Recent advances in the CHIANTI database in the X-ray range Enrico Landi Naval Research Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Line Features in RHESSI Spectra Kenneth J. H. Phillips Brian R. Dennis GSFC RHESSI Workshop Taos, NM 10 – 11 September 2003.
Advertisements

Thermal and nonthermal contributions to the solar flare X-ray flux B. Dennis & K. PhillipsNASA/GSFC, USA J. & B. SylwesterSRC, Poland R. Schwartz & K.
Instrumental Chemistry
L. Teriaca, IMPRS Seminar, Lindau 08/12/04 Spectroscopy of the solar Transition Region and Corona L. Teriaca.
Collisional-Radiative Modeling of EBIT Spectra of High-Z Ions Yuri Ralchenko National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD ADAS.
Physical characteristics of selected X-ray events observed with SphinX spectrophotometer B. Sylwester, J. Sylwester, M. Siarkowski Space Research Centre,
Cristina Chifor SESI Student Intern 2005 Solar Physics, Code 612 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Mentors: Dr. Ken Phillips & Dr. Brian Dennis FE AND FE/NI.
Page 1 Cristina Chifor (a) Ken Phillips (b), Brian Dennis (c) a) DAMTP, University of Cambridge, UK b) Mullard Space Science Lab, UK c) NASA/GSFC, Maryland,
Fitting X-ray Spectra with Imperfect Models Nancy S. Brickhouse Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Acknowledgments to Randall Smith and Adam Foster.
Super-Hot Thermal Plasmas in Solar Flares
Astrophysical Priorities for Accurate X-ray Spectroscopic Diagnostics Nancy S. Brickhouse Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics In Collaboration.
Line Transfer and the Bowen Fluorescence Mechanism in Highly Ionized Optically Thick Media Masao Sako (Caltech) Chandra Fellow Symposium 2002.
A Proposal For Improved Iron Project Collision Strengths Anil Pradhan Iron Project/ITAMP Workshop on High Accuracy Atomic Physics in Astronomy Aug. 7-9,
X-Ray Observation and Analysis of a M1.7 Class Flare Courtney Peck Advisors: Jiong Qiu and Wenjuan Liu.
RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
COOL STARS and ATOMIC PHYSICS Andrea Dupree Harvard-Smithsonian CfA 7 Aug High Accuracy Atomic Physics In Astronomy.
RHESSI/GOES Xray Analysis using Multitemeprature plus Power law Spectra. J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB)
Measuring the Temperature of Hot Solar Flare Plasma with RHESSI Amir Caspi 1,2, Sam Krucker 2, Robert P. Lin 1,2 1 Department of Physics, University of.
RHESSI/GOES Xray Analysis using Multitemeprature plus Power law Spectra. J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB) ABSTRACT: We present spectral fits for RHESSI and GOES solar.
SPD May 25, 2005 RHESSI soft X-ray imaging spectroscopy H. Hudson & A. Caspi (SSL/UCB) And B. Dennis & K. Phillips (NASA/GSFC.
Spectral simulations of a H-C-O-Si plasma David Cohen with V. Swisher, M. Brown Swarthmore College Mar. 12, 2006 For the Plasma Dynamics Laboratory, University.
Modeling X-Ray Photoionization Experiments Michael Rosenberg and David Cohen Swarthmore College Introduction In order to reliably determine the temperature,
Iron K Spectra from L-Shell Ions in Photoionized Plasmas Work in Progress Duane Liedahl Physics and Advanced Technologies Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
35th COSPAR: Scientific Commission E1.9; Paris, July 2004 Identification of Lines in the Range 3.3 Å Å Observed in RESIK Spectra B. Sylwester,
SDO/AIA science plan: prioritization and implementation: Five Objectives in 10 steps [session no.] HMI/AIA science teams meeting; Monterey; Feb
The spectral resolution of x-ray telescopes has improved many hundred-fold over the past decade, enabling us to detect and resolve emission lines in hot.
Photoionization Modeling: the K Lines and Edges of Iron P. Palmeri (UMH-Belgium) T. Kallman (GSFC/NASA-USA) C. Mendoza & M. Bautista (IVIC-Venezuela) J.
Recent advances in the CHIANTI project Enrico Landi Naval Research Laboratory.
July 11 X-Ray Gratings Workshop Capella Grating Data and the Emission Line Project - An Update Priya Desai (CfA) Nancy Brickhouse Jeremy Drake Dave Huenenmoerder.
990901EIS_RR_Science.1 Science Investigation Goals and Instrument Requirements Dr. George A. Doschek EIS US Principal Investigator Naval Research Laboratory.
EUV Spectroscopy. High-resolution solar EUV spectroscopy.
Tycho’s SNR SNR G "To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe." ~Carl Sagan.
Thermal, Nonthermal, and Total Flare Energies Brian R. Dennis RHESSI Workshop Locarno, Switzerland 8 – 11 June, 2005.
Spectral modeling of cosmic atomic plasmas Jelle S. Kaastra SRON.
The Influence of the Return Current and the Electron Beam on the X-Ray Flare Spectra Elena Dzifčáková, Marian Karlický Astronomical Institute of the Academy.
Peter Young* George Mason University, VA Uri Feldman Artep Inc, MD *Work funded by NSF and NASA.
The Influence of the Return Current and Electron Beam on the EUV and X-Ray Flare Emission E. Dzifčáková, M. Karlický Astronomical Institute of the Academy.
Diagnostics of non-thermal n-distribution Kulinová, A. AÚ AVČR, Ondřejov, ČR FMFI UK, Bratislava, SR.
Anisotropic dielectronic resonances from magnetic-dipole lines Yuri Ralchenko National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD, USA ADAS.
Atomic Physics for X-ray Astronomy: A Primer
EUV & X-ray Updates to FORWARD since our last meeting Terry Kucera NASA/GSFC March 10, 2014.
Atomic data for heavy elements relevant to magnetic fusion and astrophysics using the Los Alamos atomic physics codes James Colgan, Honglin Zhang, and.
Emission I: Atomic Physics for X-ray Astronomy Randall K. Smith Johns Hopkins University NASA/GSFC.
Atomic data: state of the art and future perspectives Jelle Kaastra with Ton Raassen, Liyi Gu, Junjie Mao, Igone Urdampilleta, Missagh Mehdipour SRON &
EVE Sun-as-a-Star Spectra Milligan et al “Fe Cascade” for SOL
Determining the Heating Rate in Reconnection Formed Flare Loops Wenjuan Liu 1, Jiong Qiu 1, Dana W. Longcope 1, Amir Caspi 2, Courtney Peck 2, Jennifer.
NON-THERMAL   DISTRIBUTIONS AND THE CORONAL EMISSION J. Dudík 1, A. Kulinová 1,2, E. Dzifčáková 1,2, M. Karlický 2 1 – OAA KAFZM FMFI, Univerzita Komenského,
UCL DEPT. OF SPACE & CLIMATE PHYSICS SOLAR & STELLAR PHYSICS GROUP Atomic Data for Astrophysics VOTADA VO Tools and Atomic Data for Astrophysics Giulio.
Light and Matter Astronomy 315 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 6.
Flare Differential Emission Measure from RESIK and RHESSI Spectra B. Sylwester, J. Sylwester, A. Kępa Space Research Centre, PAS, Wrocław, Poland T. Mrozek.
Flare Prediction and the Background Corona Coronal Diagnostic Spectrometer Wolter-Schwarzschild Type 2 telescope Two separate spectrometers- the Normal.
The CHIANTI Atomic Database An Overview of Data, Software and Applications Dr Peter Young George Mason University, USA NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
XUV monochromatic imaging spectroscopy in the SPIRIT experiment on the CORONAS-F mission I. Diagnostics of solar corona plasma by means of EUV Spectroheliograph.
Preliminary Presentation By Matthew Lewis 2 nd December 2005.
Hale COLLAGE (CU ASTR-7500) “Topics in Solar Observation Techniques” Lecture 8: Coronal emission line formation Spring 2016, Part 1 of 3: Off-limb coronagraphy.
RHESSI and the Solar Flare X-ray Spectrum Ken Phillips Presentation at Wroclaw Workshop “ X-ray spectroscopy and plasma diagnostics from the RESIK, RHESSI.
Microwave emission from the trapped and precipitated electrons in solar bursts J. E. R. Costa and A. C. Rosal1 2005, A&A, 436, 347.
Simulation of CHANDRA X-Ray Spectral Observations of  Pup (O4 If) J. J. MacFarlane, P. Wang Prism Computational Sciences Madison, WI J. P. Cassinelli,
CHIANTI An atomic database for X-ray spectroscopy Enrico Landi Naval Research Laboratory.
Emission Measure Distributions: A Tutorial Nancy S. Brickhouse Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics From Spectral Lines to Emission Measures Emission.
IAS 20 June 2013 Celebrating the achievements of Alan Gabriel Laboratory spectroscopy Exploring the process of dielectronic recombination S. Volonte.
Spectral signatures of dynamic plasmas  Many space missions over the past 30 yrs  A very dynamic Sun SoHO/EIT Hinode/SOT.
UCL DEPT. OF SPACE & CLIMATE PHYSICS SOLAR & STELLAR PHYSICS GROUP Atomic Data for Astrophysics VOTada VO Tools and Atomic Data for Astrophysics Giulio.
X-ray Spectroscopy of Coronal Plasmas Ken Phillips Scientific Associate, Natural History Museum, and Honorary Prof., QUB 1.
Electron-impact excitation of Be-like Mg
Chapter 13 – Behavior of Spectral Lines
ADAS workshop, Auburn University
Studying Transition Region Phenomena with Solar-B/EIS
VOTADA VO Tools and Atomic Data for Astrophysics
Differential Emission Measure
Presentation transcript:

Recent advances in the CHIANTI database in the X-ray range Enrico Landi Naval Research Laboratory

Overview 1.Introduction 2.What is CHIANTI 3.New features of the CHIANTI database 4.Comparison with X-ray observations 5.Conclusions

Introduction X-ray spectra are of primary importance for quantitative studies of the physics of many astrophysical objects Emission and absorption of line and continuum radiation in the X- rays offer a wide variety of diagnostic tools to determine the physical properties of emitting sources For this reason, in the recent past, several instruments have been flown to observe astrophysical sources in the X-ray range: ChandraROSAT XMMYohkoh RHESSISMM RESIK…and many others

Why a database? X-ray spectra are composed by line and continuum radiation, emitted by highly charged ions. Observed X-ray spectral lines come from Rydberg series in the H-,He-like sequences High-energy configurations (n>2) in highly charged Fe and Ni ions Innershell transitions Dielectronic satellite lines Continuum radiation comes from Free-free radiation Free-bound radiation

In order to study this radiation and use it for plasma diagnostic purposes, a large amount of atomic data are needed for both line and continuum radiation To address this need, several databases have been created in the past: CHIANTI MEKAL APEC/APED ADAS Arcetri Spectral Code

Requirements for a database In order to be suitable for the analysis of modern high-resolution spectra, atomic data bases need to - be completeno lines left behind - be accurateplasma diagnostics not hindered by atomic physics uncertainties - be easy-to-use - be transparent- the user can independently check the original data and their accuracy - no black box - all data independently refereed in peer reviewed literature Also, atomic data and predicted emissivities from data bases need to be benchmarked against observations

The CHIANTI database CHIANTI consists of A database of atomic data and transition rates A suite of IDL programs for plasma diagnostics CHIANTI is able to calculate Line emissivities formore than 230 ions innershell transitions dielectronic satellite lines Continuum emissivities forfree-free radiation free-bound radiation two-photon continuum Under the optically thin plasma assumption

CHIANTI data are: In ASCII format Selected from the refereed literature (no unpublished data) With references to original literature CHIANTI is completely transparent to the end user FREELY available on the web at Fully documented through user guides CHIANTI also maintains:a mailing list assistance to users at:

CHIANTI has enjoyed great success in the astrophysical community. CHIANTI data have been –Included in the software of several satellite borne missions SOHO/CDS(EUV) SOHO/EIT(EUV) TRACE(UV) Solar-B(EUV,X-rays) STEREO(EUV) RHESSI(X-rays) –Included in other spectral codes APEC/APED PintOfAle Arcetri Spectral Code ADAS

State-of-the-art Literature data for the X-rays have several limitations: Missing configurations (n>3 in many Fe ions) Limited atomic models for n=3 configurations ( usually due to computer memory limitation in the past ) Missing processes: resonances ionization effects on level populations recombination effects on level populations cascades from higher levels Uncertainties in line identifications

CHIANTI 5.0 The CHIANTI database has been recently greatly expanded. The main features of the next CHIANTI release (Version 5.0) are: –New data for high-energy configurations in Fe XVII-XXIII n=3,4,5,6,7Fe XVII n=3,4,5Fe XVIII-XXIII –New data for satellite lines –Ionization and recombination effects in level populations –Complete re-assessment of energy levels and line identifications –Other data and new ions for EUV and UV lines

New data for high-energy configurations in Fe XVII-XXIII We have made use of the Flexible Atomic Code, by Dr. M.F. Gu, to calculate Energy levels Radiative transition rates Collisional transition rates (including resonances) for all configurations with n=3,4,5,6,7Fe XVII n=3,4,5Fe XVIII-XXIII These data allow to predict lines in the 7-12 Angstrom range Few if any data were available in the literature for most of these configurations Data will be published separately (Landi & Gu 2005)

New data for satellite lines New data have been added to CHIANTI 5.0 for dielectronic satellite lines and innershell transitions, to match observations Fe XXIIIinnershell transitions S XVI, Ca XVIII, Fe XXIVdielectronic satellite lines These new lines also provide diagnostic tools for measuring the plasma electron temperature These lines allow to study RHESSI spectra in the 6-9 keV energy range

Fe XXV Fe XXIV satellites Fe XXIV satellites Fe XXIV satellites

Ionization and Recombination Recently, Behar & Doron (2002) and Gu (2003) demonstrated that ionization and recombination are important contributors to steady-state level population in highly ionized Fe ions CHIANTI 5.0 incorporates data and software to take these two processes into account All recombination and ionization data have been taken from the Flexible Atomic Code calculations by Gu (2003).

We make use of the Coronal Model Approximation: Without Ionization/Recombination: With Ionization/Recombination: Where:n q-1, n q, n q+1 ion fractions CI, REC total ion. and rec. rates E gi total excitation rate level i D ig total de-excitation rate level i

The Coronal Model Approximation is not valid if metastable levels have non-negligible population As the electron density increases, the population of metastable levels in highly ionized Fe ions also increases The maximum density at which metastable level populations are negligible changes from ion to ion: Ion Log Ne(max) Fe XVII any Fe XVIII > 13 Fe XIX 12 Fe XX 12 Fe XXI 12 Fe XXII 13 Fe XXIII > 13 Fe XXIV any

Fe XVII Fe XVIII Fe XIX Fe XX

Fe XXIFe XXII Fe XXIVFe XXIII

Comparison with X-ray observations We have compared the new CHIANTI 5.0 with observations of a moderate solar flare InstrumentSMM/FCS (Bragg crystal spectrometer) Date of observationAugust 25, 1980 Wavelength ranges A (channel 1) A (channel 2) A (channel 3) Spectral resolution1-20 mA (depending on the channel) SourceM 1.5 flare Spectral scan Duration17.5 minutes Ions observedH-likeO,Ne,Mg He-likeO,Ne,Na,Mg,Al Fe ionsFe XVII to Fe XXIII Ni ionsNi XIX, Ni XX

Comparison method FCS spectra were not observed simultaneously, so the flare plasma was analyzed as a function of time The Emission Measure analysis showed that The flare plasma was isothermal The temperature was decreasing slowly The emission measure decreased by a factor 6 during the observation This allowed us to use the Emission Measure as a tool to compare CHIANTI 5 emissivities and observed fluxes for each ion, to: Assess the quality of CHIANTI 5 data Identify blends from other ions and evaluate their contribution to the total intensity (additional check on atomic physics) Identify areas where improvements are still needed

In case of isothermal plasma We can define, for all the lines of the same ion, the ratio If there are no blends and no atomic physics problems, all the ratios must be the same at all temperatures, within the uncertainties.

Example: Fe XIX CHIANTI 4.2 CHIANTI 5 Time bin 1 Time bin 2

Example: Fe XVII Long standing problems: Strong A line lower than predicted »Resonant scattering? »Satellites in 15.01/15.26 intensity ratios? Disagreement in 2p-3s/2p-3d ratios »Innershell ionization to 3s? »Satellite contributions to line ratios? Existing atomic data »DW collision rates from many authors »Only very recently resonance data have been considered »Doron & Behar (2002) showed that recombination is important for Fe XVII

We used CHIANTI 5.0 to check the importance of many additional processes in Fe XVII level population: ProcessImportance CascadesModerate Collisional ionizationModerate RecombinationCrucial ResonancesCrucial We have compared the FCS spectrum with CHIANTI 5.0 predictions obtained with and without those processes

CHIANTI 4.2 CHIANTI A

Results and Conclusions CHIANTI 5.0 reproduces observed high- and low- resolution X- ray spectra with great accuracy All relevant configurations in Fe ions are now included Blending from ions of different species is accounted for Most lines are reproduced within 30% CHIANTI 5.0 represents a major advance over previous versions and other databases New diagnostic tools are now available to measure the physical properties of the emitting plasmas