NCCCP Informatics Ken Buetow, Ph.D. Leslie Derr, Ph.D. John Speakman NCI Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology June 25, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
You Can Do It! Representative Melvin Neufeld Kansas.
Advertisements

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services The PEPH Resource Center: A New, More Convenient Login.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository HathiTrust current work, challenges, and opportunities for public libraries Creating a Blueprint for a National.
The West` Washington Idaho 1 Montana Oregon California 3 4 Nevada Utah
Copyright 2014 Center to Advance Palliative Care. Reproduction by permission only. Palliative care is specialized care for people with serious illness.
The OASIS Project: Turning Surveillance Data into Action.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository HathiTrust: A Second Life for Library Collections Jeremy York Exploring Humanities Cyberinfrastructure April 30,
12 May 2015 ACR TRIAD IMAGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM NCI CQIE – Centers of Quantitative Imaging Excellence Program NCI Centers of Quantitative Imaging Excellence.
Overview of Biomedical Informatics Rakesh Nagarajan.
Coordinator Coffee Break: An introduction to UMi2b2 Cohort June 2, 2011.
University Biomedical Informatics Research Training Programs Supported by NLM Biomedical Informatics Training (BIT) Program University of California, Irvine.
BINARY CODING. Alabama Arizona California Connecticut Florida Hawaii Illinois Iowa Kentucky Maine Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri 0 Nebraska New Hampshire.
States and Cities SOL US II 2c A state is an example of a political region. States may be grouped as part of different regions, depending upon the criteria.
What are the states in the Northeast Region?
ACS CAN and the CoC: Making a Difference Saving Lives ACS CAN and the Commission on Cancer.
CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARDS CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARDS Transforming Biomedical Research To Improve the Health of Our Nation’s.
Created by Debbie Doebler 2002 The 50 United States 50 States, Capitals, Largest Cities & Regions.
Maps of the USA AlaskaHawaii. Alabama Birmingham Montgomery.
Vanderbilt University NascaBIG ® TBPT Face-to-Face Meeting December 6-7, 2011 Nashville, TN caBIG ® TBPT Face-to-Face Meeting December 6-7, 2011 Vanderbilt.
CILogon and InCommon: Technical Update Jim Basney This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository HathiTrust: Putting Research in Context HTRC UnCamp September 10, 2012 John Wilkin, Executive Director, HathiTrust.
Department of Neurology
1 The Prevention Research Centers Program: The Case for Networks Eduardo Simoes, MD, MSc, MPH Program Director Prevention Research Centers National Center.
Desirable Surveillance Network National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center Locations Regularly Performing.
Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems Resource for Researchers Tate Gould, NCES.
1 National Healthy Start Association, Inc. Prepared for Secretary Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality January 2008 Historical Overview of the Healthy.
LEGEND Public Health Schools Law Schools Medical & Other Schools Public Health Schools Teaching Public Health Law As of July 1, 2012.
Geography of America Part 1. US Population 314 Million (2012 Estimated) Top 5 Cities (2010 Census, within city limits) Growth Since 2000 New York8,175,133.
Map Review. California Kentucky Alabama.
1. AFL-CIO What percentage of the funds received by Alabama K-12 public schools in school year was provided by the state of Alabama? a)44% b)53%
Research: Intramural and Extramural Jacquelyn Goldberg, JD CIRB Review Board Administrator Clinical Investigations Branch, CTEP Division of Cancer Treatment.
Current Events Vocabulary American Sign Language II.
UPDATED KUALI STATISTICS. KUALI FOUNDATION MEMBERS – INSTITUTIONAL Australian National University Boston College Boston University Brock University Brown.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository HathiTrust and TRAC DigitalPreservation 2012 July 25, 2012 Jeremy York, Project Librarian, HathiTrust.
Directions: Label Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia--- then color.
The 5 Region of the United States
Mississippi The capital of Mississippi is Jackson.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository HathiTrust and the Future of Research Libraries American Antiquarian Society March 31, 2012 Jeremy York, Project.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository Institution Uses of HathiTrust Jeremy York University of Maine May 24, 2013.
Study Cards The East (12) Study Cards The East (12) New Hampshire New York Massachusetts Delaware Connecticut New Jersey Rhode Island Rhode Island Maryland.
Staffed Location Future Satellite Location Satellite Location.
US MAP TEST Practice
UPDATED KUALI STATISTICS. KUALI FOUNDATION MEMBERS – INSTITUTIONAL (60) Australian National University Boston College Boston University Brock University.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository HathiTrust Large Digital Libraries: Beyond Google Books Modern Language Association January 5, 2012 Jeremy York,
Education Level. STD RATE Teen Pregnancy Rates Pre-teen Pregnancy Rate.
Sponsored by the National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education as a component of the National Cooperative Education Statistics.
World History Teaching Objective Students will take a quiz over the States and Capitols. HHhH.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Robert N. Anderson, Ph.D. Mortality Statistics Branch Division of Vital.
Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning: Advancing the teaching of STEM disciplines in higher education.
HathiTrust: A valuable and visionary Partnership.
C3PR: An Introduction for Users A Tool Demonstration from caBIG™ Vijaya Chadaram Duke Cancer Center April 29, 2008.
The student will use maps locating the 50 states and the cities most significant to the historical development of the United States Cities serve as centers.
IRBchoice Connections Call: June 10, 2016
Semantic Web - caBIG Abstract: 21st century biomedical research is driven by massive amounts of data: automated technologies generate hundreds of.
2c: States grouped by region
Faculty Salary Study Comparison to AAU Data Exchange Institutions
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
Physicians per 1,000 Persons
Table 3.1: Trends in Inpatient Utilization in Community Hospitals, 1992 – 2012
Table 3.1: Trends in Inpatient Utilization in Community Hospitals, 1987 – 2007
The States How many states are in the United States?
Update May 5, 2008.
Supplementary Data Tables, Trends in Overall Health Care Market
APHL Informatics Messaging Services (AIMS)
Table 2.3: Beds per 1,000 Persons by State, 2013 and 2014
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
CBD Topical Sales Restrictions by State (as of May 23, 2019)
Percent of adults aged 18 years and older who have obesity †
From Innovation to Commercialization Access to Data
Presentation transcript:

NCCCP Informatics Ken Buetow, Ph.D. Leslie Derr, Ph.D. John Speakman NCI Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology June 25, 2007

caBIG™ Mission Mission: A virtual web of interconnected data, individuals, and organizations redefines how research is conducted, care is provided, and patients/participants interact with the biomedical research enterprise Next generation World Wide Web of biomedical research

caBIG™ Framework – Connect the cancer research community through a shareable, interoperable infrastructure – Deploy and Extend standard rules and a common language to more easily share information – Build or adapt tools for collecting, analyzing, integrating and disseminating information associated with cancer research and care

caBIG™ Connects the Cancer Community: Researchers, Clinicians, Patients Alabama Birmingham: UAB Comprehensive Cancer Center Arizona Phoenix: Translational Genomics Research Institute Tucson: University of Arizona California Berkeley: University of California Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of California at Berkeley Los Angeles: AECOM California Institute of Technology University of Southern California Information Sciences Institute University of California at Irvine The Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center La Jolla: The Burnham Institute Sacramento: University of California Davis Cancer Center San Diego: SAIC San Francisco: University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center Colorado Aurora: University of Colorado Cancer Center District of Columbia Department of Veterans Affairs Lombardi Cancer Research Center - Georgetown University Medical Center Florida Tampa: H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center at the University of South Florida Hawaii Manoa: Cancer Research Center of Hawaii Illinois Argonne: Argonne National Laboratory Chicago: Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University University of Chicago Cancer Research Center Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Indiana Indianapolis: Indiana University Cancer Center Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Iowa Iowa City: Holden Comprehensive Canter Center at the University of Iowa Louisiana New Orleans: Tulane University School of Medicine Maine Bar Harbor: The Jackson Laboratory Maryland Baltimore: The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University Bethesda: Consumer Advocates in Research and Related Activities (CARRA) NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program NCI Center for Bioinformatics NCI Center for Cancer Research NCI Center for Strategic Dissemination NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences NCI Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics NCI Division of Cancer Prevention NCI Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis Terrapin Systems Rockville: Capital Technology Information Services Emmes Corporation Information Management Services, Inc. Massachusetts Cambridge: Akaza Research Massachusetts Institute of Technology Somerville: Panther Informatics Michigan Ann Arbor: Internet2 University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center Detroit: Meyer L. Prentis/Karmanos Comprehensive Cancer Center Minnesota Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Cancer Center Rochester: Mayo Clinic Cancer Center Nebraska Omaha: University of Nebraska Medical Center/Eppley Cancer Center New Hampshire Lebanon: Dartmouth College Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center New York Buffalo: Roswell Park Cancer Institute Bronx: Albert Einstein Cancer Center Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory New York: Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center Columbia University Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center New York University Medical Center White Plains: IBM North Carolina Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Raleigh-Durham: Alpha-Gamma Technologies, Inc. Constella Health Sciences Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center Ohio Cleveland: Case Comprehensive Cancer Center Columbus: Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Oregon Portland: Oregon Health & Science University Pennsylvania Philadelphia: Drexel University Fox Chase Cancer Center Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute Tennessee Memphis: St. Jude’s Children’s Research Hospital Texas Austin: 9 Star Research Houston: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Virginia Fairfax: SRA International Reston: Scenpro Washington Seattle: DataWorks Development, Inc. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center International Paris, France: Sanofi Aventis

Molecular Medicine as a Complex Continuum Clinical Research Pathology Molecular Biology Imaging Molecular Medicine

Assembling the Cancer Community Architecture Develops architectural standards and architecture necessary for other workspaces. Vocabularies & Common Data Elements Evaluates, develops, and integrates systems for vocabulary and ontology content, standards, and software systems for content delivery. In vivo Imaging Tissue Banks and Pathology Tools Provides for the integration, development, and implementation of tissue and pathology tools. Integrative Cancer Research Provides tools and systems to enable integration and sharing of information. Clinical Trials Management Systems Addresses the need for consistent, open and comprehensive tools for clinical trials management. Provides for the sharing and analysis of in vivo imaging data. Strategic Planning Documentation and Training Data Sharing and Intellectual Capital Assists in identifying strategic priorities for the development and evolution of the caBIG™ effort. Provides training in the use of caBIG™ resources including on-line tutorials, workshops, documentation Develops policies and guidelines for sharing of data, applications and infrastructure

Managed through electronic interfaces and data about data focus on boundaries, interfaces, how things fit together, not on the internal details caBIG Strategy Modules that address specific needs Use of international data standards Connect through defined electronic interfaces

Utilizing caBIG™ in NCCCP Organizations leverage caBIG™ through the following: –Access the capabilities of caBIG™, including software, data standards, training, documentation, and support –Apply caBIG™ to achieve bench-to-bedside-to- bench molecular medicine –Apply caBIG™ beyond cancer to other diseases –Build on/contribute to caBIG™ policies and procedures

Informatics Strategy Year 1: Plan –Assess informatics capabilites/challenges of each site, stratify sites into tiers, determine strategy Year 2: Do –Execute according to plan (develop detailed plan for implementing caBIG™ infrastructure) Year 3: Assess –Evaluate execution according to plan –Document lessons learned (barriers to implementation, successful strategies, future opportunities)

Stratification of sites: Tier 1 Year 1: Plan, Year 2: Do, Year 3: Assess Baseline “Tier 1” sites Baseline plus: Collaboratively identify and deploy caBIG™ in a manner that would add value to the site, either –using NCI as an application service provider, or –installing infrastructure locally, or –adapting local systems to share data in a caBIG™ compliant manner

Stratification of sites: Tier 2 Year 1: Plan, Year 2: Do, Year 3: Assess Baseline “Tier 1” sites Baseline plus: Collaboratively identify and deploy caBIG™ in a manner that adds value to the site, either –using NCI as an application service provider, or –installing infrastructure locally, or –adapting local systems to share data in a caBIG™ compliant manner “Tier 2” sites Tier 1 plus: Use local electronic medical record infrastructure, either pre-existing or open source, to prototype a virtual national clinical data warehouse

Informatics Breakout Tomorrow Introductions Detailed overview of the caBIG™ program Informal presentations from sites –Very brief –No slides needed –Discussion of sites’ IT and informatics strengths and needs Planning our next steps

Thank you Q & A