A model of soft mass generation Jiří Hošek Department of Theoretical Physics Nuclear Physics Institute Řež (Prague)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Higgs physics theory aspects experimental approaches Monika Jurcovicova Department of Nuclear Physics, Comenius University Bratislava H f ~ m f.
Advertisements

THE FINE-TUNING PROBLEM IN SUSY AND LITTLE HIGGS
What do we know about the Standard Model? Sally Dawson Lecture 4 TASI, 2006.
Electroweak Symmetry Breaking from D-branes Joshua Erlich College of William & Mary Title U Oregon, May 22, 2007 w/ Chris Carone, Marc Sher, Jong Anly.
Announcements 11/14 Today: 9.6, 9.8 Friday: 10A – 10E Monday: 10F – 10H 9.6 Only do differential cross-section See problem 7.7 to do most of the work for.
Effective Theory of Cosmological SUSY Breaking Principles of CSB: 1.C.C. Discrete Input Controlling No. Physical States in de Sitter Space-Time 2. SUSY.
Hep-ph/ , with M. Carena (FNAL), E. Pontón (Columbia) and C. Wagner (ANL) New Ideas in Randall-Sundrum Models José Santiago Theory Group (FNAL)
Chiral freedom and the scale of weak interactions.
The minimal B-L model naturally realized at TeV scale Yuta Orikasa(SOKENDAI) Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
The classically conformal B-L extended standard model Yuta Orikasa Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
J. Hošek, in “Strong Coupling Gauge Theories in LHC Era”, World Scientific 2011 (arXiv: ) P. Beneš, J. Hošek, A. Smetana, arXiv: A.
Lattice Spinor Gravity Lattice Spinor Gravity. Quantum gravity Quantum field theory Quantum field theory Functional integral formulation Functional integral.
1 Chiral Symmetry Breaking and Restoration in QCD Da Huang Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of
1 NEUTRINO SEESAW AND CP VIOLATION FROM DYNAMICAL ELECTROWEAK SYMMETRY BREAKING 1.Introduction 2.UV Complete Model(s) 3.Seesaw 4.CP Violation R.Shrock.
Happy 120 th birthday. Mimeograph Constraining Goldstinos with Constrained Superfields Nathan Seiberg IAS Confronting Challenges in Theoretical Physics.
Chiral freedom and the scale of weak interactions.
Richard Howl The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model University of Southampton UK BSM 2007.
Fermion Masses and Unification Steve King University of Southampton.
The Top Quark and Precision Measurements S. Dawson BNL April, 2005 M.-C. Chen, S. Dawson, and T. Krupovnikas, in preparation M.-C. Chen and S. Dawson,
4 th Generation Leptons in Minimal Walking Technicolor Theory Matti Heikinheimo University of Jyväskylä.
Chiral freedom and the scale of weak interactions.
CUSTODIAL SYMMETRY IN THE STANDARD MODEL AND BEYOND V. Pleitez Instituto de Física Teórica/UNESP Modern Trends in Field Theory João Pessoa ─ Setembro 2006.
Gerard ’t Hooft Utrecht University and Mystery. Theme: - Nature is more beautiful than we think - Nature is smarter than we are The landscape around 1965:
Chiral freedom and the scale of weak interactions.
Aug 29-31, 2005M. Jezabek1 Generation of Quark and Lepton Masses in the Standard Model International WE Heraeus Summer School on Flavour Physics and CP.
Higgs boson(s) Why do we need them? What do they look like? Have we found them?
Masses For Gauge Bosons. A few basics on Lagrangians Euler-Lagrange equation then give you the equations of motion:
Two-body sfermion decays at full one-loop level within the MSSM Mgr. Hana Hlucha.
A model of flavors Jiří Hošek Department of Theoretical Physics NPI Řež (Prague) (Tomáš Brauner and JH, hep-ph/ )
Geneva, October 2010 Dark Energy at Colliders? Philippe Brax, IPhT Saclay Published papers :
Electroweak interaction
Towards computing the lepton and quark mass spectra and their consequences Jiří Hošek Department of Theoretical Physics Nuclear Physics Institute Rez (Prague)
What do we know about the Standard Model? Sally Dawson Lecture 2 SLAC Summer Institute.
Center for theoretical Physics at BUE
The Standard Model of Electroweak Physics Christopher T. Hill Head of Theoretical Physics Fermilab.
Sigma model and applications 1. The linear sigma model (& NJL model) 2. Chiral perturbation 3. Applications.
P Spring 2003 L12Richard Kass The properties of the Z 0 For about ten years the Z 0 was studied in great detail at two accelerator complexes: LEP.
A Composite Little Higgs ZACKARIA CHACKO UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK Puneet Batra.
WHAT BREAKS ELECTROWEAK SYMMETRY ?. We shall find the answer in experiments at the LHC? Most likely it will tells us a lot about the physics beyond the.
Pion mass difference from vacuum polarization E. Shintani, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, J. Noaki, T. Onogi, N. Yamada (for JLQCD Collaboration) December 5,
weak decays beta decay ofneutron problem energy and momentum not conserved e n p.
Dynamical Mass Generation by Strong Yukawa Interactions Tomáš Brauner and Jiří Hošek, Phys.Rev.D72: (2005) Petr Beneš, Tomáš Brauner and Jiří Hošek:
Time Dependent Quark Masses and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis Myung-Ki Cheoun, G. Mathews, T. Kajino, M. Kusagabe Soongsil University, Korea Asian Pacific Few.
H. Quarks – “the building blocks of the Universe” The number of quarks increased with discoveries of new particles and have reached 6 For unknown reasons.

The inclusion of fermions – J=1/2 particles
DYNAMICAL GENERATION OF FERMION MASSES AND ITS CONSEQUENCES Jiří Hošek Department of Theoretical Physics Nuclear Physics Institute Rez (Prague) Czech Republic.
? composite ? H. Fritzsch LMU Munich.
Standard Model - Standard Model prediction (postulated that neutrinos are massless, consistent with observation that individual lepton flavors seemed to.
1 Why Does the Standard Model Need the Higgs Boson ? II Augusto Barroso Sesimbra 2007.
Monday, Apr. 7, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #20 Monday, Apr. 7, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Super Symmetry Breaking MSSM Higgs and Their.
The Importance of the TeV Scale Sally Dawson Lecture 3 FNAL LHC Workshop, 2006.
2 nd International Conference on Particle Physics in Memoriam Engin Arık and Her Colleagues Doğuş University, Istanbul, Turkey June nd International.
Introduction to Flavor Physics in and beyond the Standard Model Enrico Lunghi References: The BaBar physics book,
Lecture 7. Tuesday… Superfield content of the MSSM Gauge group is that of SM: StrongWeakhypercharge Vector superfields of the MSSM.
Physics 222 UCSD/225b UCSB Lecture 12 Chapter 15: The Standard Model of EWK Interactions A large part of today’s lecture is review of what we have already.
Reference: “The Standard Model Higgs Boson” by Ivo van Vulpen,
Physics 222 UCSD/225b UCSB Lecture 10 Chapter 14 in H&M.
Handout 9 : The Weak Interaction and V-A
Dark Matter Candidates in Composite Higgs Models
PHYS 5326 – Lecture #19 Wrapping up the Higgs Mechanism
Ultraviolet Complete Electroweak Model
The MESSM The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model
Higgs boson(s) Why do we need them? What do they look like?
Spontaneous breakdown (SB) of symmetry
Masses by gauge flavor dynamics (1101
On explaining the observed pattern of quark and lepton masses
Spontaneous symmetry breaking.
Lecture 12 Chapter 15: The Standard Model of EWK Interactions
Weak interactions.
Presentation transcript:

A model of soft mass generation Jiří Hošek Department of Theoretical Physics Nuclear Physics Institute Řež (Prague)

1. AN OLD-FASHIONED REASONING In (mysterious) SU(2) L xU(1) Y : IF fermion masses are generated dynamically without elementary scalars by a new interaction the intermediate masses follow (Schwinger). Hence, fermion masses are of primary concern. L-R and interfamily connections needed. In (mysterious) SU(2) L xU(1) Y : IF fermion masses are generated dynamically without elementary scalars by a new interaction the intermediate masses follow (Schwinger). Hence, fermion masses are of primary concern. L-R and interfamily connections needed. Composite (bound state) ‘would-be’ NG bosons => New interaction must be strong. Composite (bound state) ‘would-be’ NG bosons => New interaction must be strong. Massiveness is a low-momentum phenomenon: Dynamical mass generation should be low-momentum dominated. ‘Right choice of the degrees of freedom: Massive complex vector field. Massiveness is a low-momentum phenomenon: Dynamical mass generation should be low-momentum dominated. ‘Right choice of the degrees of freedom: Massive complex vector field.

2. THE MODEL L SM is the SM Lagrangian of three fermion families supplemented with neutrino right-handed singlets L SM is the SM Lagrangian of three fermion families supplemented with neutrino right-handed singlets L F : Heavy complex vector field C μ interacting with family-changing current of the left- and right-handed fermion electroweak multiplets L F : Heavy complex vector field C μ interacting with family-changing current of the left- and right-handed fermion electroweak multiplets

SU(2) L xU(1) Y invariance is manifest NEW GLOBAL U(1) F

Renormalizability Renormalizability No one-loop vertex corrections No one-loop vertex corrections Hard right-handed Majorana mass term only for one family Hard right-handed Majorana mass term only for one family M>10 7 GeV CHALLENGE !!! M>10 7 GeV CHALLENGE !!!

3. FERMION MASS GENERATION self-consistent variational (nonperturbative) ASSUME Σ are dynamically generated ASSUME Σ are dynamically generated

Σ implies nondiagonal part of C boson propagator D effective bilinear Lagrangian Nondiagonal part of the propagator

FERMION SCHWINGER-DYSON EQUATIOS extra convergent kernels; all fermion masses in the world related

A HOPE Approximations: hard fermion masses; p=0; Π=M Approximations: hard fermion masses; p=0; Π=M Integral equations turn into UV finite calculable integrals Integral equations turn into UV finite calculable integrals

System of implicit coupled equations for the fermion masses can be analyzed abbreviate

Once we solve the equation f(y)=0 the fermion masses are given. Solutions are found.

4. W AND Z BOSON MASS GENERATION Dynamically generated Σ break SU(2) L xU(1) Y down to U(1) em Dynamically generated Σ break SU(2) L xU(1) Y down to U(1) em The ‘would-be’ NGs (composite !) are visualized in WT identities: The ‘would-be’ NGs (composite !) are visualized in WT identities:

From the pole terms we extract the effective vertices between the gauge and three multicomponenet NG bosons. These vertices give rise to the longitudinal parts of W and Z polarization tensors with massless poles (Schwinger). Their residues are

W and Z boson masses are related to the fermion masses by sum rules W and Z boson masses are related to the fermion masses by sum rules From a model of Σ the sum rules are saturated by the top quark mass From a model of Σ the sum rules are saturated by the top quark mass Weinberg’s relation tolerably violated Weinberg’s relation tolerably violated

5. SPONTANEOUS BREAKDOWN OF THE GLOBAL U(1) F SYMMETRY Σ and Π dynamically generated by strong C boson-fermion interaction break spontaneously the global U(1) F Σ and Π dynamically generated by strong C boson-fermion interaction break spontaneously the global U(1) F Massless NG pseudoscalar – phenomenologically dangerous Massless NG pseudoscalar – phenomenologically dangerous

Multicomponent bound state of both fermions and C i μ Multicomponent bound state of both fermions and C i μ Effective couplings to fermions negligibly small due to C admixture Effective couplings to fermions negligibly small due to C admixture Weinberg-Wilczek axion ? Weinberg-Wilczek axion ?

6. CONCLUDING COMMENTS (work in progress) We believe in stiff dynamics underlying SM We believe in stiff dynamics underlying SM Admiration for Wilson Admiration for Wilson Strongly coupled model of Kroll, Lee, Zumino Strongly coupled model of Kroll, Lee, Zumino Model requires several families Model requires several families