Genetics and Binge Eating: A Case- Control Pilot Study Tiffany Stewart, Ph.D. Health Behavior Pennington Biomedical Research Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Template: Making Effective Presentation about Your Evidence-based Health Promotion Program This template is intended for you to adapt to your own program.
Advertisements

Yiu-fai Cheung, MD Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine LKS Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China Sharing in GRF.
Panel Identification Improvement Facilitator Training Session 1 Day 2.
SIM Delivery System Reform Status FFY Q1, SIM Delivery System Reform Driven by Maine Quality Counts Overall Delivery System Reform Status:Green.
LCPC RESEARCH ARM TO BE TRANSFORMED INTO A RESEARCH INCUBATOR.
Manager, Solihull SEMH Team
A Librarian by Any Other Name The Role of the Informationist on a Medical School Research Team.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Virginia Rodriguez Funes, MD, FACS El Salvador. Background  The Latin American population it is now the largest single ethnic group in the United States,
Level Health Equally Well Key findings from a literature review informing collaborative efforts to improve the physical health outcomes of people with.
Changing times, Changing needs? Library Program Analysis at the Duke University Medical Center Library & UNC Health Science Library Carol Perryman, IMLS/TRLN.
Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 1 Assessment driven planning: The development of a strategic plan to address risky drinking.
Problem Analysis Intelligence Step 2 - Problem Analysis Developing solutions to complex population nutrition problems (such as obesity or food insecurity)
Introduction of Cancer Molecular Epidemiology Zuo-Feng Zhang, MD, PhD University of California Los Angeles.
Grant Writing1 Grant Writing Lecture What are the major types of grants available in mental health research? What is the process of grant preparation and.
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
Policy WG NIH policy proposal. Goal: Incorporating global access licensing as one of the additional review criteria Question 1: Should we propose this.
Evidence-Based Practice Current knowledge and practice must be based on evidence of efficacy rather than intuition, tradition, or past practice. The importance.
AB 1331: Status of Implementation March 11, 2010 Presentation to the Children’s Committee of CWDA Contact Hannah Haley, Policy Intern, John Burton Foundation.
Variation in Process and Priorities between Local Health Department Led Community Health Assessments/Improvement Plans and Hospital Led Community Health.
Using Technology to Strengthen Human Subject Protections Patricia Scannell Director, IRB Washington University School of Medicine.
Andy Finch, Ph.D. Vanderbilt University Mary Jo Rattermann, Ph.D. Research & Evaluation Resources
Approach and Key Components. The Goal of Cities for Life: To help community groups and primary care providers create an environment that facilitates and.
1 Introduction to Grant Writing Beth Virnig, PhD Haitao Chu, MD, PhD University of Minnesota, School of Public Health December 11, 2013.
COMPONENTS OF A GOOD GRANT PROPOSAL Philip T. LoVerde.
Future Use of Stored Samples & Data and the NIH Policy on GWAS and dbGaP NIAID/DAIDS Dione Washington, M.S. -- ProPEP Sudha Srinivasan, Ph.D.-- TRP Tanisha.
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat K-Series March 2012 Bioengineering Classroom.
Evaluating a Research Report
The inspection of local area responsibilities for disabled children and young people and those who have special educational needs Charlie Henry HMI National.
Elizabeth A. Martinez, MD, MHS Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions September 10, 2008 Organization of Care and Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery AHRQ grant 1K08HS A1.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 4 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
The NIH Grant Review Process Hiram Gilbert, Ph.D. Dept. of Biochemistry, Baylor College of Medicine Xander Wehrens, M.D. Ph.D. Dept. of Molecular Physiology.
Tracking Treatment Progress of Families with Oppositional Preschoolers Jaimee C. Perez, M.S., Stephen Bell, Ph.D., Robert W. Adams Linda Garzarella, B.A.,
RESIDENT PROJECTS ROBERT LEONHARD QUALITY IMPROVEMENT MANAGER.
“The Effect of Patient Complexity on Treatment Outcomes for Patients Enrolled in an Integrated Depression Treatment Program- a Pilot Study” Ryan Miller,
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
A Blueprint for Service Delivery
Slide 1 Community Networks to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities Pre-Application Conference May 26, 2004 Bethesda, MD Kenneth C. Chu, PhD Chief, Disparities.
Enhancing Equitable and Effective PTSD Disability Assessment (E3-PTSD) Ted Speroff, PhD, PI; TVHCS Patricia Sinnott, PT, PhD, MPH, co-PI;HERC.
Best reference starting point for student newbies grity/irb/upload/IW-Preparing-an-IRB- Submission-FINAL.pdf.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
The HMO Research Network (HMORN) is a well established alliance of 18 research departments in the United States and Israel. Since 1994, the HMORN has conducted.
1 Preparing an NIH Institutional Training Grant Application Rod Ulane, Ph.D. NIH Research Training Officer Office of Extramural Research, NIH.
Selecting Evidence Based Practices Oregon’s initial attempts to derive a process Implementation Conversations 11/10.
GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS: TOP 10 REVIEWER CONCERNS AND GOOD/BAD GRANTS Grant Writing for Success LeShawndra N. Price, Ph.D., NIMH, NIH Henry Khachaturian,
Evidence-Based Practice Evidence-Based Practice Current knowledge and practice must be based on evidence of efficacy rather than intuition, tradition,
Why Write A Grant? Elaine M. Hylek, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Associate Director, Education and Training Division BU CTSI Section of General Internal.
Career Development Awards (K series) and Research Project Grants (R series) Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University.
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
August 20, 2008 Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) CTSA Evaluation Approach Institute for Clinical & Translational Research (ICTR)
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
NIHR Themed Call Prevention and treatment of obesity Writing a good application and the role of the RDS 19 th January 2016.
ACGME SIX CORE COMPETENCIES Minimum Program Requirements Language Approved by the ACGME, September 28, 1999 “The residency program must require its residents.
R01? R03? R21? How to choose the right funding mechanism Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Wisconsin Department of Health Services CDC and HRSA released guidance on June 19, 2015 Guidance for health departments and planning groups Development.
European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA | EUnetHTA European network for Health Technology Assessment THL Info.
Program Planning for Evidence-based Health Programs.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
NIH R03 Program Review Ning Jackie Zhang, MD, PhD, MPH College of Health and Public Affairs 04/17/2013.
NATA Foundation Student Grants Process
NURSING PROCESS.
MUHC Innovation Model.
Leigh E. Tenkku, PhD, MPH Department of Family and Community Medicine
DARS Community Based Brain Injury Screening Initiative
A Path of Learning and Improvement
The University of Texas System Assessment of
Rick McGee, PhD and Bill Lowe, MD Faculty Affairs and NUCATS
Conclusions/ Future Directions
Cerebral palsy genomics update
Presentation transcript:

Genetics and Binge Eating: A Case- Control Pilot Study Tiffany Stewart, Ph.D. Health Behavior Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Specific Aims & Hypotheses Premise: Genes, behaviors, and the environment are intimately related in the etiology and maintenance of obesity. Further, the effects of the genotype can be amplified in an environment that promotes obesity. Primary Aim: To investigate the association between DNA sequence variation in the genes of the leptin-melanocortin pathway and the behavioral phenotype of binge eating. Primary Hypothesis: The DNA sequence variation in the genes of the leptin-melanocortin pathway is associated with a binge eating phenotype, which may contribute to the development of obesity. Secondary Aim: to implement methods to characterize a “pure” binge eating phenotype. Secondary Hypothesis: binge eating behavior is qualitatively different from eating behavior in obese individuals without eating disorders and nonobese individuals without eating disorders. Principal Investigator: Tiffany M. Stewart, Ph.D. Co-Investigators: Claude Bouchard, Ph.D., George Bray, M.D., Tuomo Rankinen, Ph.D., Donna Ryan, M.D., & Don Williamson, Ph.D.

Significance Specific:  Genetic implications: Identification of genetic basis of hyperphagia in humans Reduction of heterogeneity of obesity  Behavioral implications: Implications for diagnosis of binge eating (as well as other eating disorders) Implications for phenotyping of binge eating Overall:  This study is designed to be the first in a series of studies to investigate the relationship between genotypes and eating behaviors in humans.  This research may mark the beginnings of the attainment of knowledge towards the development of treatment programs and/or medications to be utilized in the future treatment of binge eating and/or obesity. Ultimately, this information could aid health care providers in the development of individualized treatment and prevention programs for individuals predisposed to weight gain or behaviors that may lead to inappropriate weight gain.

Participants: Total (N=200)  Cases (BED; N=100)  Controls (non eating disorder; N=100)  Men and Women ages 18-60, Weight range= normal to obese Matched experimental and control groups The present study hypothesizes behavioral phenotypes for genetic association analysis based upon empirical classification data of eating behavior. These behavioral phenotypes will be used to classify individuals. Genetic material, psychological assessment data, and body composition data will be utilized for the analysis of the association between the selected candidate genes and the behavioral phenotype, binge eating. This study will serve as a pilot study to begin recruitment and collect preliminary data for an R21 application submitted to NIH. CNRU Project Summary

Study Progress: Organization & Training IRB approval  The study was approved by the IRB. Study Coordination  Study coordination system in place. Behavioral Phenotyping  Formal training has been completed for members of the psychological assessment team for the complex behavioral phenotyping procedures, particularly with regard to the new binge eating phenotyping, and reliability procedures on these measurements are currently in progress.  Reliability procedures underway. Progression of 99% agreement between interviewers on measurement instruments so far. Genotyping  Structure and procedures in place

Study Achievement: Behavioral Phenotyping System Problematic Descriptions of Binge Eating throughout literature Inconsistencies in Psychological Diagnosis Inconsistencies in Behavioral Phenotyping in Genetic Studies Controversial Outcomes (Branson et al., 2003) Development of a finite Behavioral Phenotyping System Problem: Solution:

Study Achievement: Development of Recruitment System An online recruitment system has been developed and beta tested. This system is thought to overcome many of the obstacles of traditional methods of recruiting and since this study relies on recruiting for its success, it was necessary to develop for this project. The PBRC online recruiting system employs an online and anonymous forum by which individuals can provide PBRC with eating disorder symptom information. The online system notifies potential participants right away if they do not meet criteria for the study. However, if a participant is a possible candidate, based on the inclusion criteria, their information is securely transported to a member of the psychology via electronic mail. A member of the psychology team reviews the participant’s reported symptoms and criteria and contacts the individual directly for their first screening versus an individual with no prior knowledge of BED. This allows for case sensitivity and the likelihood of weeding out non BED cases in the early stages of the study so as to promote a more efficient phenotyping system as well as more efficient study overall. Online recruitment system beta test:  7 days- approximately 55 individuals applied for the study via online screening forms. Traditional recruitment strategies (advertisements and phone calls) will be utilized in conjunction with online strategies. PBRC database as a source of recruitment

Study Progress: Scientific Progress- R21 submission Principal Investigator: Tiffany Stewart, Ph.D. Co-Investigators: Claude Bouchard, Ph.D., George Bray, M.D., Carlos Grilo, Ph.D., Nathan Markward, Ph.D., Tuomo Rankinen, Ph.D., Donna Ryan, M.D., and Donald Williamson, Ph.D. The proposed pilot study is a collaborative effort between the Pennington Biomedical Research Center and Yale University School of Medicine. Application: 1 R21 DK Submitted June 1, 2005 Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel (NIDDK) Score 235 Overall review: The review viewed the application to have considerable significance for the reduction of the heterogeneity in obesity research, particularly in genetics. The investigative team was judged to have the experience and expertise to successfully conduct the study. The research environment was viewed as a supportive environment for the study. Overall, the review posited that the strengths of the study outweighed the weaknesses. Received CNRU funding to begin recruiting participants and collecting data Resubmitted July 1, 2006 Study will include 600 participants (300 cases, 300 controls)

Key items addressed:  Recruitment Since the submission of the initial proposal, PBRC has added an online recruiting system, which has aided the recruitment process tremendously for this study. We have complete confidence in our recruitment abilities at PBRC for this application.  Genotyping Since the submission of the initial proposal, PBRC has added a new genotype technology system, the Illumina. With the Illumina system, we can increase genotyping volume 10-fold without changing the budget. Consequently, we can include additional candidate genes from the same pathway.  Addition of a statistical geneticist to team. To provide the expertise of statistical genetics of our research team for the present project, we have added Nathan Markward, Ph.D., M.P.H. to the research team to meet this need. Study Progress: Scientific Progress- R21 submission

Significance: CNRU CNRU Funding: “Headstart”- Key to Success of project and program establishment  Addressed R21 revisions: recruiting system development, addition of personnel and coordination team, staff training  Participant incentives  Behavioral phenotyping system development Utilization of behavioral core Collaboration with molecular genetics core

Summary & Future Directions R21 submission June 1, 2005 CNRU funding and study procedures establishment R21 resubmission July 1, 2006 Future Directions: R01 Further establishment of Behavioral Genetics Research Program

Questions/Discussion