Design and Analysis of Group Sequential Clinical Trials with Multiple Endpoints and Software Development Shuangge Ma*, Michael R. Kosorok and Thomas D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interim Analysis in Clinical Trials: A Bayesian Approach in the Regulatory Setting Telba Z. Irony, Ph.D. and Gene Pennello, Ph.D. Division of Biostatistics.
Advertisements

Mentor: Dr. Kathryn Chaloner Iowa Summer Institute in Biostatistics
Phase II/III Design: Case Study
Statistical Analysis for Two-stage Seamless Design with Different Study Endpoints Shein-Chung Chow, Duke U, Durham, NC, USA Qingshu Lu, U of Science and.
1 1 Slide STATISTICS FOR BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS Seventh Edition AndersonSweeneyWilliams Slides Prepared by John Loucks © 1999 ITP/South-Western College.
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing
1 Budgets: determine the sample size as quickly as possible Matthew S. Mayo, Ph.D. Director, Center for Biostatistics and Advanced Informatics Professor.
Purpose To determine whether metoprolol controlled/extended release
Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial Presented at European Heart Failure Meeting 2003 COMET Trial.
Chapter 11: Sequential Clinical Trials Descriptive Exploratory Experimental Describe Find Cause Populations Relationships and Effect Sequential Clinical.
Sizing a Trial for the Development of Adaptive Treatment Strategies Alena I. Oetting The Society for Clinical Trials, 29th Annual Meeting St. Louis, MO.
Hypothesis Testing: Type II Error and Power.
Pengujian Hipotesis Nilai Tengah Pertemuan 19 Matakuliah: I0134/Metode Statistika Tahun: 2007.
1 1 Slide © 2006 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses.
Sample Size Determination
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 9, Part A Hypothesis Tests Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses.
Sullivan – Fundamentals of Statistics – 2 nd Edition – Chapter 11 Section 2 – Slide 1 of 25 Chapter 11 Section 2 Inference about Two Means: Independent.
8.1 Inference for a Single Proportion
CI - 1 Cure Rate Models and Adjuvant Trial Design for ECOG Melanoma Studies in the Past, Present, and Future Joseph Ibrahim, PhD Harvard School of Public.
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing II: two samples Test of significance for sample means (large samples) The difference between “statistical significance” and.
1 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing. 2 What is a Hypothesis? A hypothesis is a claim A hypothesis is a claim (assumption) about a population parameter:
Section Inference for Experiments Objectives: 1.To understand how randomization differs in surveys and experiments when comparing two populations.
1 Statistical Review Dr. Shan Sun-Mitchell. 2 ENT Primary endpoint: Time to treatment failure by day 50 Placebo BDP Patients randomized Number.
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
INTRODUCTION TO SURVIVAL ANALYSIS
1 An Interim Monitoring Approach for a Small Sample Size Incidence Density Problem By: Shane Rosanbalm Co-author: Dennis Wallace.
BEST: Beta-blocker Evaluation Survival Trial Purpose To determine whether the β-blocker bucindolol reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced.
1 Statistics in Drug Development Mark Rothmann, Ph. D.* Division of Biometrics I Food and Drug Administration * The views expressed here are those of the.
Understanding Study Design & Statistics Dr Malachy O. Columb FRCA, FFICM University Hospital of South Manchester NWRAG Workshop, Bolton, May 2015.
1 Interim Analysis in Clinical Trials Professor Bikas K Sinha [ ISI, KolkatA ] RU Workshop : April18,
1 Keaven Anderson, Ph.D. Amy Ko, MPH Nancy Liu, Ph.D. Yevgen Tymofyeyev, Ph.D. Merck Research Laboratories June 9, 2010 Information-Based Sample Size Re-estimation.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 10 Comparing Two Groups Section 10.1 Categorical Response: Comparing Two Proportions.
6.1 - One Sample One Sample  Mean μ, Variance σ 2, Proportion π Two Samples Two Samples  Means, Variances, Proportions μ 1 vs. μ 2.
Understanding Basic Statistics Fourth Edition By Brase and Brase Prepared by: Lynn Smith Gloucester County College Chapter Nine Hypothesis Testing.
Session 6: Other Analysis Issues In this session, we consider various analysis issues that occur in practice: Incomplete Data: –Subjects drop-out, do not.
1 Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Section 7.4: Estimation of a population mean   is not known  This section.
1 Pulminiq™ Cyclosporine Inhalation Solution Pulmonary Drug Advisory Committee Meeting June 6, 2005 Statistical Evaluation Statistical Evaluation Jyoti.
Sullivan – Fundamentals of Statistics – 2 nd Edition – Chapter 11 Section 3 – Slide 1 of 27 Chapter 11 Section 3 Inference about Two Population Proportions.
Candesartan in Heart Failure Presented at European Society of Cardiology 2003 CHARM Trial.
Hypothesis Testing Steps for the Rejection Region Method State H 1 and State H 0 State the Test Statistic and its sampling distribution (normal or t) Determine.
Lecture 8 Estimation and Hypothesis Testing for Two Population Parameters.
Introduction to Biostatistics, Harvard Extension School, Fall, 2005 © Scott Evans, Ph.D.1 Sample Size and Power Considerations.
COPERNICUS: Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival trial Purpose To assess the effect of carvedilol, a β 1 -, β 2 - and α 1 -receptor blocker,
授課老師: 劉仁沛教授 國立台灣大學 與 國家衛生研究院
Comparing Two Proportions Chapter 21. In a two-sample problem, we want to compare two populations or the responses to two treatments based on two independent.
Methods and Statistical analysis. A brief presentation. Markos Kashiouris, M.D.
Ex St 801 Statistical Methods Part 2 Inference about a Single Population Mean (HYP)
Chapter Nine Hypothesis Testing.
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
The Importance of Adequately Powered Studies
Chapter 8: Inference for Proportions
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Data Analysis and Interpretation
اختبار الفرضيات اختبارالفرضيات المتعلقة بالوسط
Shuangge Ma, Michael R. Kosorok, Thomas D. Cook
Sample Size Planning of Clinical Trials, Introduction
Aiying Chen, Scott Patterson, Fabrice Bailleux and Ehab Bassily
Statistical considerations for the Nipah virus treatment study
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Presentation transcript:

Design and Analysis of Group Sequential Clinical Trials with Multiple Endpoints and Software Development Shuangge Ma*, Michael R. Kosorok and Thomas D. Cook Department of Biostatsitics and Medical Informatics University of Wisconsin-Madison * Motivation:  Clinical trial with multiple endpoints: Copernicus: a large-scale, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.  Target: test the effect of the beta-blocker carvedilol on the survival of patients with severe heart failure.  Primary outcomes of interests: 1. All cause mortality, 2. The earliest time of mortality and hospitalization. Statistical goal:  Stop early if treatment effect is clear in all endpoints.  Control the many possible error rates.  Develop user-friendly software. o Two types of response:  normal distributed response: (pooled mean),  time-to-event (survival type) response: (logrank test). o Two types of decision rule:  hard decision rule (no vague component),  soft decision rule (at least one vague component). Overall Strategy (Design of Clinical Trail):  Construct marginal critical boundaries with certain alpha/beta spending functions.  Construct an appropriate multivariate decision rule.  Adjust marginal critical boundaries to conform to a global alpha spending function. Plot of Bivariate Critical Regions:  Symmetric (hard) decision rules:  Non-symmetric (soft) decision rules: Overall Strategy (Interim Analysis): At each interim analysis:  Compute the marginal critical regions based on the marginal alpha/beta spending functions and then take spatial product.  Adjust the spatial product to conform to the global alpha spending function.  Estimate the conditional distribution of the bivariate test statistic at the current look. Software Development Design the Copernicus: Design features:  Endpoint 1: = (Placebo) = (treatment)  (t)=0.05*t,  (t)=0.1*t.  Endpoint 2: =0.002 (Placebo) = (treatment)  (t)=0.05*t,  (t)=0.05*t.  Global:  =0.05,  =0.05. Enrollment: 900 days, Follow up: 85 days. Design the Copernicus (Sample Software Interface): Design of Group Sequential Clinical Trials with Multiple Endpoints (Version 1.0) Section I: Calculations of Sample Size and Critical Boundaries Copyright ® Shuangge Ma and Michael R. Kosorok Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics University of Wisconsin-Madison Design of Group Sequential Clinical Trials with Multiple Endpoints Case 1: Two endpoints: 1 st survival and 2 nd survival For the first survival endpoint: Information Spending: Relative Information (1): Relative Information (2): Relative Information (3): Relative Information (4): …… Design of Group Sequential Clinical Trials with Multiple Endpoints Case 1: Two endpoints: 1 st survival and 2 nd survival For the first survival endpoint: The alphaSpend for this endpoint is: 1 The betaSpend for this endpoint is: 1 The lambdaNull for this endpoint is: The lambdaAlter for this endpoint is: The entry for this trial is: 900 The followup for this trial is: 85 Design of Group Sequential Clinical Trials with Multiple Endpoints Decision rule: hard Sample size: 1221 Critical Boundaries: End 1 End 2 Look Lower Upper Lower Upper ………………. Interim Analysis of Copernicus:  2289 patients (1156 treatment & 1133 placebo)  Interim analysis (day): 379, 496, 671, 875.  Information spending: Endpoint 1: 0.060, 0.107, 0.215, Endpoint 2: 0.120, 0.220, 0.413,  The trial was terminated early with significantly beneficial effects on both endpoints. Interim Analysis (Sample Interface): Discussions:  This methodology and the software have been well tested.  The software can be used to analyze clinical trials with one or two primary endpoints.  Two types of responses are considered: 1. approximately Gaussian response, and 2. time-to-event response.  Source code available for Unix and Windows systems. Data Analysis of Group Sequential Clinical Trial Critical Boundaries and Test Statistics End 1 End 2 Lower Upper Test Lower Upper Test Look Look Look Look Data Analysis of Group Sequential Clinical Trial Case 1: Two Endpoints: 1 st survival & 2 nd Survival For the first survival endpoint: Please input the name of the second information file: survival1a.txt Data Analysis of Group Sequential Clinical Trial Case 1: Two Endpoints: 1 st survival & 2 nd Survival For the first survival endpoint: Global alpha Alpha Beta Look Time Look Look Look Look Design of Group Sequential Clinical Trials with Multiple Endpoints Decision rule: hard Sample size: 1221 Design of Group Sequential Clinical Trials with Multiple Endpoints Select the hard alternatives you want to control for type II error: (1) H-0, (2) H+0, (3) H0+, (4) H0-, (5) H-+, (6) H++, (7) H--, (8) H+- Please input here: