Nitrogen Losses at a Drainage Systems Scale Bruce Montgomery MN Department of Agriculture.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview – Nutrient Fate and Transport Mark B. David University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Presented at Building Science Assessments for State-Level.
Advertisements

Phosphorus Loads from Streambank Erosion to Surface Waters in the Minnesota River Basin D. J. Mulla Professor, Dept. Soil, Water, Climate University of.
Phosphorus Index Based Management Douglas Beegle Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences Penn State University
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Pesticide & Fertilizer Management Division Greg Buzicky, Director Dan Stoddard, Assistant Director.
Team Meeting #5, Great Lakes Protection Fund Grant A Phosphorus Soil Test Metric To Reduce Dissolved Phosphorus Loading to Lake Erie Heidelberg University.
Conesus Lake – Upstream Changes Maxwell Farms Farm plan developed by Nathan Herendeen, Nancy Glazier, John Hanchar, and the Maxwell Brothers.
Joseph Zachmann, Ph.D. Research Scientist Pesticide & Fertilizer Management Division.
Developing Nitrogen BMPs from Field Research Gyles W. Randall* and Jeffrey A. Vetsch, Univ. of Minnesota, Waseca, MN Abstract Best management practices.
An integrated study of nutrient leaching and greenhouse gas emissions Tyson Ochsner and Rodney Venterea Soil and Water Management Research Unit Agricultural.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
Performance–based Incentives for Conservation in Agriculture (PICA)
How Management Effects Nutrient and Sediment Losses Dennis FrameFred Madison Directors UW Discovery Farms Program.
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
PSWMRU Town Brook/Cannonsville Reservoir Watersheds – A CEAP-WAS contribution Bil Gburek and friends Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research.
Glasgow Area Chamber of Commerce And Agriculture New Trends in Agriculture Glasgow, MT January, 12, 2011.
Does agricultural drainage affect the Minnesota River? “Agricultural drainage systems make crop production more successful.” - University of Minnesota.
DRAINAGE WATER MANAGEMENT FOR MIDWESTERN ROW CROP AGRICULTURE DWM PARTNER FORUM II JUNE 15, 2011 WAYNE HONEYCUTT USDA-NRCS.
Illinois Drainage Water Management Demonstration Project Don Pitts Agricultural Engineer State Water Quality Specialist Champaign, IL NRCS USDA.
Drainage Water Management to meet Agronomic and Environmental goals University of Minnesota Dept. Soil, Water, & Climate Southwest Research and Outreach.
Using Adapt-N On-farm strip trials on Long Island, NY: Above: A = 93 lb N, G = 159 lb N Below: A = 132 lb N, G = 175 lb N AG AG Incorporating Local Weather.
A FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF DWM AT LARGE SCALE MOHAMED A. YOUSSEF and R. WAYNE SKAGGS 1 By.
Ethanol: Impacts on Soil and Water Quality Bob Broz University of Missouri Extension Water Quality Program (573)
Why evaluate nitrate losses from watersheds?   Potential health risks to public and private water supplies   Eutrophication   Hypoxia - Deficiency.
Long-Term Field Research for Developing Nitrogen BMP’s Gyles Randall Univ. of Minnesota Southern Research and Outreach Center
FLEXIBLE AND PRECISE IRRIGATION PLATFORM TO IMPROVE FARM-SCALE WATER PRODUCTIVITY FIGARO June 2014.
Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution and Water Quality as a function of Land Management Practices on Four Kansas Farms William W. Spotts Dr. Donald Huggins.
Application of seasonal climate forecasts to predict regional scale crop yields in South Africa Trevor Lumsden and Roland Schulze School of Bioresources.
Lake Springfield Watershed Nutrient Management Project February 11, 2015.
Conservation Drainage: Drainage for the 21st Century
Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits of Agricultural Conservation Policies: In-stream vs. Edge-of-Field Assessments of Water Quality. Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits.
Integrating Forages into Multi-Functional Landscapes: Enhanced Soil Health and Ecosystem Service Opportunities Douglas L. Karlen USDA-ARS Presented at.
Grand Haven Pond Study: An Investigation to Reduce Nutrient Loads and Evaluate Alternative Management Practices in Stormwater Ponds Mark Clark Wetlands.
Economics of Precision Agriculture, What Technologies are Being Adopted and Why Danny Dallas Soil 4213.
Empirical Modeling of Nitrate Loading and Crop Yield for Corn-Soybean Rotations in Iowa Rob Malone, USDA-ARS, Ames, IA Liwang Ma, Doug Karlen, Terry Meade,
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell March 11,
Co-Benefits from Conservation Policies that Promote Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: The Corn Belt CARD, Iowa State University Presented at the Forestry.
Dr. Matt Helmers Assistant Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Dept. of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Iowa State University How is.
Figure 2.1. Grain yields at KBS LTER under No-till, Reduced Input, and Biologically Based management relative to Conventional management (dotted horizontal.
Contact information: Institution: Latvia University of Agriculture Project contact person: Zane Dimanta Address: 19 Akademijas Str., LV-3001, Jelgava,
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
Modeling experience of non- point pollution: CREAMS (R. Tumas) EPIC (A. Povilaitis and R.Tumas SWRRBWQ (A. Dumbrauskas and R. Tumas) AGNPS (Sileika and.
MODELING THE IMPACT OF IRRIGATION ON NUTRIENT EXPORT FROM AGRICULTURAL FIELDS IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES W. Lee Ellenburg Graduate Research Assistant.
Cover crop economics: estimating a return on investment Liz Juchems and Jamie Benning.
Roxanne Johnson Extension Water Quality Associate February 24, 2009 Tile Drainage Forum NDSU.
Results of Long-Term Experiments With Conservation Tillage in Austria Introduction On-site and off-site damages of soil erosion cause serious problems.
Drainage and Nitrate Loss Matthew Helmers Dean’s Professor, College of Ag. & Life Sciences Professor, Dept. of Ag. and Biosystems Eng. Iowa State University.
Remote sensing of canopy reflectance on a field scale has been proposed as a useful tool for diagnosing nitrogen (N) deficiency of corn plants. Differences.
Introduction Conservation of water is essential to successful dryland farming in the Palouse region. The Palouse is under the combined stresses of scarcity.
Lake Jesup BMAP Adoption Environmental Protection Division February 23, 2010.
Drainage Management for Water Quality and Crop Production Benefits Don Pitts Agricultural Engineer NRCS USDA Champaign, IL.
Probability of Detecting Atrazine and Elevated Concentrations of Nitrate in Colorado’s Ground Water USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report
Minnesota BMP CHALLENGE SM & Water Quality Credit Trading (WQT) Workshop WELCOME!
October 12, 2015 Iowa State University Indrajeet Chaubey Purdue University Water Quality.
Nutrient content of dairy slurry Slurry nutrient variability and nutrient prices Slurry data from UW soils lab (Marshfield, WI) First year available 715.
Effect of Potential Future Climate Change on Cost-Effective Nonpoint Source Pollution Reduction Strategies in the UMRB Manoj Jha, Philip Gassman, Gene.
Protecting and saving water. Partnership Overview Who we are Our accomplishments Our challenges Our priorities.
Minnesota BMP CHALLENGE SM Workshop WELCOME!. THE MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED All or portions of 38 MN counties 13 major watershed management units ~90%
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
Updates on Current Science of Nutrient Flows and Conservation Actions in Iowa Dan Jaynes Panel: Bill Crumpton, Matt Helmers, Tom Isenhart, Dan Jaynes,
To better understand ground water, it’s important to visualize the rock layers, most of which serve as drinking water aquifers, which exist under Dodge.
Taking on the Challenge Addressing Sustainability and Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Goals Caroline Wade, Nutrient Watershed Manager Illinois Corn Growers.
1 AGRICULTURAL POLLUTION REDUCTION ACTIVITY Financed by USAID APRA ROMANIA PROJECT Project implemented by: Assistance project for MAFWE International Resources.
Dodge County Water Monitoring Update
Evaluation of Pre-Side Dress Nitrate Test for Corn in Minnesota
USING GIS CROP INFORMATION TO DETERMINE SITE-SPECIFIC MANURE MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
Image courtesy of NASA/GSFC
2018 Louisiana Soil Health and Cover Crop Conference
Iowa Agriculture Water Alliance
Jacob Piske, Eric Peterson, Bill Perry
Presentation transcript:

Nitrogen Losses at a Drainage Systems Scale Bruce Montgomery MN Department of Agriculture

Red Top Cooperators UM Dept. of Soil, Water & Climate Blue Earth Agronomics Rob & Janice Meyer-Red Top Farms University of Minnesota Extension UM Dept of Biosystems and Ag Eng. Brown Nicollet Environmental Health And the BNC Water Quality Board

Why do producers error on the high side? “Research is only tested on garden size plots!” Because most research is developed on small plots under ideal conditions, many farmers believe that University recommendations will not work on production scale operations

St. Peter Wellhead Protection Area

Community Water Supplies Impacted by Ag

Key Project Goals: Red Top Farm Demonstration Bridge the gap between UM water quality plot work and farm fields in terms of evaluating nitrogen and pesticide Best Management Practices (BMPs). Characterize long-term water quantity and quality trends on a field scale using subsurface tile drainage systems. Develop a demonstration site that is meaningful on a local and a regional scale.

Red Top is Located in Nicollet County, MN

Red Top Field Layout West Field East Field

Monitoring Equipment at Red Top

Annual Drainage Losses Red Top Farm Annual Drainage Loss (Inches) On average, 7” of drainage or 25% of the annual water budget is transported.

“Storm Events” account for the majority of the annual drainage losses 58% 74% 76% Annual Drainage Loss (Inches)

Monthly Distribution of Sub-surface Drainage 2000 Growing Season-Red Top Typically, April-May- Early June account for approximately 75% of the annual drainage

Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Rates to Corn

1997 and 1999 N Rate Design

St. Peter Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate Validation Project 2000 and 2001 N Fertilizer Rate (Lb/A) on Corn Following Soybeans Bu/Acre

New UM Pub

Midwestern Water Quality Project Symposium March 11, 2003 Country Inn and Suites Mankato 9:00-3:00 Improve water quality in the Minnesota River Basin Midwestern Water Quality Project Minnesota CAP’s Partners MN Corn Growers St. Peter Wellhead Partnership University of Minnesota NAICC

Nitrate-N Changes After Implementation of UM BMPs: Nitrate-N Concentrations (mg/L)

Nitrate-N Changes After Implementation of UM BMPs: Nitrate-N Concentrations (mg/L)

Corn-95 Beans-96 Corn-97 Beans-98 Corn-99 Beans-00 Corn-01 Nitrate-N Concentration Conclusions NO 3 -N mg/Liter Approaching “background levels” (Corn-Sb rotation with no nitrogen fertilizer)

Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Rates to Corn

Nitrate-N Changes –Aggressive N Inputs/Management Changes Nitrate-N Concentrations (mg/L)

2001 and 2002 Nitrate-N Concentrations in Tile Water

Nitrate Concentrations by Growing Seasons and Crop

Nitrate-N Concentrations-Entire Monitoring Cycle at Red Top Farms Nitrate-N Concentrations (mg/L)

Nitrate-N Losses from Corn and Soybeans Average N Losses: 22 lb/A/year

Ortho-Phosphorus Concentrations Flow-Weighted by Growing Seasons

Total Phosphorus Concentrations Flow-Weighted by Growing Seasons

Phosphorus (Total) Losses via Sub-Surface Drainage

Red Top Benefits: Model Calibration

Sands et al, 2003

Pesticides at a Glance at the Red Top Site APPLIED to FIELD Metolachlor (Dual) Acetochlor (Surpass) Nicosulfuron (Accent) Imazethapyr (Pursuit) Dicamba (Banvel) Atrazine Glyphosate (Roundup) Trifluralin (Treflan) DETECTED in TILE WATER Metolachlor (Dual) Acetochlor (Surpass) Nicosulfuron (Accent) Imazathypyr (Pursuit) Dicamba (Banvel) Atrazine

Seven Mile Creek Watershed Characteristics 85% of the watershed is cropland-mostly prime; Very high % tile drained; Documented water quality challenges

Seven Mile Creek High Nitrogen Loading Minor Watershed

Seven Mile Creek Significant Phosphorus Loading Minor Watershed

Red Top and Seven Mile Creek Nitrate-N “Runoff”:

Red Top and Seven Mile Creek Nitrate-N Concentrations:

Field (Red Top) vs Watershed Scale (Seven Mile Creek) Nitrate-N Losses

n Due to the flashy drainage characteristics of these systems, continuous automated monitoring is absolutely critical! n The majority of the drainage and chemical movement occurs in very narrow timeframes. Red Top Farm Demonstration Drainage and Response Times

n Implementation of existing Nitrogen BMPs and University of Minnesota Fertilizer Recommendations resulted in a significant reduction in fertilizer inputs (25-30%), maintained yields and appears to have decreased N losses at this site by 40-50%. n Field scale Nitrogen strip validation work both at Red Top and within the St. Peter Source Water Protection Area continued to demonstrate that the UM Fertilizer Recommendations will optimize yields. Red Top Farm Demonstration Nitrogen Management Conclusions

General Observations based on the First 5 Years at Red Top Expect to see annual N LOSSES between Lb/A under well managed corn-soybean production; Unlikely that the 10 mg/L drinking water standard can be attained under corn-soybean rotations.

Red Top Farm Demonstration Nitrogen Losses in a Nutshell Assuming that nitrate-N levels of mg/L under a corn-soybean rotation are “background levels”, this means the following: 1)For every inch of drainage water, there is 3.2 pounds of N loss; (simply calculated by dividing the concentration by the magic number Of 4.4. In this case 14 mg/L divided by 4.4=3.2) 2) Furthermore, since the average annual drainage is 7”, this means that 22 lb/A is lost each year.

Red Top Farm Demonstration Nitrogen Management Conclusions n The biggest water quality improvements will be realized through the implementation of basic nitrogen management such as correct rate selection and timing of application.

n Monitoring tile drainage systems is a practical methodology for verifying effectiveness of Best Management Practices on a field-scale. n This system is an excellent educational tool for developing the linkage between ag practices and water quality issues. Red Top Farm Demonstration General Conclusions

For more information from MDA Staff…….. Bill VanRyswyk-Surface Water Hydrologist, Mankato Brian Williams-Advisor, Le Sueur Paul Wotzka-Surface Water Hydrologist, Elba (Whitewater State Park) Bruce Montgomery-Unit Supervisor, St. Paul