Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation Matthieu Nesme, François Faure, Yohan Payan 2 nd Workshop on Computer Assisted.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modeling interaction with deformable objects in real-time Diego dAulignac GRAVIR/INRIA Rhone-Alpes France.
Advertisements

An Architecture for Real-Time Vertebrae Drilling Simulation.
THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD
Steady-state heat conduction on triangulated planar domain May, 2002
Corrélation d'images numériques: Stratégies de régularisation et enjeux d'identification Stéphane Roux, François Hild LMT, ENS-Cachan Atelier « Problèmes.
Closest Point Transform: The Characteristics/Scan Conversion Algorithm Sean Mauch Caltech April, 2003.
Some Ideas Behind Finite Element Analysis
CST ELEMENT Constant Strain Triangular Element
VIRTUAL ARTHROSCOPIC KNEE SURGERY TRANING SYSTEM Yang Xiaosong The Chinese University of Hong Kong Tsinghua University.
Meshless Elasticity Model and Contact Mechanics-based Verification Technique Rifat Aras 1 Yuzhong Shen 1 Michel Audette 1 Stephane Bordas 2 1 Department.
ECIV 720 A Advanced Structural Mechanics and Analysis
Notes Assignment questions… cs533d-winter-2005.
Dynamic Real-Time Deformations using Space & Time Adaptive Sampling Gilles Debunne Marie-Paule Cani Gilles Debunne Marie-Paule Cani Mathieu Desbrun Alan.
ECIV 720 A Advanced Structural Mechanics and Analysis
Overview Class #6 (Tues, Feb 4) Begin deformable models!! Background on elasticity Elastostatics: generalized 3D springs Boundary integral formulation.
Error Analysis for Material Point Method and a case study from Gas Dynamics Le-Thuy Tran and Martin Berzins Thanks to DOE for funding from
Introduction Fast and reliable methods for predicting and monitoring in-vivo bone strength are of great importance for hip joint replacement. To avoid.
Interactive Animation of Structured Deformable Objects Mathieu Desbrun Peter Schroder Alan Barr.
FEA Simulations Usually based on energy minimum or virtual work Component of interest is divided into small parts – 1D elements for beam or truss structures.
Point Based Animation of Elastic, Plastic and Melting Objects Matthias Müller Richard Keiser Markus Gross Mark Pauly Andrew Nealen Marc Alexa ETH Zürich.
Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering
Adaptive Dynamics of Articulated Bodies. Articulated bodies in Computer Graphics – Humans, hair, animals – Trees, forests, grass – Deformable bodies –
Computational Fracture Mechanics
1cs533d-winter-2005 Notes  More reading on web site Baraff & Witkin’s classic cloth paper Grinspun et al. on bending Optional: Teran et al. on FVM in.
FE Modeling Strategy Decide on details from design Find smallest dimension of interest Pick element types – 1D Beams – 2D Plate or.
MCE 561 Computational Methods in Solid Mechanics
Meshless Animation of Fracturing Solids Mark Pauly Leonidas J. Guibas Richard Keiser Markus Gross Bart Adams Philip Dutré.
Introduction to virtual engineering László Horváth Budapest Tech John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics Institute of Intelligent Engineering.
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering A one-field discontinuous Galerkin formulation of non-linear Kirchhoff-Love shells Ludovic Noels Computational.
FastLSM: Fast Lattice Shape Matching for Robust Real-Time Deformation Alec RiversDoug James Cornell University.
2004 March, 4 Page 1 Finite Element Analysis Basics – Part 2/2 Johannes Steinschaden.
Surgical Thread Simulation J. Lenoir, P. Meseure, L. Grisoni, C. Chaillou Alcove/LIFL INRIA Futurs, University of Lille 1.
SOFA : Design for Parallel Computations Jérémie Allard.
UT DALLAS Erik Jonsson School of Engineering & Computer Science FEARLESS engineering Stable Real-Time Deformations Authors: Matthias Muller, Julie Dorsey,
C M C C Centro Euro-Mediterraneo per i Cambiamenti Climatici COSMO General Meeting - September 8th, 2009 COSMO WG 2 - CDC 1 An implicit solver based on.
Haptics and Virtual Reality
GRAVIR / IMAG, Grenoble, FRANCE A joint lab of CNRS, INPG, INRIA and UJF June 12, 2003IS4TM, Juan-Les-Pins, FRANCE Real-time Simulation of Self-Collisions.
Introduction Surgical training environments as well as pre- and intra-operative planning environments require physics-based simulation systems to achieve.
Proof of concept studies for surface-based mechanical property reconstruction 1. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ 2. Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester,
The Finite Element Method A Practical Course
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods Li, Yang FerienAkademie 2008.
A.H. Gosline ( andrewg [at] cim.mcgill.ca) S.E. Salcudean (tims [at] ece.ubc.ca) J. Yan (josephy [at] ece.ubc.ca) Haptic Simulation of Linear Elastic Media.
Detail-Preserving Fluid Control N. Th ű rey R. Keiser M. Pauly U. R ű de SCA 2006.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Illustration of FE algorithm on the example of 1D problem Problem: Stress and displacement analysis of a one-dimensional bar, loaded only by its own weight,
1 Haptic Systems Mohsen Mahvash Lecture 9 20/1/06.
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
Beyond Bouncing Boxes Fast, yet still Realistic, Deformation and Fracture Jeff Lander Darwin 3D, LLC Luxoflux James O'Brien U. of California, Berkeley.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
M. Zareinejad
DEWEK 2004 Lecture by Aero Dynamik Consult GmbH, Dipl. Ing. Stefan Kleinhansl ADCoS – A Nonlinear Aeroelastic Code for the Complete Dynamic Simulation.
Head Segmentation using a finite element approach J.Piovano, T. Papadopoulo Odyssée Laboratory (ENPC, ENS, INRIA), INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis, France I. Introduction.
Haptic Deformation Modelling Through Cellular Neural Network YONGMIN ZHONG, BIJAN SHIRINZADEH, GURSEL ALICI, JULIAN SMITH.
1 Data Structures for Scientific Computing Orion Sky Lawlor /04/14.
Basic Geometric Nonlinearities Chapter Five - APPENDIX.
Adaptive resolution of 1D mechanical B-spline Julien Lenoir, Laurent Grisoni, Philippe Meseure, Christophe Chaillou.
VEHICLE DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS USING NUMERICAL METHODS VIYAT JHAVERI.
Finite Element Method Weak form Monday, 11/4/2002.
Boundary Element Method
CHAPTER 2 - EXPLICIT TRANSIENT DYNAMIC ANALYSYS
Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering
Le-Thuy Tran and Martin Berzins
Continuum Mechanics (MTH487)
CMIC Image-Guided Interventions workshop series
روش عناصر محدود غیرخطی II Nonlinear Finite Element Procedures II
FEA Simulations Boundary conditions are applied
ECIV 720 A Advanced Structural Mechanics and Analysis
Implementation of 2D stress-strain Finite Element Modeling on MATLAB
GENERAL VIEW OF KRATOS MULTIPHYSICS
Realistic multiphysics analysis
Presentation transcript:

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation Matthieu Nesme, François Faure, Yohan Payan 2 nd Workshop on Computer Assisted Diagnosis and Surgery March 2006, Santiago de Chile TIMC & GRAVIR laboratories

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 2 Motivation To model soft bodies for surgical training or per-operative simulators (EPIDAURE-INRIA)

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 3 Goal Deformable model allowing: – Interactivity speed robustness – Accuracy accurate deformations and forces  Finite Element dynamics = fast deformation propagation – Patient specific mesh

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 4 Goal Deformable model allowing: – Interactivity speed robustness – Accuracy accurate deformations and forces  Finite Element dynamics = fast deformation propagation – Patient specific mesh

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 5 Outline Previous work – Interactive deformable models – Patient specific models Contribution – Deformable Octree Mesh – Hierarchical Finite Element Results

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 6 Previous Work - Interactive deformable models Speed / Fast computation – Multiresolution [Debunne01,Wu01,Dequidt05] – FE Linear computation of large displacements [Etzmuß03,Müller04,Nesme05] [Debunne01]

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 7 Background Dynamical Propagation / Static convergence

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 8 Background How many time steps or iterations are necessary to propagate deformation to all nodes ? ? Dynamical Propagation / Static convergence

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 9 Background How many time steps or iterations are necessary to propagate deformation to all nodes ? ? Explicit solvers#steps=O(#nodes) Iterative implicit solvers #iterations=O(#nodes) Iterative static solvers Dynamical Propagation / Static convergence

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 10 Previous Work - Interactive deformable models Fast dynamical propagation / static convergence – Multigrid solver [Terzopolous88,Wu04] – Hierarchical FE [Grinspun02,Capell02]  Better compromise speed / propagation

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 11 Previous Work - Patient specific models 1. Scan data  voxels 2. Segmentation  tagged voxels 3. Surface meshing  triangles 4. Volume meshing  tetrahedra, hexahedra 5. FEM modeling  simulation

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 12 Previous Work - Patient specific models 1. Scan data  voxels 2. Segmentation  tagged voxels 3. Surface meshing  triangles 4. Volume meshing  tetrahedra, hexahedra 5. FEM modeling  simulation 4  generic volume mesh + matching [Couteau00,Clatz05] – Slow, specific cases, degenerate mesh

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 13 Previous Work - Patient specific models 1. Scan data  voxels 2. Segmentation  tagged voxels 3. Surface meshing  triangles 4. Volume meshing  tetrahedra, hexahedra 5. FEM modeling  simulation 4 & 5  Meshless method [Desbrun95,Müller04] – Not interactive

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 14 Previous Work - Patient specific models 1. Scan data  voxels 2. Segmentation  tagged voxels 3. Surface meshing  triangles 4. Volume meshing  tetrahedra, hexahedra 5. FEM modeling  simulation

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 15 Contribution Deformable Octree Mesh  3 & 4 & 5 – Does not need for volume or surface mesh  directly segmented scan – Multiresolution Hierarchical FE – Fast propagation

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 16 Octree Mesh

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 17 Octree Mesh Decompose the bounding box of the object into an octree FEM modeling on cells

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 18 Octree Mesh Decompose the bounding box of the object into an octree FEM modeling on cells Interpolate the displacement within cells

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 19 Octree Mesh Decompose the bounding box of the object into an octree FEM modeling on cells Interpolate the displacement within cells Add degrees of freedom where needed

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 20 Octree Mesh Precompute a maximal resolution

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 21 Octree Mesh Precompute a maximal resolution Multiresolution with virtual tree structures – Mechanics – Rendering – (collision mangement, …)

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 22 Octree Mesh Compute cell properties using filling ratio and material properties

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 23 Octree Mesh Compute cell properties using filling ratio and material properties

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 24 Octree Mesh Compute cell properties using filling ratio and material properties

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 25 Mechanics

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 26 Mechanics Classical Finite Element formulation Elements Interpolations functions NODAL

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 27 Hierarchical FE Bases Define functions using a hierarchical basis Goal: to give a better propagation

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 28 Hierarchical FE Bases Define functions using a hierarchical basis Goal: to give a better propagation

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 29 Hierarchical FE Bases Define functions using a hierarchical basis Goal: to give a better propagation

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 30 Hierarchical FE Bases Hierarchical positions hierarchical nodal P0P0 P1P1 P2P2 P3P3 ΔP 4 ΔP 5 ΔP 6 ΔP 7 ΔP 8

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 31 Hierarchical FE Bases Hierarchical positions hierarchicalnodal

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 32 Hierarchical FE Bases Functions influencing an element hierarchicalnodal

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 33 Hierarchical FE Bases Propagation in nodal Explicit Implicit / static step 0 iteration 0 initial deformation

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 34 Hierarchical FE Bases Propagation in nodal step 0step 1 iteration 0 iteration 1 Explicit Implicit / static initial deformation propagated deformation

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 35 Hierarchical FE Bases Propagation in nodal step 0step 1 step 2 iteration 0 iteration 1 iteration 2 Explicit Implicit / static initial deformation propagated deformation

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 36 Hierarchical FE Bases Propagation in nodal step 0step 1 step 2step 3 iteration 0 iteration 1 iteration 3iteration 2 Explicit Implicit / static initial deformation propagated deformation

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 37 Hierarchical FE Bases Propagation with hierarchical functions Explicit Implicit / static step 0 iteration 0 initial deformation

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 38 Hierarchical FE Bases Propagation with hierarchical functions step 0step 1 iteration 0 iteration 1 direct interaction Explicit Implicit / static initial deformation propagated deformation

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 39 Hierarchical FE Bases Propagation with hierarchical functions step 0step 1 iteration 0 iteration 1 direct interactioninterpolation + Explicit Implicit / static initial deformation propagated deformation interpolated deformation

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 40 An implementation Linear strain and stress tensors Linear interpolation inside cubic elements Static solver using Conjugate Gradient in hierarchical coordinates

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 41 Results - Propagation Evolution of the solution during a static solving – Pull blue node – Measure displacement of green node force Displacement

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 42 Results - Propagation Evolution of the solution during a static solving – Pull blue node – Measure displacement of green node force Displacement

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 43 Results - Propagation Evolution of the solution during a static solving – Pull blue node – Measure displacement of green node force Displacement  real-time

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 44 Results - Propagation Static solver with changing boundary conditions 10 CG iterations nodal / hierarchical

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 45 Results – Global convergence Number of CG iterations for global convergence Example 1 Example 2 force gravity Number of elements composing the beam Example 1 nodal hierarchical Example 2 nodal hierarchical (in number of CG iterations)

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 46 Conclusion & Perspective Deformable octree mesh – does not need for surfacic or volumic mesh Hierarchical FE – fast propagation Hierarchical corotational for large displacements Automatic adaptative criteria Hierarchical boundary conditions

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 47 Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation Thank you Matthieu Nesme, François Faure, Yohan Payan

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 48 An implementation Difference with classical nodal FE: – Computations of K take into account all ancestors cells Functions at the same level of the considered element Functions at an upper level from ancestors

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 49 An implementation Integration Range definition of the functions ancestor

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 50 Previous Work - Interactive deformable models Force computation (deformation, stress) Dynamics  Time integration Multiresolution models

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 51 Previous Work - Dynamics Explicit methods – Fast computation of one step – Slow propagation Implicit methods [Baraff98] – Stable – Solve a system – Longer step – Propagation / computational time

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 52 Previous Work - Force computation Precomputation [Cotin96] – Precomputed inverse matrix – Quasi-static solver – Small displacements Large displacements – Non-linear strain tensor [Debunne01,Picinbonno03] – Corotational [Etzmuß03,Müller04] Material laws [Terzopoulos88,Hauth03]

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 53 Previous Work - Adaptativity Multiresolution – Allocate ressources where they are most profitable Several meshes at several levels of detail [Debunne01] – Difficult meshes building – No mathematical proofs Precomputed progressive meshes [Wu01] – Difficult to adapt meshes during the animation Octree Mesh [Dequidt05] – Problems at join between several levels of detail Hierarchical [Grinspun02,Wu04] Better compromise speed / propagation

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 54 Hierarchical FE Bases Hierarchical positions P 0 P 1 P 2 P 3 ΔP 4 ΔP 5 ΔP 6 ΔP 7 ΔP 8 P 0 P 1 P 2 P 3 (P 0 +P 1 )/2+ΔP 4 (P 1 +P 2 )/2+ΔP 5 (P 2 +P 3 )/2+ΔP 6 (P 3 +P 0 )/2+ΔP 7 (P 0 +P 1 +P 2 +P 3 )/4+ΔP 8 hierarchical nodal P0P0 P1P1 P2P2 P3P3 ΔP 4 ΔP 5 ΔP 6 ΔP 7 ΔP 8

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 55 Hierarchical FE Bases Define functions using a hierarchical basis Goal: to give a better propagation Hierarchical functionsNodal functions

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 56 Octree Mesh Compute cell properties using filling ratio and material properties Image par image, virer surfacique, commencer par finnest->coarsest + multires et fleche

Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Finite Element Model for Soft Body Simulation 57 Results - Propagation Evolution of the solution during a static solving – Pull blue node – Measure displacement of green node force Displacement  real-time