A search for supernovae in galaxy clusters at 0.1 < z < 0.2 David J Sand (U of A) Chandra Fellows Symposium 2007 See arXiv0709.2519.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Astrophysics with TPF-C David Spergel Princeton.
Advertisements

Unresolved X-Ray Sources in Intermediate Redshift Cluster Fields Unresolved X-Ray Sources in Intermediate Redshift Cluster Fields S. Fawcett, A. Hicks,
CLASH: Cluster Lensing And Supernova survey with Hubble ACS Parallels WFC3 Parallels 6 arcmin. = 2.2 z=0.5 Footprints of HST Cameras: ACS FOV in.
Life Before the Fall: Group Galaxy Evolution Prior to Cluster Assembly Anthony Gonzalez (Florida) Kim-Vy Tran (CfA) Michelle Conbere (Florida) Dennis Zaritsky.
Ben Maughan (CfA)Chandra Fellows Symposium 2006 The cluster scaling relations observed by Chandra C. Jones, W. Forman, L. Van Speybroeck.
The Milky Way PHYS390 Astrophysics Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 19.
First X-Ray Results from the Optically Selected Red Sequence Cluster Survey (RCS) at Z ~ 1 Amalia K. Hicks, Erica Ellingson, Howard Yee, Tesla Jeltema,
Weak-Lensing selected, X-ray confirmed Clusters and the AGN closest to them Dara Norman NOAO/CTIO 2006 November 6-8 Boston Collaborators: Deep Lens Survey.
Growth of Structure Measurement from a Large Cluster Survey using Chandra and XMM-Newton John R. Peterson (Purdue), J. Garrett Jernigan (SSL, Berkeley),
AGN and Quasar Clustering at z= : Results from the DEEP2 + AEGIS Surveys Alison Coil Hubble Fellow University of Arizona Chandra Science Workshop.
I. Balestra, P.T., S. Ettori, P. Rosati, S. Borgani, V. Mainieri, M. Viola, C. Norman Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times - Venice, March 2006.
A search for supernovae in galaxy clusters at 0.1 < z < 0.2 David J Sand Collaborators: Dennis Zaritsky, Stephane Herbert-Fort, Suresh Sivanandam, Doug.
On the Distribution of Dark Matter in Clusters of Galaxies David J Sand Chandra Fellows Symposium 2005.
Discovery of Galaxy Clusters Around Redshift 1 Deborah Haarsma, Calvin GLCW, June 1, 2007.
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Existing Transient Surveys: Optical I: Big Apertures Geoff Bower.
“ Testing the predictive power of semi-analytic models using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey” Juan Esteban González Birmingham, 24/06/08 Collaborators: Cedric.
Lens Galaxy Environments Neal Dalal (IAS), Casey R. Watson (Ohio State) astro-ph/ Who cares? 2.What to do 3.Results 4.Problems! 5.The future.
An alternative hypothesis to account for the LMC microlensing events Jordi Miralda-Escudé The Ohio State University IEEC/ICREA.
Evolution of Galaxy groups Michael Balogh Department of Physics University of Waterloo.
Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing What did we learn? What can we learn? Henk Hoekstra.
Natalie RoeSNAP/SCP Journal Club “Identification of Type Ia Supernovae at Redshift 1.3 and Beyond with the Advanced Camera for Surveys on HST” Riess, Strolger,
NAOKI YASUDA, MAMORU DOI (UTOKYO), AND TOMOKI MOROKUMA (NAOJ) SN Survey with HSC.
Science Update: SN2011fe in M101 (Pinwheel Galaxy) Peter Nugent (LBNL/UCB)
Type and redshift distributions 65 candidates have been observed between June 2003 and May Redshift is measured by using emission and/or absorption.
Padua: 1604 → 2004 – Supernovae as cosmological lighthouses SNLS – The SuperNova Legacy Survey Mark Sullivan (University of Toronto) on behalf of the SNLS.
SNLS: Overview and High-z Spectroscopy D. Andrew Howell (Toronto) for the SNLS Collaboration (see: for full list)
Luminosity and Mass functions in spectroscopically-selected groups at z~0.5 George Hau, Durham University Dave Wilman (MPE) Mike Balogh (Waterloo) Richard.
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
Richard Mushotzky (NASA/GSFC) and Amalia K. Hicks (University of Colorado) An enduring enigma in X-ray astronomy is the "missing mass" in cooling flow.
Wide Field Imagers in Space and the Cluster Forbidden Zone Megan Donahue Space Telescope Science Institute Acknowledgements to: Greg Aldering (LBL) and.
Stellar Populations Science Knut Olsen. The Star Formation Histories of Disk Galaxies Context – Hierarchical structure formation does an excellent job.
Dwarf LSB galaxies in the Virgo cluster Jonathan Davies.
Evolution of galaxy cluster scaling and structural properties from XMM observations: probing the physics of structure formation. Doctorant: Sergey ANOKHIN.
The Extremely Red Objects in the CLASH Fields The Extremely Red Galaxies in CLASH Fields Xinwen Shu (CEA, Saclay and USTC) CLASH 2013 Team meeting – September.
Hot gas in galaxy pairs Olga Melnyk. It is known that the dark matter is concentrated in individual haloes of galaxies and is located in the volume of.
MASS AND ENTROPY PROFILES OF X-RAY BRIGHT RELAXED GROUPS FABIO GASTALDELLO UC IRVINE & BOLOGNA D. BUOTE P. HUMPHREY L. ZAPPACOSTA J. BULLOCK W. MATHEWS.
The Sino-French IFU Workshop ---Lijing PU,SHIBI --Yunnan Observatory (Group.
Different Kinds of “Novae” I. Super Novae Type Ia: No hydrogen, CO WD deflagration --> detonation Type Ia: No hydrogen, CO WD deflagration --> detonation.
Diffuse Intergalactic Light in Intermediate Redshift Cluster: RX J I. Toledo (PUC) J. Melnick (ESO) E. Giraud (LPTA) F. Selman (ESO) H. Quintana.
DES Cluster Simulations and the ClusterSTEP Project M.S.S. Gill (OSU / CBPF / SLAC) In collaboration with: J. Young, T.Eifler, M.Jarvis, P.Melchior and.
Initial Results from the Chandra Shallow X-ray Survey in the NDWFS in Boötes S. Murray, C. Jones, W. Forman, A. Kenter, A. Vikhlinin, P. Green, D. Fabricant,
G. Miknaitis SC2006, Tampa, FL Observational Cosmology at Fermilab: Sloan Digital Sky Survey Dark Energy Survey SNAP Gajus Miknaitis EAG, Fermilab.
X-RAY FOLLOW-UP OF STRONG LENSING OBJECTS: SL2S GROUPS (AND A1703) FABIO GASTALDELLO (IASF-MILAN, UCI) M. LIMOUSIN & THE SL2S COLLABORATION.
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs Lan Wang Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann (MPA) Cheng Li (MPA/SHAO, USTC) Gabriella.
A wide field multi-wavelength survey of two clusters at z~0.5 Tommaso Treu (UCSB)
Baryon content of galaxy groups Ming Sun (University of Virginia) ‏ M. Voit, M. Donahue (MSU) A. Vikhlinin, W. Forman, C. Jones (CfA) N. Sehgal (KIPAC)
Announcements The final exam will be at Noon on Monday, December 13 in Van Allen Hall LR1. Practice questions for unit #5 are available on the class web.
Major dry-merger rate and extremely massive major dry-mergers of BCGs Deng Zugan June 31st Taiwan.
The SN Ia Rate In 0.5
Searching High-z Supernovae with HSC and WFMOS
Subaru Wide-Field Survey of M87 Globular Cluster Populations N.Arimoto (NAOJ) N.Tamura, R.Sharples (Durham) M.Onodera (Tokyo, NAOJ), K.Ohta(Kyoto) J.-C.Cuillandre.
Elinor Medezinski Johns Hopkins University Galaxy Galaxy Lensing in CLASH clusters.
MASS PROFILES OF X-RAY BRIGHT RELAXED GROUPS: METHODS AND SYSTEMATICS FABIO GASTALDELLO IASF-INAF MILANO & UC IRVINE D. BUOTE UCI P. HUMPHREY UCI L. ZAPPACOSTA.
RGS observations of cool gas in cluster cores Jeremy Sanders Institute of Astronomy University of Cambridge A.C. Fabian, J. Peterson, S.W. Allen, R.G.
Investigating dark matter halos of galaxies from the COMBO-17 survey Martina Kleinheinrich (Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Heidelberg) & Hans-Walter.
TWO SAMPLES OF X-RAY GROUPS FABIO GASTALDELLO UC IRVINE & BOLOGNA D. BUOTE P. HUMPHREY L. ZAPPACOSTA J. BULLOCK W. MATHEWS UCSC F. BRIGHENTI BOLOGNA.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
The Delay Time Distribution of Type Ia Supernovae: Constraints on Progenitors Chris Pritchet (U. Victoria), Mark Sullivan (Oxford), Damien LeBorgne (IAP),
The XMM Distant Cluster Project: Survey limits and Pilot Survey Georg Lamer A. Schwope, V. Hambaryan, M. Godolt (AIP) H. Böhringer, R. Fassbender, P. Schücker,
Star Formation History of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
Chapter 25 Galaxies and Dark Matter. 25.1Dark Matter in the Universe 25.2Galaxy Collisions 25.3Galaxy Formation and Evolution 25.4Black Holes in Galaxies.
CIfAR Stanford 2008 SN Ia Rates: Theory, Progenitors, and Implications.
Guoliang Li Shanghai Astronomic Observatory November 1st, 2006 November 1st, 2006 The giant arc statistic in the three-year WMAP cosmological model COLLABORATORS:
Simulating the Production of Intra-Cluster Light Craig Rudick Department of Astronomy CERCA - 02/17/05.
Galaxy Evolution and WFMOS
Stellar Populations Science Knut Olsen. The Star Formation Histories of Disk Galaxies Context – Hierarchical structure formation does an excellent job.
Jesper Rasmussen (Univ. of Birmingham)
A photometric method to classify high-z supernovae found with HSC
Advisors: Tom Broadhurst, Yoel Rephaeli
Globular Clusters with Gemini
Presentation transcript:

A search for supernovae in galaxy clusters at 0.1 < z < 0.2 David J Sand (U of A) Chandra Fellows Symposium 2007 See arXiv

SN in clusters The metal enrichment of the intracluster medium, SN rate in clusters, and the amount of stellar mass in intracluster light are intimately related subjects Chandra Image of ICM SNR ICL in Coma

Is there some way to separate the two populations? Perhaps in galaxy clusters -- simple SFH and dominated by ellipticals today? SN Ia progenitors & rates SNIa occur in both old, evolved stellar systems and in regions of high star formation (e.g. Mannucci et al. 2005; Scannapieco & Bildsten 2005; Sullivan et al. 2006) -- Two populations of progenitors??? Possible singly degenerate and double degenerate systems Log SFR SNR

Enrichment of the intracluster medium SNIa provide ~0.7 M sun of iron per event (e.g. Tsujimoto et al. 1995) Clusters are excellent for studying metal enrichment -- they have a simple SFH and deep potential from which material cannot escape. Can be measured from the iron-K complex at ~7 keV. Renzini 2003; see also Tozzi et al. 2003; Baumgartner et al. 2003

Gonzalez et al. (2005) have shown that the ICL is well fit by a separate r 1/4 profile and has a radial extent of ~100s of kpc Gonzalez et al. (2005) have shown that the ICL is well fit by a separate r 1/4 profile and has a radial extent of ~100s of kpc Different measurements have shown that the ICL makes up ~30% of the total stellar budget Different measurements have shown that the ICL makes up ~30% of the total stellar budget Can intracluster SN be enriching the ICM in situ? -- preliminary calculations suggest up to ~50% of metals come from IC SN (e.g. Domainko et al. 2004; Zaritsky et al. 2004) Can intracluster SN be enriching the ICM in situ? -- preliminary calculations suggest up to ~50% of metals come from IC SN (e.g. Domainko et al. 2004; Zaritsky et al. 2004) Content and quantity of intracluster light -- how much does it pollute the ICM? The ratio of hostless to hosted SN Ia gives a measurement of the mean ICL fraction (see also Gal-Yam et al. 2003)

Intracluster SN contribute a large fraction of the metals seen in the ICM Data points are from XMM observations of clusters with direct measurements of the ICL (Gonzalez et al. 2005) Sivanandam et al in prep Total metal contribution from IC SNe If ALL metals produced in galaxies and ICS are dumped into the ICM.

Arizona cluster supernovae search ~60 X-ray selected galaxy clusters at 0.1 < z < 0.2 Revisit fields ~monthly in the g-band at the 90-inch Follow-up spectroscopy at the MMT within 5 days to weed out foregrounds and core- collapse SN Goal: Find cluster SN-Ia

Three principle goals: 1.Determine the mean fraction of intracluster star light. 2.Determine the SN-Ia rate to place clear constraints on the SN-Ia ‘delay time’ -- the time between formation of a stellar system and the eventual explosion of some of its members as SN-Ia. This may be a clean way to probe the ‘older’ progenitor population in clusters 3.Combine these two measurements to determine the contribution of intracluster SN to the global chemical enrichment of clusters

90 Prime on the 2.3m Bok Telescope Blue sensitive, 1 degree FOV, 0.45”/pixel We center each cluster on chip 1 (30’ FOV) and use chip 3 as a control -- each chip is separated by ~500 arcsec Typical seeing: ~2 arcsec

The complete initial campaign Received 11 nights of 90-inch time to write an image pipeline and demonstrate that we can ID transients on ~hour time scales. -- DONE Received inch nights + 5 MMT spectroscopic nights. Unfortunately, 11/12 90-inch nights were ruined due to weather/instrument problems. 1 night of Blue Channel Spectrograph time was used to follow up the 1 good 90-inch night.

Transient detection in real time Automated pipeline developed to reduce data, difference images with best archived reference image (using Alard’s algorithm), detect potential transients and post them to a group web site for human review. Typically ~10 candidates; 2-3 real Human confirmed transients are batch submitted to NED and GCVS to screen out known AGN/QSOs and variable stars

Transient detection efficiency Place fake point source ‘SN’ into images to understand detection efficiency as a function of seeing, AM, and background (in galaxy vs. hostless) Typically 85-90% detection efficiency from g~18-22 We mask aggressively near saturated stars.

Conditions at the 90-inch Typical image FWHM is ~2-2.5”. Worst on Kitt Peak and worse than standard lore for the 90- inch. Does not deter from survey goals, and during >2.5” seeing, extra exposures are taken. If seeing >3”, I go to bed.

ICL SNe Candidates In our pilot photometric campaign, we found 4 hostless events, all with R > r 200 from the cluster center. Either these are not real, there is an excess of ICL at R > r 200 or star formation is causing an increase in SN rate. IC candidates are checked by summing all available imaging epochs to rule out a faint host -- to the best of our ability

Detection of Central Excess of Cluster Events? Taking the X-ray luminosity of each cluster, we calculated M 200 and r 200 using the L X -M 200 relation found by Reiprich & Bohringer Used chip 3 transients to determine ‘background’ rate.

What are these excess transients? Out of ~40-50 excess transient events, we expect only ~10 to be cluster SN-Ia (Sharon et al. 2007) or core collapse SN. Is the central excess also due to cluster AGN, as seen in X-ray (e.g. Ruderman & Ebeling 2005) or optical studies (Martini et al. 2007)?

Initial Spectroscopy

More Spectra z~2 QSO’s Other spectra include cluster galaxies (which need subtraction to search for SN), lower z QSOs, 1 CC SN in the foreground and variable stars

Other methods for IDing SNIa We will never get the spectroscopy to follow up all of our events in a timely fashion. -Multi-band imaging of clusters to get cluster red sequence. Events associated with cluster ellipticals almost certainly cluster SNIa. -Followup spectroscopy of the host galaxies using the undersubscribed 90 inch spectrograph will screen out foreground/background galaxies and obvious QSOs.

Future -- Moving imaging to CFHT/Megacam (with Hoekstra & Pritchet) The plan -- Monitor ~70 galaxy clusters at 0.05 < z < 0.15 in g and r band every month for 2 years --In the end, stack the images to measure the truncation radius of cluster galaxy DM halos as a function of clustercentric radius with weak lensing --Monthly monitoring will yield ~60 cluster SN Ia and ~10 IC SN Ia. We are pursuing spectroscopy at MMT, KP-4m, Gemini, et al…

Recap We have begun a SN search in ~60 X-ray selected galaxy clusters at 0.1<z<0.2 with the 1 degree imager on the UA 2.3m An automated transient detection pipeline is in place, and our detection efficiencies are well understood Initial spectroscopy has been encouraging and will continue. We plan to use other methods to probabilistically determine if a given event was a cluster Ia or not. We are moving the imaging portion of survey to the CFHT…stay tuned! Once the survey is complete, we will be able to place constraints on the SNIa rate associated with old stellar pops and the metal enrichment of the ICM

The Inner Density Profile of Galaxy Clusters David Sand -- U of Arizona Collaborators - T. Treu, R. Ellis, G. Smith, J-P Kneib

Full 2D modeling of MS2137 & A383 (Sand et al. submitted) We have modified J.P. Kneib’s LENSTOOL software to include generalized NFW mass profiles. LENSTOOL accounts for ellipticity (both in luminous and dark matter components) and substructure (e.g. associated with visible galaxies). Can take into account the full multiple imaging constraints  Two background sources associated with the tangential and radial arcs  Multiple images determined from spectroscopy, surface brightness conservation and iterative lens modeling.  Two features on the tangential arc and one on the radial arc are identified. MS2137 lensing interpretation

Constraints on Inner Slope with observationally motivated prior of r sc = kpc The best-fitting r sc is poorly constrained. If scale radius = 400 kpc, then best fitting inner slope is  = 0.75 (for MS2137) Need a mass probe at high radii!!