Lunar Advanced Science and Exploration Research: Partnership in Science and Exploration Michael J. Wargo, Sc.D. Chief Lunar Scientist for Exploration Systems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Presentation to the NASA Goddard Academy 2. Constellation Overview Ken Davidian Lead, Commercial.
Advertisements

1 Pacific International Science Center for Exploration Systems (PISCES) Conference – Nov 12, 2008 Commercial Lunar Business Perspectives John Kohut Chief.
1 Partnering Presented at JUSTSAP/PISCES 2008 Collaboration with Colorado School of Mines.
Ad hoc Biomedical Committee Report NIH/NASA MOU Exploration Technology Development Program (ETDP) Milestones 2009 Human Research Program Status For Section.
Inner Guides=Text Boundary Outer Guides=Inner Boundary Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration Michele Gates Human Exploration and Operations Mission.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) is the first mission in NASA's Vision for Space Exploration, a plan to return to the moon and then to travel to.
Astronaut-Aided Construction of a Large Lunar Telescope Background Concepts for large astronomical facilities to follow the Next Generation Space Telescope.
Overview of Advanced Design White Paper Farrokh Najmabadi Virtual Laboratory for Technology Meeting June 23, 1998 OFES Headquarters, Germantown.
1 Optimizing Utility in Cloud Computing through Autonomic Workload Execution Reporter : Lin Kelly Date : 2010/11/24.
Habitat & Waypoints Picture. 2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture Design Requirements: A safe, reliable, low maintenance habitat to.
Flags Courtesy of 3dflags.com Robotic Precursor Missions to the Moon and Mars Douglas. A. Craig Tetsuji Yoshida NASA- HQ Shimizu Corp. November 2008.
9/2/2010Innovative and Successful Partnerships SummitPage 1 Johnson Space Center Johnson Space Center Capabilities and Partnerships Ellen Ochoa Deputy.
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
Strategic Plan Elements: ISRU, Analog Outpost Mike Duke November 10, 2008.
Space Exploration: Should It Be Done? Nishith Patel.
“ PHOBOS - SOIL ” Phobos Sample Return Mission 1. goals, methods of study A.Zakharov, Russian academy of sciences Russian aviation.
The Edinburgh Research Partnership in Engineering and Mathematics Heriot-Watt University EH14 4AS University of Edinburgh EH9 3LA ECOSSE.
1 Introduction to Grant Writing Beth Virnig, PhD Haitao Chu, MD, PhD University of Minnesota, School of Public Health December 11, 2013.
New, unique, meaningful destination for human explorers in next decade Provides a high-value target well-suited to exploitation using unique astronaut.
SMD Suborbital Science in the Planetary Science Division Philippe Crane Planetary Atmospheres Discipline Scientist LCANS Meeting 28 April 2007.
ESMD Education Presentation to Space Grant Directors March 2007 Jerry Hartman Exploration Systems Mission Directorate Education Lead.
Funding Opportunities and Challenges at NSF Jesús M. de la Garza, Ph.D. Program Director Division of Civil and Mechanical Systems Directorate for Engineering.
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat K-Series March 2012 Bioengineering Classroom.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration International Engagement & Partnerships: Building on the Past, Boldly Collaborating for the Future Goddard.
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
Challenges & Strategies for Lunar Habitation Systems Larry Toups Advanced Projects Office Constellation Program October 2006.
IMARS History and Phase II Overview Presented to MEPAG 13 May 2014 L. May, NASA HQ NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has not been approved or adopted.
Commercial Space Vehicles Lessons Learned Needs Workshop Bette Siegel, Ph.D. ESMD Bette Siegel, Ph.D. ESMD September 18, 2006.
What is SBIR?  SBIR is a federal program where small businesses compete for up to $670,000 to research, develop and commercialize a new technology. 
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Lynn Garrison MSFC SBIR Program Manager NASA’s Mission To understand and protect our home planet To explore the Universe and Search for Life To Inspire.
Carl G. Ray Program Executive Small Business Innovation Research Small Business Technology Transfer SBIRSBIR To increase small business participation.
RASC-AL 2010 Topics. TECHNOLOGY-ENABLED HUMAN MARS MISSION NASA is interested in eventual human mission to the Martian surface. Current Mars design reference.
Diane E. Wickland NPP Program Scientist NPP Science: HQ Perspective on VIIRS May 18, 2011.
The Augustine Committee Review of Human Spaceflight Plans Committee Briefing to COMSTAC October 29, 2009 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee.
Dr. Richard R. Vondrak Director, Robotic Lunar Exploration Program Science Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters September 2004 NASA Robotic Lunar Exploration.
Accelerated Long Range Traverse (ALERT) Paul Springer Michael Mossey.
Pacific International Space Center for Exploration Systems (PISCES): Vision and Goals Frank Schowengerdt, Director of PISCES Presented at JUSTSAP/PISCES.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
Proposition 1 Workshop: the Grant Application Process July 2015.
Applied Sciences Perspective Lawrence Friedl, Program Director NASA Earth Science Applied Sciences Program LANCE User Working Group Meeting  September.
Interlude  Viking mission operations ended in the early 1980s  Viking missions gave scientists the most complete picture of Mars to date. What does this.
Near-Term Mars Colonization -A DevelopSpace Project- May 4 th, 2008.
Crew Mobility for Lunar Surface Exploration Dr. Rob Ambrose NASA-JSC May 2008.
S cience M ission D irectorate Research Solicitation Overview.
1 SBIR/STTR Overview Wang Yongqiang. 2 Federal SBIR/STTR Program ‣ A +$2Billion funding program set-aside for small businesses seeking to early stage.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 27, 2013 Defining Potential HEOMD Instruments for Mars 2020 A Work in Progress... NOTE ADDED BY.
CSRP NASA Workshop NASA’s Revised Budget. CSRP NASA Workshop NASA’s New Vision and Objectives (as of January 14, 2004)  VISION  The fundamental goal.
Colorado Space Grant Symposium 2011 Meeting Colorado School of Mines Affiliate.
March 2004 At A Glance Advanced Mission Design (AMD) researches and develops innovative trajectories and the mathematical methods used for optimal designs.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science 1 NASA—Johnson Space Center Astromaterials Research and Exploration.
Lunar Surface Atmosphere Spectrometer (LSAS) Objectives: The instrument LSAS is designed to study the composition and structure of the Lunar atmosphere.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use FISO COLLOQUIUM, 18 June 2014 B. HUFENBACH ESA’S SPACE EXPLORATION STRATEGY.
LUNAR MISSION TO CELEBRATE THE 50 TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE APOLLO LANDING 1.
Workshop on Science Associated with the Lunar Exploration Architecture - Earth Science Subcommittee Theme: A Lunar-Based Earth Observatory Science Observations.
Mission: Moon!. What is it like on the Moon? Length of Day Atmosphere Temperature Water Radiation Gravity Landscape.
The Global Exploration Roadmap Considerations on Life Support International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) Francois Spiero, CNES Co-chair,
Bringing Digital Technology Back to Earth ISCe2005 Presented by Ken Dozier USC Viterbi School of Engineering NASA Far West Technology Transfer Center.
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
Quality System.
h t t p : / / w w w . u s c . e d u / g o / t t c
Mars Sustainability Workshop Kennedy Space Center February 8, 2018
Goddard Contractor Association
Systems Engineering for Mission-Driven Modeling
NASA Satellite Laser Ranging Moblas 4 Monument Peak, CA LRO and HPWREN Scott Wetzel NASA Satellite Laser Ranging Program Near Earth Networks Programs.
Title (do not change font or font size for any of the chart elements)
11/28/17—Astronomy Warm-Up: Write 3 things you know about the Milky Way galaxy. Bring laptops/project materials MONDAY!! SCSh1. Students will evaluate.
Dr. James Vedda Center for Space Policy and Strategy
Jeff Dutton/NASA COR August 26, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Lunar Advanced Science and Exploration Research: Partnership in Science and Exploration Michael J. Wargo, Sc.D. Chief Lunar Scientist for Exploration Systems (202)

Announcement Information Go to: –Research Opportunities in Space and Earth Sciences (ROSES) –Solicitation: NNH07ZDA001N –Appendix C.8 Or, search for: nspires laser nasa

What’s Changed The Notice of Intent deadline has been changed from June 29 to July 6. The submission date for proposals has been extended from September 7 to September 20. Additionally, there is text in the LASER call that will now allow for 4 year proposals. –Proposers must be sure to have 4 years of work in the proposal.

Exploration Topics 1.Lunar Data Processing and Modeling to support Human Lunar Missions and surface activities 2.Field Exploration Techniques and Outpost Operations 3.Lunar Regolith Interaction and Simulant Investigations 4.Resource Utilization

1. Lunar Data Processing and Modeling to support Human Lunar Missions and surface activities: Identification, processing, analysis, and delivery to the Planetary Data System of lunar data sets that would be of value to exploration Modeling that can improve our understanding of the local or general lunar environment (e.g. lighting, thermal, radiation, etc.) or improve our ability to optimize systems that function therein

Theoretical and/or experimental work on fluid behavior and interactions in lunar gravity and how they would affect operations and systems performance at an outpost –Cryogenic fluid creation, transfer, storage, loss replenishment, and performance in mobile and stationary human environmental control systems –Such investigations should demonstrate how they would reduce risk and/or enhance performance during human missions to the Moon Theoretical work on volatile deposition, transport, segregation, and distribution at the lunar poles Developing strategies and identifying considerations for site selection, including the roles of: –planetary processes, resource availability, topography, and geochemistry/mineralogy 1. Lunar Data Processing and Modeling to support Human Lunar Missions and surface activities:

Recognizing that measurements to be made on upcoming international robotic missions will add greatly to our quantitative understanding of the Moon, proposals should clearly indicate how any near term theoretical/modeling efforts will add significant value in this early phase of lunar exploration.

2. Field Exploration Techniques and Outpost Operations This topic area addresses key field exploration techniques and outpost science and operations. –sample collection, documentation, curation –human-robotic interactions –planetary protection Development, analysis, and possible ground demonstration of techniques to support science, as well as resource evaluation for human activities Study of exploratory strategies for maximizing scientific or technical return from surface activities –human-machine interaction/optimization –human centered computing –development of optimized exploration science protocols

2. Field Exploration Techniques and Outpost Operations Study of tradeoffs between human and robotic capabilities to accomplish tasks that will be performed on the Moon for exploration and science Study of human performance in the execution of exploration or science activities that are expected to be part of a lunar outpost or sortie missions or are uniquely enabled by local human presence Studies using field sites, facilities, or hardware on Earth as analogs for lunar exploration science

3. Lunar Regolith Interaction and Simulant Investigations This topic area includes any theoretical or applied research that looks at how outpost or human sortie activities will interact with regolith in order to execute lunar exploration and/or science missions, including investigations using lunar simulant. –charging, adhesion, chemistry, handling, transport, extraction, processing, etc Lunar dust investigations for mitigation –dust properties, electrostatic dust charging, dust repellant materials, and dust-related planetary protection studies Civil engineering questions related to: –Trafficability (e.g., effects of repeated traverses on the regolith stability) –Geotechnical properties, stabilization –Mining and excavation

3. Lunar Regolith Interaction and Simulant Investigations The Moon is recognized as an excellent testbed for testing technologies for planetary protection. Investigations that develop new strategies for limiting contamination released by human support equipment (habitats, extra-vehicular activity (EVA) suits, mobility aids) and for preventing contamination of human systems by dust and other lunar elements

4. Resource Utilization Theoretical or applied scientific research on the use of local resources –Production of oxygen, nitrogen, and other volatiles, fuels, metals –Using regolith as construction materials, etc.) in lunar outpost activities, –Assessment of materials processing strategies and methodologies in the lunar environment Development of time-phased strategies for resource utilization with analyses of which resource types to exploit at what times Concepts to shift human exploration paradigms away from resupply to local generation of finished products to be used at the outpost for either exploratory or scientific benefit

4. Resource Utilization Studies of the use of human lander components or decomposed lander materials for secondary functions after the primary mission has been completed Cost-to-benefit evaluations or different resource development strategies, using development cost, landed mass, and total end-to-end energy as the figures of merit