The Future of Technology 2003 IEEE Fellows Technology Survey Prepared for IEEE Spectrum By The Response Center December 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Investigating the Connections between Oil and Gas Industry Affiliation and Climate Change Perceptions Abstract In discussions about climate change, it.
Advertisements

Page 1 Marie Curie Schemes Science is not the whole story! (How to write a successful Marie Curie RTN Proposal) Siobhan Harkin.
1 ACI Annual Audit Committee Survey - Global M A R K E T I N G & C O M M U N I C A T I O N S R E S E A R C H Charles Garbowski Research February 21, 2006.
Salary Trends in in the Therapeutic Horsemanship Industry: An Update Lorrie Renker Pebbles Turbeville.
Choosing a Professional School. OHLPA Office of Health and Legal Professions Advising Pre-Health Advising Academic Advising Center – Farrior Hall Second.
© 2009 Richard Day Research, Inc. Purdue University Calumet Campus Climate Survey Results Richard Day, Ph.D. Richard Day Research November 27, 2009.
Association of Cable Communicators Cable Industry Community Contribution Results May 2008 Prepared for: Steven R. Jones Executive Director Association.
Summary of Results from Spring 2014 Presented: 11/5/14.
The Future of Technology IEEE Fellows Web-Based Study Prepared for: IEEE Spectrum By: The Response Center November 2003.
OverviewOverview – Preparation – Day in the Life – Earnings – Employment – Career Path Forecast – ResourcesPreparationDay in the LifeEarningsEmploymentCareer.
UNIVERSUM STUDENT SURVEY 2014 University Report | US Edition James Madison University | All undergraduate students.
Trendence Graduate Barometer Business Edition Partner report prepared for Nyugat-Magyarországi Egyetem.
REACH FOR POLYMERS EXPERT WORKSHOP BPF “REACH & CLP SEMINAR” WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 19 th.
11 Issues and Reputation November © December 2011 Project: 7311, GlobeScan® The 2011 GlobeScan Radar CSR Survey is confidential and is provided.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Third Party Advertising Evaluation: American Express eStatement Topline July 2008.
NATIONAL PROJECT ACTIVITIES, EVALUATION , Ankara EUROFACE CONSULTING, CZECH REPUBLIC.
Effect of Staff Attitudes on Quality in Clinical Microbiology Services Ms. Julie Sims Laboratory Technical specialist Strengthening of Medical Laboratories.
OverviewOverview – Preparation – Day in the Life – Earnings – Employment – Career Path Forecast – ResourcesPreparationDay in the LifeEarningsEmploymentCareer.
2014 IT Salary Survey: Application Development Research Findings © 2014 Property of UBM Tech; All Rights Reserved.
2014 IT Salary Survey: Healthcare Research Findings © 2014 Property of UBM Tech; All Rights Reserved.
2014 US IT Salary Survey Research Findings © 2014 Property of UBM Tech; All Rights Reserved.
OverviewOverview – Preparation – Day in the Life – Earnings – Employment – Career Path Forecast – ResourcesPreparationDay in the LifeEarningsEmploymentCareer.
The Salary Thermometer° Keeping your salary system healthy.
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors Summer 2015 Ann S. Bisconti, PhD Bisconti Research, Inc.
Version 1 | Internal Use Only© Ipsos MORI 1 Version 1| Internal Use Only Sheffield CCG CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Clean Energy Industry is Significant 5,985 Firms.
1 1 Copyright Universum 2008 Copyright Universum 2009 University Report Universum Student Survey 2009 Italian Edition Tor Vergata Business.
2014 IT Salary Survey: Executives Research Findings © 2014 Property of UBM Tech; All Rights Reserved.
Clarendon County State of the Workforce Report Bruce Mills, Research Analyst Santee-Lynches Regional COG Clarendon Co. Development Board Jan. 24, 2013.
IEEE All Society Research Project: 2003 IEEE Oceanic Engineering Society Research coordinated by IEEE Research Corporate Strategy and Communications.
(ISC) Global Workforce Study U.S. Government Results May 7, 2013.
THE 2011 VCC STUDENT CENSUS SURVEY Selected Findings for Overall Census Responses April 2012.
Recovery Oriented System Indicators (ROSI) Survey FY 2011 ROSI Survey Results Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services September,
Company X © 2009 Ipsos 1 Thank you for participating in the Best Companies to Work For Survey Thank you for participating in this year’s Seattle Business.
Research methodology Data Collection tools and Techniques.
1 School of Health in Social Science 2011 UG Entrants’ Survey Analysis.
Connecticut Fire Chiefs Association Membership Survey Results October 2005 Shoreline Associates, Inc.
Data Collection in the U.S. BLS’ CES Survey New Frontiers for Data Collection October 31 – November 2, 2012 Geneva, Switzerland Ken Robertson, Assistant.
January 25-27, 2011 Dr. Bob Couch, Director Office of Career and Technology Education South Carolina Department of Education 2011 National Technology Centers.
INTERNATIONAL ADVERTISING SURVEY IAA FEBRUARY 2007.
Responsible Electricity Transmission for Albertans (RETA) November 2, 2009 Responsible Electricity Transmission for Albertans (RETA)
IEEE Computer Society Report of an Online Survey of Current and Non-Renewing Members May 2012 – version 3.0 EDITED June 20, JMS Prepared by: Robin.
UBC Department of Finance Office Staff Survey Forum Presentation March 17, 2004.
IEEE All Society Research Project: 2003 IEEE Nuclear and Plasma Sciences Society Research coordinated by IEEE Research Corporate Strategy and Communications.
Small business owners Research April 5 – April 12, 2012 Total Respondents: 500 Research powered by:
Natalya Kryvulina, Andrey Kashyn June, 2009 Astana, Kazakhstan.
Educators’ Attitudes about the Accessibility and Integration of Technology into the Secondary Curriculum Dr. Christal C. Pritchett Auburn University
Role of Account Management at ERCOT 2005 Meeting Management Support Survey Review For 2006 Subcommittees.
Membership Survey Survey Prepared by Bristol Omnifacts Research Lunenburg Yacht Club February 2008.
1 Engineering Overview A Statistical Profile of the Engineering Profession.
Transportation 2035 Survey Results Presented to: MTC Planning Committee November 9, 2007.
Florida’s Educator Outcome Survey 2005 Prepared by Anna Vaccaro, Marketing Research Analyst Ulrich Research Service.
Increasing Efficiency in Data Collection Processes Arie Aharon, Israel Central Bureau of Statistics.
University as Entrepreneur Results of Surveys of ASU Faculty, Students and Staff Spring 2007 Surveys conducted by the Institute for Social Science Research.
Some sociological aspects on gender discrimination at work in Croatia Branka Galić Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of sociology Zagreb,
NEW FOCUS nf nf 1 Research Strategy and Implementation Telephone: Facsimile: ACN: 066.
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Office of Institutional Research CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY FALL, 2006.
2009 Annual Employee Survey U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development December 29,2009 (updated January 8, 2010)
Human Resources Office of 1 Summary of Results College of Design Dean’s Reports.
UKZN Employee Engagement Survey – 2013 Overall Report 1.
1 Taking the pulse of the reader of the ABA Section of Real Property  Trust & Estate Law’s Probate & Property.
© 2016 Results and Analysis: Elementary Schools Only 2016 School Quality Survey Spring ISD January 19 – 31, 2016.
CRM Report Card Kerry Glance, Site editor, SearchCRM.com
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
Writing to Learn vs. Writing in the Disciplines
Presentation transcript:

The Future of Technology 2003 IEEE Fellows Technology Survey Prepared for IEEE Spectrum By The Response Center December 2002

2 Table of contents Page Background and Objectives3 Methodology4 Notes on Analysis5 Study Findings6 Technology-Needy Social Issues7 Tech Industry Recovery?8 Open Source Computing9 How Will We Access Information?10 Broadband Access & Applications11 Moore ’ s Law13 Billion-Transistor Chips?14 The Energy Industry15 Future Energy Sources17 Alternative Automotive Fuels18 Air and Rail Transportation21 Tomorrow ’ s Engineers 22 Respondent profile24

3 Background and Objectives IEEE ’ s flagship publication, IEEE Spectrum, will focus on “ the future of technology ” in its January 2003 issue. To obtain a better understanding of technology issues, the magazine ’ s editorial staff wants to obtain views from influential people in the electrical and electronics engineering community. To this end, the magazine commissioned The Response Center, an independent market research company, to conduct a research project among IEEE members nominated by their peers for “ Fellows ” status. Primary objectives of the study include: To measure Fellows ’ opinions on hot topics in science and technology, such as computers, power and energy and transportation. l To provide Fellows with a forum for expressing their views on the future of technology by allowing them the opportunity to elaborate on their opinions to questions asked. To produce a reference guide for Spectrum writers to access while authoring articles for the January ‘ 03 issue. Study findings gleaned from this research are summarized in the following charts.

4 Methodology l The Response Center conducted a Web-based research study among IEEE Fellows.Data collection took place over a period beginning November 5, 2002 and ending on December 2, l The questionnaire was developed by IEEE, in conjunction with The Response Center. It is estimated that the survey averaged 15 to 20 minutes to complete. An address list of approximately 1,200 Fellows was provided by IEEE. Fellows were pre-notified of the study via an alert from IEEE. Following, The Response Center sent out invitations and hosted the study ’ s website. Midway through data collection, reminder s were sent to all who failed to respond to the initial invitation. l A total of 565 Fellows responded to the survey, resulting in a response rate of 48%.

5 Notes on the Report l All numbers reported are percentages unless otherwise noted. These percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number, thus percentages may not add to 100%. Given the self-administered methodology employed, all results reported represent response-based data. That is, respondents who answer “ don ’ t know ” or who choose not to answer a specific question have been “ based out ” or excluded from reported results for that particular question. Thus, the actual number answering each question varies to some degree. l Where 10-point scales were used (ratings from 1-10), the higher number represents the more strongly positive evaluation. Top-3 box scores (ratings 8-10) indicate highly positive perceptions while bottom-3 box scores are indicative of highly negative perceptions. Question numbers reflect the final version of the “ Future of Technology ” questionnaire.

Study Findings

7 Technology-Needy Social Issues l Question: Below is a list of broad social issues. Please indicate the amount of technological resources you feel will be needed in the next five years to address each issue. (10= need more technological resources; 1= need less technological resources) *Q1: Base = “ total ” (422)

8 Tech Industry Recovery? l Question: Thinking about the current difficulties being experienced by the following industries, please indicate which industry you think will be most likely to recover first. (1= most likely to recover; 5= least likely to recover) Q2: Base = “ total ” (418) * Percentage ranked 1st ** Percentage ranked 5th or 6th

9 Open Source Computing l Question: How important do you feel open source computing (Linux, for example) is for the development of new computer products and technology? (10=extremely important; 1=not important at all) *Q3: Base = “ total ” (425) Open Source Computing

10 How Will We Access Information? l Question: In your opinion, what will be the most common way people access information in 10 years? (1= most common way; 6= least common way) Q4: Base = “ total ” (418) * Percentage ranked 1st ** Percentage ranked 5th or 6th

11 Broadband Access Around the World *Q5: Base = “ total ” (374) 30% Broadband Access? l Question: Traditionally, a product is considered successful when it has reached 30% market penetration. In most areas, broadband access is below 30%. When do you think that 30% broadband access will be achieved in each of the following regions?

12 Broadband Applications l Question: Please indicate how strongly you feel each of the following computer applications will increase demand for broadband in the coming years. (10= strongly increase demand; 1= not strongly increase demand) *Q6: Base = “ total ” (415) Increase broadband demand?

13 Moore ’ s Law Question: How long do you think Moore ’ s Law (doubling integrated circuit transistor density every 18 months) will continue to hold true? *Q7: Base = “ total ” (390) Moore’s Law

14 Billion-Transistor Chips? l Question: Currently, there are integrated circuits with 250 million transistors running. Some people in the semiconductor industry are forecasting that by the end of the decade there will be integrated circuits with one billion transistors running. How useful would such capacity be in each of the following industries? *Q8: Base = “ total ” (400) Usefulness of integrated circuits with one billion transistors running?

15 Energy Deregulation vs. Innovation l Question: How much do you agree with this statement? (10= strongly agree; 1= strongly disagree) “ Energy deregulation in the US will advance energy technology development. ” *Q9: Base = “ total ” (400) Statement: “Energy deregulation in the US will advance energy technology development.”

16 Energy Production and Distribution *Q10: Base = “ total ” (393) Energy deregulation More efficient trading facilities Increased storage capacity Better transmission/distribution systems Alternative sources Important to successful electric energy production and distribution? l Question: How important is each of the following to successful electric energy production and distribution? (10= very important; 1= not at all important)

17 Future Energy Sources l Question: How promising is each of the following technologies with respect to energy production over the next 10 years? (10= very promising; 1= not at all promising) *Q11: Base = “ total ” (390) Promising in terms of energy production?

18 Alternative Automotive Fuels l Question: How important is the development of fuels, other than gasoline, that can power automobiles and mass-transit vehicles? (10= very important; 1= not at all important) *Q12: Base = “ total ” (421) Fuel Development

19 Alternative Automotive Fuels, cont ’ d l Question: Which of the following alternative fuels that can be used to power automobiles and mass-market vehicles do you feel is most promising? (4= most promising; 1= least promising) Q13: Base = “ total ” (420)

20 Barriers to Alternative Automotive Fuels l Question: How much of a barrier is each of the following to the development of [alternative automotive fuels]? (10= major barrier; 1= not a barrier at all) *Q14: Base = “ total ” (372) Barrier to the development of various alternative fuel sources?

21 Air and Rail Transportation *Q15: Base = “ total ” (434) Statement: “Planes, as a form of mass transit, cannot be developed and maintained without significant government support Statement: “Trains and light rail, as a form of mass transit, cannot be developed and maintained without significant government support l Question: How much do you agree with the following statements? (10= strongly agree; 1= strongly disagree) “ Planes, as a form of mass transit, cannot be developed and maintained without significant government support. ” “ Trains and light rail, as a form of mass transit, cannot be developed and maintained without significant government support. ”

22 Educating Tomorrow ’ s Engineers Question: How well do you feel university engineering departments are doing in terms of educating today ’ s engineering students? (10= excellent job; 1= poor job) *Q16: Base = “ total ” (434) University Engineering Departments

23 Engineering Salaries *Q17: Base = “ total ” (436) Statement: “High-caliber students are no longer choosing engineering as a profession because they are able to make more money in other professions.” l Question: How much do you agree with this statement? 10= strongly agree; 1= strongly disagree. “ High-caliber students are no longer choosing engineering as a profession because they are able to make more money in other professions. ”

Respondent Profile

25 Area of Expertise and Employment Q19; Q20: Base = “ total ” (440)

26 Entrepreneurial Status Q21: Base = “ total ” (439)