QARTOD II Currents and Waves IN-SITU WAVE GROUP Kent Hathaway, Moderator QARTOD II February 28 – March 2, 2005.
QARTOD II Currents and Waves In-Situ Currents: Breakout Group Report Out QARTOD II February 28 – March 2, 2005.
Integrated Ocean Observing System Data Management and Communications March 2004 The US Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Plan for Data Management.
JEFS Status Report Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington Cliff Mass, Jeff Baars, David Carey JEFS Workshop, August
Long-Term Ambient Noise Statistics in the Gulf of Mexico Mark A. Snyder & Peter A. Orlin Naval Oceanographic Office Stennis Space Center, MS Anthony I.
2 nd international Conference for GODAR-WESTPAC JODC, Japan Coast Guard, Tokyo 2004.
Satellite Drifter Technology Dr. Sergey Motyzhev.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Climate Change Committee WG1 QA/QC procedures and – programme for the EC inventory process André Jol, EEA 2 September 2004.
An Instrumented Coastal Process Modeling Test Bed US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Jeff Hanson U. S. Army Engineer Research and Development.
Presented by: Mike Hamdan South Coast Air Quality Management District Diamond Bar, CA Presented at: The Tribal Air Monitoring Training, Pechanga Reservation,
ATMS 373C.C. Hennon, UNC Asheville Observing the Tropics.
WP2: Data products generation in Mediterranean Sea EMODNET Chemistry Data Products, Experts Workshop Split (Croatia), June 2014 Sissy Iona, HCMR-HNODC.
Towards a Standard for Real-time Quality Control Procedures for in situ Ocean Waves Richard Bouchard 1 and Julie Thomas 2 1.NOAA’s National Data Buoy Center.
Chapter 8: Systems analysis and design
JCOMM Data Buoy Cooperation Panel October 16, 2006 National Data Buoy Center 2006 Review: A Year of Growth Paul F. Moersdorf, PhD, Director.
April nd IBTrACS Workshop 1 Operational Procedures How can we build consistent, homogeneous, well- documented climate quality data?
Automated CBC Parameters
Evaluation of Microwave Scatterometers and Radiometers as Satellite Anemometers Frank J. Wentz, Thomas Meissner, and Deborah Smith Presented at: NOAA/NASA.
Data Buoy Cooperation Panel Hester Viola
1 Mexico Regional AMDAR Workshop November 2011 Data Quality Monitoring and Control (QM / QC) Axel Hoff Convenor of WMO AMDAR Panel‘s Science and Technical.
DATA QUALITY CONTROL Julie Thomas Coastal Data Information Program (CDIP) Scripps Institution of Oceanography CI Design Workshop October 2007 La.
Wsws wpwp dw wpwp wsws NARR ONLY Variations in x (size parameter)
Observing System Monitoring Center (OSMC) Status Update April 2005 Steve Hankin – PMEL (co-PI) Kevin Kern – NDBC (co-PI)
Maintaining a U.S. Leadership Position In Worldwide Operational Ocean Observations For Spring IOOS Meeting March 8, 2013 Helmut H. Portmann, Director National.
The New Geophysical Model Function for QuikSCAT: Implementation and Validation Outline: GMF methodology GMF methodology New QSCAT wind speed and direction.
Work Package 2 / 3 TECHNOLOGIAL & PROCEDURAL HARMONISATION FixO3 General Assembly 14 th to the 16 th October 2014, Heraklion-CRETE Alicia Lavín, IEO Santander,
Data Assembly Center (DAC) Example Data Quality Procedures VRCO Discussions, 06 December 2006.
IOVWST Meeting May 2011 Maryland Calibration and Validation of Multi-Satellite scatterometer winds Topics  Estimation of homogeneous long time.
US Army Engineer Research and Development Center U.S. IOOS MODEL VALIDATION CAPABILITY SURA SUPER-REGIONAL TEST BED Working across agencies to bring observations.
Ocean Vector Wind Workshops and the Role of Cal/Val in Preparing for Future Satellite Wind Sensors Dudley Chelton Cooperative Institute for Oceanographic.
Chapter Two Fundamentals of Data and Signals Data Communications and Computer Networks: A Business User's Approach Eighth Edition.
CO-OPS Expands Meteorological Sensor Network and Quality Control Kathleen Egan, Tom Landon NOAA/NOS/Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services.
1 Short Course on Meteorological Applications of Aircraft Weather Data Future Plans – Opportunities for the Private Sector January 14, 2007 Kevin Johnston.
N ational C limatic D ata C enter Development of the Global Historical Climatology Network Sea Level Pressure Data Set (Version 2) David Wuertz, Physical.
Data Management System to Collect, Quality Control, Distribute, and Archive Near Real-time Marine Data Jeremy J. Rolph, Jacob T. Rettig, Mark A. Bourassa,
Automated Operational Validation of Meteorological Observations in the Netherlands Wiel Wauben, KNMI, The Netherlands Introduction QA/QC chain Measurement.
Evaluation of SVP-BW drifters thanks to deployments near moored buoys DBCP-18 workshop - Martinique October 2002 By Pierre Blouch Presentation :
NWS MARINE PREDICTION CENTER America’s Weather Warning and Forecast Service for Mariners at Sea.
Andrea Kaiser-Weiss, Melbourne Joint GHRSST Workshop, 6 th March 2012 Experiences with SST profiles from near-surface Argo measurements A. Kaiser-Weiss.
National Data Buoy Center Ian Sears National Data Buoy Center An Overview of Quality Control Procedures for Buoy Data.
NOAA IOOS SOS Implementations in 2008 Jeff de La Beaujardière, PhD NOAA IOOS Program DIF Sr Systems Architect.
CTD Data Processing Current BIO Procedure. Current Processing Software Matlab Migrating to R & Python Code Version Control SVN Migrating to GitHub.
Quality Assurance of Real-Time Data February 2004 C OASTAL D ATA I NFORMATION P ROGRAM C OASTAL D ATA I NFORMATION P ROGRAM present.
Estimating Rainfall in Arizona - A Brief Overview of the WSR-88D Precipitation Processing Subsystem Jonathan J. Gourley National Severe Storms Laboratory.
Double Star Active Archive - DWP/STAFF 1 Double Star Active Archive STAFF/DWP Keith Yearby and Hugo Alleyne University of Sheffield Nicole Cornilleau-Wehrlin.
Quality Control of Soil Moisture and Temperature For US Climate Reference Network Basic Methodology February 2009 William Collins USCRN.
1 Benefits of ITS During Hurricane Evacuations Hurricane Evacuation Transportation Workshop April 5, 2003.
SeaDataNet Technical Task Group meeting JRA1 Standards Development Task 1.2 Common Data Management Protocol (for dissemination to all NODCs and JRA3) Data.
Chapter Two Fundamentals of Data and Signals
Evaluation of the Cuban Wind Atlas
Challenges in Centralized Aggregated Data Quality Control
Marine Meteorology Quality Control at the Florida State University
Anne Karin Magnusson Norwegian Meteorological Institute, met.no Bergen
Calculating Wave Speed
Handbook on Meteorological Observations
Electromagnetic Spectrum
Monitoring procedures
Yunxia Zheng, Yongping Li and Runling Yu OCT,2009 in Halifax
Directional Wave Measurements: Answering the Question of Ground Truth
Presentation transcript:

National Data Buoy Center Presented to the QARTOD III Workshop November 2, 2005 Wave Data Quality Control Chung-Chu Teng

National Data Buoy Center NDBC Wave Measurement systems 96 buoys (35 directional waves) and 4 C-MAN stations

National Data Buoy Center Katrina

National Data Buoy Center Station 42003

National Data Buoy Center Station 42003

National Data Buoy Center Station 42040

National Data Buoy Center Station 42040

National Data Buoy Center Station 42007

National Data Buoy Center Station 42007

National Data Buoy Center Sensor Evaluations Individual Sensor Calibrations Payload Testing System Lab Testing Blue-tag System Testing Burn-In Data Evaluation at deployment Data Quality Control: The Last Line of Defense, after…

National Data Buoy Center FPSN7 vs m Discus moored next to FPSN7 3-m to replace FPSN7 Interesting, but limited data comparison

National Data Buoy Center FPSN7 vs Wave Height

National Data Buoy Center Performed On: –NDBC and Regional Observatory Data Consists Of: –Automated Real-Time Checks –Man-Machine Mix Outputs: –Withhold, adjust real-time data NOTICE: Users don’t see flags –Archive Data Set Data Quality Control

National Data Buoy Center Quality Control Process Flow Real-Time: –Message Integrity –Automated Hard-Flag –Automated Soft-Flag Post-Release, Pre-Archive: Data Analyst

National Data Buoy Center Quality Control of Wave Data No QC Done Onboard the Buoy Handbook of Automated Quality Control Checks and Procedures of the National Data Buoy Center Automated QC Done in Real-Time at NWSTG Hard-flags: – Stop the Release and Archive of Data unless Analyst Overrides. Override in advance – Storm Limits Remove before archive –Hierarchical: Order of Precedence, Fail One and Stop Soft-flags: Warning

National Data Buoy Center Hard-Flags by hierarchy - highest to lowest: T Transmission parity error M Missing sensor data W wave message is short, checksum or parity errors. E Calculation limits are exceeded or are in error D Delete measurement S Invalid statistical parameter V Failed time continuity. L Failed range limits. R Related measurement has failed a hard QC check.

National Data Buoy Center Time Continuity Check Dependent on time since last valid observation. Max. allowed value = 0.58*Std.dev.*SQRT(TimeDiff) Std. dev. Chosen 50% higher climatic standard dev. within a month Only Applied to Wave Height

National Data Buoy Center If data fails time continuity, it may still be released if: Wave Height: Current wind speed > 15 m/s Storm Limits: Allows Release of Failed Time Continuity with Approach of a Hurricane, or Storm of the Century

National Data Buoy Center The tie between range and time continuity checks If WVHGT fails for two consecutive hours, no measurements will be sent until analyst reviews (D-flag) Measurements should still be sent if it fails a range check, unless it failed a time continuity check the previous hour.

National Data Buoy Center Soft-flags for Waves a: Measurement is above monthly, regional limit. b: Measurement is below monthly, regional limit. c: Measurement has been adjusted, or corrected. f: Measurement failed hourly time continuity. m: High frequency spikes detected in the wave spectrum. p: Failed wave height to wave period comparison test. q: Swell direction is from an improbable direction. w: Failed wind direction verses wave direction check. x: Wind wave energy is too high for prevailing wind speed. y: Wind wave energy is too low for prevailing wind speed.

National Data Buoy Center x and y flags:

National Data Buoy Center Post-Release Analysis Wind vs Wave Energy Scatterplots Ad-hoc Comparisons with NCEP WWIII Check-Ratio at 0.1, 02., and 03. Hz

National Data Buoy Center Wind-Wave Scatterplot

National Data Buoy Center Time Series Mean Acceleration or Displacement within Limits (L-flag) and Not Outside of Max/Min (S-flag)

National Data Buoy Center NDBC QC Table

National Data Buoy Center NDBC Web Page 20 Million Hits/Month

National Data Buoy Center NDBC Stations and Data Peering into the Future… More stations –More buoys and C-MAN stations (96 and 57) –DART buoys (from 6 to 39) –TAO buoys (55 + 4) More measurements: directional waves, current (surface or profile), CT (surface or profile), and other oceanographic and climate data. Multipurpose systems and stations Data Management and Communication (DMAC) – including NDBC Data Assembly Center New technology and systems