National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Advertisements

9 November 2007 Cecilia de la Rosa Head of the Internal Quality Unit How to prepare for an external review Current trends in the European Quality Assurance.
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
1. Set expectations and measure performance ◦ What employees are expected to do for their organization in return for pay and benefits ◦ Allows employees.
IDEA What it is and How to Implement the System Texas A & M, February 2013 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Senior Educational Consultant.
Overview of key changes to Ofsted inspection of Initial Teacher Training (ITT) from September 2012.
Green Roof Action Project 綠頂行動 Our scheme is not just about physical implementation of green features on top of school buildings, it is about the knowledge.
Second Independent Evaluation Roles / Responsibilities & Relationships.
Empowering Staff Through Institute Planning (ESTIP) Executive Workshop Institute Name: XXXXXX Presenter: XXXXXX Date: XXXXXX.
Quality Assurance and Development Unit College of Applied Medical Sciences Females 1.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
The Institutional Effectiveness Plan An Excellent Way to Convey Evidence of Assessment Ellen M. Boylan, Ph.D. Marywood University NEAIR – 33 rd Annual.
Monash University Library Quality Cycle EXCELLENCE AND DIVERSITY and LEADING THE WAY Monash University’s strategic framework and overall directions MONASH.
Academic Assessment Task Force Report August 15, 2013 Lori Escallier, Co-Chair Keith Sheppard, Co-Chair Chuck Taber, Co-Chair.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
SACS Reaffirmation Project Compliance Certification Team Leaders Meeting Friday, August 27, – 11:00AM 107 Main Building Jennifer Skaggs, Ph.D. SACS.
University of Warsaw The Office for Quality of Education 11th of December th of December 2008.
Program Review In Student Affairs Office of the Vice President Division of Student Affairs Virginia Tech
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
NEASC FIVE YEAR REPORT FITCHBURG STATE COLLEGE JANUARY 2007.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
D1.HRD.CL9.06 D1.HHR.CL8.07 D2.TRD.CL8.09 Slide 1.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
July 2007 National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Role of Action Planning in The Developmental.
Northwest Accreditation. Sandra Elman Visit ( ) General Recommendations  pages maximum  3 major themes for all chapters (standards) Descriptive.
National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Action Planning Workshop January 2007.
Committee on University Effectiveness Working Group on Institutional Assessment April 8, 2011.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
University of Warsaw. The quality of education assurance and enhancement system at the University of Warsaw.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
Accreditation (AdvancED) Process School Improvement Activities February 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator of.
Let Quality Guide Quality Evaluation Recent Trends Implemented in the Middle East.
QAA COLLABORATIVE PROVISION AUDIT DRAFT REPORT. QAA CPA Process Submission by the University of Self Evaluation Document (SED) (December 2005) Selection.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
Performance-Based Accreditation
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Technical Business Consultancy Project
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
process and procedures for assessments
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Southampton City Council School School Improvement Service
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Middle States Accreditation Standards and Processes
Sam Houston State University
How did we do it? Case examples from AIC
Program Review Workshop
Periodic Review Departmental Review.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Sam Houston State University
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
WG A ECOSTAT Intercalibration guidance : Annexes III, V, VI
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews

Objectives To provide experience with self study and accreditation processes. To identify matters that will need to be considered in preparation for Accreditation reviews.

Processes will have to be followed as closely as possible. Some adjustments may be necessary because of the early stage of implementation of the quality assurance and accreditation processes.

Two Forms of Self Study and Review Institutional Total institution including overview of programs, and administrative and academic functions Programs Ten selected programs reviewed in depth Programs from a number of different colleges Most programs the same at both universities

Programs

Key Dates December 31, 2007 Self study reports and key documents sent to NCAAA January 31, 2008 Self study reports sent to external reviewers (Questions, planning, additional information requests, planning for site visits) May 1 to May Site visits by reviewers

Action following Reviews Draft reports completed. Factual accuracy checked with institutions Reports finalized Institutions invited to respond to recommendations (for real accreditation) Commission decides on accreditation Later reports from institutions on action taken

Scope of Self Studies Basis for Quality Judgments Achievement of mission and goals Performance in relation to 11 standards Self studies must report on both these elements

Standards

Evidence and Performance Indicators Judgments about quality of performance should be based on evidence. What evidence is available will vary for different circumstances. The Commission has drafted a set of KPIs which have been circulated for response. Final list will be available in September and should be included in evaluations and reports. Additional indicators can be selected by institutions and/or programs. Eg. Completion rates, employment rates, student evaluations, research output, user satisfaction surveys, etc.

Templates for Self Study Reports Include details of information about the institution/program, process for self study, goals and objectives, evaluations of performance, plans for improvement etc. Add additional material if desired and attach relevant detailed reports and information.

Administration and Organization Self studies are a major undertaking and require effective leadership and wide involvement. Coordination is essential, both within each self study, and between groups. The number of programs involved makes this particularly important.

Administration and Organization Leadership by senior administrator and quality director. Steering committee to provide support, advice, planning etc. For institutional self study—distribute detailed work across a number of sub-committees --subject to coordination and oversight by steering committee and leaders. For program self studies—Must have one main committee. Desirable to have sub committees, but what is appropriate will depend on circumstances.

Administration and Organization Timelines are critical. Procedures should be agreed to ensure appropriate processes and coordination. For each self study—individual or small group to draft final report taking sub committee reports and information into account. Notes distributed include some suggestions for sub committees.

Administration and Organization Procedures should allow for widespread involvement—Eg. Invite input from faculty, students, other stakeholders. Draft final reports should be considered by senior administrators—(Not watered down, but they should know all about it, be able to provide input, and share in working out possible actions in response.)

Using the Self Evaluation Scales Scales to assist in self evaluation. Draw attention to practices followed in good institutions. Are they done here? How well are they done? Stars used to record judgments. Provision to provide explanatory comment, overall rating for group of items, and priorities for improvement. Provision for independent rating and comment by an informed independent observer.

For Example Is this true? Y No NA  Faculty are available at sufficient scheduled times for consultation and advice to students  Adequate tutorial assistance is provided to ensure understanding and ability to apply learning  Systems are in place within each program for monitoring and coordinating student workload.  The progress of individual students is monitored and assistance and/or counselling provided to those facing difficulties.  Year to year progression rates and program completion rates are monitored, and analysed to identify any categories of students who may be having difficulty.  Progression and completion rates are evaluated by reference to appropriate benchmarks and action taken when problems are identified. 4Educational Assistance for Students Standard 4. Learning and Teaching How Well is it Done?

Dealing with Different Sections Eg. Different campuses, different sections for male and female students It is one institution, one program. Judgments must be for the institution or the program, not for parts of them. Collect information for each campus/section. Then combine them in a way that gives an overview of common strengths and weaknesses, and also details of variations and conclusions about what should be done in response.

Reporting on analyses using the self evaluation scales. The self study reports should be descriptive reports describing procedures followed, evidence found including tables and other details as required, and drawing conclusions. (Lengthy or very detailed data should be attached) Scales are NOT the report, they are a source of information. Results can be cited as appropriate but the scales themselves should be kept separate as a reference document.

Form of Reports See templates provided Main documents should be provided in English. Supplementary documents in English or Arabic (though English copies will be helpful if available For institutional self study—six hard copies of report and CD. Supplementary material also on CD if possible. For program self studies—five hard copies of report and CD. Supplementary material also on CD if possible.