GLAST LAT Project Calibration and Analysis Meeting, 28 Nov 2005 E. Grove et al. 1 Proposed Flight Trigger Configuration: Engines and Scheduler Table J.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alex Moiseev, 02/01/021 ACD VETO SIGNALS AND EFFICIENCY With the recent changes, the following ACD VETO signals will be generated: AEM VETO HIT MAP, created.
Advertisements

1 Background: Use of TKR Trigger One-Shots individual TKR strip channels “true” when analog shaped pulse is above threshold. strips in a plane are OR’d.
SVACInstrument Analysis Meeting, October 7, 2005 Anders W. Borgland 1 CAL Calibrations And High Energy Muon Gain Anders W. Borgland Science Verification,
S. Ritz 1 Hardware Trigger Throttle Issues Context: the triggers Purpose of throttle on TKR trigger Earlier design using TKR geographic information The.
SVAC/ISOCInstrument Analysis Meeting, April 14, 2006 Anders W. Borgland 1 The LAT In Every Which Way You Want It! Anders W. Borgland Science Verification,
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb28,2006 Preliminary Studies on the dependence of Arrival Time distributions in the LAT using CAL Low Energy Trigger.
GLAST LAT Project Apr 1, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/31 Overview of End to End Runs Eduardo do Couto e Silva April 1, 2005 ( not it is not a joke, we finally.
SVAC/ISOCInstrument Analysis Workshop, February 27, 2006 Anders W. Borgland 1 Overview Of LAT Data Taking Anders W. Borgland Science Verification, Analysis.
GLAST LAT Project LAT System Engineering 1 Test Definition Planning Pat Hascall SLAC System Engineering Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
S. Ritz1 Checking Out What is Checked In  Need to optimize balance of checking between users and developers. –infuse more of a culture of detailed checking.
GLAST LAT ProjectOnline Peer Review – July 21, Integration and Test A. T. Kavelaars 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I&T Integration Readiness.
GLAST LAT Project11/18/04 I&T Two Tower IRR 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Integration and Test Two Tower Integration Readiness Review Particle Test Elliott.
GLAST LAT ProjectTrigger Scheduler, Engines, and Rates 6 Feb 2006 J. Eric Grove Naval Research Lab Washington DC Trigger Scheduler, Engines, and Rates.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectCalibration and Analysis group meeting, April, 3, 2006 CAL on-orbit calibration with protons. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU.
GLAST LAT Project 1 Tracker “mini-tower” Full Size Calorimeter module Face to Face IDT meeting March 20, 2002 Convener: E. do Couto e Silva Engineering.
Hardware Failure Impacts Exercises S. Ritz. Issues Recent results from design reliability analysis (system engineering, Thurston et al.) Probabilities.
Calorimeter GLAST Software Jan 2001 Naval Research Lab Washington DC J. Eric Grove 1 Balloon Flight Integration Calorimeter Calibration Needs J.
Calorimeter GLAST Software Jan 2001 Naval Research Lab Washington DC J. Eric Grove 1 Calibration Software Needs For CAL BFEM J. Eric Grove Naval.
GLAST LAT Project July 19, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/17 Science Verification Analysis and Calibration GLAST Large Area Telescope Eduardo do Couto e Silva.
GLAST LAT Project May 25, 2006: Pre-Environmental Test Review Presentation 6 of 12 LAT Test Results 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Pre-Environmental Test.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA CD3-Critical Design Review, May 12, 2003 S. Ritz Document: LAT-PR Section 03 Science Requirements and Instrument Design.
SVAC Instrument Analysis Meeting Aug 5, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva and Anders W. Borgland 1/7 SVAC 8 tower testing+ACD Anders and Eduardo.
GLAST LAT ProjectGLAST Flight Software IDT, October 16, 2001 JJRussell1 October 16, 2001 What’s Covered Activity –Monitoring FSW defines this as activity.
Onboard Filter Update Performance after updated cuts David Wren 26 January 2004.
SVACInstrument Analysis Meeting, January 13, 2006 Anders W. Borgland 1 Data Is (Nearly) Here! Anders W. Borgland Science Verification, Analysis and Calibrations.
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb28,2006 E. do Couto e Silva 1 Final Data Taking with SLAC (Data for Instrument Analysis Workshop 7) Eduardo do.
SVACInstrument Analysis Meeting, September 23, 2005 Anders W. Borgland 1 GEM Discarded Events Anders W. Borgland Science Verification, Analysis and Calibrations.
GLAST LAT Project IA Workshop 4 July 15, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/7 Overview of Data Taking Anders W. Borgland Science Verification, Analysis and Calibrations.
GLAST LAT Project SE Test Planning meeting October 4, 2004 E. do Couto e Silva 1/13 SVAC Data Taking during LAT SLAC Oct 4, 2004 Eduardo.
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb27,2006 S. Ritz Backgrounds and Trigger Rates 1 Backgrounds and Trigger Rates on Orbit S. Ritz with many contributions.
GLAST Large Area Telescope Engineering Meeting 23 November 2004 Charge Injection Calibration James Swain Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
SVACInstrument Analysis Workshop IV Quatorze Juillet, 2005 Anders W. Borgland 1 Overview of Data Taking Anders W. Borgland Science Verification, Analysis.
ACD calibrations Pedestals Measured from online script Measure PHA w/ HV off, no charge injection Use cyclic triggers ~ ADC counts, very narrow.
GLAST LAT Project Test Planning Meeting Dec 5, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/5 Final Proposal for Phase 1 and 2 SVAC, E2E Tests (hereafter LAT 70X, 80X) Eduardo,
Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Institute for High Energy Physics Vienna Level-1 Trigger Menu Working Group CERN, 9 November 2000 Global Trigger Overview.
GLAST LAT ProjectInstrument Analysis Workshop, June 2004 J. Eric Grove Naval Research Lab Washington DC Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope CAL Detector.
GLAST Large Area Telescope Instrument Flight Software Flight Unit Design Review 16 September 2004 Diagnostics Framework James Swain Stanford Linear Accelerator.
GLAST LAT Project4 April 2005 LAT System EngineeringLAT Test Planning Meeting GLAST LAT GLAST LAT System Engineering Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
GLAST LAT Project ACD G3 Talks - 1 March, Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Large Area Telescope GASU Based Trigger Systems Jim Panetta.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, F Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS F: On-Orbit Calibration and.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectInstrument Analysis meeting, February, 27, 2006 CAL features and idiosyncrasies. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU Gamma-ray Large.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Muons at NRL 28 Feb 2006 J. Eric Grove Naval Research Lab Washington DC LAT Muon Data Taking During Environmental Test at NRL J. Eric.
GLAST LAT Project LAT System Engineering 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT System Engineering Pat Hascall SLAC System Engineering Manager
GLAST LAT Project IA Workshop 4 July 14, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/7 Introduction to the Instrument Analysis Workshop 4 Eduardo do Couto e Silva July.
GLAST LAT Project CU Beam Test Workshop 3/20/2006 C. Sgro’, L. Baldini, J. Bregeon1 Glast LAT Calibration Unit Beam Test Status Report on Online Monitor.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T Test Planning Telecon, 8 Nov 2004 CAL Test and Calibration DefinitionJ. Eric Grove GLAST LAT GLAST LAT Calorimeter Subsystem Gamma-ray.
Throttle Studies David Wren Analysis Group Meeting 22 March 2004.
New zero suppression in simulation: current status David Adams BNL November 25, 2015 DUNE 35-ton simulation, reconstruction and analysis.
GLAST LAT ProjectNovember 18, 2004 I&T Two Tower IRR 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Integration and Test Two Tower Integration Readiness Review SVAC Elliott.
GLAST LAT Project SE Test Planning Dec 7, 2004 E. do Couto e Silva 1/27 Trigger and SVAC Tests During LAT integration Su Dong, Eduardo do Couto e Silva.
Acd Veto Latching The Acd front end electronics generate a veto primitive when a discriminator goes above threshold. But. The signal is split: One path.
Background Rejection Prep Work
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope ACD Final Performance
Comparison of GAMMA-400 and Fermi-LAT telescopes
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope
Single-CAL Test and Calibration
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope
LAT Test Results GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Pre-Shipment Review
Calorimeter calibrations with Flight Software.
Overview Goal Study GEM variables in SVAC ntuple
Imaging crystals with TKR
Mini Tower Preliminary Results
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Integration and Test Organization Chart
Eduardo do Couto e Silva Feb 28, 2006
Shaped Digital Readout Noise in CAL
GLAST Large Area Telescope: I&T Test Readiness Review
Overview of Beam Test Benoit, Ronaldo and Eduardo Nov 8 , 2005 thanks to Steve and Bill for helping to consolidate all the information.
Presentation transcript:

GLAST LAT Project Calibration and Analysis Meeting, 28 Nov 2005 E. Grove et al. 1 Proposed Flight Trigger Configuration: Engines and Scheduler Table J. Eric Grove Naval Research Lab 28 November 2005

GLAST LAT Project Calibration and Analysis Meeting, 28 Nov 2005 E. Grove et al. 2 Purpose Intent: Want to run LAT at SLAC with trigger config as much like flight as possible –What is flight trigger config? How should it be implemented? –Trigger Group and SVAC Group proposal Discussion among Eduardo, Eric, Pat, Anders, Steve, JJ, Mike, Su Dong, etc. Want input from C & A group –Is this a reasonable first implementation? –What needs to be tested now or first? –What have we missed? –Please estimate some rates identified below… First, need to understand capabilities of Trigger –Defining document: LAT-TD The GLT Electronics Module, Programming ICD Specification

GLAST LAT Project Calibration and Analysis Meeting, 28 Nov 2005 E. Grove et al. 3 Trigger Logic Specified in “Trigger Engines” from combinations of “Conditions” –8 Trigger Conditions are defined 2 8 = 256 possible combinations of these Conditions Each can be allowed (or disallowed) to open a trigger window (i.e. start a coincidence) ROI Condition is different (see next page) –And be careful not to confuse the ROI Condition with the selection of ACD tiles that make up a Region of Interest (see next page) ConditionFlight settingComment ROI (ACD)Tower-local veto, ~0.3 MIPNot allowed to open wdw TKR CAL-LO100 MeV single log CAL-HI1 GeV single log CNO~20 MIPs single tileWhat is flight threshold? Periodic~1 HzGives pedestals SolicitedSpecial use ExternalNothing connected!Not allowed to open wdw

GLAST LAT Project Calibration and Analysis Meeting, 28 Nov 2005 E. Grove et al. 4 Detail: ROI Condition The ROI Trigger Condition is different –Can be used as trigger source or veto of TKR Globally applied to all Engines, all “Regions of Interest” –One or the other, not both We’ve selected TKR-veto mode –Thus TKR=False and ROI=True should never occur »Forbidden by definition of ROI Condition in GEM Regions of Interest –Groupings of ACD tiles to be used as trigger or veto of TKR Also called “tile lists” –Up to 16 Regions of Interest may be specified at any time Two candidate configs for flight –16 “Tower-local” Regions »Corresponding to tiles nearest each Tower (sorta) –1 “Global” Region »Single region: all top tiles and first 2 layers of side tiles –We’ve selected the Tower-local Regions, ok?

GLAST LAT Project Calibration and Analysis Meeting, 28 Nov 2005 E. Grove et al. 5 More Trigger Logic 16 Trigger Engines are available –For each engine Defined readout mode –Zero suppression on or off (for ACD and CAL together) –4-range or 1-range readout(for CAL) Programmable pre-scale User-defined “marker” –5-bit numerical value to use, e.g., as a label –We haven’t defined any markers, ok? Scheduler table –Points each of the 256 combinations of Conditions to a single Engine No ambiguity SVAC and Trigger Group defined Scheduler and Engines –Please review and think about next few slides

GLAST LAT Project Calibration and Analysis Meeting, 28 Nov 2005 E. Grove et al. 6 Trigger Scheduler Table Note: Events with ROI and no TKR are all mapped to the “Should never happen” engine (TKR,ROI) = (z,z) means (0,0), (1,0), and (1,1) but not (0,1) Note: On ground, same map, but always set prescale to unity No prescale!! No prescale?

GLAST LAT Project Calibration and Analysis Meeting, 28 Nov 2005 E. Grove et al. 7 Comments Pedestals: Two purposes –“Clean” pedestals (only Periodic=True) –“Unbiased” sample of typical LAT state (Periodic=True and other stuff True or False) Random sample: Preserve as much info as possible –Unsuppressed, 4-range readout –No on-board filtering or prescaling There are other options for the GCR Calibration Engine –GCR calibration Logic: Should we use CNO or throttle with CNO && TKR && CAL-LO? Readout: zero-suppressed, 4-range, with NO prescaling –We are assuming that there is no prescaling since rate < 100 Hz CNO events are intended for CAL calibrations –Sideways (ACD-TKR-ACD) “not useful”. Discard them. –Any uses for sideways CNO? –What is the rate of sideways CNO? The combination TKR=False and ROI=True should never occur –ROI is defined to be coincidence between TKR signal and tower-local veto We’ve put all of these in one engine with minimal readout

GLAST LAT Project Calibration and Analysis Meeting, 28 Nov 2005 E. Grove et al. 8 More comments Trigger efficiency studies are complicated –Be careful with prescaling Need to account for missed events Don’t want to miss a rare condition We’ve prescaled only the Deliberate Leakage of particles engine –Need some knowledge of effect of filter Leak some events to ground TKR trigger efficiency, readout efficiency –The obvious TKR efficiency test is a special case and NOT included here. CAL-LO in coincidence with ACD acting as trigger, allowed to open the window –Need to use standard data mode for any continuous efficiency study Rates –What are the rates of each of the Trigger Engines, as defined here? Is no prescaling acceptable? Can we allow FSW filter to do it all?

GLAST LAT Project Calibration and Analysis Meeting, 28 Nov 2005 E. Grove et al. 9 Appendix: Scheduler in text form Eight trigger engine definitions in order of precedence (high to low) 1.Should never happen (external triggers)(128 entries) –Logic: External condition set with anything else –Readout: zero-suppressed, 1-range, no prescale 2.JJ’s special-purpose solicited triggers(63 entries) –Logic: Solicited condition set with any of the remainder –Readout: zero-suppressed, 1-range, no prescale 3.Pedestals(31 entries) –Logic: Periodic condition set –Readout: unsuppressed, 4-range, no prescale 4.GCR calibration(15 entries) –Logic: CNO –Readout: zero-suppressed, 4-range, no prescale 5.High energy photons(7 entries) –Logic: CAL-HI –Readout: zero-suppressed, 1-range, no prescale 6.Photons, primary science data(2 entries) –Logic: TKR && notROI && (CAL-LO || notCAL-LO) –Readout: zero-suppressed, 1-range, no prescale 7.Photons that don’t convert in TKR (i.e. CAL only)(1 entry) –Logic: CAL-LO && notTKR && notROI –Readout: zero-suppressed, 1-range, no prescale 8.Deliberate leakage of protons and He(2 entries) –Logic: TKR && ROI && (CAL-LO || notCAL-LO) –Readout: zero-suppressed, 1-range, prescaled 1.More Should never happen(7 entries) –Logic: notTKR && ROI –Readout: zero-suppressed, 1-range, no prescale prescale changes for GND system tests Or should there be more Conditions?