Wellcome Trust/Australia/New Zealand International Collaborative Research Grants  Up to £12 million funding for Large grants to foster collaborative research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Advertisements

Delivering as One UN Albania October 2009 – Kigali.
Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services Evaluation of the SME Funding Schemes - summary European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Strengthening Health Research Capacity of Nurses – The Need for Evidence Based Practice Dr. Shareen Swastika Ali ( BDS,PGDETT,MPH) Health Research Officer.
Imperial College London July 2010 The Wellcome Trust.
Embedding Public Engagement Sophie Duncan and Paul Manners National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
We need user-led research more now than ever before…
Page 1 Marie Curie Schemes Science is not the whole story! (How to write a successful Marie Curie RTN Proposal) Siobhan Harkin.
The University of Queensland November 2014 Professor Marian Simms Executive Director, Social, Behavioural and Economic Sciences (SBE) Funding Prospects.
Funding Collaborative Research—ARC Perspective 19 February 2015 Denise Meredyth Australian Research Council.
CEET Conference 2011 Funding VET for Social Inclusion Competitive tendering and contestable funding in VET: approaches to supporting access and equity.
Public engagement and lifelong learning: old wine in a new bottle, or a blended malt? Paul Manners Director, National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement.
Professor Ian Anderson & Ms Debra Knoche Centre for Health & Society – Onemda VicHealth Koori Health Unit University of Melbourne National Workforce Strategy.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Sue Sheridan, Acting Director, Patient.
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
LEADER -The acronym ‘LEADER' derives from the French words "Liaison Entre Actions de Développement de l'Économique Rurale“ which means, ‘Links between.
Wellcome Trust - Funding the best science
Knowledge Translation. CIHR’s mandate CIHR is Canada's major federal funding agency for health research. Its objective is to excel, according to internationally.
Grant Writing1 Grant Writing Lecture What are the major types of grants available in mental health research? What is the process of grant preparation and.
Challenge Questions How good is our strategic leadership?
Implementing the new Australian Medical Council standards: The focus on Indigenous health Professor Michael Field Chair, Medical School Accreditation Committee,
ARC Centres of Excellence for funding commencing in 2017 June 2015
Presentation of the WATER OPERATORS PARTNERSHIP AFRICA Levi Zulu WASAZA.
Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Wellcome Trust - Funding the best science
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
Developing a ‘Bench to Bedside’ Commercial Collaboration Jo Chambers.
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
Outcomes of the 16 th Regional Disaster Managers Meeting held from 9 th – 11 th August 2010 Presentation to the Pacific Humanitarian Team Monday 6 th December.
The European Network for Quality Assurance in VET Dissemination Conference Eurobanqua LdV Project Athens 15/2/2008 Giorgio Allulli Vicechairperson of ENQAVET.
The AIACC Project Assessments of Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change in Multiple Regions & Sectors UNFCCC Workshop Bonn 9 June 2003.
SSHRC Partnership and Partnership Development Grants Rosemary Ommer 1.
XXX_DECRIPT_MON00/1 Quality and impact of Social Science and Operations Research by the Special Programme in Human Reproduction Department of Reproductive.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Leonardo da Vinci Partnerships: an opportunity to work together Italian National Agency for LLP - Leonardo da Vinci Sectoral Programme.
EU Funding opportunities : Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme Justice Programme Jose Ortega European Commission DG Justice.
Partnership in ISCs and examples of good practice Sue Preece HMI February 10 th 2010.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
Australian Injury & Disability Insurance Network AIIN Health Special Interest Group & ICT Geelong November
The ERA-NET TRANSCAN-2, in continuity with the preceding ERA-NET TRANSCAN, aims at linking translational cancer research funding programmes in 15 Member.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
1 Voluntary and Community Sector Review Voluntary & Community Sector Review Grants Strategy Working Party Participative Session 28 September 2006 Appendix.
Jean Monnet Activities in Erasmus+ Programme - Information on Jean Monnet Activities - Next Call for proposals Selection results Call 2015 (EAC/A04/2014)
Changing the way the New Zealand Aid Programme monitors and evaluates its Aid Ingrid van Aalst Principal Evaluation Manager Development Strategy & Effectiveness.
Outcome On completion of this unit the student should be able to describe and evaluate programs implemented by international and Australian government.
What is Schools First? New national initiative commencing 2009 Designed to improve student outcomes via strengthening school- community partnerships Open.
Building Strong Library Associations | Sustaining Your Library Association BSLA Stakeholders Workshop Yaounde, Cameroon, April 2012 Managing Relationships.
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
The ARC — overview and opportunities (China) 16 November 2015 Presented by Mr Justin Withers Director, Policy and Integrity The Australian Research Council.
Guidelines Recommandations. Role Ideal mediator for bridging between research findings and actual clinical practice Ideal tool for professionals, managers,
HPTN Ethics Guidance for Research: Community Obligations Africa Regional Working Group Meeting, May 19-23, 2003 Lusaka, Zambia.
Commissioning Support Programme Post-16 Commissioning David Brown NASS Conference 9 th October 2009.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
Health Technology Assessment Methodology, an EUnetHTA View Basics for the Assessment in EU Countries PharmDr. Martin Visnansky, MBA, PhD., MSc. (HTA) HTA.
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
RCUK International Funding Name Job title Research Councils UK.
June 24, 2016 UNAIDS Partnerships- Strategies, structures and social relationships Sally Smith Partnership Adviser.
Social Protection Global Technical Team Retreat,
ROSEMARY BRYANT AO RESEARCH CENTRE
Eligibility and evaluation
Commissioning A short introduction
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Strategy
The future of clinical trial funding
STRATEGIC PLAN.
Presentation transcript:

Wellcome Trust/Australia/New Zealand International Collaborative Research Grants  Up to £12 million funding for Large grants to foster collaborative research between the developing countries of S & SE Asia (including the Pacific region) and Australia and/or New Zealand

Wellcome Trust/Australia/New Zealand International Collaborative Research Grants Objectives To improve health in the developing countries by  Funding research into major health issues of developing countries of S and S E Asia and the Pacific  Developing research capacity in both the developing countries of the region and in Australia and New Zealand

Wellcome Trust/Australia/New Zealand International Collaborative Research Grants  Subject area: Multi-disciplinary biomedical and clinical research projects. Projects may include studies on infectious and non- communicable diseases (laboratory and field-based), health service research, health policy research

Wellcome Trust/Australia/New Zealand International Collaborative Research Grants Awards:  Large 5 year inter-disciplinary research proposals that have clear established goals and objectives  Focus on major health issues in the developing countries, translation of research into health outcomes  Must demonstrate focus of work “centre of gravity” in the developing country  Funding may include: Project dedicated costs - equipment, salaries, training (for developing country researchers) and travel

Wellcome Trust/Australia/New Zealand International Collaborative Research Grants Assessment criteria:  Scientific excellence, feasibility and relevance  Importance and significance of health issue for the region  Impact on addressing health issues of the developing countries  Complementarity and added value of collaboration  Potential to develop/strengthen research capacity

From Application to Award Full Application Wellcome Trust Peer Review & Rebuttal Expression of Interest Assessment Committee Decision 15 October 2002 February 2003

WELLCOME TRUST AUSTRALIA/NEW ZEALAND INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH GRANTS SCHEME (ICRGS) Karlo Mila and Bruce Scoggins Health Research Council Workshop on ‘All you need to know’ June 2002

WHAT IS THE SCHEME? ICRGS is two separate schemes: Wellcome Trust – New Zealand (HRC) Wellcome Trust – Australia (NHMRC) WT, HRC and NHMRC will run a single application and selection process.

WHAT ARE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE NZ SCHEME? 1.Funding health research that leads to better outcomes for people in developing countries in the region and for people from developing countries within New Zealand (with a particular emphasis on the Pacific region). 2.To conduct research in the Pacific and New Zealand that builds greater human capacity and capability among Pacific Island researchers, both in the Pacific and within New Zealand.

WHAT IS THE FUNDING AVAILABLE FOR NZ SCHEME? 1.Projected total of up to $20M for expenditure over 5 years. 2.Funds50% NZ Government* 50% Wellcome Trust 3.Funding available 1 July *NZ Partners are HRC, Vote Health, Vote RS&T

WHAT TYPE OF RESEARCH WILL BE SUPPORTED? 1.Research which contributes to the scheme’s objectives. 2.Research will need to be of high quality as assessed by peer review. 3.Research provider will be required to meet ethical and regulatory requirements in NZ and in all host countries. 4.Collaborative arrangements must be demonstrated at time of application.

WHAT IS THE PROCESS FOR ASSESSMENT? 1.Two stage process: -Expression of Interest - Full Proposals 2.International peer review panel: - Wellcome Trust (3) - Australia (3) - New Zealand (3) + independent Chair (USA) 3.Referee reports and applicant rebuttal

WHAT ARE THE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA? 1.Quality of research proposal, feasibility, relevance and coherance. 2.Importance and significance of health issue. 3.Complementarity of the research groups. 4.Likely impact of the research on the health issue.

5.Extent to which proposal addresses methodologies for translation of research into improved health. 6.Potential to develop research capacity in NZ, Pacific and developing countries. 7.Extent of training provided. 8.Extent of involvement of health authorities in developing countries in research and implementation of outcomes. WHAT ARE THE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA? Cont’d

WHAT IS THE TIMELINE FOR THE SCHEME? 1.Expressions of Interest:15 Oct Full Proposals:28 Feb Announcement of Outcome:14 June Contracts Commence :1 July 2003

HOW WILL CONTRACTS BE MANAGED? 1.Wellcome Trust will fund overseas host institution based research. 2.Wellcome Trust may also fund research on Pacific populations in New Zealand. 3.HRC will fund New Zealand based research. 4.NHMRC would fund Australian based research. 5.Partners will finalise contractual arrangements at the time final selection is made.

WHAT IS THE ROLE OF THE HRC? 1.Contributing to management of scheme. 2.Co-ordinating a telephone network with Pacific countries. 3.Running workshops for stakeholders. 4.Responding to researcher enquiries. 5.Developing policy guidelines on conduct of research with Pacific nations.

WHAT ARE THE NEXT STEPS? 1.Provision of scheme Handbook: July Application forms available: Expression of Interest: July 2002 Full Proposal: August Advice on the scheme: Ongoing from HRC 4.HRC to seek additional $1.25M to bring pool to $20M.

Current HRC Pacific Relevance / Pacific Governance Classification

Responsiveness to Pacific Measurement Table N.A.RELEVANCEGOVERNANCE ConsultationNoneDemonstrated ConsultationOngoing consultation (infrastructure) ParticipantsNoneCohortPacific priority population ResearchersNonePacific researcherPacific led (First named investigator) Data design and AnalysisStandardPacific specific considerations Pacific models, methodologies, analysis of data Capacity building opportunities NoneTraining opportunities e.g. training Pacific interviewers Pacific Formal postgraduate qualification DisseminationNo effortAdequate dissemination to Pacific communities Outstanding culturally appropriate, targeted and effective dissemination

12 Principles of Partnership 1.Formulate objectives together 2.Develop mutual trust 3.Share information 4.Develop communication networks 5.Create transparency 6.Share responsibility 7.Monitor and evaluate the collaboration 8.Disseminate results 9.Apply results 10.Share profits equitably 11.Increase research capacity 12.Build on the achievements Swiss Commission for Research Partnership with Developing Countries, KFPE, 1998

Research Benefits analysis: Who benefits? NEW ZEALAND?  Researchers  Research Institutions  Population  Training opportunities  Govt. bodies  NGO’s  From publications  From potential commercial profit PACIFIC NATIONS?  Researchers  Research Institutions  Population  Training opportunities  Govt. bodies  NGO’s  From publications  From potential commercial profit

Aims of Effective Partnerships  Mutual trust  Shared leadership  Effective communication  Transparent processes  Utility of results for local community  Building of research capacity  Effective dissemination  Equal sharing of benefits / profits  Ongoing relationship