Material produced and owned by

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Profiting from Innovation
Advertisements

Developing and Managing a Successful Technology & Product Strategy
Henkel’s Stage-Gate Process (Portugal Division)
Localism and town and parish councils – front runners’ experiences James Kingston Decentralisation and Neighbourhoods Team Department for Communities and.
PROJECT TITLE Project Leader: Team: Executive Project Sponsor (As Required): Date: Month/Day/Year 110/17/2014 V1.
Innovation processes in enterprise and analysing enterprise’s innovation capability Miika Kajanus.
N O V E M B E R Chase Home Lending - New Product Development Process P R O D U C T D E V E L O P M E N T JU Vice President – Product Design Leader.
Intuitive Design Inc. New Product Development Progress March 25, 2006 Prepared for: Company Management Team Dave Leis.
New Product and Service Development March 2007 PB.
JJ New Product Development at PCH. Publishers Clearing House PCH was founded in 1953 PCH’s name is synonymous with sweepstakes marketing In 1985 PCH started.
Innovation Management
Page 1 Business Architecture – From Business Strategy to the Alignment of IT Rich Waller An Insurance Industry Case Study April 15, 2009.
Storyboard Presentation – Enabling Tools February 20-21, 2007 / St. Pete’s Beach, FL Sean Osborne (248) Director,
Uniqueness and Complementary Assets in e-Health Entrepreneurship HST.921 Spring 2009 February 19 Tutorial HST.921 Tutorial – February 19, 2009.
Global Procurement Solutions (GPS) Manager of Business Development Final Project, Fall semester December 16, 2000.
Innovation Leadership Training Day Four Idea Evaluation February 20, 2009 All materials © NetCentrics 2008 unless otherwise noted.
Business plans MGT 470. Feasibility Study versus Business Plan Feasibility = screening opportunities to decide the conditions under which you are willing.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
© 2002 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 9-1 principles of MARKETING Chapter 9 New Product Development and Life Cycle Strategies.
Chapter 3 Internal Analysis: Distinctive Competencies, Competitive Advantage, and Profitability.
STRATEGIES FOR NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (AGENDA ITEM 5) DECISION EXPECTED TAKE NOTE OF THE PAPER th PAPU Administrative Council 24 May – 3 June, 2015,
Designing Products and Processes with a Future. What does it take? Involve the customer Meet with the customer Listen to customer Educate the customer.
GLOBAL REGULATORY STRATEGY CONSIDERATIONS SCIENTIFIC SARAH POWELL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, REGULATORY STRATEGIES SEPTEMBER 14-17, 2008 BOSTON, MA.
The New Product and Services Development Process By SK Winning Innovations for Tomorrow (WIT)
TM -1 Technology Management & Competitive Advantage Jason C. H. Chen, Ph.D. Professor of MIS School of Business Administration Gonzaga University Spokane,
COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western are trademarks used herein under license.
Figure 4.1 NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Finance Corporate strategy and portfolio decisions Regulatory affairs Marketing and sales + market research.
New Product Development (NPD) 3 inescapable facts about NPD – It is expensive, risky and time consuming For example, Gillette spent in excess of £100 million.
Entrepreneur Opportunities and Global Success from Puerto Rico Luis David Soto 1.
1 Value Assessment of Development-Stage Assets Pharmaceutical Products, Medical Devices, and Related Intellectual Property Frank S. Castellana, M.D., Eng.Sc.D.
Dtengineering 1 of 16 The Product Development Process Introduction.
PROFIT CHAIN.
Developing and Managing a Successful Innovation Strategy.
Metrics Simple definition: Metrics are a set of measurements that quantify results. Metrics are used to establish benchmarks, make comparisons, and evaluate.
Tm&i 2010 IVa.1 the six phases of the NPD process* *reproduced from ‘Product Innovation: leading change through integrated product development’. D. Rainey.
Ch. 5: Project Planning Good Quote: Plans are only good intentions unless they immediately degenerate into hard work Lame excuses for not planning: Takes.
Chapter Eight New-Product Development and Product Life-Cycle Strategies.
New York University, Spring 2003 Developing New Product and Services Final assignment Lucia Franchi Reckitt Benckiser R&D Manager.
A conceptual and dynamic approach to innovation in tourism A conceptual and dynamic approach to innovation in tourism "SMEs’ distributed innovation model.
Key terms & New product development
Generating Growth in the Operationally Driven Company Professor Rebecca Henderson MIT Sloan School of Management Phone: (617) ,
PROJECT TITLE Project Leader: Team: Executive Project Sponsor (As Required): Date: Month/Day/Year 16/25/2015 V2.
Simple rules to follow when creating the business plan.
1 Gary Williams – Director Jeni Clark – Associate Director New Product Development May 16,2012.
FOODSERVICE JBP GUIDEBOOK
1 Managing New Product Introduction: Life Cycle Phases Team Members: Jhon Benavides Sabrina Patino Russ Watt June 5, 2009 Solar Plus.
Technology Commercialization Technology Commercialization, 2011 Sanjay Dhole, Technology Programs Coordinator Maricopa SBDC.
Commercialization Plan Product Development Business model Financial plan BUSINESS PLAN Development strategy Budgets IDEA Invention Preface Fig 1.
Stuck! Professor Rebecca Henderson & Professor Nelson Repenning
OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 1. PRODUCT CHOICE 2. PROCESS CHOICE 3. FACILITIES CHOICE 4. QUALITY CHOICE.
Chapter 3: The Internal Organization: Resources, Capabilities, Core Competencies and Competitive Advantages Diane M. Sullivan, Ph.D., 2012 Sections modified.
CYSSC - Cluster 2.0 Vision & Project Plan Medium Sensitivity Aug 29, 2011 Cluster 2.0 Project Team.
MM IDEADEVELOPMENTLAUNCH QMM IDEAResources CEOCONCEPTDEVELOPMENTLAUNCHFINIDEACONCEPTCEODEVELOPMENTLAUNCHCEOIDEACONCEPTDEVELOPMENTLAUNCHQMMIDEADEVELOPMENTCONCEPTLAUNCHQMMIDEACEOCONCEPTLAUNCHQMMIDEADEVELOPMENTLAUNCHQMMIDEAResources.
Product Design and Development Chapter 3
Fall CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l4 University of Portland School of Engineering Senior Design Lecture 4 Definition phase Design phase.
IS&T Project Reviews September 9, Project Review Overview Facilitative approach that actively engages a number of key project staff and senior IS&T.
Selecting the Right CRM System at AVEBE Refik Kocak CRM Partners (on behalf of AVEBE) CUSTOMER.
IP4INNO Module 4B: Business Planning with IP The 7Ps Assessment Tool Timing recommendation: 1.5 hours Name of speakerVenue & date.
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 4th Edition
Chapter Outline Innovation, Technological Change, and Competition
Week 6 Innovation Process
Carl Holmes Christy Lee
A Review of BSC Vocabulary
Contents A GENERIC IT BALANCED SCORECARD
Quality Management Systems – Requirements
L6 Entrepreneurship Assignment 2017 – 2018
BUSINESS CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT – ‘GETTING OFF THE GROUND’
Stage Gate Process Template
Driving Successful Projects
Alza & Ciba-Geigy: Making relationships work
Presentation transcript:

Material produced and owned by Professor Rebecca Henderson MIT Sloan School of Management Phone: (617) 253-6618, Email: Rhenderson@mit.edu, http://www.mit.edu/people/rhenders/home.html

Effective innovation strategies answer three key questions: How will we Create value? How will we Deliver value? How will we Capture value? 8

How will we create value? How will the technology evolve? How will the market change? How will we capture value? How should we design the business model? Where should we compete in the value chain? How should we compete if standards are important? How will we deliver value? How do we manage the core business and growth simultaneously? How do we use our strategy to drive real resource allocation?

Why have a strategy?

Why have a strategy? 1. To make choices

Is This Your Project Pipeline?

Overcommitment destroys productivity Average Value-Added Time on Engineering Tasks 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 Number of Projects per Engineer

The Timing and Impact of Management Attention Phases Knowledge Concept Basic Prototype Pilot Manufacturing Acquisition Investigation Design Building Production Ramp-Up High ABILITY TO INFLUENCE OUTCOME Index of Attention and Influence ACTUAL ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT PROFILE Low

Why is it so hard to kill project #26? It’s a “good” project! It meets NPV, ROI goals An important customer wants it The CEO/my boss wants it It’s Frank’s project It might be the project that saves my bacon Good managers can meet stretch goals (and I’m a good manager) Making difficult decisions takes time and eats energy

What can be done? Measure capacity, track resources Make real decisions with real data Use decision tools that allow you to view initiatives in comparison to each other and within the context of your strategic objectives

Measure capacity, track resources

Track Resources Over Time 6000 Exploratory projects Innovation projects 4500 Product Support HOURS PER MONTH Administration 3000 CAPACITY 1500 An understanding of resource utilization impacts both portfolio planning and project gate keeping. Use of funnels and matrices on their own can bring forth an optimized project portfolio. But without adequate attention to innovation capacity, the portfolio’s promise will remain unrealized. In addition to overall resource requirements for the portfolio, it is also important to factor in individual resource constraints. Studies show that the overall productivity for individuals peaks at 2 to 3 projects, and declines rapidly thereafter. For example, when key managers are shown as contributing materially to five or more projects, many of the projects are not happening and the remainder are adversely affected. 11-Sep 1-Jan 23-Apr 13-Aug 3-Dec 24-Mar 14-Jul 3-Nov

Making real decisions with real data

Technology Strategy in Practice Strategies are worthless unless they are linked to real resource allocation decisions Decide Who will make the decisions How often By what criteria

An Assignment Given to Small Groups of Managers at XYZ Co. Identify the salient characteristics of your organization’s “innovation funnel” Where do new ideas come from When are decisions made? Who is involved in these decisions? 2. Draw a diagram of the innovation funnel that captures these characteristics

The innovation funnel Phase I Phase II Phase III Launch 14 86 14

The Innovation Funnel: Defined separation between stages: Clearly defined criteria: a way to kill “living dead” projects Senior managers engaged at the right time Capture ideas from everywhere, manage ideas in an organized way so that they turn into products A continuous process: Does this fit with our strategy? A picture of the business: an overview of the shape of the pipeline Give teams the freedom they need between gates 15 87 15

An Innovation Funnel Example Gatekeeper Gatekeeper Gatekeeper Gatekeeper Idea Generation Launch & Rollout Feasibility Capability Concept refinement and prototype creation Product optimization Commercialization Production & Distribution Initial marketing and technical concepts Post Launch Review Launch Proposal Contract Tracks success of and key learnings from launched products Charter Launch Plan including CEP approval request. Cross-functional development plan including project plan as contract between team and Gatekeeper. KEY One page description of proposed project including objective, rationale and development routes. Early Commercial Assessment = GATE = DOCUMENT

Gates: are major milestones are intended to allow passage of the projects more likely to succeed by sacrificing projects more likely to fail as early as possible focus decision-making. At a gate, a decision is made to either: Continue working on the project, moving it along to the next stage in the funnel; or Stop working on the project, shelving it or canceling it; or Get additional information and reconsider the project for passage through the same gate once that information becomes available

Example: The Key Questions Answered By Each Phase Portfolio Review Phase Review 1 Phase Review 2 Phase Review 3 Phase Review 4 Idea Generation Current Product Support E N T R X I Phase 1: Concept Investigation Phase 4: Post Release Phase 2: Feasibility Phase 3: Development Does the idea fit roughly with our strategy and resource availability? If yes, then concept document approved & sub-team allocated Does the product make sense from marketing, technical & financial perspectives? If yes, then concept approved & full team allocated What is the product spec? Can we develop it within budget and schedule? Can we produce it at the required cost & volume? If yes, then prototype approved & full team allocated Has the product been fully verified and validated? Have production objectives been met? If yes, then full manufacturing approved & sub-team allocated Is the product meeting safety, efficacy and business targets in the market? If yes, then closeout approved & handoff to product support

Reasons to have a strategy: 2. To be able to change it

Initially, PDAs did not seem to be a threat to PCs: Speed, Power, Memory PCs ? PDAs Time 35

PDAs sold to customers with different needs: Speed, Power, Memory PCs PDAs Weight/cost 35

But as PDAs improve they may come to challenge PCs ? Speed, Power, Memory PCs PDAs Weight/cost 35

Or consumer preferences may change Speed, Power, Memory PCs ? PDAs Weight/cost 35

How shall we capture value? Uniqueness, Complementary Assets & the Structure of the Value Chain

The second of two key questions: How will we Create value? How will we Deliver value? How will we Capture value?

How shall we capture value? How should we design the business model? Where should we compete in the value chain? How should we compete if standards are important?

Three key ideas: Uniqueness Complementary assets Controlling the knowledge generated by an innovation Complementary assets Controlling the assets that maximize the profits from innovating Understanding the dynamics of the value chain Should we buy our suppliers? Distributors? Should we outsource our manufacturing… distribution… sales… capability? 55 39

Sources of Uniqueness Intellectual property protection Secrecy Speed Patents Finite length The right to prohibit “producing” Copyrights The right to prohibit “copying” Secrecy Trade secrets & non compete clauses “Tacit” knowledge Speed 59