1 Neutrino: a spy of the innermost solar interior Nuclear reactions in the Sun and solar neutrinos.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The structure and evolution of stars Lecture 3: The equations of stellar structure Dr. Stephen Smartt Department of Physics and Astronomy
Advertisements

Standard Solar Model Calculation of Neutrino Fluxes Aldo Serenelli Institute for Advanced Study NOW 2006 Conca Specchiulla 11-Sept-2006.
Announcements Star Assignment 3, due Wednesday March 17 –READ chapter 16, –Do Angel quiz, –Do Astronomy Place tutorial “Measuring Cosmic Distances: Lesson.
Neutrinos Louvain, February 2005 Alan Martin Arguably the most fascinating of the elementary particles. Certainly they take us beyond the Standard Model.
1 Geo-Neutrinos : a new probe of Earth’s interior What is the amount of U, Th and 40 K in the Earth? What is the amount of U, Th and 40 K in the Earth?
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
The structure and evolution of stars
1 The pp-chain and the CNO-cycle after KamLAND Solar neutrinos after SNO and KamLAND The Boron flux The Beryllium flux Nuclear physics of the pp-chain.
Prospects for 7 Be Solar Neutrino Detection with KamLAND Stanford University Department of Physics Kazumi Ishii.
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 2 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
1 Some key problems and key reactions in Nuclear Astrophysics Main issues: BBN: was the universe always the same? What’s in the core of Sun and other MS.
Nuclear reactions and solar neutrinos
1 The pp-chain (and the CNO-cycle) after SNO and KamLAND Barbara Ricci, University of Ferrara and INFN Fourth International Conference on Physics Beyond.
1 Nuclear fusion in the Sun The spies of solar interior: –neutrinos –helioseismology What can be learnt about the Sun? What can be learnt about nuclear.
1 B.Ricci* What have we learnt about the Sun from the measurement of 8B neutrino flux? Experimental results SSM predictions SSM uncertainties on  (8B)
Solar & Atmospheric. June 2005Steve Elliott, NPSS Outline Neutrinos from the Sun The neutrinos Past experiments What we know and what we want to.
Guest Lecturer: Dr W J Chaplin
1 The standard solar model and solar neutrinos Episode I: Solar observables and typical scales Episode II: Standard and non-standard solar models Episode.
October 3, 2003IFIC, UVEG-CSIC A road map to solar fluxes, osc. param., and test for new physics Carlos Pena Garay IAS ~
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 3 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
Reminder n Please return Assignment 1 to the School Office by 13:00 Weds. 11 th February (tomorrow!) –The assignment questions will be reviewed in next.
Peggy Norris, Black Hills State Univ/Sanford Underground Laboratory at Homestake.
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
1 Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun * Can we learn on exo-planets from asteroseismology?Can we learn on exo-planets from asteroseismology?
Chapter three Sun’s model Major contributions in building the Sun’s model have been made by Eddington (1930’s), Hoyle (1950’s),Bahcall, Clayton (1980’s)
Lecture 10 Energy production. Summary We have now established three important equations: Hydrostatic equilibrium: Mass conservation: Equation of state:
The Importance of Low-Energy Solar Neutrino Experiments Thomas Bowles Los Alamos National Laboratory Markov Symposium Institute for Nuclear Research 5/13/05.
Solar Neutrinos Dr Robert Smith Astronomy Centre University of Sussex.
The Elementary Particles. e−e− e−e− γγ u u γ d d The Basic Interactions of Particles g u, d W+W+ u d Z0Z0 ν ν Z0Z0 e−e− e−e− Z0Z0 e−e− νeνe W+W+ Electromagnetic.
Lecture 13. Review: Static Stellar structure equations Hydrostatic equilibrium: Mass conservation: Equation of state: Energy generation: Radiation Convection.
Stellar Nucleosynthesis Charles Hyde 2 March 2009.
February 23, 2005Neutrino Telescopes, Venice Comparing Solar and KamLAND Data Comparing Solar and KamLAND Data Carlos Pena Garay IAS, Princeton ~
Methods and problems in low energy neutrino experiments (solar, reactors, geo-) I G. Ranucci ISAPP 2011 International School on Astroparticle physics THE.
Anti-neutrinos Spectra from Nuclear Reactors Alejandro Sonzogni National Nuclear Data Center.
-NUCLEUS INTERACTIONS OPEN QUESTIONS and FUTURE PROJECTS Cristina VOLPE Institut de Physique Nucléaire Orsay, France.
The Standard Solar Model and Experiments Predictions versus experiments Uncertainties in predictions Challenges and open questions BP00: astro-ph/
Neutrino Oscillations in vacuum Student Seminar on Subatomic Physics Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics Dennis Visser
SNO and the new SNOLAB SNO: Heavy Water Phase Complete Status of SNOLAB Future experiments at SNOLAB: (Dark Matter, Double beta, Solar, geo-, supernova.
Lesson 13 Nuclear Astrophysics. Elemental and Isotopic Abundances.
Application of neutrino spectrometry
What temperature would provide a mean kinetic energy of 0.5 MeV? By comparison, the temperature of the surface of the sun  6000 K.
1 The structure and evolution of stars Lecture 3: The equations of stellar structure.
1. active prominences - solar prominences that change in a matter of hours.
Masatoshi Koshiba Raymond Davis Jr. The Nobel Prize in Physics 2002 "for pioneering contributions to astrophysics, in particular for the detection of cosmic.
Neutrino Oscillations at Homestake from Chlorine to the Megadetector Ancient Origins of the Question ~1860 Darwin publishes “On The Origin of Species”-
SAGE: status and future SAGE: V.N. Gavrin Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow.
P Spring 2002 L18Richard Kass The Solar Neutrino Problem M&S Since 1968 R.Davis and collaborators have been measuring the cross section of:
Solar Neutrinos By Wendi Wampler. What are Neutrinos? Neutrinos are chargeless, nearly massless particles Neutrinos are chargeless, nearly massless particles.
Solar Neutrino Results from SNO
October 14th, 2006LONU-LENS, Virginia Tech Solar Luminosity by Neutrinos Solar Luminosity by Neutrinos Carlos Pena Garay IFIC, Valencia ~
5th June 2003, NuFact03 Kengo Nakamura1 Solar neutrino results, KamLAND & prospects Solar Neutrino History Solar.
Solar Neutrinos & Homestake or Something new under the Sun Kevin T. Lesko Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA.
Solar neutrino physics The core of the Sun reaches temperatures of  15.5 million K. At these temperatures, nuclear fusion can occur which transforms 4.
Solar Neutrinos on the beginning of 2017
Relativistic Kinematics for the Binding Energy of Nuclear Reactions
IBD Detection Efficiencies and Uncertainties
(Xin-Heng Guo, Bing-Lin Young) Beijing Normal University
Neutrino astronomy Measuring the Sun’s Core
How precisely do we know the antineutrino source spectrum from a nuclear reactor? Klaus Schreckenbach (TU München) Klaus Schreckenbach.
The Sun The Sun’s Spectrum
SOLAR ATMOSPHERE NEUTRINOS
Solar Neutrino Problem
Pauli´s new particle * nt nm ne e m t Beta-Decay Pa 234 b (electron)
The pp-chain and the CNO-cycle after KamLAND
7Be neutrino line shifts in the sun.
Neutrino Physics & Astrophysics : Overview
1930: Energy conservation violated in β-decay
Sun enrico.
Intae Yu Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Korea KNO 2nd KNU, Nov
Some Nuclear Physics with Solar Neutrinos
Presentation transcript:

1 Neutrino: a spy of the innermost solar interior Nuclear reactions in the Sun and solar neutrinos

2 The spy of nuclear reactions in the Sun The real proof of the occurrence of nuclear processes is in the detection of reaction products (holds for Sun & Earth)The real proof of the occurrence of nuclear processes is in the detection of reaction products (holds for Sun & Earth) For the Sun, only neutrinos can escape freely from the production region.For the Sun, only neutrinos can escape freely from the production region. By measuring solar neutrinos one can learn about the deep solar interior (and about neutrinos…)By measuring solar neutrinos one can learn about the deep solar interior (and about neutrinos…)

3 The luminosity constraint The total neutrino flux is immediately derived from the solar constant K o :The total neutrino flux is immediately derived from the solar constant K o : If one assumes that Sun is powered by transforming H into He (Q=26,73MeV):If one assumes that Sun is powered by transforming H into He (Q=26,73MeV): 4p+2e - -> 4He + ? Then one has 2 e for each Q of radiated energy, and the total neutrino produced flux is:Then one has 2 e for each Q of radiated energy, and the total neutrino produced flux is: if L and L e are conserved = if L and L e are conserved 2 e ?

4 Towards neutrino energy spectra To determine  tot we did not use anything about nuclear reactions and solar models.To determine  tot we did not use anything about nuclear reactions and solar models. In order to determine the components (  pp,  Be  B …)one has to know the relative efficiencies of nuclear reactions in the Sun (branches ppi/ppII/ppIII…)In order to determine the components (  pp,  Be  B …)one has to know the relative efficiencies of nuclear reactions in the Sun (branches ppi/ppII/ppIII…)

5 The pp-chain 99,77% p + p  d+ e + + e 0,23% p + e - + p  d + e 3 He+ 3 He  +2p 3 He+p  +e + + e ~2  %84,7% 13,8% 0,02%13,78% 3 He + 4 He  7 Be +  7 Be + e -  7 Li + e 7 Be + p  8 B +  d + p  3 He +  7 Li + p ->  +  pp I pp III pp II hep hep 8 B  8 Be*+ e + + e 2 

6 A group picture Neutrino Energy [Mev] Neutrino flux [cm -2 s -1 ]

7 Another group picture The production region of neutrinos

8 A 40 year long journey In 1963 J Bahcall and R Davis, based on ideas from Bruno Pontecorvo, started an exploration of the Sun by means of solar neutrinos.In 1963 J Bahcall and R Davis, based on ideas from Bruno Pontecorvo, started an exploration of the Sun by means of solar neutrinos. Their trip had a long detour, generating the “solar neutrino puzzle”Their trip had a long detour, generating the “solar neutrino puzzle” All experiments, performed at Homestake, Kamioka, Gran Sasso and Baksan exploring different portions of the solar spectrum, presented a deficit of e.All experiments, performed at Homestake, Kamioka, Gran Sasso and Baksan exploring different portions of the solar spectrum, presented a deficit of e. Were all experiments wrong?Were all experiments wrong? Was the SSM wrong?Was the SSM wrong? Was nuclear physics wrong?Was nuclear physics wrong? Or did something happen to neutrinos during their trip from Sun to Earth?Or did something happen to neutrinos during their trip from Sun to Earth?

9 Disappearance vs. Appearance ?

10 SNO: the appearance experiment A 1000 tons heavy water detector sensitive to B-neutrinos by means of: CC: e +d -> p + p + e CC: e +d -> p + p + e sensitive to e only, provides a good measurement of e spectrum with weak directionality NC: x +d -> p + n + x NC: x +d -> p + n + x all Equal cross section for all flavors. It measures the total 8 B flux from Sun. ES: x +e -> e + x ES: x +e -> e + x Mainly sensitive to e, strong directionality. The important point is that SNO can determine both:  ( e ) and  ( e +  +  )

11 SNO results The measured total B neutrino flux is in excellent agreement with the SSM prediction. Only 1/3 of the B-neutrinos survive as e 2/3 of the produced transform into  or  SSM & N.P are rightSSM & N.P are right All experiments are rightAll experiments are right Neutrinos are wrongNeutrinos are wrong

12 From Sun to Earth: The KamLAND confirmation anti- e from distant (  100 km) nuclear reactors are detected in 1Kton liquid scintillator where: Anti  e +p -> n + e + n + p -> d +  Obs./Expected= 54/ ( ) Oscillation of reactor anti- e proven -> Oscillation of reactor anti- e proven - > SNO is confirmed with man made (anti)neutrinos

13 The impact of SNO and KamLAND BeforeSNO AfterSNO-I AfterKamLAND AfterSNO-II

14 Bruno Pontecorvo The Cl-Ar method Neutrino sources (sun, reactors, accelerators) Neutrino oscillations Neutron Well LoggingA New Geological Method Based on Nuclear Physics Neutron Well Logging - A New Geological Method Based on Nuclear Physics, Oil and Gas Journal, 1941, vol.40, p An application of Rome celebrated study on slow neutrons, the neutron log is an instrument sensitive to water and hydrocarbons. It contains a (MeV) neutron source and a (thermal) neutron detector. As hydrogen atoms are by far the most effective in the slowing down of neutrons, the distribution of the neutrons at the time of detection is primarily determined by the hydrogen concentration, i.e. water and hydrocarbons.

15 From neutrons to neutrinos We have learnt a lot on neutrinos. Their survival/transmutation probabilities in matter are now understood. We have still a lot to learn for a precise description of the mass matrix (and other neutrino properties…) Now that we know the fate of neutrinos, we can learn a lot from neutrinos.Now that we know the fate of neutrinos, we can learn a lot from neutrinos.

16 What next? Neutrinos and Supernovae Neutrino contribution to DM Neutrinos and the Earth Neutrinos and the Sun

17 The measured boron flux The total active    ( e +  +   boron flux is now a measured quantity. By combining all observational data one has:   = 5.5 (1 ± 7%) 10 6 cm -2 s -1. The central value is in good agreement with the SSM calculation present   /   =7%Note the present 1  error is   /   =7% next few years   /    3%In the next few years one can expect to reach   /    3% BP2000 C FRANECGARSOM   [10 6 s -1 cm -2 ]

18 s 33 s 34 s 17 s e7 s pp Nuclear The Boron Flux, Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics nuclear physics   depends on nuclear physics and astrophysics inputs Scaling laws have been found numerically* and are physically understood s s s 17 1 s e7 -1 s pp -2.7   =   (SSM) · s s s 17 1 s e7 -1 s pp -2.7 com 1.4 opa 2.6 dif 0.34 lum 7.2 · com 1.4 opa 2.6 dif 0.34 lum 7.2 These give flux variation with respect to the SSM calculation when the input X is changed by x = X/X (SSM). Can learn astrophysics if nuclear physics is known well enough.  astro * Scaling laws derived from FRANEC models including diffusion. Coefficients closer to those of Bahcall are obtained if diffusion is neglected.

19 Uncertainties budget Nuclear physics uncertainties, particularly on S 34, dominate over the present observational accuracy   /   =7%. The foreseeable accuracy   /   =3% could illuminate about solar physics if a significant improvement on S 34 is obtained. For fully exploiting the physics potential of a   measurement with 3% accuracy one has to determine S 17 and S 34 at the level of 3% or better. Source  X/X (1   /   (1  S330.06*0.03 S S17**0.05 ? **0.05 Se70.02 Spp Com Opa Dif Lum *LUNA gift ** See later

20 Progress on S 17 S 17 (0) [eV b] Ref. Adel.-Review RMP 70,1265 (1998) Nacre-Review 21 ± 2 NP 656A, 3 (1999) Hammache et al 18.8 ± 1.7 PRL 86, 3985 (2001) Strieder et al 18.4 ± 1.6 NPA 696, 219 (2001) Hass et al 20.3 ± 1.2 PLB 462, 237 (1999). Junghans et al ± 0.6 PRL 88, (2002)+ nucl exp Baby et al ± 0.7 PRL. 90, (2003) Results of direct capture expts**. JNB and myself have long been using a conservative uncertainty, however recently high accuracy determinations of S 17 have appeared. Average from low-energy (<425KeV) data of 5 recent determinations yields: S 17 (0)= 21.4 ± 0.5 with    dof=1.2 A theoretical error of ± 0.5 has to be added.A theoretical error of ± 0.5 has to be added. However all other expts. give somehow smaller S17 than Junghans et al. **See also Gialanella et al EPJ A7, 303 (2001) Note that indirect methods also give somehow smaller values In conclusion, it looks that aIn conclusion, it looks that a 5% accuracy has been reached.

21 Remark on S 17 and S 34 For a long time S 17 was the main uncertainty. S 17 (0)= 20.5 ± 1 eVbIf S 17 (0)= 20.5 ± 1 eVb a 5% accuracy has been reached. The 9% error of S 34 is the main source of uncertainty for extracting physics from Boron flux. LUNA measurement of S 34 will be extremely important. Source  S/S (1   /   S330.06*0.03 S S17** Se70.02 Spp Com Opa Dif0.10***0.03 Lum

22 Sensitivity to the central temperature Boron neutrinos are mainly determined by the central temperature, almost in the way we vary it. (The same holds for pp and Be neutrinos) Bahcall and Ulmer. ‘96  i /  i SSM B Be pp T/T SSM Castellani et al. ‘97

23 The central solar temperature The various inputs to   can be grouped according to their effect on the solar temperature. All nuclear inputs (but S 11 ) only determine branches ppI/ppII/ppIII without changing solar structure. The effect of the others can (largely) be reabsorbed into a variation of the “central” solar temperature: 20.   =   (SSM) [T /T (SSM) ] 20.. S s s 17 s e7 -1 Source dlnT/dlnS  dln  B /dlnS   S S S1701 Se70 Spp Com Opa Dif Lum (  20)Boron neutrinos are excellent solar thermometers due to their high (  20) power dependence.

24 Present and future for measuring T with B-neutrinos   /   =7%  S nuc / S nuc =At present,   /   =7% and  S nuc / S nuc = 10% (cons.) translate into  T/T= 0.6 % the main error being due to S 17 and S 34.  S nuc /S nuc =0If nuclear physics were perfect (  S nuc /S nuc =0) already now we could have:  T/T= 0.3 %   /   =3%When   /   =3% one can hope to reach (for  S nuc /S nuc =0) :  T/T= 0.15 %

25 The central solar temperature and helioseismology For the innermost part, neutrinos are now (  T/T = 0.6%) almost as accurate as helioseismology They can become more accurate than helioseismology in the future. Helioseismology determines sound speed. The accuracy on its square is  u/u  0.15% inside the sun. Accuracy of the helioseismic method degrades to 1% near the centre. Boron neutrinos provide a complementary information, as they measure T.  u/u 1  3  present  T/T future

26 The Sun as a laboratory for astrophysics and fundamental physics A measurement of the solar temperature near the center with 0.15% accuracy can be relevant for many purposes –It provides a new challenge to SSM calculations –It allows a determination of the metal content in the solar interior, which has important consequences on the history of the solar system (and on exo-solar systems) One can find constraints (surprises, or discoveries) on: –Axion emission from the Sun –The physics of extra dimensions (through Kaluza-Klein axion emission) –Dark matter (if trapped in the Sun it could change the solar temperature very near the center) – … BP-2000FRANECGAR-SOM T6T

27 CNO neutrinos, LUNA and the solar interior The principal error source is S 1,14. The new measurement by LUNA is obviously welcome.The principal error source is S 1,14. The new measurement by LUNA is obviously welcome. A measurement of the CNO neutrino fluxes would provide a stringent test of the theory of stellar evolution and unique information about the solar interior. Source  X/X (1  )   /    O /  O S S S Se Spp S1, Com Opa Dif Lum Solar model predictions for CNO neutrino fluxes are not precise because the CNO fusion reactions are not as well studied as the pp reactions.Solar model predictions for CNO neutrino fluxes are not precise because the CNO fusion reactions are not as well studied as the pp reactions. Also, the Coulomb barrier is higher for the CNO reactions, implying a greater sensitivity to details of the solar model.Also, the Coulomb barrier is higher for the CNO reactions, implying a greater sensitivity to details of the solar model.

28 Solar neutrino experiments and CNO cycle Solar neutrino experiments set an upper limit (3  ) of 7.8% to the fraction of energy that the Sun produces via the CNO fusion cycle. An order of magnitude improvement upon the previous limit. New experiments are required to detect CNO neutrinos and to proof that some 1% of the solar luminosity is generated by the CNO cycle. Bahcall, Garcia & Pena-Garay Astro-ph

29 Is the Sun fully powered by nuclear reactions? Are there additional energy sources beyond 4H->He?: Are there additional energy losses, beyond photons and neutrinos?Are there additional energy losses, beyond photons and neutrinos? One can determine the “nuclear luminosity” from measured neutrino fluxes, K nuc =  tot Q/2, and compare with the observed luminosity K:One can determine the “nuclear luminosity” from measured neutrino fluxes, K nuc =  tot Q/2, and compare with the observed luminosity K: K nuc /K= 1.4 ( %) (1  ) This means that, within 25%, the Sun is actually powered by 4H->He fusion…This means that, within 25%, the Sun is actually powered by 4H->He fusion…

30 Summary Solar neutrinos are becoming an important tool for studying the solar interior and fundamental physics. Better determinations of S 34 and S 1,14 are needed for fully exploiting the physics potential of solar neutrinos. All this brings towards answering fundamental questions: Is the Sun fully powered by nuclear reactions?Is the Sun fully powered by nuclear reactions? Is the Sun emitting something else, beyond photons and neutrinos?Is the Sun emitting something else, beyond photons and neutrinos?