Comparison of Scintimammography and Dedicated Emission Mammotomography

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CT Scanning: Dosimetry and Artefacts
Advertisements

Image Reconstruction.
Sezione di Napoli Univ. “Federico II” Experimental study of beam hardening artefacts in photon counting breast computed tomography M.G. Bisogni a, A. Del.
Gamma Camera Quality Control
Advanced GAmma Tracking Array
Improved Conspicuity of Abdominal Lesions with Single-Source Dual-Energy MDCT Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center Jerusalem, Israel Ruth Eliahou.
Chapter 8 Planar Scintigaraphy
MAMMO QC – covered in week 8
Computed Tomography II
Computed Tomography III
Computed Tomography RAD309
Optimisation of X-ray micro-tomography to perform low-dose imaging of highly-dosed gels P.M.Jenneson, E.C.Atkinson, P.Wai and S.J.Doran In 1993, Maryanski.
RHESSI Studies of Solar Flare Hard X-Ray Polarization Mark L. McConnell 1, David M. Smith 2, A. Gordon Emslie 4, Martin Fivian 3, Gordon J. Hurford 3,
Uni S School of Electronics and Physical Sciences Department of Physics University of Surrey Guildford Surrey GU2 7XH, UK Optimisation of X-ray micro-tomography.
On-Orbit Adjustment Calculation for the Generation-X X-ray mirror Figure D. A. Schwartz, R. J. Brissenden, M. Elvis, G. Fabbiano, D. Jerius, M. Juda, P.
tomos = slice, graphein = to write
On A Large Array Of Midsized Telescopes Stephen Fegan Vladimir Vassiliev UCLA.
Planar scintigraphy produces two-dimensional images of three dimensional objects. It is handicapped by the superposition of active and nonactive layers.
Despeckle Filtering in Medical Ultrasound Imaging
8/18/2015G.A. Fornaro Characterization of diffractive optical elements for improving the performance of an endoscopic TOF- PET detector head Student: G.
1 History and Lessons from FDA Regulation of Digital Radiology Kyle J. Myers, Ph.D. Division of Imaging and Applied Mathematics OSEL/CDRH/FDA October 22,
Dott. Dario Tresoldi CNR IPCF ME
Coincidence imaging today
The Project of Space Experiment with Wide Field Gamma-Ray Telescope (“GAMMASCOPE”) Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University.
Coincidence to Image: PET Imaging Jennifer White Marketing Manager SNS Workshop October 13, 2003.
Compton Camera development for the imaging of high energy gamma rays 1 Martin Jones UNTF 2010 Salford – April 14 th Martin.
Design and simulation of micro-SPECT: A small animal imaging system Freek Beekman and Brendan Vastenhouw Section tomographic reconstruction and instrumentation.
Module B Computed Tomography Physics, Instrumentation, and Imaging.
Fundamental Limits of Positron Emission Tomography
M. Alnafea1*, K. Wells1, N.M. Spyrou1 & M. Guy2
Factors affecting CT image RAD
Interaction ionizing radiation with biological tissue. Basic dosimetry.
© Jimoid.com 2005 Imaging Basics A medical image is a 2D or 3D distribution of signals which represent properties of an object. The purpose of medical.
Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography
HEALTH Novel MR-compatible PET detectors for simultaneous PET/MRI imaging FP7-HEALTH-2009-single-stage The focus should be to develop novel.
Professor Brian F Hutton Institute of Nuclear Medicine University College London Emission Tomography Principles and Reconstruction.
PET/SPECT Phantom. Side View of Phantom Image Resolution Intrinsic resolution FWHM Intrinsic resolution FWHM Field of view Field of view Measurement:
We report the result of a beam test on a prototype of Astronomical hard X-ray/soft gamma-ray Polarimeter, PoGO (Polarized Gamma-ray Observer). PoGO is.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL LABORATORY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Image Reconstruction of Restraint-Free Small Animals with Parallel and Multipinhole Collimation:
M. D. A NDERSON Cancer Center Nuclear Imaging (M.Cam) Richard E. Wendt III, Ph.D. and William D. Erwin, M.S. Small Animal Cancer Imaging Research Facility.
Nuclear Medicine: Tomographic Imaging – SPECT, SPECT-CT and PET-CT Katrina Cockburn Nuclear Medicine Physicist.
A Single Photon Emission Computer Tomograph for breast cancer imaging S. Vecchio a, N. Belcari a, P. Bennati b, M. Camarda a, R. Campanini c, M. N. Cinti.
Part No...., Module No....Lesson No
Conclusions Simulated fMRI phantoms with real motion and realistic susceptibility artifacts have been generated and tested using SPM2. Image distortion.
Introduction In positron emission tomography (PET), each line of response (LOR) has a different sensitivity due to the scanner's geometry and detector.
Impact of Axial Compression for the mMR Simultaneous PET-MR Scanner Martin A Belzunce, Jim O’Doherty and Andrew J Reader King's College London, Division.
A New High Intensity Cold Neutron Spectrometer at NIST J. A. Rodriguez 1,3, P. Brand 3, C. Broholm 2,3, J.C. Cook 3, Z. Huang 3, P. Hundertmark 3, J. Lynn.
P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade, L.Peralta, J. Varela GEANT4 Medical Applications at LIP GEANT4 Workshop, September – 4 October LIP – Lisbon.
X-ray SNR in 3 steps. I ∆I. X-ray transmission SNR Review Let N = average number of transmitted x-rays N = N 0 exp [ - ∫  dz ] Emission and transmission.
Improved Hybrid PET Imaging Using Variable Focal Length Fan-Slat Collimators Thomas C. Rust and Dan J. Kadrmas, Ph.D. Medical Imaging Research Laboratory.
Active Pixel Sensors in Medical and Biologi The application of Large Area Active Pixel Sensor (LAS) to high resolution Nuclear Medicine imaging Bob Ott.
Acquisition time6 min1 min 12 s Collimator height25 mm (Anger)12 mm (HiSens) Detector1 layer, 1 pixel / hole3 layers, 1 pixel / hole3 layers, 4 pixels.
Considerations on the possibility of Phase Contrast Mammography using ICS sources B. Golosio a, P. Delogu b, I. Zanette b, M. Carpinelli a, G. L. Masala.
Basis of Mammography F. Milano Dept. Clinical Physiopathology University of Florence
Computed Tomography Computed Tomography is the most significant development in radiology in the past 40 years. MRI and Ultrasound are also significant.
The study of new reconstruction method
Segmentation of 3D microPET Images of the Rat Brain by Hybrid GMM and KDE Tai-Been Chen Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Science,
The Optimization of Reconstruction Method Reducing Partial Volume Effect in PET/CT 3D Image Acquisition Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical.
Simulations in Medical Physics Y. TOUFIQUE*, R.CHERKAOUI EL MOURSLI*, M.KACI**, G.AMOROS**, *Université Mohammed V –Agdal, Faculté des Sciences de Rabat,
Nuclear Medicine Physics
Positron emission tomography: a review of basic principles, scanner design and performance, and current systems  Pat Zanzonico  Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 
CT Radiation Dose at Equal Image Contrast-to-noise Ratio using Iodine- and Novel Tantalum-based Contrast Agents: A Large Habitus Phantom Study Paul FitzGerald.
Reconstructions with TOF for in-beam PET
Single Photon Emission Tomography
Tianfang Li Quantitative Reconstruction for Brain SPECT with Fan-Beam Collimators Nov. 24th, 2003 SPECT system: * Non-uniform attenuation Detector.
QC And NEMA In The Nuclear Arena
P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade, L.Peralta, J. Varela
First demonstration of portable Compton camera to visualize 223-Ra concentration for radionuclide therapy Kazuya Fujieda (Waseda University) J. Kataoka,
Assist. Prof. Dr. Ilker Ozsahin Oct
Roshan S Livingstone and Benedicta R Department of Radiology
Presentation transcript:

Comparison of Scintimammography and Dedicated Emission Mammotomography Martin P. Tornai, Caryl N. Brzymialkiewicz, Spencer J. Cutler, Priti Madhav Multi-Modality Imaging Laboratory Department of Radiology Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA Supported by NIH Grant RO1-CA96821 and DAMD 17-03-1-0558

Overview Develop a “universal” breast phantom for emission and/or transmission imaging Needs to be compressible for uncompressed and partial compression imaging comparisons Needs to accommodate inserted lesions Needs to have physical attributes similar to human torso Make direct comparison of uncompressed breast SPECT and compressed scintimammography Develop and compare various fillable lesion sizes Compare different activity concentrations

Solid State Imaging Detector Detector CdZnTe Density 5.78 g/cm3 Effective Z 49 Elements 64 x 80 Crystal Dimensions 2.3 x 2.3 x 5 mm3 Pixel Size 2.5 x 2.5 mm2 FOV 16 x 20 cm2 Sensitivity 38 cts/sec/MBq Uniformity (post corr) < ±4% Energy Resolution 6.1% @ 140 keV 20.0 cm 16.0 cm 6.6 cm LumaGEM™ 3200-S (Gamma Medica Inc.)

Prototype Emission Mammotomograph Anthropomorphic torso and breast phantoms (Radiology Support Devices, Inc.) Integrated Gamma Camera (Gamma Medica, Inc.) Polar Tilt,  ROR Azimuth,  Radius of Rotation control (Newport Corp., Sanyo-Denki) Rotation stage and goniometer (Newport Corp.)

Compressible Breast Phantom & Chest Plate Fill port 3 cm f insertion port Fillable Volume: ~700 mL Nipple-Chest: 9 cm Medial-Lateral: 12 cm Superior-Inferior: 13 cm “Skin” thickness: 0.16 cm (Radiology Support Devices, Inc.)

Compressible Breast Phantom & Lesions Digital X-ray image Stems: 1.6 mm OD x 4.5 cm polyethylene 70 500 140 300 Lesions Volume “Diameter” (microL) (mm) 40 +/- 0.15 4.2 70 +/- 0.15 5.1 140 +/- 0.15 6.4 300 +/- 0.30 8.2 500 +/- 0.30 9.8 40 140 140 (Harvard Apparatus)

Scintimammography Acquisition Parameters Lesion Concentration 40 microCi / mL 20X clinical ! Lesion : Background Inf., 12 : 1, 7 : 1, 3 : 1 View Lateral (single view) Compression 12 cm, 9 cm, 6 cm Acquisition Time 10 min (equivalent)

Breast Compression 4 cm 12 cm 9 cm 6 cm Cranio-Caudal Lateral

Scintimammography (Planar) Projections Compression Thickness 9cm 7 : 1 9cm 12 : 1 9cm 3 : 1 12 cm 9 cm 6 cm 12 : 1 7 : 1 Leaky Phantom 3 : 1

Scintimammography: Effects of Compression 12 : 1 Concentration Ratio

Scintimammography: Effects of Activity Concentration 6 cm Compression

SPECT Acquisition Parameters 20X clinical ! Lesion Concentration 40 microCi / mL Lesion : Background Ratios Inf., 12 : 1, 7 : 1, 3 : 1 Mammotomography (q = 0 – 360) Orbits: Vertical Axis of Rotation (VAOR) ROR = 6.6 cm, f = 0 deg Tilted Parallel Beam (TPB) ROR = 5.2 cm, f = 45 deg 3 Lobed Sinusoid on Hemisphere (ProjSine) ROR = 2.8 – 5.2 cm, f = 15 – 45 deg Angular Increment : 2.8 deg Acquisition Time : 10 min (equivalent) Details about orbits and sampling on POSTER # M2-269

Mammotomography Orbits VAOR TPB45 ProjSine 0o 30o 60o 90o Camera Tilt () Details about orbits and sampling on POSTER # M2-269

Mammotomography Reconstructions 12 : 1 Concentration ProjSine Data Transverse Sagittal Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP) OSEM reconstruction with 5 iterations, 8 subsets, calculated attenuation correction, 3D Hann filtration with fc = 0.8*Nyquist

Mammotomography MIPs 300 uL 500 uL 40 uL 70 uL 140 uL VAOR TPB45 ProjSine 12 : 1 7 : 1 3 : 1

SPECT SNR & Contrast 12 : 1 Concentration Data ROI data from OSEM reconstruction with 3 iterations, 8 subsets, calculated attenuation correction, 3D Hann filtration with fc = 0.8*Nyquist

SPECT & Scintimammography SNR & Contrast

Conclusions Developed a compressible breast+chest phantom useful for comparative emission breast imaging with physical limitations more consistent with a human torso Measured various lesion sizes, locations (esp. near chest wall), and activity concentrations relative to backgrounds Compared compressed breast, planar scintimammography with uncompressed breast SPECT mammotomography Scintimammography has limited viewable breast volume towards the anterior chest wall Under a wide range of “low noise” measurement conditions: More lesions, lesion sizes, and (3D) lesion locations can be detected (and thus quantitated) with dedicated emission mammotomography than with compressed breast scintimammography

Multi-Modality Imaging Lab