WMPG Workshop August, 2005 WHYNET: Scalable Testbed for Next-Generation Mobile Wireless Networking Technologies R. Bagrodia, E. Belding-Royer, B. Daneshrad,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wireless Testbed in Tsinghua University Fenghua Li Network Research Center of Tsinghua University AsianFI 2008.
Advertisements

Information Society Technologies programme 1 IST Programme - 8th Call Area IV.2 : Computing Communications and Networks Area.
U NIVERSITY OF M ASSACHUSETTS, A MHERST Department of Computer Science R3: Robust Replication Routing in Wireless Networks with Diverse Connectivity Characteristics.
pTunes: Runtime Parameter Adaptation for Low-power MAC Protocols
CSE 6590 Department of Computer Science & Engineering York University 1 Introduction to Wireless Ad-hoc Networking 5/4/2015 2:17 PM.
1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Summary and Further Reading Part I of 13th.
Rev A8/8/021 ABC Networks
June 3, A New Multipath Routing Protocol for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks Amit Gupta and Amit Vyas.
Multicasting in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks (MANET)
Arsitektur Jaringan Terkini
CS541 Advanced Networking 1 Wireless Mesh Networks Neil Tang 1/26/2009.
A Survey on Wireless Mesh Networks Sih-Han Chen 陳思翰 Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering National Taipei University of Technology.
1 Cross-Layer Design for Wireless Communication Networks Ness B. Shroff Center for Wireless Systems and Applications (CWSA) School of Electrical and Computer.
A Survey on Sensor Networks Rick Han CSCI 7143 Secure Sensor Networks Fall 2004.
Cross Layer Design in Wireless Networks Andrea Goldsmith Stanford University Crosslayer Design Panel ICC May 14, 2003.
Issues in ad-hoc networks Miguel Sanchez Nov-2000.
August 18-19, 2002 UCSC Baskin School of Engineering1 UCSC PERC COMPONENT: Protocols for Wireless Internetworks J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves Computer Communication.
SUMMARY COMMENTS ON SENSOR NETWORKS Ian F. Akyildiz Broadband & Wireless Networking Laboratory School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute.
Wireless Mesh Networks
Mobile Computing: Wireless Mesh and Sensor Networks Thomas Kunz Professor and Director Technology Innovation Management Program Carleton University.
1 Energy Efficient Communication in Wireless Sensor Networks Yingyue Xu 8/14/2015.
COnvergence of fixed and Mobile BrOadband access/aggregation networks Work programme topic: ICT Future Networks Type of project: Large scale integrating.
Copyright © 2006, Dr. Carlos Cordeiro and Prof. Dharma P. Agrawal, All rights reserved. 1 Carlos Cordeiro Philips Research North America Briarcliff Manor,
Distributed Real-Time Systems for the Intelligent Power Grid Prof. Vincenzo Liberatore.
Hamida SEBA - ICPS06 June 26 th -29 th Lyon France 1 ARMP: an Adaptive Routing Protocol for MANETs Hamida SEBA PRISMa Lab. – G2Ap team
Tufts Wireless Laboratory School Of Engineering Tufts University “Network QoS Management in Cyber-Physical Systems” Nicole Ng 9/16/20151 by Feng Xia, Longhua.
1 National Research Council - Pisa - Italy Marco Conti Italian National Research Council (CNR) IIT Institute MobileMAN Architecture and Protocols 2nd MobileMAN.
A Simple and Effective Cross Layer Networking System for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Wing Ho Yuen, Heung-no Lee and Timothy Andersen.
HPC use in Testing Ad Hoc Wireless Sensor Networks
Jason Ernst and Mieso Denko
IT 351 Mobile &Wireless Computing Semester 2, Dr. Hala Mokhtar Room 79- 2nd floor.
Challenged Networking An Experimental Study of New Protocols and Architectures Erik Nordström.
Cross Layer Design (CLD) for Wireless Networks. Future Wireless Systems Nth Generation Cellular Wireless Internet Access Wireless Video/Music Wireless.
Improving QoS Support in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Agenda Motivations Proposed Framework Packet-level FEC Multipath Routing Simulation Results Conclusions.
1 Heterogeneity in Multi-Hop Wireless Networks Nitin H. Vaidya University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign © 2003 Vaidya.
Gürkan RAKANOĞLU. Outline Overview of Wireless Mesh Networks Video Streaming over Wireless Networks Applications of Video over Wireless Networks.
Wireless Mesh Network 指導教授:吳和庭教授、柯開維教授 報告:江昀庭 Source reference: Akyildiz, I.F. and Xudong Wang “A survey on wireless mesh networks” IEEE Communications.
Fair Sharing of MAC under TCP in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Mario Gerla Computer Science Department University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA.
1 Mobile ad hoc networking with a view of 4G wireless: Imperatives and challenges Myungchul Kim Tel:
From “input” to “parameter”: The Topology Dichotomy in the Future Wireless Internet NSF FIND Mobility Workshop, Sep. 27, 2007 Ram Ramanathan BBN Technologies.
COST289 14th MCM Towards Cognitive Communications 13 April Towards Cognitive Communications A COST Action Proposal Mehmet Safak.
Overview of Research Activities Aylin Yener
Ch 11. Multiple Antenna Techniques for WMNs Myungchul Kim
Lan F.Akyildiz,Weilian Su, Erdal Cayirci,and Yogesh sankarasubramaniam IEEE Communications Magazine 2002 Speaker:earl A Survey on Sensor Networks.
A Survey on Wireless Mesh Networks IAN F. AKYILDIZ, GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY XUDONG WANG, KIYON, INC. IEEE Radio Communications September 2005.
S Master’s thesis seminar 8th August 2006 QUALITY OF SERVICE AWARE ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS Thesis Author: Shan Gong Supervisor:Sven-Gustav.
Architectures and Algorithms for Future Wireless Local Area Networks  1 Chapter Architectures and Algorithms for Future Wireless Local Area.
Milestones, Feedback, Action Items Power Aware Distributed Systems Kickoff August 23, 2000.
1 Mobile Computing and Wireless Networking CS 851 Seminar 2002 Fall University of Virginia.
Jungsik Yoon Networked Media Lab Department of Information and Communication Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) 2009.
Multiuser Receiver Aware Multicast in CDMA-based Multihop Wireless Ad-hoc Networks Parmesh Ramanathan Department of ECE University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Magda El Zarki Ne X tworking’03 June 23-25,2003, Chania, Crete, Greece The First COST-IST(EU)-NSF(USA) Workshop on EXCHANGES & TRENDS IN N ETWORKING 1.
Internet of Things. IoT Novel paradigm – Rapidly gaining ground in the wireless scenario Basic idea – Pervasive presence around us a variety of things.
Project Topics ECE 591. Project 1: Localization through Wi-Fi and Wireless Camera WIFI localization: Wireless Camera: Goal: Understand RF based localization.
Wireless Mesh Networks Myungchul Kim
Status & Challenges Interoperability and global integration of communication infrastructure & service platform Fixed-mobile convergence to achieve a future.
Intro Wireless vs. wire-based communication –Costs –Mobility Wireless multi hop networks Ad Hoc networking Agenda: –Technology background –Applications.
1 Architecture and Behavioral Model for Future Cognitive Heterogeneous Networks Advisor: Wei-Yeh Chen Student: Long-Chong Hung G. Chen, Y. Zhang, M. Song,
Group #3: Mobility Models and Mobile Testbeds. The Models Motion, Traffic, Network.
LA-MAC: A Load Adaptive MAC Protocol for MANETs IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference(GLOBECOM )2009. Presented by Qiang YE Smart Grid Subgroup Meeting.
Mesh Networks and DTN Break Out Group  Common research challenges  A representative experiment  Issues for a one page writeup  what incentive for the.
Session 1: Technology Development August 15 NSF Workshop.
Wireless sensor and actor networks: research challenges Ian. F. Akyildiz, Ismail H. Kasimoglu
1 Wireless Networks Lecture 31 Wireless Mesh Networks Dr. Ghalib A. Shah.
Architecture and Algorithms for an IEEE 802
A New Multipath Routing Protocol for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks
Srikanth Krishnamurthy, Guru Parulkar, Mart Molle, Vana Kalogeraki,
Course Project Topics for CSE5469
Xiuzhen Cheng Csci332 MAS Networks – Challenges and State-of-the-Art Research – Wireless Mesh Networks Xiuzhen Cheng
EEL 6935 Wireless Ad Hoc Networks
Presentation transcript:

WMPG Workshop August, 2005 WHYNET: Scalable Testbed for Next-Generation Mobile Wireless Networking Technologies R. Bagrodia, E. Belding-Royer, B. Daneshrad, M. Fitz, M. Gerla, S. Krishnamurthy, U. Mitra, P. Mohapatra, M. Molle, R. Rao, C. Shen, M. Srivastava, M. Takai Rajive Bagrodia UCLA Computer Science Department

WMPG Workshop August, 2005 Future Wireless Networks: Trends & Challenges Growing demand for mobile access, but wireless capacity limited –Departure from traditional layering approach to cross-layer design approaches (e.g., information sharing, joint design) –Exploiting wireless link flexibility by dynamic selection of transmission parameters (e.g., power, channel, modulation) Convergence and interoperability of heterogeneous systems with diverse radio technologies (e.g., 3G, 4G, WLAN, UWB) –Multi-interface/multi-mode/programmable radio devices Self-organizing wireless networks to extend coverage, reduce costs, potentially also improve performance (e.g., mesh networks; ad-hoc access networks) Embedded networked sensing and its applications Security issues

WMPG Workshop August, 2005 Implication for Networked Systems The next generation wireless communication technology being developed for this purpose will be adaptive (software-defined radios, smart antennas, programmable networks, …) There is substantial ‘cross-layer interaction’ among the technology solutions at multiple layers of the protocol stack (e.g., medium access, routing, and transport) to provision dynamic Quality of Service among the voice, video, and data traffics that must be carried by such networks There is limited experience, in the commercial or military arena, with large scale deployments and use of such on-the-move communication technology Static analysis and planning may not be adequate to achieve the dynamically varying Quality of Service requirements for the diverse applications Real-time network simulations/emulations can play a critical role in assessing the dynamic impact of net-centricity in the design and operation of such networks

WMPG Workshop August, 2005 WHYNET: Thesis Cross-layer interactions between radios, antenna, protocols and applications is key to exploiting next generation wireless technologies. A hybrid testbed that exploit advantages of physical and simulation testbeds to study such intercations and their impact on application-level performance Testbed must be accurate, efficient and scalable: –Accuracy: permit phy, radio, MAC, & networking attributes to be reflected in a common setting –Efficiency: real-time evaluation of models with tens of nodes. –Scalability: evaluation of wireless networks with thousands of devices Demonstrate the unique contributions of WHYNET for cross-layer optimization studies Generate a repository of wireless networking scenarios, measurements, models and implementations Make testbed accessible to the research community via the web

WMPG Workshop August, 2005 Potential Impact Cross layer interaction –Effective use of new radio technologies at higher layers Example: IEEE a (fastest on the market) –Highest PHY rate: 54 Mbps, above MAC: less than 30 Mbps –With RTS/CTS: less than 24 Mbps even under no contention

WMPG Workshop August, 2005 Adequate feedback from PHY is one of the key requirements to success Cross Layer Interaction Application Middleware Service Network MAC PHY Cross Layer Others (802.11b…) SDRs Smart Antenna (SISO/MIMO) UWB Transport PDA application with intermittent connectivity… Location service… Wireless aware TCP… Multi-path routing… Power conservation…

WMPG Workshop August, 2005 WHYNET Approach: Hybrid Testbed A hybrid testbed for heterogeneous, wireless networking Heterogeneity in wireless technologies: MANET, wireless LAN, 3G cellular, sensors, narrowband, wideband, UWB, … Hybrid testbed –Combines realism of physical testing with scalability, flexibility and repeatability of simulations (Zhou et al TOMACS, April 2004) –Smooth transition from design to deployment

WMPG Workshop August, 2005 WHYNET Testbed Flexible & realistic evaluation framework Smooth transition from system design to deployment Simulation Repeatability, controllability, scalability Physical Realism Emulation Real applications & network protocols

Hybrid Testbed Case Studies: Overview XCP performance in wireless networks  Collaboration between UCLA and HRL Labs Adaptive video streaming performance in ad hoc networks Using SCTP for transport layer Internet host mobility support  Collaboration between UCLA and Univ. of Delaware Bandwidth aggregation on multi-homed wireless hosts in inter-working cellular and mesh networks  Collaboration between UCLA and UCSD Evaluation of a distributed fairness algorithm (IFA) for mesh networks in presence of real and diverse set of applications

Adaptive Video Streaming Performance in Ad Hoc Networks Evaluate adaptive video streaming performance in presence of channel fading, congestion and node mobility in ad hoc networks Use QStream as a representative adaptive media application  Optimizes two quantitative measures of video quality along temporal and spatial dimensions  Relies on TCP for rate control and drops low priority data during congestion to maintain video quality and timeliness

Adaptive Video Streaming Performance in Ad Hoc Networks Hybrid testbed usage – emulated wireless hosts running QStream communicating with each other over a simulated ad hoc network Observed complete lack of correlation between perceptual and quantitative metrics, especially with node mobility

sQualnet Simulation Framework Scalable framework as extension to Qualnet Rich set of sensor network specific models  Sensing and radio channels,  MAC (S-MAC, T-MAC) and routing (diffusion, DTN, tree) protocol  Battery and power consumption models Formal release of version 1.0 Adoption by growing user base  UCLA projects: SOS Dynamic Sensor OS, Ragobot, Ad hoc Distributed Control Systems (ADCS), and Helimote Energy Harvesting Aware Sensor Nets  External academic users: UCSB, USC, University of Bristol, University of Missouri-Rolla, Iowa State, Nanjing University, City University of Hong Long…  Industry users: SDRC, Boeing, HRL Functional Model Sensor Node Hardware Model Battery Model Radio CPU ADC (Sensor) Wireless Channel Sensor Channel Network Stack Sensor Stack Application Transducer Actuator Joint work with Mani Srivastava

Hybrid sQualnet Capabilities Modeling of multitiered heterogeneous sensor networks  Field of motes (non-IP) with backbone of microservers (IP) Real-code emulation for motes  Run unmodified SOS and TinyOS code for motes in sQualnet  Makes larger set of protocols available, reduces debugging effort (in progress) Hybrid simulation: mix of simulated and real nodes  Wireless channel emulation, sensor channel emulation, actuator emulation and application emulation,

Impact of (Real) Traffic Model MANET traffic model (CBR)  AODV and DSR perform equally well Sensor Network traffic model  DSR performs 500 times better than AODV Lesson: Routing protocol performance is highly dependent on traffic model. Simulation: 1K nodes, 256B pkt, 1 pkt/sec for 15 min. To summarize: High sensitivity of predicted network performance on traffic distributions.

Testbed Challenges Scalability  Provide use-sensitive projections: 1K MANET vs 10K node sensor networks vs 1M node mixed network vs …  Study layer-specific protocols vs. cross-layer effects Application-centricity  Shift focus from protocol & device performance to impact on end- end application (middleware) performance  Impact on simultaneous support for multiple applications with diverse QoS requirements Interoperability Cost, robustness, efficiency … of dynamic switching among networks