Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Facilitators: David McDevitt, Director of Leon County Growth & Environmental Management John Kraynak,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Siskiyou County Land Development Manual 2006 Update Planning Commission Hearing Land Development Manual Update.
Advertisements

Past and Current Initiatives in Pinellas County to Coordinate Planning between the School Board and Local Governments 1996 – Interlocal Agreement and Comprehensive.
Matching Grant Program Revisions Board of Directors December 6, 2011 Laguna Skate Garden Bayer Neighborhood Park & Gardens Petaluma Marsh.
July 15, 2008 – GB Work Session Discussion of Mayor Thomas E. Swisstack’s Priority List Recommendations.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER 11, 2012 CELEBRATION POINTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS.
How We Shall Live in Volusia County? Florida Department of Community Affairs June 16, 2007 Charles Gauthier, AICP.
LID and Stormwater Technical Resource Center Update County Road Administration Board November 3,
Planning and Development Services Department Steve Dush, Director Ralph Hilliard, Planning Manager Onelia Lazzari, Principal Planner John Freeland, Building.
Platting Update Orange County BCC January 27, 2015.
Marketplace Development Trends Drive Success Facilitators: Wayne Tedder, Director of the Tallahassee-Leon County Planning Department Tony Biblo, Development.
Citizens’ Academy Planning and Development Services Department Steve Dush, Director Ralph Hilliard, Planning Manager Onelia Lazzari, Principal Planner.
Community Development Department Neoga Lakes – Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Master Planned Development (MPD) Rezoning Application.
Sharman S. Brooks Senior Planner Kristine Goddard, AICP Principal Planner
Open Space Residential Development Bylaw Town of Rehoboth.
Streamlining Development Permitting March 8, 2011.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Environmental Streamlining Taskforce Meeting July 20, 2011.
Regulatory Streamlining Implementing the Task Force Recommendations March 26, 2013 Regulatory Streamlining Implementing the Task Force Recommendations.
B-WSFWP-1 Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP) Adoption Hearing May 19, B-WSFWP-1 Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP) Adoption.
Community Development Department ISLAND WALK REZONING REQUEST APPLICATION #2648.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF PEARLAND PLANNING DAY MARCH 13, 2008.
Public Hearing Modifications to the Gated Community Ordinance Board of County Commissioners Presented by the Orange County Public Works Department February.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
First Public Hearing February 10,  Board of County Commissioners direction of April 2008 to assess efficiency of development review process and.
Second and Final Public Hearing February 24,
Planning and Community Development Department Housing Element City Council February 03, 2014.
Community Development Department DEVELOPMENT FEE STRUCTURE.
February 20, 2007 Macon County Planning Board. Structure Height Ordinance Allows construction to 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is greater Measured from.
Planning and Community Development Department Update on Improvements to the Development Review Process and Recommended Changes Related to Design Review.
Stanton Energy Center Solar Facility Presentation to the Board of County Commissioners February 22,
Eastside Activity Center Zoning Overlay District and Amended Land Development Regulations.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT FY Budget Worksession July 11, 2011.
Planning under the Growth Management Act
Horizon West Village Planned Development Code Update Adoption Public Hearing Board of County Commissioners February 11, 2014 Chapter 38, Article XIII,
Organizational Study of Inspectional Services City of Springfield, Massachusetts February 21, 2008.
Amendments to Concurrency Management Regulations.
Planning & Community Development Department Zoning Code Amendment Public Hearing Proposed elimination of the 50% review step from the design review process.
Regulatory Streamlining Task Force Update Discussion Item December 6, 2011 Board of County Commissioners.
Residential Plats Orange County Board of County Commissioners August 19, 2014.
Ordinance Amending Chapter 37 Orange County Code Utilities Department October 21,
Request to Advertise January 27,  Board of County Commissioners direction of April 2008 to assess efficiency of development review process and.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Getting Started: Summary of Bylaw and Regulatory Options for Stormwater and Low Impact Development Lexington & Wakefield 1 st Workshop - February 7, 2007.
Alachua County Plat Review Process September 9, 2008.
Siemon & Larsen Outline of New Zoning Code. Siemon & Larsen Goals Eliminating redundant and conflicting provisions An overall update Address concerns.
Community Development Department Neoga Lakes Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Amendment.
PW NVBIA Chapter Meeting February 26, 2014 Wade Hugh Development Services.
Community Development Department Ryan’s Landing Planned Unit Development Application No
CITY OF STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: 9.02Public Facilities.
Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item.
CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE & PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION: City Council April 10, 2013 Chapter 35.1 of the Hampton City Code.
CPA Congregate Living Facilities as Accessory Use to Religious Facilities Text Amendment Department of Growth Management Mehdi Benkhatar, Planner.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
Chapter 15, Amended Article X Wetland Conservation Areas Presented by the Orange County Environmental Protection Division February 5, 2008 Presented by.
OPEN SPACE/ CONSERVATION
Presented by Kelsey Lang, Planning Associate June 27, 2016
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Growth Management Amendments Land Use & Transportation
Planning & Development Services
Site Plan Control By-law
New Comprehensive Zoning By-law December 12, 2016.
Zoning Ordinance Update Study
Planning Land Development Regulations Board (PLDRB)
Updates to the Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvements Fee (TR/TIF) City Council July 24, 2017.
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
ZONING CODE UPDATE ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES
Chapter 4 Osceola County Land Development Code (LDC)
Amendments to Palm Coast Apartment Planned Unit Development Agreement
Land Development Code (LDC)
Department of Environmental Quality
Accessory Dwelling Units: Maximum Unit Size and Residential Impact Fee
Presentation transcript:

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Facilitators: David McDevitt, Director of Leon County Growth & Environmental Management John Kraynak, Environmental Compliance Director Leon County Growth & Environmental Management Facilitators: David McDevitt, Director of Leon County Growth & Environmental Management John Kraynak, Environmental Compliance Director Leon County Growth & Environmental Management

Panelists: Tony Park, Director Leon County Public Works Department Joe Brown, Director of Engineering Services Leon County Public Works Department Florida Wayne Tedder, Director Tallahassee-Leon County Planning Department Carolyn Bibler, Bibler Design Development Carmen Green, Blackhawk Engineering Tony Park, Director Leon County Public Works Department Joe Brown, Director of Engineering Services Leon County Public Works Department Florida Wayne Tedder, Director Tallahassee-Leon County Planning Department Carolyn Bibler, Bibler Design Development Carmen Green, Blackhawk Engineering

GEM Permit Process Improvement Focus Group Members AppointedAppointed By Ms. Wendy Grey Mr. David Walmsley Commissioner Rackleff Mr. Terry Fregly Mr. Russell Price Commissioner Depuy Mr. Ted Thomas Mr. Ben Wilkinson, Jr Commissioner Grippa Ms. Carolyn Bibler Nancy Caire Miller Commissioner Winchester Mr. Rick Bateman Mr. Millard Noblin Commissioner Proctor Ms. Carmen Green Ms. Pam Hall Commissioner Thaell Ms. Kathy Archibald Mr. Neil Fleckenstein Commissioner Sauls

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Enhanced Permitted Use Verifications (PUVs)  Additional Site-Specific Environmental Information Based on GIS Availability  LDC Revised to Provide for Optional PUV Enhanced Permitted Use Verifications (PUVs)  Additional Site-Specific Environmental Information Based on GIS Availability  LDC Revised to Provide for Optional PUV

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Pre-Application Meetings and Quick Checks  Revise LCD to Implement Mandatory Pre- Application Meeting for all Projects  Reinstitute “Quick Check” Review Process Pre-Application Meetings and Quick Checks  Revise LCD to Implement Mandatory Pre- Application Meeting for all Projects  Reinstitute “Quick Check” Review Process

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Concurrent and Conceptual Site Plan/EIA/EMP Review Processes  Establish in the LDC a Sequential (Site Plan/EMP) Review Process  Provide a Conceptual Site Plan Approval Process with Majority of Environmental Issues moved to EMP Concurrent and Conceptual Site Plan/EIA/EMP Review Processes  Establish in the LDC a Sequential (Site Plan/EMP) Review Process  Provide a Conceptual Site Plan Approval Process with Majority of Environmental Issues moved to EMP

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Administrative Approval for Type B and Type C Site Plans  DRC to be Provided Approval Authority for the Majority of Type C Proposals  Staff would be Provided Authority to Approve Type B Site and Development Plans Administrative Approval for Type B and Type C Site Plans  DRC to be Provided Approval Authority for the Majority of Type C Proposals  Staff would be Provided Authority to Approve Type B Site and Development Plans

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Modification of Tree Survey Requirements  Move Survey from NFI to the EIA or EMP Stage of Review  Implement Tree Sampling Methodology outside of Project Impact Area  Provide one (1) week Reduction in Project Approval Time Modification of Tree Survey Requirements  Move Survey from NFI to the EIA or EMP Stage of Review  Implement Tree Sampling Methodology outside of Project Impact Area  Provide one (1) week Reduction in Project Approval Time

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Discontinue Environmental Permitting of Residential Docks  Reduction in Permitting Time Associated with Docks  Increases Staff Review Time for Other Projects Discontinue Environmental Permitting of Residential Docks  Reduction in Permitting Time Associated with Docks  Increases Staff Review Time for Other Projects

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Reducing the Level of Silviculture Review  Clarifies when Silviculture Activity Does Not Require County Permitting  Increase Staff Review Time for Other Projects Reducing the Level of Silviculture Review  Clarifies when Silviculture Activity Does Not Require County Permitting  Increase Staff Review Time for Other Projects

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Implement Enhanced Criteria for the Quality Development Program  Provides an Alternative and Expedited Review Process  Can provide applicant with Improved Marketing and Financial Position Implement Enhanced Criteria for the Quality Development Program  Provides an Alternative and Expedited Review Process  Can provide applicant with Improved Marketing and Financial Position

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Comprehensive Review of and Revisions to the Land Use Regulations  Reformat and Revise for Clarity and Ease of Use  Amend to Implement Board’s Direction Regarding Streamlining Comprehensive Review of and Revisions to the Land Use Regulations  Reformat and Revise for Clarity and Ease of Use  Amend to Implement Board’s Direction Regarding Streamlining

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Natural Area/Conservation Area Requirements  Reduces the Need for Recorded Conservation Easements on “Non- Protected” Areas  Reduces Two (2) Weeks from Approval Time for Certain Projects Natural Area/Conservation Area Requirements  Reduces the Need for Recorded Conservation Easements on “Non- Protected” Areas  Reduces Two (2) Weeks from Approval Time for Certain Projects

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Definition of Protected Tree, Reforestation Requirements, Replanting Requirements and Tree Debit/Credit System, and Landscape Regulations  Board Citizen’s Committee Has Been Appointed  Recommendations Anticipated by Late Summer 2006 Definition of Protected Tree, Reforestation Requirements, Replanting Requirements and Tree Debit/Credit System, and Landscape Regulations  Board Citizen’s Committee Has Been Appointed  Recommendations Anticipated by Late Summer 2006

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Pre-Development Review Time Frames  Reduction in Staff Review Times for NFIs and EIAs from 15 to 10 Working Days  Board has Indicated Support for Additional Staff to Implement Pre-Development Review Time Frames  Reduction in Staff Review Times for NFIs and EIAs from 15 to 10 Working Days  Board has Indicated Support for Additional Staff to Implement

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Construction of Single Family Homes in Subdivisions with Incomplete Infrastructure  Board Approved this Provision in Bonded Public Subdivisions in February 2006  Can Reduce Time Required to Receive Final Certificate of Occupancy by Two (2) Months Construction of Single Family Homes in Subdivisions with Incomplete Infrastructure  Board Approved this Provision in Bonded Public Subdivisions in February 2006  Can Reduce Time Required to Receive Final Certificate of Occupancy by Two (2) Months

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Native Forest and/or High Quality Successional Forest Regulations  Revise Code to Provide for Additional Clarification Regarding Native and HQSF Community Types  Material Developed by Tall Timbers Research to be Utilized as a Basis Native Forest and/or High Quality Successional Forest Regulations  Revise Code to Provide for Additional Clarification Regarding Native and HQSF Community Types  Material Developed by Tall Timbers Research to be Utilized as a Basis

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Regulation of Significant and Severe Slopes  Deregulate Significant Slopes Inside USA and Enhance SWM Considerations.  Deregulate Isolated and Human Made Significant and Severe Slopes  Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Code Revisions will be required. Regulation of Significant and Severe Slopes  Deregulate Significant Slopes Inside USA and Enhance SWM Considerations.  Deregulate Isolated and Human Made Significant and Severe Slopes  Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Code Revisions will be required.

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Revising and Updating the Public Works Design Guidelines Manual  Roads, Stormwater Management Facilities in Public Subdivisions and Sidewalks  Guidelines for Infrastructure Inside and Outside the USA Revising and Updating the Public Works Design Guidelines Manual  Roads, Stormwater Management Facilities in Public Subdivisions and Sidewalks  Guidelines for Infrastructure Inside and Outside the USA

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Establish a “Project Manager Concept” within the Department  Staff with Authority to Facilitate and Coordinate Development Review Issues Across Division and Department Lines  Project Manager Would Serve as an “Ad- Hoc” Ombudsman Establish a “Project Manager Concept” within the Department  Staff with Authority to Facilitate and Coordinate Development Review Issues Across Division and Department Lines  Project Manager Would Serve as an “Ad- Hoc” Ombudsman

Time is Money The Permitting Process Streamlined Provide Adequate Staffing Levels at the Department  Board has Indicated Support for Additional Staffing in Environmental Compliance and Development Services Divisions  Fee Enhancements will be required to Off- Set Additional Staffing Provide Adequate Staffing Levels at the Department  Board has Indicated Support for Additional Staffing in Environmental Compliance and Development Services Divisions  Fee Enhancements will be required to Off- Set Additional Staffing