Mobile Security and Payment Nour El Kadri University Of Ottawa

Security Keep in mind: Security requires an overall approach A system is as secure as its weakest component –Securing network transmission is only part of the equation The sad part is that people often prove to be the weakest link in the chain –Employee who hacks company’s billing database –Careless user who writes his/her PIN on the back of their handset and forget in on the bus

The Role of Cryptography SIM Module and Authentication centers in GSM Architecture WAP Gateway security gaps and their solution in the new WAP protocol stack for built-in IP How does cryptography complement such solutions? What are the business implications?

Network Transmission Security Requirements Authentication Confidentiality Integrity Non-repudiation Cryptography plays a central role in satisfying these requirements Other techniques include: Packet acknowledgements Checksums

Cryptography Sender: plaintext  cipher text …. Using encryption algorithms Receiver cipher text  plaintext …. Using a matching decryption algorithm

Secret-Key or Symmetric Cryptography Alice and Bob agree on an encryption method and a shared key. Alice uses the key and the encryption method to encrypt (or encipher) a message and sends it to Bob. Bob uses the same key and the related decryption method to decrypt (or decipher) the message.

Advantages of Symmetric Cryptography There are some very fast classical encryption (and decryption) algorithms Since the speed of a method varies with the length of the key, faster algorithms allow one to use longer key values. Larger key values make it harder to guess the key value -- and break the code -- by brute force.

Disadvantages of Symmetric Cryptography Requires secure transmission of key value Requires a separate key for each group of people that wishes to exchange encrypted messages (readable by any group member) –For example, to have a separate key for each pair of people, 100 people would need about 5000 different keys.

Public-Key Cryptography AKA Asymmetric Cryptography Alice generates a key value (usually a number or pair of related numbers) which she makes public. Alice uses her public key (and some additional information) to determine a second key (her private key). Alice keeps her private key (and the additional information she used to construct it) secret.

PK Cryptography – cont’d Bob (or Carol, or anyone else) can use Alice’s public key to encrypt a message for Alice. Alice can use her private key to decrypt this message. No-one without access to Alice’s private key (or the information used to construct it) can easily decrypt the message.

Public Key Cryptography Source: N. Sadeh

Man-in-the-Middle Attack Solution: Certificate Authorities Keys are certified, that means a third person/institution confirms (with its digital signature) the affiliation of the public key to a person

Certificate Authorities Three types of organizations for certification systems (PKIs?): Central certification authority (CA) –A single CA, keys often integrated in checking software –Example: older versions of Netscape (CA = Verisign) Hierarchical certification system –CAs which in turn are certified by “higher” CA –Examples: PEM, Teletrust, infrastructure according to Signature Law Web of Trust –Each owner of a key may serve as a CA –Users have to assess certificates on their own –Example: PGP (but with hierarchical overlay system)

Hybrid Encryption Systems All known public key encryption algorithms are much slower than the fastest secret- key algorithms. In a hybrid system, Alice uses Bob’s public key to send him a secret shared session key. Alice and Bob use the session key to exchange information.

Digital Signatures A digital signature is an electronic signature that can be used to authenticate the identity of the sender of a message or the signer of a document

Digital Signatures Source: N. Sadeh

Elliptic Curve Cryptography ECC was introduced by Victor Miller and Neal Koblitz in For DSA, RSA we need larger key length. ECC requires significantly smaller key size with same level of security. Benefits of having smaller key sizes : faster computations, need less storage space. ECC ideal for constrained environments: Pagers ; PDAs ; Cellular Phones ; Smart Cards

Key player Certicom is a key player. Acquired by Research in Motion (two days ago. Verisign was bidding on the company too This will set new research ahead in the wireless security arena

Smart card: –A card that contains a processor, memory, and an interface to the outside world. –Vary based on the capabilities of the processor and size of the memory –A smart card needs a reader –Not very common in north America, but it is widespread in other places. –Problems: Lack of standard interfaces Smart Cards

GSM’s SIM-Based Authentication

Message Authentication Codes Checksums –used mostly to verify the integrity of messages Use a hybrid approach Recipient can verify both the authenticity and the integrity of the message MACs are also referred to as “Message Integrity Codes”

Security: The Combinations are Many IPSec protocol has been adopted by GPRS –Negotiation of security parameters between sender and recipient –Negotiation carried out using Internet Key Exchange Flexibility in adapting security parameters to mobile environments is very important –Keys might be stored on SIM or WIM modules –Limited memory and processing power –Low bandwidth and high latency

Wired Equivalent Privacy Aka “WEP” Represents Wi-Fi first attempt at security Works at data link layer (Layer 2) Uses static 40 or 104 bit keys for authentication and encryption. Based on RC4 symmetric stream cipher. Key stream generated from initial key, used to encrypt and decrypt data

WAP Security: WTLS Keys generally placed in normal phone storage. New standards emerging (WAP Identity Module [WIM]) for usage of tamper-resistent devices. Aside from crypto problems: –User interface attacks likely (remember SSL problems) –WTLS terminates at WAP gateway; MITM attacks possible.

WAP Transaction layer WTP Three classes of transactions: –Class 0: unreliable –Class 1: reliable without result –Class 2: reliable with result Does the minimum a protocol must do to create reliability. No security elements at this layer. Protocol not resistant to malicious attacks.

WAP Session Layer WSP Meant to mimic the HTTP protocol. No mention of security in spec except for WTLS. Distinguishes a connected and connectionless mode. Connected mode is based on a SessionID given by the server.

Wireless Identity Module Can be used to hold private and secret keys required by WTLS TLS and non-WAP applications Computes crypto operations –“unwrapping master secret” –client signature in WTLS Handshake –key exchange (ECC WTLS Handshake) It can also store certificates and generate keys WIM does not necessarily need to be issued by the mobile operator It can be implemented on the SIM card

WMLScript SignText Allows developers to write applications where users are prompted with a text that they reject or accept Acceptance requires the user to punch his/her WIM PIN code and that results in the generation of a digital signature DS is transmitted back to the content server

WAP Security Models Operator Hosts Gateway –Without PKI –With PKI Content Provider Hosts Gateway –Static Gateway Connection –Dynamic Gateway Connection

Operator Hosts Gateway

Without PKI: –Advantages No extra work for Content Provider No extra work for user System only requires one logical gateway –Disadvantages Content Provider must trust Operator (NDA) Operator can control home deck Operator can introduce advertising

Operator Hosts Gateway With PKI: –Advantages Content providers does not need to trust Operator. –Disadvantages PKI Infrastructure must be in place.

Content Provider Hosts Gateway Static Gateway Connection –Advantages Content Provider does not need to trust Operator Content Provider can control home deck OTA can be used to configure mobile terminal –Disadvantages Mobile terminal may have limited number of gateway config sets (i.e., Nokia 7110 has 10) Mobile Terminal needs to be configured. –OTA via WAP Push / SMS may not work with gateway / mobile terminal combination –Content Provider may have to pre-configure mobile terminals

Content Provider Hosts Gateway Internet WAP Gateway WTLS Class 2SSL Operator Web Server SSL Content Provider WAP Gateway

Content Provider Hosts Gateway Dynamic Gateway Connection –Advantages Content Provider does not need to trust Operator. Content Provider does not need to worry about mobile terminal configuration –Disadvantages Operator needs to trust Content Provider. Deployment very slow.