Agenda Review homework Lecture/discussion Week 8 assignment Metrics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Cause Variation
Advertisements

The Arbitrage Pricing Theory (Chapter 10)  Single-Factor APT Model  Multi-Factor APT Models  Arbitrage Opportunities  Disequilibrium in APT  Is APT.
Chapter 6 - Statistical Process Control
Manufacturing Metrics
Chapter 9A Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control
Marketing 334 Consumer Behavior
13–1. 13–2 Chapter Thirteen Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Chapter 10 Quality Control McGraw-Hill/Irwin
8-1 Is Process Capable ? The Quality Improvement Model Use SPC to Maintain Current Process Collect & Interpret Data Select Measures Define Process Is Process.
1 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Technical Note 7 Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control.
The Quality Improvement Model
1/55 EF 507 QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FALL 2008 Chapter 10 Hypothesis Testing.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Basic Business Statistics, 10e © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 9-1 Chapter 9 Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests Basic Business Statistics.
1 The Assumptions. 2 Fundamental Concepts of Statistics Measurement - any result from any procedure that assigns a value to an observable phenomenon.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Statistics for Business and Economics 7 th Edition Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing: Single.
BPT2423 – STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL.  Estimation of Population σ from Sample Data  Control Limits versus Specification Limits  The 6σ Spread versus.
X-bar and R Control Charts
Determining the Size of
Statistical Process Control (SPC)
Chapter 5 Product Specifications. Learning Objectives How to translate subjective customer needs into precise target specs? How could the team resolve.
Quality management: SPC - I
To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management, 8e by Render/Stair/Hanna 17-1 © 2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Chapter 17.
Chapter 10 Hypothesis Testing
Business Statistics, A First Course (4e) © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 9-1 Chapter 9 Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests Business Statistics,
Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests
Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap th Lesson Introduction to Hypothesis Testing.
Cost Volume Profit Analysis or Break Even Analysis Dr. R. Jayaraj, M.A., Ph.D.,
Market segmentation and targeting
 Review homework Problems: Chapter 5 - 2, 8, 18, 19 and control chart handout  Process capability  Other variable control charts  Week 11 Assignment.
Chapter 10 Hypothesis Testing
Process Capability and Statistical Process Control.
Statistical Process Control (SPC) Chapter 6. MGMT 326 Foundations of Operations Introduction Strategy Quality Assurance Capacity, Facilities, & Work Design.
1 LECTURE 6 Process Measurement Business Process Improvement 2010.
Variables, sampling, and sample size. Overview  Variables  Types of variables  Sampling  Types of samples  Why specific sampling methods are used.
EMBA 8021 Nothing in the world can take the place of PERSISTENCE. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will.
To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management, 9e by Render/Stair/Hanna 17-1 © 2006 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Chapter 17.
 Review homework Problems: Chapter 5 - 2, 8, 18, 19 and control chart handout  Process capability  Other variable control charts  Week 11 Assignment.
Problem Solving.
Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
1 MARKETING RESEARCH Week 5 Session A IBMS Term 2,
Chapter 36 Quality Engineering (Part 2) EIN 3390 Manufacturing Processes Summer A, 2012.
Chapter 23 Process Capability. Objectives Define, select, and calculate process capability. Define, select, and calculate process performance.
Chapter 8 - slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter Eight Product, Services, and Brands: Building Customer.
Global Edition Chapter Eight Product, Services, and Brands: Building Customer Value Copyright ©2014 by Pearson Education.
Chapter 10: Hypothesis Testing Using a Single Sample.
Chap 8-1 Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests.
Product, Services, and Branding Strategy Chapter 8.
Time Series Analysis and Forecasting. Introduction to Time Series Analysis A time-series is a set of observations on a quantitative variable collected.
Chapter 3 Data Description Section 3-2 Measures of Central Tendency.
Quality Control Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill.
Chapter 17 Process Improvement Using Control Charts Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Managerial Decision Modeling 6 th edition Cliff T. Ragsdale.
Unit-3 Control chart Presented by N.vigneshwari. Today’s topic  Control chart.
Tech 31: Unit 3 Control Charts for Variables
MSA / Gage Capability (GR&R)
Forecasting Methods Dr. T. T. Kachwala.
1 2 3 INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE PROJECT REPORT 2016
36.1 Introduction Objective of Quality Engineering:
Chapter 8: Selecting an appropriate price level
Higher National Certificate in Engineering
CHAPTER 6 Control Charts for Variables
Product, Services, and Branding Strategy
Process Capability Process capability For Variables
Process Capability.
Product, Services, and Branding Strategy
Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
BENEFITS OF AUTOMATED SPC
The Arbitrage Pricing Theory (Chapter 10)  Single-Factor APT Model  Multi-Factor APT Models  Arbitrage Opportunities  Disequilibrium in APT  Is APT.
Presentation transcript:

Agenda Review homework Lecture/discussion Week 8 assignment Metrics Chapter 3 -  11, 36(c) Case Study: “How We Slashed Response Time” Lecture/discussion Chapter 4: Statistics Metrics Measurement Statistics Week 8 assignment Homework Problems chapter 4 – 2, 3 Quality Metrics

Chapter Four “We best manage what we can measure” Quality Metrics Chapter Four “We best manage what we can measure” Quality Metrics

Metric A metric is a verifiable measure stated in either quantitative or qualitative terms. “95 percent inventory accuracy” “as evaluated by our customers, we are providing above-average service” Quality Metrics

Metric A metric is a verifiable measure that captures performance in terms of how something is being done relative to a standard, allows and encourages comparison, supports business strategy. Quality Metrics

Customer quality measures Customers typically relate quality to: Feature based measures; “have” or “have not” - determined by design Performance measures - “range of values” - conformance to design or ideal value Quality Metrics

True versus substitute performance measures Customers - use “true” performance measures. example: a true measure of a car door may be “easy to close”. true performance measures typically vary by each individual customer. Unfortunately, producers cannot measure performance as each individual customer does. Producers - use “substitute” performance measures these measures are quantifiable (measurable units). Substitute measure for a car door: door closing effort (foot-pounds). Other example: light bulb true performance measure -- brightens the room substitute performance measure – wattage or lumens Quality Metrics

Educating Consumers Sometimes, producers educate consumers on their substitute performance measures. What are substitute performance measures for the following customer desires: Good Gas Mileage Powerful Computer What is the effect of educating consumers on performance measures? Quality Metrics

What is a “metric”? Another term for a substitute performance measure is a metric. Metric is a standard of measurement. In quality management, we use metrics to translate customer needs into producer performance measures. Internal quality metrics scrap and rework process capability (Cp or Cpk) first time through quality (FTTQ) Quality Metrics

Identifying effective metrics Effective metrics satisfy the following conditions: performance is clearly defined in a measurable entity (quantifiable). a capable system exists to measure the entity (e.g., a gage). Effective metrics allow for actionable responses if the performance is unacceptable. There is little value in a metric which identifies nonperformance if nothing can or will be done to remedy it. Example: Is net sales a good metric to measure the performance of a manufacturing department? Quality Metrics

Use of quality metrics Quality metric data may be used to: spot trends in performance. compare alternatives. predict performance. However, organizations should consider the costs and benefits of collecting information for a particular quality metric. collecting data will not necessarily result in higher performance levels. higher quality companies often use fewer metrics than their competitors. Quality Metrics

Acceptable ranges In practice, identifying effective metrics is often difficult. Main reason: non-performance of a metric does not always lead to customer dissatisfaction. Consider the car door example again, if door closing effort is the metric, will a customer be dissatisfied if the actual effort is 50 foot-pounds versus 55 foot-pounds. Producers typically identify ranges of acceptable performance for a metric. (a) For services, ranges often referred to as break points. (b) In manufacturing, these ranges are known as targets, tolerances, or specifications. Quality Metrics

Break points Break points are levels where improved performance will likely change customer behavior. Example: waiting in line Suppose the average customer will only wait for 5 minutes Wait longer than 5 minutes -- customer is dissatisfied. 1-5 minutes -- customer is satisfied. less than 1 minute -- customer is extremely satisfied Should a company try to reduce average wait time from 4 to 2 minutes.? Quality Metrics

Targets, tolerances and specifications Target (nominal) - desired value of a characteristic. A tolerance specifies an allowable deviation from a target value where a characteristic is still acceptable. Lower specification limit (LSL) Upper specification limit (USL) TARGET -1 +1 Quality Metrics