Using BI to Maximize ROI from CRM Rebecca Wettemann Vice President, Nucleus Research

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capital Budgeting.
Advertisements

Chapter McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 9 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria.
Nucleus Research, Inc. Microsoft Dynamics GP Competitive ROI Positioning.
Hosted by Maximizing ROI from SAP Rebecca Wettemann
The ROI Factors of CRM Rebecca Wettemann Vice President, Nucleus Research
Capital Budgeting Net Present Value Rule Payback Period Rule
1 Investment Appraisal Geoff Leese Sept 1999 revised Sept 2001, Jan 2003, Jan 2006, Jan 2007, Jan 2008, Dec 2008 (special thanks to Geoff Leese)
0 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Capital Budgeting Techniques.
Chapter 14 Evaluating AIS Investments Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
Chapter 4. Economic Factors in Design The basis of design decisions will be economics. Designing a technically safe and sound system will be only part.
Building the Right Business Case Eric Frantz Solution Consultant - Value Creation, QAD QAD Explore 2012.
@davidsamoranski Analyze This - How to Calculate the Business Value of SharePoint David Samoranski Director, Western Region david.samoranski.
1 Chapter 10: The Basics of Capital Budgeting: Evaluating Cash Flows Overview and “vocabulary” Methods Payback, discounted payback NPV IRR, MIRR Profitability.
4. Project Investment Decision-Making
Vietnam Master in Management – HCMC dec 2003 Business Plan The Business Plan The Financial Plan is a part of the Business Plan How to build the Financial.
McGraw-Hill /Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. May 31 Capital Budgeting Decisions.
SYS364 Feasibility and Cost Analysis. Today’s Agenda  Feasibility and Cost Analysis Tools  Understanding Costs and Benefits  Payback Analysis  Return.
Moving from Analysis to Design
Chapter 14 Assessing the Value of IT. Traditional Financial Approaches  ROI – Return on Investments Each area is considered an investment center ROI.
Lecture 8 Net Present Value and Calculating the Best Alternative.
Nucleus Research, Inc. Assessing and Maximizing the Real Value of June 2, 2004 Ian Campbell Chief Executive Officer
P.V. VISWANATH FOR A FIRST COURSE IN FINANCE 1. 2 Decision Criteria NPV IRR The Payback Rule EVA Mutually Exclusive Projects The case of multiple IRRs.
Project Estimation Describe project scope, alternatives, feasibility.
© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria Chapter Nine.
The Analyst as a Project Manager
PROJECT EVALUATION. Introduction Evaluation  comparing a proposed project with alternatives and deciding whether to proceed with it Normally carried.
 SAP AG 2001 ROI Business Case Assemble IT And Business Personnel Define Initial Scope and Cost Parameters Review Functionality Contained in the.
Project Assessment Essentials of Corporate Finance Chapters 4, 8, 9, 12 Materials Created by Glenn Snyder – San Francisco State University.
Economic Aspects of Information Systems Updated 2015 MIS 2000 Information Systems for Management Instructor: Bob Travica.
Improving effectiveness of your tax operations 10 May 2012 CHARLOTTE RUSHTON MANAGING DIRECTOR, ASIA PACIFIC.
Capital Budgeting Chapter 11.
Chapter 5 Initiating and Planning Systems Development Projects
Project Proposals Selecting the right project. Aggregate Project Plan Minor Process change Extensive Process change Minor Process change Extensive Process.
Introduction ► This slide deck provides a suggested framework for the financial evaluation of an investment project. When evaluating any such project,
Capital expenditure decisions: an introduction
© 2006 ITT Educational Services Inc. SE350 System Analysis for Software Engineers: Unit 6 Slide 1 Chapter 5 Initiating and Planning Systems Development.
On Target Group Coaching
10-1 The Basics of Capital Budgeting Should we build this plant?
Chart Your Course to Business Success On Target Business Intensive: Session 6 May 1, 2012 Advisors On Target 1.
A Comparison of Approaches to Investment Analysis John Favaro Proc. Fourth International Conference on Software Reuse, 1996, IEEE Computer Press, p
Chapter 5 : Initiating and Planning Systems Development Projects.
BUSINESS DRIVEN TECHNOLOGY Plug-In T7 Valuing Technology.
© 2005 by Prentice Hall Chapter 5 Initiating and Planning Systems Development Projects Modern Systems Analysis and Design Fourth Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer.
Reseller Live “ Selling IP Applications Alone Will Not Guarantee Success ” C. Don Gant VP Channel Marketing/Business Development.
1 Understanding the Business Value of IS (supplement to Ch. 14) Kat Schwaig.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 8 Moving from Analysis to Design.
Presentation made by 3D High School G.B. Bodoni.  What is it? Business Plan is a planning document that describe in detail the business project and allows.
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible Web site, in whole or in part.
Chapter 8 Capital Asset Selection and Capital Budgeting.
1 Ex Libris Alma TCO/ROI April Why Use Financial Tools like ROI?
Company Name Description of Plan Todays Date. 24/01/2016 Objectives Your target = £X per annum. Average order value £X– then you need to work out how.
©2005 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 13/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton Capital Budgeting Chapter 11.
BTS730 – Systems Analysis and Project Management Cost Management.
UNIT No. 3 Capital Budgeting Nature Significance Technique of Capital Budgeting Pay back Method Accounting Rate of Return Net Present Value Profitability.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage the IT Portfolio World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
PRESENTATION ON FINANCIAL COMPONENT OF A BUSINESS PLAN BY AHMeD Hussain Khan.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage IT Budgets & Cost World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Copyright  2006 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Management Accounting: Information for managing and creating value 4e Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith.
Slide 1 Software Construction Software Construction Lecture 3.
Plan for Application Consolidation. Successful application consolidation relies on assessment of the application portfolio to determine the best candidates.
Strategic Information Initiatives Week 5 Analysis Framework.
Sagecrm.com Financial Sales Tools for Partners David Riordan Commercial Cross-Sell Manager Sage CRM.
Project Estimation Describe project scope, alternatives, feasibility.
Chapter 5 Initiating and Planning Systems Development Projects
Factors to consider System component costs Methods
WEBINAR The Total Economic Impact Of Software-As-A-Service
Chapter 5 Initiating and Planning Systems Development Projects
Chapter 5 Initiating and Planning Systems Development Projects
Avoiding the Pitfalls that can Doom the Best Sales and Marketing Strategies… Beyond the CRM Hype Greg Hatfield Senior Vice President
Presentation transcript:

Using BI to Maximize ROI from CRM Rebecca Wettemann Vice President, Nucleus Research

An ROI-focused technology research and advisory firm. We deliver ongoing advice, analysis, and modeling tools to help senior management quantify and prove the financial and business benefit their technology decisions bring to the corporation. Research centers in Boston, Paris, and London. About Nucleus Research

Agenda Identifying ROI potential How BI helps CRM Why measure Calculations Examples Assessing benefits and costs

Nucleus Research products ROI Advisory Service We provide ongoing information, insight, financial tools, and methodology to help you accurately assess the return for proposed and existing technology. Unlimited support for your IT CFO. Project Support We give you assessment support for a single technology decision. A Nucleus Research analyst helps develop the business case.

Clients

Let’s look at ROI…

What’s the ideal ROI?

CRM ROI Challenges Some users don’t use it. Users who do are challenged to enter/extract data. Managers still don’t get what they want.

The hard fact of technology If an application doesn’t generate a positive return, you shouldn’t have deployed it. Deploying too many applications with a negative ROI (that can’t be blamed on others) can get the CIO fired.

Key factors to a high ROI Breadth “How many people will the application affect?” Repeatability “How many times a day will they use it?” Cost “Is this a costly task?” Collaboration “Will employees need to collaborate?” Knowledge “Can I reuse the information I create?”

How BI delivers ROI Leverage Relatively small investment leverages returns from existing technology. Key strategy: know where the benefits lie!

How BI delivers ROI Democracy BI gives a broad population access to data in context and reduces gatekeeping. Key strategies: look at breadth and repeatability, and democratize access – not report creation.

How BI delivers ROI Visibility Users can quickly identify opportunities for cost savings or top-line opportunities. Key strategies: put your data house in order, and define processes to ensure effective adoption.

How could BI most impact your environment (think breadth and repeatability!)?

Measuring Technology

Why use financial measurements? Old Days Choice was limited and the value was obvious. SiebelOracle Interoffice mail Today You have many choices, often replacing current strategies. Decision must be based on sound business criteria.

Where to focus efforts? Can you identify the areas that deliver maximum benefit? Content management: Benefit

Cost vs. benefit Can you justify the upgrade or purchase decision? Will the company get back more than it spends? Did I get a fair price based on the benefits? Can I prove this to management? Can I prove this to the shareholders?

Prioritize projects ROIPayback Project A345%18 months Project D128%8 months Project C54%1 month Project B120%38 months Project E205%19 months

Standard ROI process for technology investments Financial Results Category Assessment - Marketing materials - Trade pubs - Competition Identify - Top areas of real benefit - Impact to company/group - Stakeholders Quantify - Measure benefit areas - Confirm values - Survey - Direct observation - Estimate - Get benefit buy-in Assess - Calculate Metrics - Reconfirm values - Perform sensitivity analysis - Assess expected case/worst case Phase 1 Phase 3 Phase 2

Where are you in the ROI process?

The Calculations

Compare financial measurements to other internal decisions and success factors - NOT to the results of other companies! Using financial measurements Document Management? Positive ROI!

Short finance class… Toolbox used to measure the value of technology: Net Present Value Payback Period Return on Investment IRR TCO

Net Present Value NPV The value today of cash received at a future date given an interest rate. Use a spreadsheet or a financial calculator $100 Year 3 15% Interest Rate

Payback Period Payback The time period needed before net savings equal initial cost. Excellent measure of risk Should be the key measurement! Savings Costs Payback Period Time

Payback and Risk Payback indicates when ROI = 0 Short payback periods drive an aggressive deployment strategy: Deploy today and – if necessary – discard tomorrow. Value Time

Return On Investment ROI The average total savings over 3 years divided by the cost. Nucleus recommends a three year horizon but use a time period consistent with your organization’s standards. (Year 1, Year 2, Year 3) / 3 Initial Cost ROI =

Internal Rate of Return IRR The interest rate that equates to the cash flows. Never use IRR! If you have to, use MIRR instead $100 $199$9 IRR = 100% Year 1Year 10 $100 $0$102K IRR = 100% Year 1Year 10

What about TCO? Total Cost of Ownership looks at costs and ignores benefits. Good for comparing two similar applications Good for budgeting Bad for choosing applications Bad for prioritizing projects

What about the others? EVA - Economic Value Add(ed) is really ROI less the cost of capital. It’s simple but eliminates an important ratio: Is an EVA=3% good or bad? TEI - Total Economic Impact is really just ROI but explicitly includes direct and indirect benefits. ROO - Return on Opportunity is TEI made fluffier. ROA - Return on Assets is only interesting if there are sunk intangible costs. cROI – False ROI inflated by vendor marketing folks.

Assessing costs and benefits

Six categories of cost 1.Software 2.Hardware 3.Personnel 4.Consulting 5.Training 6.Other one time and recurring

Measuring Benefit

Marginal ROI from BI Leverage Democracy Visibility

Reduced the number of personnel. Reduced costs to print and distribute the maintenance manual. Avoided regulatory fines. Reduced accounts receivable. Reduced the cost to publish to the Web. Reduced travel costs. Benefit examples - directly quantifiable

Benefit examples - productivity based Reduced the time needed to develop new software by 25%. The financial audit takes 1 week rather than 3 weeks. Maintenance on an aircraft takes 10% less time. Increased software quality.

Types of benefits Believability 1 st Order2 nd Order3 rd Order4 th Order Direct savings - Reduction in cost Indirect savings - Increase in worker productivity Semi-direct savings - Expected reduction in cost Very indirect savings - Increase in manager productivity

Techniques for measuring benefits Direct observation – pilot site Corporate history Surveys Case studies Benchmark data Educated guess Uneducated guess Psychic Vendor-supplied estimates Vendor ROI sales quick calculator Good Bad Always do a worst-case assessment

Benefit achievability Type of benefit 1 st Order 2 nd Order 3 rd Order 4 th Order Measurement strategy ObservationCase studiesVendor calculatorEducated guess Good CautionUnlikely Caution

Inefficient transfer of time The fact of life: time saved does not equal time worked. Use correction factors to adjust the estimate of time saved to a reasonable estimate of the value to the company. Range from 0.1 to 1 to adjust time saved to time worked.

Benefit assessment worksheet Estimate of productivity increase:5% (based on: direct survey and estimate) Value of increase for 10 $100K ea:$50,000 (use fully loaded cost) Correction factor:0.50 (Correct for inefficient transfer of time) Expected benefit to company:$25,000 How will the benefit be achieved? __ Reduction in staff or staff hours __ Increase in productivity, limiting the need for more staff __ Increase in profit to company __ Gradual attrition over next 3 years (10%, 50%, 100%) Worst-case benefit:$12,500 (In this case, assume 50% of initial estimate)

Benefit milestone Commit to achievable milestones: Target: $25,000 annual savings Year 1: Reduce hourly cost by $2,500 Year 2: Reduce hourly cost by $12,500 Year 3: Reduce hourly cost by $25,000 or staff by 1 person Assumption: No change in workload

Key Strategies for Success Match the app to the business Keep the engagement going Keep it simple Manage your cash flow

Examples...

Example “Monthly sales reports are now delivered automatically to managers!” How many steps in the old sales report production process? Time saved at each step? (survey or direct observation) Fully loaded cost per hour? (apply correction factor)

Example “Users don’t have to re-enter data for pipeline analysis and marketing!” Time saved by not updating? They may be goofing off so apply a correction factor!

Example “Sales support teams are more effective.” What was the % growth in work? What was the % growth in the department? Calculate the # employees saved times the fully loaded cost Didn’t need to hire so there is no one to goof off -- no correction factor.

Example “Providing tools and immediate access to data increased productivity!” Calculate time saved per employee Apply a correction factor! Or Calculate the impact on business profit Sold more software? Repaired more aircraft? Wrote more insurance policies?

Example “Employees make better decisions and are happier!” Great! (probably can’t count it)

Harrah’s Entertainment Used Teradata technology to develop global profiles of their customers. ROI:389%Payback: 4 months Increased profits. Avoided an increase in personnel costs. BI helps Teradata predict how, when, and how much individual customers will spend – and where.

The right corporate ROI strategy includes: Common metric for all projects.  ROI and Payback Standard correction factors for benefits. Standard ROI tool and business case presentation. Key personnel managing assessments armed with information, case studies, benchmark data.

Summary A small investment in BI can leverage returns from your existing CRM investment. Measuring ROI should be consistent and structured across your entire company. Management is key to delivering ROI from any CRM project. Gauge the breadth and repeatability before you start. Examine both expected and worst-case ROI. The shorter the payback, the lower the risk.

Resources Nucleus Research Web site: Nucleus Research knowledge center Tutorial B20 – ROI Quick Reference Guide A11 – Managing Payback and Risk A10 – Maximizing ROI A21 – The Strengths and Weaknesses of TCO A4 – Human Factors Impact Application Value