S T. Bauschert 11.05.2001 1 IP Network Engineering Challenges Senior Consultant Network Planning and Design Siemens AG, München

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
APNOMS03 1 A Resilient Path Management for BGP/MPLS VPN Jong T. Park School of Electrical Eng. And Computer Science Kyungpook National University
Advertisements

Japan Telecom Information & Communication Labs
Traffic Engineering over MPLS
Identifying MPLS Applications
Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching: An Overview of Signaling Enhancements and Recovery Techniques IEEE Communications Magazine July 2001.
S Licentiate course on Telecommunications Technology (4+1+3 cr.) Course Topic Spring 2000: Routing Algorithms in the DiffServ MPLS Networks Introduction.
IETF Differentiated Services Concerns with Intserv: r Scalability: signaling, maintaining per-flow router state difficult with large number of flows r.
Deployment of MPLS VPN in Large ISP Networks
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 MPLS Scale to 100k endpoints with resiliency and simplicity Clarence.
Why SDN and MPLS? Saurav Das, Ali Reza Sharafat, Guru Parulkar, Nick McKeown Clean Slate CTO Summit 9 th November, 2011.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—8-1 MPLS TE Overview Understanding MPLS TE Components.
All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2006, ##### Scalability of IP/MPLS networks Lieven Levrau 30 th April, 2008 France Telecom, Cisco Systems, uawei Technologies,
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—8-1 MPLS TE Overview Introducing the TE Concept.
1 Traffic Engineering (TE). 2 Network Congestion Causes of congestion –Lack of network resources –Uneven distribution of traffic caused by current dynamic.
1 EL736 Communications Networks II: Design and Algorithms Class3: Network Design Modeling Yong Liu 09/19/2007.
1 NW’00 Paris © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc. Diff-Serv-aware Traffic Engineering and its Applications Francois Le Faucheur Cisco Systems
MPLS and Traffic Engineering CMPT Spring Liang Zhou Jiang (Jeff)
CPSC Topics in Multimedia Networking A Mechanism for Equitable Bandwidth Allocation under QoS and Budget Constraints D. Sivakumar IBM Almaden Research.
Ashish Gupta Under Guidance of Prof. B.N. Jain Department of Computer Science and Engineering Advanced Networking Laboratory.
Introduction to MPLS and Traffic Engineering Zartash Afzal Uzmi.
QoS Protocols & Architectures by Harizakis Costas.
MPLS and Traffic Engineering
1IMIC, 8/30/99 Constraint-Based Unicast and Multicast: Practical Issues Bala Rajagopalan NEC C&C Research Labs Princeton, NJ
A General approach to MPLS Path Protection using Segments Ashish Gupta Ashish Gupta.
Introduction to MPLS and Traffic Engineering
Traffic Engineering and Routing Hansen Bow. Topics Traffic Engineering with MPLS Issues Concerning Voice over IP Features of Netscope QoS Routing for.
A General approach to MPLS Path Protection using Segments Ashish Gupta Ashish Gupta.
Ashish Gupta (98130) Ashish Gupta (98131) Under guidance of Prof. B. N. Jain.
1 Network Architecture and Design Internet QoS Differentiated Services (DiffServ) Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Reference Zheng Wang, Internet QoS,
A Study of MPLS Department of Computing Science & Engineering DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY, LEICESTER, U.K. By PARMINDER SINGH KANG
SMUCSE 8344 Constraint-Based Routing in MPLS. SMUCSE 8344 Constraint Based Routing (CBR) What is CBR –Each link a collection of attributes (performance,
Draft-li-ccamp-auto-mbb-te-path-00IETF 88 CCAMP1 IGP Extensions for Automatic Computation of MPLS Traffic Engineering Path Using Traffic Engineering Layers.
Implement a QoS Algorithm for Real-Time Applications in the DiffServ-aware MPLS Network Zuo-Po Huang, *Ji-Feng Chiu, Wen-Shyang Hwang and *Ce-Kuen Shieh.
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) presented by: chitralekha tamrakar (B.S.E.) divya krit tamrakar (B.S.E.) Rashmi shrivastava(B.S.E.) prakriti.
1 Fabio Mustacchio - IPS-MOME 2005 – Warsaw, March 15th 2005 Overview of RSVP-TE Network Simulator: Design and Implementation D.Adami, C.Callegari, S.Giordano,
EQ-BGP: an efficient inter- domain QoS routing protocol Andrzej Bęben Institute of Telecommunications Warsaw University of Technology,
QoS in MPLS SMU CSE 8344.
1 Multi Protocol Label Switching Presented by: Petros Ioannou Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, UCY.
Introduction to MPLS and Traffic Engineering Zartash Afzal Uzmi.
Lecture 15. IGP and MPLS D. Moltchanov, TUT, Spring 2008 D. Moltchanov, TUT, Spring 2015.
End-to-end resource management in DiffServ Networks –DiffServ focuses on singal domain –Users want end-to-end services –No consensus at this time –Two.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.3: Selecting an Appropriate QoS Policy Model.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 3: Introduction to IP QoS.
IP/MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching
MultiProtocol Label Switching (MPLS) July 29, 2000TECON 2000 Pramoda Nallur Alcatel Internetworking Division.
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) References: Juniper white papers on MPLS and DiffServ at: white_papers/
MPLS and Traffic Engineering Ji-Hoon Yun Computer Communications and Switching Systems Lab.
Ethernet Circuit. Ethernet Circuit Concepts Circuit switching features –End to end quality of service –End to end Layer 2 security –Granular bandwidth.
Monitoring and Measurement System in EuQoS project dr Andrzej Beben Telecommunication Network Technology Group Warsaw University.
A Snapshot on MPLS Reliability Features Ping Pan March, 2002.
Graceful Label Numbering in Optical MPLS Networks Ibrahim C. Arkut Refik C. Arkut Nasir Ghani
Paris-November-2000 IP VPN service model IP VPN service Dimitrios Kalogeras.
A Practical Approach for Providing QoS: MPLS and DiffServ
1 Dynamic Service Provisioning in Converged Network Infrastructure Muckai Girish Atoga Systems.
June 4, 2003Carleton University & EIONGMPLS - 1 GMPLS Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching Vijay Mahendran Sumita Ponnuchamy Christy Gnanapragasam.
Supporting DiffServ with Per-Class Traffic Engineering in MPLS.
(Slide set by Norvald Stol/Steinar Bjørnstad
GMPLS for Ethernet A Framework for Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Ethernet draft-papadimitriou-ccamp- gmpls-ethernet-framework-00.txt.
Challenges in the Next Generation Internet Xin Yuan Department of Computer Science Florida State University
A Snapshot on MPLS Reliability Features Ping Pan March, 2002.
Internet Traffic Engineering Motivation: –The Fish problem, congested links. –Two properties of IP routing Destination based Local optimization TE: optimizing.
MULTI-PROTOCOL LABEL SWITCHING By: By: YASHWANT.V YASHWANT.V ROLL NO:20 ROLL NO:20.
Bearer Control for VoIP and VoMPLS Control Plane Francois Le Faucheur Bruce Thompson Cisco Systems, Inc. Angela Chiu AT&T March 30, 2000.
MPLS Introduction How MPLS Works ?? MPLS - The Motivation MPLS Application MPLS Advantages Conclusion.
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Routing algorithms provide support for performance goals – Distributed and dynamic React to congestion Load balance.
An evolutionary approach to G-MPLS ensuring a smooth migration of legacy networks Ben Martens Alcatel USA.
Multi-domain MPLS Deployment Enhancement
CHAPTER 8 Network Management
Kireeti Kompella Juniper Networks
Separating Routing Planes using Segment Routing draft-gulkohegde-spring-separating-routing-planes-using-sr-00 IETF 98 – Chicago, USA Shraddha Hegde
Presentation transcript:

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges Senior Consultant Network Planning and Design Siemens AG, München Dr. Thomas Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges Outline Network Architecture IP Traffic Specification IP Network Dimensioning IP Traffic Engineering and QoS Provisioning Further important Engineering Issues Special Topic: MPLS - DiffServ: Combination of Traffic Engineering and QoS Provisioning

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges Network Architecture

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges Network Architecture State-of-the-art network architecture: switched (MPLS) IP core network (highly meshed) multiple homed distribution/access routers

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges Network Architecture Future challenges: scaleable/reliable network architecture (to accommodate huge IP traffic growth): Tbit/s- routers required in near future switched (MP S) optical core network (ASON): interaction of IP and optical layer (similar to IPoATM) ATM virtual meshing via ATM PVCs router throughput < 1 Gbit/s, STM-16 I/F router throughput < 1 Tbit/s, STM-64 I/F physical meshing ASON router throughput < 1 Tbit/s n x STM-64 DWDM I/F virtual meshing via wavelenghts state-of-the-artfuture

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges IP Traffic Specification

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges IP Traffic Specification (for Network Planning Purposes) State-of-the-art: traffic model stream/elastic traffic: stream traffic parameters: offered traffic + effective bitrate elastic traffic parameters: flow arrival rate + average flow size traffic matrix generation methodology Challenges: traffic classification: how many classes are really necessary? which QoS metrics should be applied? (e.g. blocking probability for stream traffic is only reasonable in case of CAC) point-to-multipoint traffic description strong relationship to QoS mechanisms

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges IP Network Dimensioning

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges IP Network Dimensioning State-of-the-art: single link dimensioning with multirate Erlang-B (stream) and M/G/R-PS (elastic, ideal TCP behavior) model dimensioning for tree-type access networks separate dimensioning for elastic / stream traffic portions

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges IP Network Dimensioning Challenges: link dimensioning model improvements: - dimensioning formula for short flows - M/G/R-PS extension for multiple r peak - consideration of QoS mechanisms and multiple QoS levels network dimensioning algorithm (similar to the well-known unified algorithm for PSTN and ATM networks) with following features: - integrated (IGP) routing optimization - consideration of constraints imposed by TE and QoS mechanisms like MPLS, OMP, DiffServ - multiple load period dimensioning - point-to-any dimensioning (for DiffServ networks) - consideration of restoration capabilities (e.g. via MPLS) - dimensioning for multiple QoS metrics integration of dimensioning algorithm and TE system in automated planning and engineering system

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges IP Traffic Engineering and QoS Provisioning

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges IP Traffic Engineering and QoS Provisioning State-of-the-art: separate application of Traffic Engineering and QoS mechanisms (multipath routing (OMP), MPLS LSP adaption, DiffServ, IntServ) in IP networks Challenges: performance evaluation of TE / QoS mechanisms use of TE for fast load adaption and restoration development of optimum TE control algorithm (objectives/constraints of TE?) information exchange/interaction of TE mechanism and routing combination of different mechanisms: MPLS-OMP, MPLS-DS -requires protocol enhancements > new IETF drafts -driver: search for optimum tradeoff between overprovisioning and complexity - strong relationship to SLA formulation - will admission control be really neccessary? end-to-end QoS provisioning: reasonable scenarios

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges Further important Engineering Issues

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges Further important Engineering Issues Optimization tasks concerning routing protocols: IGP (OSPF, ISIS) design / optimization rules EGP (BGP-4) design / optimization rules (e.g. application and # of route reflectors, confederations etc.) traffic induced by routing protocol performance evaluation of routing protocols Optimization of Data Center (server site) locations Engineering of Data Centers

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges Special Topic: MPLS-DiffServ* *partially taken from MPLS2000 Conference material

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges MPLS-DiffServ

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges MPLS-DiffServ

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges MPLS-DiffServ

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges MPLSDiffServ (DS) DS over MPLS (or: MPLS - DS): E-LSP L-LSP TE not CoS aware! DS aware MPLS TE: TE is CoS aware OMP MPLS-OMP DS aware MPLS TE + RSVP CAC for rt- Traffic (e.g. voice) reinvention of ATM! IntServ increasing complexity! MPLS-DiffServ Overview

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges DS over MPLS: “MPLS Support of Diff-Serv” draft-ietf-mpls-diff-ext-07.txt, Aug 2000 MPLS TE: “Requirements for Traffic Engineering Over MPLS” RFC2702, Informational RFC “RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels” draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-tunnel-07.txt, Aug 2000 “Constraint-Based LSP Setup using LDP” draft-ietf-mpls-cr-ldp-04.txt, Jul 2000 “Extensions to ISIS for TE” draft-ietf-isis-traffic-03.txt, Sept 2000 “TE extensions to OSPF” draft-katz-yeung-ospf-traffic-03.txt, Oct 2000 DS aware MPLS TE: “Requirements for support of Diff-Serv-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering” draft-lefaucheur-diff-te-reqts-00.txt, Jul 2000 “Extensions to IS-IS, OSPF, RSVP and CR-LDP for support of Diff-Serv-aware MPLS TE” draft-lefaucheur-diff-te-ext-00.txt, Jul 2000 MPLS-DiffServ IETF Drafts

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges MPLS-DiffServ Example: MPLS TE

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges MPLS-DiffServ Example: DS over MPLS

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges MPLS-DiffServ Example: DS aware MPLS TE

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges MPLS-DiffServ Example: DS aware MPLS TE

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges MPLS-DiffServ Example: VoMPLS - DS aware MPLS TE with RSVP CAC

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges  “ultimate QoS” solution for VoMPLS:  QoS never degrades  automatic/dynamic traffic engineering of voice (exceeds today’s TDM TE capabilities)  excess calls get rejected if/when EF-capacity exceeded  traffic patterns do not have to be known before  This level of sophistication is only useful in some environments  Under construction at IETF MPLS-DiffServ VoMPLS: DS aware MPLS TE with RSVP CAC

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges MPLS-DiffServ

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges Additional Slides

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges MPLS-DiffServ IP VPN-Concepts: HOSE Model

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges MPLS-DiffServ IP VPN Concepts: PIPE Model

s T. Bauschert IP Network Engineering Challenges Current IGP extensions for TE: advertise “unreserved TE bandwidth” (at each preemption level) Proposed IGP extensions for DS aware TE:  Class-Types= group of Diff-Serv classes sharing the same bandwidth constraint (eg AF1x and AF2x)  advertise “unreserved TE bandwidth” (at each preemption level) for each Class-Type Current LSP-signalling extensions for TE:  at LSP establishment signal TE tunnel parameters (label, explicit route, affinity, preemption,…) Proposed LSP-signalling extensions for DS aware TE:  also signal the Class-Type  perform Class-Type aware CAC Current Constraint Based Routing for TE: compute a path such that on every link there is sufficient “unreserved TE bandwidth” Proposed Constraint Based Routing for DS aware TE: same CBR algorithm but satisfy bandwidth constraint over the “unreserved bandwidth for the relevant Class-Type” (instead of aggregate TE bandwidth) MPLS-DiffServ Necessary Enhancements for DS aware MPLS TE