Martin Ince Communications Limited The World University Rankings 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using Rankings to Drive Internal Quality Improvements
Advertisements

A journey through the scholarly publishing and evaluation landscape Themes and trends in research from global to individual scales Sarah Huggett Publishing.
GLOBAL RANKINGS OF UNIVERSITIES John O’Leary I Editor I Times Higher Education Supplement.
: Institutional Research Consultancy Unit League and Ranking Tables and their Influence on Graduate Surveys Presentation to Victorian Statistical Officers.
Bernard Appiah, B.Pharm, MDC, MS, DrPH AuthorAID Team Member Texas A&M University School of Public Health Writing.
Understanding College Rankings Amy VanSurksum, International Officer (USA Midwest & Northeast) University of Glasgow.
Martin Ince Communications Ltd Leiden Rankings Conference, February 6 and 7, 2009.
Using Rankings to Drive Internal Quality Improvements Dr. Kevin Downing City University of Hong Kong & Ms. Mandy Mok QS Asia.
Bibliometrics overview slides. Contents of this slide set Slides 2-5 Various definitions Slide 6 The context, bibliometrics as 1 tools to assess Slides.
1 Using Scopus for Literature Research. 2 Why Scopus?  A comprehensive abstract and citation database of peer- reviewed literature and quality web sources.
Users and Uses of IPUMS International Data Presented by Dr. Miriam King.
Ranking universities: The CHE Approach Gero Federkeil CHE – Centre for Higher Education Development International Colloquium “Ranking and Research Assessment.
Innovation Measurement
THE ROLE OF CITATION ANALYSIS IN RESEARCH EVALUATION Philip Purnell September 2010.
Edouard Mathieu Head of the Benchmarking Center Invest in France Agency * ARWU: Academic Ranking of World Universities 2005 A few remarks on ARWU*
Ranking the World’s Universities: What it means for your institution’s future Martin Ince Taipei, Taiwan March 24, 2011 Martin Ince Communications Limited.
Using Rankings to Drive Internal Quality Improvements
The World University Rankings. Presentation at EPFL Martin Ince -Contributing editor, THES Crans-Montana, Switzerland 20 March 2006.
Higher Education in Europe: Crisis and Opportunity Howard Davies Director London School of Economics Microsoft Government Leaders Forum Lisbon 31 January.
Rating and Ranking: Pros and Cons Dr. Mohsen Elmahdy Said Professor, Mechanical Design and Production Department Faculty of Engineering – Cairo University.
The CHE ranking The multi-dimensional way of Ranking Isabel Roessler CHE – Centre for Higher Education Development International Conference “Academic Cooperation.
Research and Publication for Business and Management Researchers: The Way Forward Prof Dr T C Melewar Prof of Marketing and Strategy Brunel University,
Searching for Globally Feasible Indicators from Domestic Rankings Ya Lan Xie and Ying Cheng Graduate School of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Excellence in scientific research Prof
World University Rankings Phil Baty Deputy Editor Times Higher Education magazine Abuja, Nigeria, 22 April, 2009.
Difficulties and Possibilities of University Rankings in Hungary Magdolna Orosz (Eötvös Loránd University Budapest, Hungary) Academic cooperation and competitiveness.
Developing a University Strategy in the 21 st Century Howard Davies Director The London School of Economics Peking University 6 August 2004.
New Workflows in Research and Collaboration and the Role of the Library. Introducing the Mendeley Institutional Edition LIBER Conference, Tartu, June 2012.
Recent trends and economic impact of emigration from Latvia OECD/MFA Conference Riga, December 17, 2012 Mihails Hazans University of Latvia Institute for.
Engineering Summer Camp (21-23 July 2015). Date 21 July 2015 – 23 July 2015 Engineering camp activities include: -Engineering Projects and Poster Presentation.
Quality Assurance in Higher Education and Vocational Education and Training WS 8/Panel 1: Reflection on the demands on quality in HE Gudrun Biffl/AUT/WIFO.
Uwe Brandenburg Options and limits of measurability: the experience from the Excellence Ranking in the light of the global ranking discussion.
Rajesh Singh Deputy Librarian University of Delhi Measuring Research Output.
Maastricht University Prof. dr. M. Paul, President.
13 February 2015, University of Sheffield Higher education research: global, national local? Simon Marginson UCL Institute of Education.
111 The Internationalization of the Academic Profession: changes and realities Futao HUANG 黄福涛 Hiroshima University, Japan AC21.
Universities in Global Competition: how well is the UK doing? Howard Davies Director - London School of Economics Harkness Fellowship Lecture Hong Kong.
Martin Ince Communications Limited The World University Rankings in 2008.
Web of Science® Krzysztof Szymanski October 13, 2010.
THOMSON REUTERS—GLOBAL INSTITUTIONAL PROFILES PROJECT DR. NAN MA SCIENCE AND SOLUTION CONSULTANT THOMSON REUTERS OCT 19 TH, 2010.
Quality Assurance & University Rankings. Shanghai Ranking (Shanghai Jiao Tong University) THES (Times Higher Education Supplement) CHE Ranking »Centrum.
The University of Warwick An International University? Dr David Law Academic Registrar and Director of International Office.
 Remember, it is important that you should not believe everything you read.  Moreover, you should be able to reject or accept information based on the.
A Bibliometric Comparison of the Research of Three UK Business Schools John Mingers, Kent Business School March 2014.
Science and higher education in a more global era and how Russia is positioned SIMON MARGINSON University of Melbourne, Australia after 28 October: Institute.
Innovative research and first-class higher education? Some general remarks from a librarian Henryk Hollender Lazarski University.
The Atlas of Ideas : Mapping the new geography of science Sir David King Chief Scientific Adviser to HM Government 17 January 2006.
1. Taihoku Imperial University National Taiwan University
G3 Francophone Academic Alliance. Founding of G3 alliance  Created in September 2012 in Brussels.  Three founding members:  Université de Genève 
15 April 2016, ECED-2016 at UCL The international context of higher education change: Drivers and challenges Simon Marginson ESRC/HEFCE Centre for Global.
Rosie Drinkwater & Professor Lawrence Young Group Finance Director, Pro Vice-Chancellor (Academic Planning & Resources) League Tables Where are we, why.
Scientists and public communication: A survey of popular science publishing across 15 countries EMA Thematic Conference, Bordeaux March 29-30, 2010 Peter.
Duncan Ross Director, data and analytics Times Higher Education.
Classification & Ranking in Higher Arts Education New EU developments and the role of ELIA.
Gleb Sukhorukov School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, UK How to increase publication activity.
Academic Ranking of World Universities
Developing Turkey-UK research partnerships
What does it mean to be a top 10 University?
Industry Fast Facts Information INTERNAL ONLY SLIDE
Political Science and Geography (TR020)
RMIT’s standing in QS Graduate Employability Rankings 2017 edition
Prof.Dr. Melih Bulu, Istinye University March 23
How good are Australian universities
Student Engagement Data in the UK: Policy and Practice
‘Accessing Emerald’ Saudi Digital Library
BESS – The Business, Economics and Social Studies Programme (TR081)
MIT- Massachusetts Institute of Technology Number 1 University in World By. Prof. B.A.Khivsara.
Professor Diana Kornbrot University of Hertfordshire
BESS – The Business, Economics and Social Studies Programme (TR081)
Internationalisation of higher education in the UK
Presentation transcript:

Martin Ince Communications Limited The World University Rankings 2007

Martin Ince Communications Limited The Challenges of University Ranking Presentation by Martin Ince Contributing editor, THES, Université Libre, Brussels December 12, 2007

Martin Ince Communications Limited The THES Since 1971 Since 1971 Weekly newspaper formerly associated with The Times [of London] Weekly newspaper formerly associated with The Times [of London] Group including TES Group including TES Online at since 1994 Online at since 1994www.thes.co.uk

Martin Ince Communications Limited Why rank universities? Interest in ranking things and people Interest in ranking things and people - Hospitals - Schools - Local authorities - Rich lists; Britain, world, Asians, footballers - Universities: The Times

Martin Ince Communications Limited Does it matter? Some of these rankings are fun or pornography, eg Rich Lists Some of these rankings are fun or pornography, eg Rich Lists Others are serious Others are serious - Bad marks for school or hospital - Likewise for a university department - Over 1000 “failing” public bodies in UK – schools, police forces etc

Martin Ince Communications Limited National Rankings The Times The Times - produced by John O’Leary, former editor of THES - Institutions as well as subjects Criteria for subjects include: - Teaching quality - Research quality - Entry standards - Employability

Martin Ince Communications Limited National rankings (2) Criteria for institutions include Criteria for institutions include - Teaching standards - Staff/student ratio - Library spending - Facilities spending - Good degrees - Jobs - Research

Martin Ince Communications Limited The US Comparison US News and World Report “America’s Best Colleges” US News and World Report “America’s Best Colleges” - Mainly about how likely you are to graduate - Also student experience eg class size - However, many other tables eg liberal arts, business, engineering colleges - Likewise McLean’s (Canada) et al

Martin Ince Communications Limited Richness of data Main table in US News has 18 main columns Main table in US News has 18 main columns Likewise Times Good University Guide Likewise Times Good University Guide How can we do this globally? How can we do this globally?

Martin Ince Communications Limited Why world rankings? Long overdue: higher education has always been very international Long overdue: higher education has always been very international Unique position of the THES Unique position of the THES Universities becoming more global Universities becoming more global Knowledge the real factor in international competitiveness Knowledge the real factor in international competitiveness Increasing desire for comparative information Increasing desire for comparative information

Martin Ince Communications Limited Why world rankings (2)? GATS GATS EU and Bologna EU and Bologna 3 million students outside home country 3 million students outside home country Forecast to be 5 million by 2010 Forecast to be 5 million by 2010 BTA BTA UK as a major source and destination UK as a major source and destination UK as major collaborator UK as major collaborator UK universities opening in China and elsewhere UK universities opening in China and elsewhere

Martin Ince Communications Limited And Tony says so “In 10 years we will think nothing of students going off to university anywhere in the world” “In 10 years we will think nothing of students going off to university anywhere in the world” Tony Blair at the Labour Party conference, September 2006

Martin Ince Communications Limited In addition Interest from governments – UK Interest from governments – UK Treasury, Lambert EU, Germany EU, Germany Shanghai Jiao Tong Shanghai Jiao Tong OECD from 2010 OECD from 2010

Martin Ince Communications Limited How to do it? Audience includes – Audience includes – Internationally mobile students Internationally mobile students Internationally mobile staff Internationally mobile staff Internationally mobile money Internationally mobile money - Focus on: - Teaching - Research - International orientation

Martin Ince Communications Limited Peer review Peer review is the way academic value is measured Peer review is the way academic value is measured We decided to make it the centrepiece of this ranking We decided to make it the centrepiece of this ranking It is the least understood aspect of our work It is the least understood aspect of our work So here is the explanation So here is the explanation

Martin Ince Communications Limited Peer review (2) Total 5,101 over three years Total 5,101 over three years International spread International spread Subject spread Subject spread Active academics Active academics

Martin Ince Communications Limited The peers Gathered by QS listbuilding Gathered by QS listbuilding 41 per cent in Europe 41 per cent in Europe 30 per cent the Americas 30 per cent the Americas 29 per cent Asia Pacific 29 per cent Asia Pacific Aggregate no more than three yearsAggregate no more than three years

Martin Ince Communications Limited The question Online survey Online survey The top 30 universities in the topics they know about The top 30 universities in the topics they know about - Arts and humanities - Social sciences - Science - Biomedicine - Technology

Martin Ince Communications Limited Plusses Simple Simple Understandable Understandable Robust Robust Self-correcting if large enough sample Self-correcting if large enough sample Hard to cheat Hard to cheat

Martin Ince Communications Limited Minuses Biases include Biases include - Age - Size - Name -Beijing -Loughborough -Brussels, Leuven Audience conservatism

Martin Ince Communications Limited Employers Another group who know about university quality Another group who know about university quality Innovation in 2005 Innovation in 2005 Mainly private sector Mainly private sector At 10 per cent of total At 10 per cent of total Therefore academics cut from 50 to 40 per cent Therefore academics cut from 50 to 40 per cent Will be improved Will be improved 2007 sample 1, sample 1,471

Martin Ince Communications Limited Employers are: Americas 43 per cent Americas 43 per cent Europeans 32 per cent Europeans 32 per cent Asia Pacific 25 per cent Asia Pacific 25 per cent Again, maximum three years aggregationAgain, maximum three years aggregation

Martin Ince Communications Limited Quantitative measures Aim to measure universities in terms of Aim to measure universities in terms of - Student commitment - Research commitment - International commitment and competitiveness

Martin Ince Communications Limited How to do this Extensive data gathering exercise Extensive data gathering exercise By UK firm QS By UK firm QS Mix of data sources Mix of data sources National National Institutional Institutional Direct contact Direct contact

Martin Ince Communications Limited First quantitative criterion… Staff/student ratio Staff/student ratio Classic measure of commitment to teaching Classic measure of commitment to teaching 20 per cent of final score 20 per cent of final score

Martin Ince Communications Limited How international? Two criteria rated at 5 per cent each Two criteria rated at 5 per cent each Is this somewhere where people want to be? Is this somewhere where people want to be? Staff Staff Students Students - Again raises issues -Visiting scholars? -EU cross-border students? -Doing full courses? -Geography advantage

Martin Ince Communications Limited Citations Like peer review Like peer review Classic measure of research quality Classic measure of research quality Use Scopus data Use Scopus data

Martin Ince Communications Limited Citations (2) Citations per staff member to see density of brain power Citations per staff member to see density of brain power Not citations per paper Not citations per paper Well-understood bias Well-understood bias - against non-English publication - against arts and humanities - against national-oriented topics This accounts for the final 20 per cent

Martin Ince Communications Limited Comparison with Shanghai Jiao Tong Not a newspaper Not a newspaper Nobel + Fields prizes Nobel + Fields prizes Nobel 6/9 in 2007 Fields 4/6 in 21 st century These used twice These used twice Science and Nature Science and Nature Science and Social Science citations Science and Social Science citations 500 rather than our rather than our 200

Martin Ince Communications Limited Comparison with Shanghai Jiao Tong But: But: Ends up looking rather similar near the top Ends up looking rather similar near the top Share 133/200 Share 133/200 Next – OECD

Martin Ince Communications Limited Changes in 2007 Scopus: better at Asia Scopus: better at Asia Also more transparent Also more transparent Better at non-English sources Better at non-English sources

Martin Ince Communications Limited Changes (2) Z score: Z score: Measure distance from centre Normalise top to 100 Effects outliers such as CalTech, LSE

Martin Ince Communications Limited Changes (3) Harder to cheat Harder to cheat Main effects in South Asia FTEs more rigorously defined

Martin Ince Communications Limited What did we find? Harvard Harvard The US – 57 in top 200 The US – 57 in top 200 Yale Oxbridge logjam at 2 Yale Oxbridge logjam at 2

Martin Ince Communications Limited But… The top 200 includes universities in 28 states The top 200 includes universities in 28 states US, UK, Australia, Netherlands US, UK, Australia, Netherlands Korea, China, Japan Korea, China, Japan Continental Europe Continental Europe Developing world: Unam, Brazil (2), Cape Town 200= Developing world: Unam, Brazil (2), Cape Town 200=

Martin Ince Communications Limited International commitment US shows up badly US shows up badly HKUST top for international staff, LSE in sixth place HKUST top for international staff, LSE in sixth place London School of Economics top for international students London School of Economics top for international students Yale among few US with international staff Yale among few US with international staff

Martin Ince Communications Limited Peer review Berkeley the winner Berkeley the winner Cambridge, Oxford, Stanford, Harvard popular Cambridge, Oxford, Stanford, Harvard popular Well-liked universities all over the world Well-liked universities all over the world Little evidence of patriotism bias Little evidence of patriotism bias US, UK, Australia, Japan, China, Canada,Singapore dominate the top 20 US, UK, Australia, Japan, China, Canada,Singapore dominate the top 20

Martin Ince Communications Limited Citations Medical faculty is a big plus Medical faculty is a big plus Or major biomedical income Or major biomedical income CalTech the winner by some distance, then Stanford, MIT, ENS CalTech the winner by some distance, then Stanford, MIT, ENS Big country effect is at work here Big country effect is at work here

Martin Ince Communications Limited Staff/student ratio Winner CalTech, US Winner CalTech, US US, French, Swiss, etc institutions all well placed US, French, Swiss, etc institutions all well placed Harvard shows badly here at 15th Harvard shows badly here at 15th Asian and European universities well- placed Asian and European universities well- placed Weak correlation with research – but not zero Weak correlation with research – but not zero

Martin Ince Communications Limited Take home message Small variations don’t matter much Small variations don’t matter much A position can be gained by many combinations of weakness and strength A position can be gained by many combinations of weakness and strength eg, many Asian institutions do well despite scoring zero on citations eg, many Asian institutions do well despite scoring zero on citations

Martin Ince Communications Limited What we didn’t find Data on 500 institutions with significant citations Data on 500 institutions with significant citations Have to teach undergraduates Have to teach undergraduates Have to teach in at least two areas Have to teach in at least two areas

Martin Ince Communications Limited Things that don’t work Library spending Library spending Course cost Course cost Completion Completion Entry standards Entry standards Wealth Wealth Alumni giving Alumni giving

Martin Ince Communications Limited Response More work than writing the thing More work than writing the thing Last year about 30 newspaper articles in Mexico alone Last year about 30 newspaper articles in Mexico alone Interest from media, universities etc across Europe and Asia Interest from media, universities etc across Europe and Asia Less from the US Less from the US Political response – Ireland, Malaysia, Switzerland Political response – Ireland, Malaysia, Switzerland

Martin Ince Communications Limited Types of response Reject the whole idea Reject the whole idea Complain about their position Complain about their position Think it is about right Think it is about right Wonder how to do better Wonder how to do better Compare Shanghai… Compare Shanghai…

Martin Ince Communications Limited Belgian institutions Leuven 61 (was 96 in 2006) Leuven 61 (was 96 in 2006) Louvain 123 Louvain 123 Ghent 124 Ghent 124 ULB 154 ULB 154 Antwerp 187 (up from 252) Antwerp 187 (up from 252) VUB 229 (down from 133) VUB 229 (down from 133) Liege 262 (201 in 2006) Liege 262 (201 in 2006)

Martin Ince Communications Limited This means… Strong showing cf comparable countries Strong showing cf comparable countries Cf Netherlands Cf Netherlands 11 in top 200, 12 in in top 200, 12 in 500 Perhaps less international Perhaps less international

Martin Ince Communications Limited Good at…. Peer review Peer review Employer review Employer review Not very international Not very international Somewhat less cited Somewhat less cited

Martin Ince Communications Limited How to do better Publish more in the right places Publish more in the right places Be more international Be more international Be better represented academically around the world Be better represented academically around the world Have better employer links Have better employer links Have enough staff to teach your students Have enough staff to teach your students

Martin Ince Communications Limited The future Important for staff, students, parents, management, employers Important for staff, students, parents, management, employers Important for governments Important for governments Important for business Important for business Important globally, eg for the EU Important globally, eg for the EU Management tool: Management tool: - How do we look? - Who to talk to? - What are our ambitions?

Martin Ince Communications Limited Future developments New data New data - Any suggestions? - Subject specific? - Management indicators Refine existing data, eg from employers More global reach, eg Africa New analyses New entrants And most importantly….

Martin Ince Communications Limited Job creation More people looking at it than doing it More people looking at it than doing it Leiden, CEPES Leiden, CEPES IREG IREG All highly valuable All highly valuable

Martin Ince Communications Limited The book Published 2006 and again early 2008 Published 2006 and again early 2008 Yours from Yours from institutions including articles on the top 100 and shorter details on the rest 500 institutions including articles on the top 100 and shorter details on the rest Data in groups after 200 Data in groups after 200

Martin Ince Communications Limited …really the last slide Thanks to Thanks to Gerard Kelly, editor of The THES Nunzio Quacquarelli, QS Ben Sowter, QS Staff of Scopus