Free vs. Forced ConvectionFEFLOW ® Exercise Salt intrusion from top Vertical cross section.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Steady-state heat conduction on triangulated planar domain May, 2002
Advertisements

1 A parallel software for a saltwater intrusion problem E. Canot IRISA/CNRS J. Erhel IRISA/INRIA Rennes C. de Dieuleveult IRISA/INRIA Rennes.
Multiscale Packed Bed Reactor with Extra Dimension
Free Convection: General Considerations and Results for Vertical and Horizontal Plates Chapter 9 Sections 9.1 through 9.6.2, 9.9.
Features of POLLUSOL Flow model Flow model Homogeneous, Isotropic, Heterogeneous and Anisotropic medium Homogeneous, Isotropic, Heterogeneous and Anisotropic.
By S Ziaei-Rad Mechanical Engineering Department, IUT.
Ground-Water Flow and Solute Transport for the PHAST Simulator Ken Kipp and David Parkhurst.
Aspects of Conditional Simulation and estimation of hydraulic conductivity in coastal aquifers" Luit Jan Slooten.
Problem Set 2 is based on a problem in the MT3D manual; also discussed in Z&B, p D steady state flow in a confined aquifer We want to predict.
Homework 3: Use the Fixed Grid --Volume of Fluid Method with Structured Cartesian CVFEM mesh To track Filling Front h=1 h = 0 2 r = 1 3 Hand in 1. Code.
CE An Intro Problem—will lead to first homework Fluid is contained in along square duct, see cross section below, three faces of the duct are kept.
Free Convection: Mass Transfer Chapter 9 Section 9.10.
CHE/ME 109 Heat Transfer in Electronics LECTURE 11 – ONE DIMENSIONAL NUMERICAL MODELS.
Subsurface Hydrology Unsaturated Zone Hydrology Groundwater Hydrology (Hydrogeology )
Geothermal Application 1 Summer School Heat extraction from a sloped sandstone aquifer Vertical cross section of the model domain.
Numerical study of the blade cooling effect generated by multiple jets issuing at different angles and speed into a compressible horizontal cross flow.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Density-Dependent Flows Primary source: User’s Guide to SEAWAT: A Computer Program for Simulation of Three-Dimensional Variable-Density Ground- Water Flow.
BIOPLUME II Introduction to Solution Methods and Model Mechanics.
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Approaches to Groundwater Modeling Conceptual Model.
Modelling Flow through Fractures in Porous Media Holzbecher Ekkehard Wong LiWah Litz Marie-Sophie Georg-August-University Göttingen, Geological Sciences,
Partial Differential Equations Finite Difference Approximation.
A conservative FE-discretisation of the Navier-Stokes equation JASS 2005, St. Petersburg Thomas Satzger.
Numerical Simulations of Silverpit Crater Collapse: A Comparison of TEKTON and SALES 2 Gareth Collins, Zibi Turtle, and Jay Melosh LPL, Univ. of Arizona.
Transport.chem.dat File  3 waters –Background, O 2 (solution 1) –Sewage effluent, NH 4 + and Cl - (solution 2) –Rain O 2 (solution 3)  NH 4 + oxidation.
© Cambridge University Press 2010 Brian J. Kirby, PhD Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Powerpoint.
A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas O. COCEAL and S. E. BELCHER University of Reading, UK.
Free Convection: General Considerations and Results for Vertical and Horizontal Plates 1.
Summerschool Modelling of Mass and Energy Transport.
Illustration of FE algorithm on the example of 1D problem Problem: Stress and displacement analysis of a one-dimensional bar, loaded only by its own weight,
Interactive Computational Sciences Laboratory Clarence O. E. Burg Assistant Professor of Mathematics University of Central Arkansas Science Museum of Minnesota.
Outline Numerical implementation Diagnosis of difficulties
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
FREE CONVECTION 7.1 Introduction Solar collectors Pipes Ducts Electronic packages Walls and windows 7.2 Features and Parameters of Free Convection (1)
FALL 2015 Esra Sorgüven Öner
Material Point Method Grid Equations
Types of Boundary Conditions 1.Specified head (including constant head) h = f (x,y,z,t) 2.Specified flux (including no flow)  h/  l = -q l /K l 3.Head-dependent.
The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department EENV 5326 Groundwater Modeling.
Convective Instability in quasi 2D foams Eric Janiaud, Stefan Hutzler, Denis Weaire. Trinity College, Dublin
The Finite Element Method A self-study course designed for engineering students.
Some slides on UCLA LM-MHD capabilities and Preliminary Incompressible LM Jet Simulations in Muon Collider Fields Neil Morley and Manmeet Narula Fusion.
Dynamics of a Gas Bubble in an Inclined Channel at Finite Reynolds Number Catherine Norman Michael J. Miksis Northwestern University.
Appendix A.
Transient thermal + fatigue analysis in ASONIKA. Specify a name for the project.
Ekman Spiral Boundary layer flow under horizontal homogeneous condition Assuming steady state and neglecting thermodynamic effect, Using K-theory Further.
Computational Modeling of 3D Turbulent Flows With MC2 Claude Pelletier Environment Canada MSC / MRB.
Lecture Objectives: - Numerics. Finite Volume Method - Conservation of  for the finite volume w e w e l h n s P E W xx xx xx - Finite volume.
1 Copyright by PZ Bar-Yoseph © Finite Element Methods in Engineering Winter Semester Lecture 7.
CFD Exercise 1 Laminar & turbulent flows with COMSOL.
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
Model Anything. Quantity Conserved c  advect  diffuse S ConservationConstitutiveGoverning Mass, M  q -- M Momentum fluid, Mv -- F Momentum fluid.
THERMO-STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Finite Element Method Weak form Monday, 11/4/2002.
Free vs. Forced Convection
Transient Mixed Flow Modeling Capability in SRH-2D for Culverts and Bridges Yong G. Lai.
Lecture 20 Ground Water (3) Ground water movement
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
12 - finite element method
Distributed Flow Routing
Finite Difference Method
FEM Steps (Displacement Method)
finite element method node point based strong form
The Finite Element Method
finite element method node point based strong form
The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Approaches to Groundwater Modeling Conceptual Model.
Beam Analysis with ANSYS
GLOBAL PROCESS DATA Name File: Contains the names of most input and output files and controls the parts of the model program that are active. Discretization.
Local Scale Finite Element Modelling of Stack Pollutant Emissions
CASA Day 9 May, 2006.
Presentation transcript:

Free vs. Forced ConvectionFEFLOW ® Exercise Salt intrusion from top Vertical cross section

Free vs. Forced ConvectionFEFLOW ® Exercise Spatial Discretization Automatic mesh generation (~3000 triangular elements) Mesh refinement (via Rubberbox and Border Options) FEFLOW Mesh Generation Height approx. 100 m

Free vs. Forced ConvectionFEFLOW ® Exercise Model Set-up FEFLOW Basic Settings 2D (default) Problem Class: Flow and Mass (steady flow, transient transport) Vertical problem projection Temporal and control data: Automatic time stepping, FE/BE time integration Final time: days (100 years)

Free vs. Forced ConvectionFEFLOW ® Exercise Flow Problem - Material parameters Global: Density ratio  =  Input 10 [10 -4 ] Model Set-up

Free vs. Forced ConvectionFEFLOW ® Exercise Flow Problem - Boundary Conditions Impermeable border (default) 1 st -kind boundary condition at an arbitrary node, e.g., upper left: h = 0 m Model Set-up

Free vs. Forced ConvectionFEFLOW ® Exercise Mass-Transport Problem - Boundary Conditions Implemented as 1 st -kind boundary condition in the center section of the upper border (via Border- Option) Concentration at the spill site: 100 mg/l C = 100 mg/l Model Set-up

Free vs. Forced ConvectionFEFLOW ® Exercise Numerical Solution FEFLOW Options Direct equation solver

Free vs. Forced ConvectionFEFLOW ® Exercise FEFLOW Ergebnis Free convection Numerical Solution

Free vs. Forced ConvectionFEFLOW ® Exercise Base model – Save…

Free vs. Forced ConvectionFEFLOW ® Exercise Model Extension Flow Problem - Boundary Conditions Horizontal hydraulic gradient (‘strong’) Implemented as 1 st -kind boundary condition along the left and right vertical borders (via Border-Option): left side:h = 0 m right side:h = 0.1 m

Free vs. Forced ConvectionFEFLOW ® Exercise FEFLOW Result Flow is dominated by forced horizontal convection Numerical Solution

Free vs. Forced ConvectionFEFLOW ® Exercise Reducing the boundary-condition value on the right vertical border (via Debug option): right side:h = 0.01 m Model Modification Flow Problem - Boundary Conditions Horizontal hydraulic gradient (‘weak’)

Free vs. Forced ConvectionFEFLOW ® Exercise Combined effects of free and forced convection FEFLOW Result Numerical Solution

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.