Consequence Management Bob Dumont Senior Staff Meteorologist Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology (OFCM) November 28, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emergency response organization (ERO)
Advertisements

© 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights Reserved. Evolutionary Strategies for the Development of a SOA-Enabled USMC Enterprise Mohamed Hussein, Ph.D.
[Exercise Name] Functional Exercise Player Briefing [Location] [Date] [Logo Here]
National Incident Management System (NIMS)  Part of Homeland Security Presidential Directive-5, February 28,  Campuses must be NIMS compliant in.
1 of 11 - OFCM Special Session - Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling Support for Homeland Security Panel 2: ATD Research Needs and Priorities.
Interagency Refinery Task Force Gina M. Solomon, M.D., M.P.H. Deputy Secretary for Science and Health California Environmental Protection Agency
Coastowne’s Challenges – Destructive Seismic Event (6 to 10 months) Threat of storm surge and earthquakes – No Mitigation Plan/No Capacity to React Our.
School Emergency Operations Plan Tabletop Exercise
Visual 3.1 Unified Command Unit 3: Unified Command.
EDS Public Information Tabletop Exercise
1 NGA Regional Bio-Terrorism Conference Boston, Massachusetts January 12-13, 2004.
Alexander Brandl ERHS 561 Emergency Response Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Federal Advisory Board DHS Challenges & Opportunities Captain Curtis Dubay, P.E. Department.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2 2 Emergency Response Assets/Teams Incident Management Assistance Teams (IMAT) Emergency Response Team-Advanced.
Urban Meteorology for Homeland Security Presented to Urban Meteorology Forum September 21, 2004 Nancy Suski Director Emergency Preparedness & Response.
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology Federal Coordinator’s Update COPC/SPOSC Meetings Samuel P. Williamson Federal Coordinator November.
EDS Tactical Communication Tabletop Exercise [Exercise Location] [Exercise Date] [Insert Logo Here]
Flood Risk Management Program Rolf Olsen Institute for Water Resources U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
The Evolving Roles and Responsibilities of Federal Agencies in Providing Transport and Dispersion Support Debbie Payton NOAA’s Ocean Service Office of.
Challenges in Urban Meteorology: A Forum for Users and Providers OFCM Panel Summaries Bob Dumont Senior Staff Meteorologist OFCM.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency International Cooperation in Nuclear Security David Ek Office of Nuclear Security.
Part of a Broader Strategy
Emergency Management Information System - EMIS
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research (OFCM) Presentation for the ITS America 2006 Annual Meeting May 9,
HOMELAND SECURITY ADVISORY SYSTEM. Established after the terrorist attacks on America September 11, 2001.
NOAA/NWS Support for Homeland Security: ATD Modeling Structure Services Cooperative Support.
October 27, 2005 Contra Costa Operational Area Homeland Security Strategic and Tactical Planning and Hazardous Materials Response Assessment Project Overview.
Contingency Planning and Emergency Preparedness Process and Practice PCWG Protection Cluster Coordination Training 2008.
EDS Incident Command System Tabletop Exercise [Exercise Location] [Exercise Date] [Insert Logo Here]
National Response Center (NRC)  The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting all.
WGA Request The Western Governors urge NOAA to: Complete a National Needs Assessment Report, by NOAA’s Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology,
Challenges in Urban Meteorology: A Forum for Users and Providers OFCM Workshop Summaries Lt Col Rob Rizza Assistant Federal Coordinator for USAF/USA Affairs.
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology OFCM Opening Remarks and WG/WIST Activities Update Paul Pisano Mike Campbell WG/WIST Cochairs June 6,
IS-804: ESF #4 – Firefighting Firefighting
IS-813: ESF #13 – Public Safety and Security
Critical Infrastructure Protection Overview Building a safer, more secure, more resilient America The National Infrastructure Protection Plan, released.
Potentially Hazardous Asteroids: Characterization, Atmospheric Entry and Risk Assessment 9 July 2015 Ames Research Center Moffett Field, California IAWN.
National Wildland Fire Weather Needs Assessment National Wildland Fire Weather Needs Assessment Mr. Mike Babcock Senior Staff Meteorologist, OFCM CCAMS.
Workshop On STRATEGY FOR PROVIDING ATMOSPHERIC INFORMATION Planning to Exploit our National Investment in Weather Technology December 3 - 5, 2001.
Assessments. Assessment in the Project Cycle DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING EVALUATION ASSESSMENT.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO Ocean Studies Board November 10, 2009.
1Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology OFCM OFCM Special Session: Challenges of Urban Test Beds Charge to the Joint Action Group for Joint.
Session 71 Federal Involvement in Risk Assessment and Management is relatively recent.
1 USCG/NRT Special Teams Workshop CDR Steve Danielczyk, CIH U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters Office of Response (G-MOR)
Homeland Security Where Are We Session 6 NRT – RRTs 2004 Co-Chairs Meeting San Diego, CA Commander Ray Perry, USCG.
James S. Ellis National Atmospheric Release Advisory Center Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Department of Energy (DOE) OFCM Special Session Atmospheric.
TOPOFF 2 (T2) July May 2003 Department of Justice, Office of Domestic Preparedness Department of State.
PLUME MODELING WALTER CHROBAK HEADQUARTERS PROGRAM MANAGER NATIONAL ATMOSPHERIC RELEASE ADVISORY CENTER (NARAC) OFFICE OF EMERGENCY OPERATIONS NATIONAL.
NOAA’s Capabilities to Support Homeland Security NOAA’s Capabilities to Support Homeland Security Donald Wernly National Weather Service November 28, 2001.
Emergency Response Worker Health & Safety Training Interagency Communications.
Opening Remarks Samuel P. Williamson Federal Coordinator Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research June 6 -
Disaster Planning Workshop Hosted By: Pleasantview Fire Protection District.
Evolving Roles and Responsibilities Homeland Security Transport and Dispersion Modeling Support Kathryn Snead, U.S. EPA.
OFCM Special Session: Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling for Homeland Security Samuel P. Williamson Federal Coordinator for Meteorology June.
Joint Concept Development and Experimentation (JCD&E)
1Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology OFCM OFCM Special Session: Uncertainty in Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion (ATD) Models Setting the.
Vision of an Integrated Global Observing System Gregory W. Withee Assistant Administrator for Satellite and Information Services National Oceanic and Atmospheric.
1 Clarus Clarus Nationwide Surface Transportation Weather Observing & Forecasting System Paul Pisano Team Leader Road Weather Management Office of Transportation.
Symposium On WEATHER INFORMATION FOR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION “Preparing for the Future: Improved Weather Information for Decision-Makers” December 4 - 6,
Interagency Geospatial Preparedness Team Overview Briefing Susan Kalweit - Chief, IGPT.
3rd National Surface Transportation Weather Symposium Session 8 : Keys to Success: Creating synergy in all components of surface transportation weather.
Copyright – Disaster Resistant Communities Group – Initial Planning Conference.
Interagency Modeling & Atmospheric Assessment Center Presented to 8 th Annual George Mason University Conference On Transport & Dispersion Modeling July.
James S. Ellis Atmospheric Science Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Department of Energy (DOE) Workshop on Effective Emergency Response.
Harris County Case Study.  Aligning plans with emergency support functions (ESFs) can facilitate an efficient and effective response to emergencies.
Business Continuity Management Business Continuity Management (BCM) is a holistic management process that identifies potential impacts that threaten an.
Summary of the Report, “Federal Research and Development Needs and Priorities for Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion Modeling” 22 September 2004 Walter.
National Response Center (NRC)
Augmentation.
Prevention, Intelligence
Presentation transcript:

Consequence Management Bob Dumont Senior Staff Meteorologist Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology (OFCM) November 28, 2001

Overview Consequence Management –Support Structure –Current Challenges –Recommendations Summary

Consequence Management Support Structure References: (Federal Response Matrices are in folders) –Federal Response Plan –Federal Radiological Emergency Response Plan –National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan Under a given scenario, LFA assignments are clearly stated; however, the concept of dispersion modeling and effects prediction varies by LFA and scenario--also support agencies get involved

Consequence Management Support Structure (2) Three-tiered Structure –Tier 1--Support to the emergency “first-responders.” Need to get useful information to the on-scene decision makers in a very short time frame –Tier 2--Bridges the gap between the first-response and steady-state support of Tier 3. May have deployed on- scene support to provide meteorological observations and tactical dispersion modeling, depending on the scenario. Both NOAA/NWS and DOD have the capability to deploy teams

Consequence Management Support Structure (3) –Tier 3--Ongoing consequence management support. The LFA tasks an operational center to provide dispersion and effects predictions, using the agency’s model of choice DOE: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory--ARAC NRC: NRC--RASCAL/NOAA/NCEP/ARL--HySplit-4 DOD: Joint Forces Command--HPAC/VLSTRACK/D2PC EPA: FEMA--CATS/HPAC/VLSTRACK/ALOHA For radiological emergencies/LNLL--ARAC FEMA: CATS/HPAC/VLSTRACK/ALOHA/ARAC NASA: ERDAS (ER Dispersion Assessment System)

Consequence Management Current Challenges All the models have limitations and weaknesses, regarding the scenarios they can support There are no standard criteria on which to evaluate and select the right dispersion model for a particular application or scenario We don’t have a clear definition of timeliness and resolution requirements, and, as a result, we simply don’t know how good the agencies’ models of choice are at meeting current or anticipated future requirements.Communications and coordination; i.e., getting an accurate and easily interpretable product we can in the hands of the decision maker in a timely and secure (if required) manner.

Consequence Management Current Challenges (2) Modeling in the urban environment and water- borne transport modeling--little has been done to date For biological attacks or water-borne chemical attacks, need to develop a forensic capability; i.e., a reverse dispersion capability to determine the point of attack

Consequence Management Recommendations Endorse the OFCM follow-on Workshop on Effective Emergency Response: Selecting a Suitable Dispersion Model for a Given Application, December 5-6, 2001 Work with the Office of Homeland Security to clearly define homeland security requirements for environmental support

Consequence Management Recommendations (2) To improve our urban modeling capability, if feasible, recommend the acceleration of the DOE/DTRA major urban field dispersion experiment by 1 year from July 2003 to July 2002 Establish program to develop new and improved NBC (nuclear/radiological, biological, and chemical) meteorological models that can be applied in real time any place in the world-- consider a “community” model approach

Consequence Management Recommendations (3) Long-term goal: Develop the strategic framework where all government agencies and other authorized users (emergency responders) can access via secure communications (if necessary) and run dispersion models to meet real-time requirements for any type of terrorist threat/attack Develop national plan for environmental support to homeland security, to include a concept of operations based on LFA scenarios

Summary Improved atmospheric and dispersion models Limited computing capacity will require agencies to share the load Acquire available high resolution observations-- get access to state and local mesonets Strengthen our communications and dissemination infrastructure, particularly with respect to secure communications

Summary (2) Develop a concept of operations that puts one accurate and easily interpretable product in the hands of the decision maker Strengthen first responders’ understanding of evolving weather services

Summary (3) The benefits of this effort : –Understanding the roles/missions of the various Federal agencies with regard to homeland security and knowing how individual agencies currently plan to respond in the event of a potential or real terrorist threat or attack –Developing a coordinated, interagency concept of operations of how agencies will respond in the future –As future requirements are identified, we’ll need to leverage individual agencies’ capabilities and resources to capitalize on available opportunities