1 Spatial variations of the electron-to- proton mass ratio: bounds obtained from high-resolution radio spectra of molecular clouds in the Milky Way S. A. Levshakov Dept. Theoretical Astrophyscis A.F. Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute St. Petersburg
2 Contents Short Introduction Part I. What is known Part II. What is new Conclusions
3 = m e /m p = e 2 /(hc) Atomic Molecular Discrete Spectra allow to probe variability of through relativistic corrections to atomic energy, ( Z) 2 R corrections for the finite nuclear mass, R and important for molecules less important for atoms Z – atomic number R – Rydberg constant
4 fine-structure levels: = molecular rotational transitions: 2 = atomic levels, in general: ’= + qx + … = 2Q x = ( ’ ) Q = q/ dimensionless sensitivity coefficient q-factor [cm -1 ] individual for each atomic transition = ’- = ’- either spatial or temporal differences
5 Quasar spectra Redshift: z = ( - 0 )/ 0 Part I. Cosmological Temporal Variations VLT/UVES z 2 t yr
6 Single ion / measurements FeII Q 0.04 Q Q 0.06 = 1 2 z 1 – z 2 (Q 2 – Q 1 )(1+z) = vv 2c Q FeI Q 0.08 Q 0.03 Q 0.05
7 QSO HE neutral iron FeI resonance transitions at z=0.45 Doppler width 1 km/s ( ! ) Simple one-component profiles Q 0.08Q 0.03 v = -200 200 m/s / = 7 7 ppm
8 Q the highest resolution spectrum, FWHM = 3.8 km/s FeII resonance transitions at z=1.84 Current estimate: v = -130 90 m/s / = 4.0 2.8 ppm
9 brightest QSO HE FeII resonance transitions at z= FeII pairs {1608,X} X = Current estimate: 1) updated sensitivity coefficients (Porsev et al.’07) 2) Accounting for correlations between different pairs {1608,X} / = 1.79 ppm The most stringent limit: | / | < 2 ppm Calibration uncertainty of 50 m/s translates into the error in / of 2 ppm cf. pixel size 2-3 km/s
10 Conclusions (Part I) No cosmological temporal variations of at the level of 2 ppm have been found (same for )
11 Part II. Spatial Variations (search for scalar fields) dependence of masses and coupling constants on environmental matter density Chameleon-like scalar field models: = ( ) = ( ) - ambient matter density Khoury Weltman’04 Bax et al.’04 Feldman et al.’06 Olive Pospelov’08 lab / ISM
12 Ammonia Method to probe m e /m p vibrational, and rotational intervals in molecular spectra E vib : E rot 1/2 : vib / vib = 0.5 / rot / rot = 1.0 / the inversion vibrational transition in ammonia, NH 3, inv = 23.7 GHz inv / inv = 4.5 / Flambaum Kozlov’07 Q inv / Q vib = 9
13 N N H H H H H H H H H H H H N N eV 1.3 cm U(x) x inv exp(-S) the action S -1/2 Quantum mechanical tunneling double-well potential of the inversion vibrational mode of NH 3
14 By comparing the observed inversion frequency of NH 3 with a rotational frequency of another molecule arising co-spatially with ammonia, a limit on the spatial variation of / can be obtained : / = 0.3(V rot – V inv )/c 0.3 V /c V = V noise V Var( V) = Var( V noise ) Var( V ) V noise = 0 V = V
15 23 GHz 18 GHz 93 GHz Hyper-fine splittings in NH 3, HC 3 N N 2 H +
16 Dense molecular clouds, n H 10 4 cm -3, T kin 10K High-mass clumps, M 100M solar, Infrared Dark Clouds (IRDCs) Low-mass cores, M 10M solar Protostellar cores containing IR sources Starless cores (prestellar cores) Dynamically stable against grav contraction Unstable n H 10 5 cm -3 n H 10 5 cm -3
17 CS CO HCO + CCS NH 3 N2H+N2H+ N2D+N2D+ H3+H3+ H2D+H2D+ D2H+D2H+ D3+D3+ H2H2 H+H+ e-e- 15,000 AU 7,000 AU 5,000 AU 2,000 AU 10 4 cm cm -3 Molecular differentiation within a low-mass core
18 Perseus molecular cloud D 260 pc 6 2 o or 27 9 pc M 10 4 M solar n H 100 cm -3 Preliminary obtained results (Levshakov, Molaro, Kozlov 2008, astro-ph/ )
19 Perseus molecular cores Rosolowsky et al ammonia spectral atlas of 193 molecular cores in the Perseus cloud Observations: 100-m Green Bank Telescope (GBT) GBT beam size at 23 GHz is FWHM = 31arcsec (0.04 pc) Spectral resolution = 24 m/s (!) Single-pointing, simultaneous observations of NH 3 and CCS lines
20 pure turbulent broadening, (CCS) = (NH 3 ) pure thermal, (CCS) = 0.55 (NH 3 ) V n=98 = 44 13 m/s V n=34 = 39 10 m/s V n=21 = 52 7 m/s CCS vs NH 3 symmetric profiles / = (5.2 0.7) 10 -8
21 Pipe Nebula Rathborne et al molecular cores in Pipe Nebula Observations: 100-m Green Bank Telescope (GBT) Spectral resolution = 23 m/s (!) Single-pointing, simultaneous observations of NH 3 and CCS lines GBT beam size at 23 GHz is FWHM = 30arcsec (0.02 pc)
22 V n=8 = 69 11 m/s CCS vs NH 3
23 New results (Astron.Astrophys., astro-ph/ ) 32m MEDICINA (Bologna) Italy 100m EFFELSBERG (Bonn) Germany 45m NOBEYAMA (NRAO) Japan Nov 24-28, 2008 Feb 20-22, 2009 Apr 8-10, 2009 Collaboration with Alexander Lapinov Christian Henkel Takeshi Sakai NH 3 HC 3 N NH 3 N 2 H + 41 cold and compact molecular cores in the Taurus giant molecular complex 55 molecular pairs in total Paolo Molaro Dieter Reimers
24 Observations: 32-m Medicina Telescope: beam size at 23 GHz, FWHM = 1.6 arcmin position switching mode two digital spectrometers ARCOS (ARcetri COrrelation Spectrometer) and MSpec0 (high resolution digital spectrometer) Spectral res. = 62 m/s (NH 3 ), 80 m/s (HC 3 N) ARCOS Spectral res. = 25 m/s (NH 3 ), 32 m/s (HC 3 N) MSpec0 100-m Effelsberg Telescope: beam size at 23 GHz, FWHM = 40 arcsec frequency switching mode K-band HEMT (High Electron Mobility Transistor) receiver, backend FFTS (Fast Fourier Transform Spectrometer) Spectral res. = 30 m/s (NH 3 ), 40 m/s (HC 3 N) 45-m Nobeyama Telescope: beam size at 23 GHz, FWHM = 73 arcsec HEMT receiver (NH 3 ), and SIS (Superconductor-Insulator- Superconductor) receiver (N 2 H + ) Spectral res. = 49 m/s (NH 3 ), 25 m/s (N 2 H + ) position switching mode Independent Doppler tracking of the observed molecular lines
25 Effelsberg 100-m
26 Nobeyama 45-m
27 total n=55 co-spatially distributed Black: 1 <1.2 Red: 1.2 <1.7 = b(NH 3 ) b(HC 3 N) = 1.7 for pure thermal broadening
28 Results total sample, n=55 mean V = 14.1 4.0 m/s scale = 29.6 m/s (standard deviation) median V = 17 m/s thermally dominated, n=7 (red points) mean V = 21.5 2.8 m/s scale = 13.4 m/s median V = 22 m/s co-spatially distributed, n=23 (red black points) mean V = 21.2 1.8 m/s scale = 3.4 m/s median V = 22 m/s effelsberg, n=12 mean V = 23.2 3.8 m/s scale = 13.3 m/s median V = 22 m/s nobeyama, n=9 mean V = 22.9 4.2 m/s scale = 12.7 m/s median V = 22 m/s NH 3 HC 3 N NH 3 N 2 H +
29 Poor accuracy in lab frequencies - main source of uncertainties NH 3 sys = 0.6 m/s HC 3 N sys = 2.8 m/s N2H+N2H+ sys = 14 m/s V = 23.2 3.8 stat 2.8 sys m/s Effelsberg: / = (2.2 0.4 stat 0.3 sys ) 10 -8
30 GBT vs Effelsberg V 52 7 m/s V 23.2 3.8 m/s CCS NH 3 HC 3 N NH (1) MHz Yamamoto et al.’90 – radioastronomical estimate (10) MHz CDMS’05 - catalogue (4) MHz Lovas et al.’92 - laboratory 1 kHz at 22.3 GHz v 13.4 m/s V 22 7 m/s V 6 7 m/s
31 new precise lab freqencies badly needed ! lab 1 m/s
32 Constraint on -variation fine-structure transition of carbon [CI] 609 m low-lying rotational lines of 13 CO J=1-0 (2.7 mm), J=2-1 (1.4 mm) observations of cold molecular clouds F = 2 / F/F = 2 / - / = v/c TMC-1 Schilke et al.’95 L 183 Stark et al.’96 Ori A,B Ikeda et al.’02 v = v rot - v fs mean V = 0 60 m/s scale = 215 m/s (standard deviation) median V = 0 m/s sample size n=13 FWHM = m/s FWHM = 100 m/s | F/F| < 0.3 ppm | / | < 0.15 ppm
33 Conclusions (Part II) expected / velocity offset V = 23 4 stat 3 sys m/s / = (2.2 0.4 stat 0.3 sys ) conservative upper limits at z=0 : | / | < 1.5 no known systematic at the level of 20 m/s reproduced at different facilities at high-z, ISM (z=0) ISM (z>0) | / | 3 verification – other molecules new targets if no temporal dependence of (t) is present