Fisica del b in CMS N. Magini Università & INFN Firenze Parma, 19 Gennaio 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
B Tagging with CMS Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa B  Workshop Helsinki 29 May – 1 June 2002.
Advertisements

0 25. Sept 2006 M.Smizanska, Lancaster University, UK LHC preparations for precise measurements of muonic very rare B-decays 25. Sept 2006 M.Smizanska,
Prospect for  s measurement at LHC Alessia Satta on behalf of the LHCb collaboration + some Atlas and CMS results Physics at LHC, 3 rd october 2008.
Martin zur Nedden, HU Berlin 1 B-Physics at ATLAS Precise B-Decays Measurement sensitive to BSM Physics at ATLAS Martin zur Nedden Humboldt-Universität.
B triggering Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa Consorzio CMS Italia Firenze 7 Sept
CMS High Level Trigger Selection Giuseppe Bagliesi INFN-Pisa On behalf of the CMS collaboration EPS-HEP 2003 Aachen, Germany.
ATLAS first run scenarios for B physics Paula Eerola, Lund University On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration Beauty 2006, Oxford, September 2006.
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
Prospects of measuring B s !  +  - with CMS Frank-Peter Schilling (CERN/PH) For the CMS Collaboration Assisi (Perugia), Italy 20 th -24 th June 2005.
FPCP 2003 : 3-6 June 2003 Ecole Polytechnique, Paris Status and Prospects of ATLAS and CMS for B Physics and CP Violation Fairouz Ohlsson-Malek LPSC-Grenoble/IN2P3/ATLAS.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
22 July 2005Mauro Donega HEP20051 B s lifetimes in hadronic decays at CDF Mauro Donegà Université de Genève on behalf of the CDF collaboration.
Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.
BR = ( (stat) ± 2(syst) ± 5 (BR))  From PDG * From MC * BR(  needs to be rescaled for f s /f d From Data b->sss pure penguin amplitude.
6 th International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons July 2, 2004 Rare B Decays at LHC Sébastien VIRET Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique.
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
BEAUTY 2006, 28/09/06Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS & CMS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory On behalf of ATLAS and CMS.
R.W.L.Jones High Precision Measurements of B s Parameters in B s  J/  1/19 High Precision Measurements of B s Parameters in B s  J/ψ  Roger Jones.
B tagging as a key to New Physics (Physics TDR report) Valery Andreev UCLA October 9-10, 2006 DOE review, task L.
CKM2006 at Nagoya University Dec. 14 th 2006 Makoto Tomoto Nagoya University on behalf of CMS and ATLAS collaborations Rare B decays in ATLAS and CMS.
CMS / ATLAS production: quarkonia, cross section, correlations Valery P. Andreev University of California, Los Angeles on behalf of the CMS and ATLAS Collaborations.
Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.
Peter Fauland (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity for the B S - mixing phase  S at LHCb.
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.
B 0 s  J/   LHC review Nicolò Magini University and INFN, Firenze For the ATLAS, CMS and LHCb collaborations Oxford, 28 th September 2006 Beauty 2006.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
B S Mixing at Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi University and INFN of Padova On behalf of the CDF&D0 Collaborations First Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology.
Ji Hyun Kim Korea University. Introduction Results of Trigger Study – Event generation – Trigger efficiency Trigger rates and Statistics 25 – 26 Sep.
Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.
FPCP04, Daegu, 9 Oct 2004P J Dornan - Imperial College London1 B-Physics at the LHC P J Dornan Imperial College, London.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
1 Perspectives for quarkonium production in CMS Carlos Lourenço, on behalf of CMSQWG 2008, Nara, Japan, December 2008.
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
DIS 2004, Strbske Pleso,April LHCb experiment sensitivity to CKM phases and New Physics from mixing and CP violation measurements in B decays LHCb.
Il Trigger di Alto Livello di CMS N. Amapane – CERN Workshop su Monte Carlo, la Fisica e le simulazioni a LHC Frascati, 25 Ottobre 2006.
ICHEP 2002 First Heavy Flavor Results Using the Silicon Vertex Trigger A. Cerri.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Beautiful B Physics at the Tevatron IOP HEPP half day meeting Results From the Tevatron Imperial College London, 21 September 2005 Rick Jesik Imperial.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Physics at LHC Prague, 6-12 July, 2003 R. Kinnunen Helsinki Institute of Physics A/H ->  and H + ->  in CMS R. Kinnunen Physics at LHC Prague July 6.
ATLAS B-Physics Reach M.Smizanska, Lancaster University, UK
Recent Open Heavy Flavor Results from ATLAS and CMS Experiment at LHC
B Masses and Lifetimes at the Tevatron Satoru Uozumi University of Tsukuba Duke University.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
B 0 s  J/   with the ATLAS and CMS detectors Nicolò Magini University and INFN, Firenze Nagoya, 15 th December 2006 CKM th International Workshop.
RECENT RESULTS FROM THE TEVATRON AND LHC Suyong Choi Korea University.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Julia Thom, FNALEPS 2003 Aachen Rare Charm and B decays at CDF Julia Thom FNAL EPS 7/18/2003 Tevatron/CDF Experiment Decay Rate Ratios and CP Asymmetries.
1 Arnold Pompoš, SUSY03, Tucson, Arizona, June 5-10, 2003.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
12 March 2006, LCWS06, BangaloreS. Bhattacharya 1 Satyaki Bhattacharya The Standard Model Higgs Search at the LHC University of Delhi.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
Tommaso Boccali SNS and INFN Pisa Vertex 2002 Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 3-8 November 2002 High Level Triggers at CMS with the Tracker.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Sinéad Farrington University of Glasgow for the CDF Collaboration European Physical Society Aachen, 17 th -23 rd July 2003 B Lifetimes and Flavour Tagging.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India LHC weekely meeting.
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
1 Rare B Decays At CDF Michael Weinberger (Texas A&M University ) For the CDF Collaboration DPF 2006 November 1, 2006.
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
Presentation transcript:

Fisica del b in CMS N. Magini Università & INFN Firenze Parma, 19 Gennaio 2006

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 2 The CMS detector 4 Tesla Solenoid Muon system in return yoke Staged Scenario for start-up 1. 3 rd forward pixel disks missing 2. RPC up to |  | < Single muon trigger up to |  | < 2.1, dimuon up to |  | < 2.4 ECAL & HCAL inside solenoid 22 m long, 15 m diameter, ton Detector ton Detector Tracker (Pixel + Silicon Microstrip) Tracker (Pixel + Silicon Microstrip)  < 2.4

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 3 B Physics at CMS B-decays program B-decays program Inclusive b production CP violation B 0 s Mixing Rare decays B c b production at LHC b production at LHC Starting luminosity  cm -2 s -1  0.5 mb  about 0.5 x 10 6 b pairs/s only 100 ev/s on tape for ALL interesting physics channels The trigger strategy is a great challenge The trigger strategy is a great challenge

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 4 Inclusive b production bb differential cross section (from b   X) Expected CMS reach – up to p T ~ 1 TeV/c b   X rate extracted from total rate fitting the distributions of p T w.r.t. the closest B jet b   X rate extracted from total  rate fitting the distributions of  p T w.r.t. the closest B jet b c udsg 120 < p T < 170 GeV/c Valery Andreev, David B. Cline, Stan Otwinowski

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 5 Benchmark channels Decays into muons (di-muon Lvl-1 Trigger) : B S  J/     KK (B s mixing, CPV) B S(d)   (rare decays) Fully hadronic channel (Single muon Lvl-1 Trigger from other B   + X ) : B S  D S   (  KK)   (B s mixing)

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 6 s s B0sB0sB0sB0s B0sB0sB0sB0s B 0 s oscillations B s are too heavy to be produced at B factories  studied at hadron colliders Standard Model predictions  s  s   m S < 22.2 x s 95% CL,  s  s  PDG Experimental 95% CL  s  s   m S > 14.4 x s -1,  s  s   s  s  Latest result by CDF  s  s   s  s      D0  s  s     s

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 7 B s  J/   BR(B s  J/   )=(9.3±3.3)x10 -4 J/  ℓ + ℓ - (BR≈6%)  K + K - (BR ≈ 49%) CP violation weak phase  s = 2  = 2 2  SM predicts  s ~ O(0.03) Main ongoing activity: benchmark channel for B Physics studies in CMS Physics TDR – Vol. 2 Angular distributions of decay products depend on  s,  s,  M s (B 0 s mixing) and  s (CP Violation) ℓ+ℓ+ ℓ-ℓ- K+K+ K-K- pp N. Magini, V. Ciulli, T. Speer, K. Prokofiev, L. Wilke, S. Shulga, T. Ilicheva

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 8 Main backgrounds  at LHC –Signal B 0 s  J/        K + K fb B 0 d  J/  K* –Exclusive bkg B 0 d  J/  K*       K  900 fb –Inclusive backgrounds : –b  J/  X –b  J/  X 51.4 nb –Prompt pp  J/  X –Prompt pp  J/  X 310 nb  –In all samples : p T  GeV/c  –In signal + B d bkg : p T  GeV/c

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 9 Monte Carlo samples –Signal B 0 s  J/        K + K - 200k ev B 0 d  J/  K* –Exclusive bkg B 0 d  J/  K*       K  50k ev Generated with SIMUB  full angular distributions –Inclusive backgrounds : –b  J/  X –b  J/  X 200k ev –Combinatorial bb   –Combinatorial bb   with M(  GeV/c 2 100k ev Generated with PYTHIA  no angular distributions –Prompt pp  J/  X –Prompt pp  J/  X 50k ev J/ Generated with modified PYTHIA tuned on CDF J/  production cross sections  –In all samples : p T  GeV/c  –In signal + B d bkg : p T  GeV/c

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 10 B 0 s  J/        K + K - Selection strategy Trigger L1 : double muon trigger L2 : regional J/  reco with fast tracking L3 : regional  + B 0 s reco with fast tracking Offline Kinematic fitting Optimization performed vs. the following backgrounds: Prompt pp  J/  X Inclusive b  J/  X Inclusive b  J/  X B 0 d  J/  K*B 0 d  J/  K*

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 11 B 0 s  J/  L1 Trigger –Trigger 2  extended to |  | < 2.4 –Efficiency on signal sample with symmetric threshold p T  GeV/c : 33.3%

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 12 CMS Trigger & DAQ Two level trigger: Lvl-1 and HLT 40 MHZ 50 kHz 100 Hz HW SW 4 DAQ slices at start-up  50 kHZ

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 13 Level 1 Muon Trigger rates Low Lumi  < kHz DAQ 3.6 kHz for  14 ; 3, =3.6 kHz  W =90%  Z =99%  Bs  =15% B s  J/   B s  J/   efficiency 33.3% Lvl-1 thresholds optimized for discovery physics High - p T processes are selected b-jets are selected mainly by trigger 1  and 2  trigger

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 14 Using the Tracker at HLT Muon HLT stream optimized for high p T isolated muons  use the Silicon Tracker instead to reconstruct the decay chain at HLT HLT track reconstruction has to be fast but does not need to be global as the offline one, therefore it can be: –Regional Restricted to some phase-space region defined from external Lvl-1 information (e.g. a cone around muon/jet direction or the set of tracks coming from a vertex or above a P T threshold ) –Partial Stopped after a number of hits have been assigned to the track –Conditional Stopped when enough resolution is reached or on other condition Full tracker performance pTpTpTpT

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 15 B s  J/   HLT L2 strategy Define regions of interest for muon reconstruction Signal Primary Vertex identificationSignal Primary Vertex identification y y xz cm 7cm z0z0 Hit pairing with a straight line in rz –IP  1 mm –p T > 1 GeV/c Matching with 3 rd layer  track candidate PV candidate if  2 track cross z-axis Signal vertex from the highest  p T  eff. 96%  = 80  m

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 16 B s  J/   HLT L2 strategy Define Regions of Interest for muon reconstruction (5 tracker hits) Muon direction : from L1 muon candidates |  | < 0.15 |  | < 0.5

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 17 Partial reconstruction Reconstruction of muon tracks in RoI Sufficient track parameter resolutions with 5 hits Half the time for full reconstruction needed Full tracker performance Time vs hits in 100 GeV/c b-jets IP pTpTpTpT

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 18 B s  J/   HLT L2 strategy  150 MeV/c 2 around J/  mass Transverse decay length resolution ~ 100  m – –    10 and L T /  L T )  > 3  Rate = 10 Hz, ~ 190 ms ~ 80% of L2 J/  are from b Signal x 10 3 b  J/  X prompt J/  Tracks reconstructed with 5 hits around L1 muons - |  | < 0.15, |  | < 0.5

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 19 B s  J/   HLT L3 strategy |  | < 0.9, |  | < 0.9 Regional tracking around J/  direction |  | < 0.9, |  | < 0.9 HLT  HLT Rate Events/10fb % 0.05 Hz  mass  20 MeV/c 2 B 0 s mass  190 MeV/c 2

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 20 B s  J/   Offline selection strategy Combinatorial decay chain reconstruction Kinematic fitting – application of constraints from decay kinematics –J/  mass constraint  M(  <12 MeV/c 2,  M(B 0 s ) < 67 MeV/c 2

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 21 B s  J/   Proper time resolution

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 22 Event selection Events selected per 10 fb -1 Estimated S/B ~ 6, but very limited statistics for backgrounds  larger MC sample produced   Vertex pointing (cos  > 0.9)    m  < 12 MeV/c 2    m B 0 s < 67 MeV/c 2

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 23 B s  J/   Analysis Two methods may be used to extract parameters of interest from angular distributions –Unbinned maximum Likelihood fit

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 24 Angular moments method Time evolution is a function of the transversity amplitudes A 0 (t), A || (t), A  (t) which contain the parameters of interest Known functions of the three helicity angles  1,  2,  describing decay product kinematics  A set of 6 weighting functions w i (  1,  2,  ) is defined to separate the 6 b i (t) components

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 25 Angular moments method Statistical error with 64k generator level events Sources of systematics: Background contamination Detector resolution effect shown to be negligible Selection efficiency bias Taking into account these effects, after 3 years at low luminosity (60 fb -1 ): error on ΔΓ s /Γ s < 0.018

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 26 B s(d)  Lvl-1: 2  p T > 3 GeV/c,  =15.2% HLT strategy: –Select pixel seeds with p T > 4 GeV/c in  -  region around trigger  ’s –Conditional tracking: -stop if p T <4 5σ or N hit = 6 or σ(p T )/p T <0.02 -B s reconstruction if only 2 track candidates with opposite charge in  150 MeV/c 2 window -Vertex    20 and d r  > 150  m FCNC b  s or b  d only at loop-level in SM  BR(B s  ) = (3.5±1.0)x10 -9 MSSM enhancement (high tanβ)  probe for new physics BR(B s  μμ)=3x10 -6 (tanβ/50) 6 (200 GeV/c 2 / m A ) 4 U. Langenegger, A. Starodumov, P. Trüb

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 27 B s  Lvl-1  HLT  Global  Events / 10fb -1 Trigger Rate 15.2%33.5%5.1%47<1.7Hz HLT Full Tracker Offline analysis (hep-ph/ ) based on SV cuts (decay length and direction) + Tk/Calo Isolation: with SM BR=3.5x fb -1  7 signal events with < 1 background 5  observation with 30 fb -1 and analysis could be perfomed at high lumi too Mass resolution  = 50 MeV/c 2  = 74 MeV/c 2

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 28 B s  Tk Isolation Decay length significance

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 29 B s  D s    (  KK)   P(b  B s ) x Br(B s  D S     K K   ) ~ 5 x L1 1  trigger: p T > 14GeV/c, R=3.2 kHz HLT strategy: - -pixel seeds in full acceptance and Primary Vertex - -Partial tracking: 2 pixel and 1 strip hits - -Topological cuts:  R(KK) Kinematical cuts: p T (  ) > 2GeV/c, p T (D S ) > 4 GeV/c, p T (B S ) > 5 GeV/c - -Mass reconstruction:  M  <15 MeV/c 2,  M Ds <75 MeV /c 2,  M Bs <270 MeV/c 2 - -HLT efficiency 9% B S -B S mixing:  m S  14.4 ps 95% CL

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 30  BsBsBsBs DsDsDsDs B s  D s    (  KK)   Mass resolutions (only 3 hits are used)  = 5 MeV/c 2  = 25 MeV/c 2  = 95 MeV /c 2 1 year low luminosity (20 fb -1 ): Lvl-1 1 kHz HLT 5 Hz signal events   m S up to 20 ps events are needed to test allowed SM range:  m S  26 ps 99%CL Can not be run on full Lvl kHz because of large output rate: still room to improve

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 31 B c Physics B c → J/ ψµ  (J/ψ→µµ) 258 evts after 1 fb -1 (+156 for e chan) B c → J/ ψ π (J/ψ → µµ) 70 evts after 1 fb -1, Mass RMS 76 MeV Decay length residual RMS 25  m J.Q. Tao, G.M. Chen, C.H. Jiang But still need to study bkg rejection M = ± 4.8 ± 1.1 MeV/c 2  =  = −0.16 ± 0.03 ps

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 32 High Level Trigger table for low lumi TriggerThreshold (  =90-95%) (GeV) Indiv. Rate (Hz) Cumul rate (Hz) 1e, 2e 29, , 2  80, (40*25) , 2  19, , 2  86, Jet * Miss-E T 180 * jet, 3-jet, 4-jet 657, 247, e * jet 19 * Inclusive b- jets Calibration/other10105 Where is B – physics ? Table optimized in DAQ- TDR for discovery physics Allocation of additional 50 Hz to “Standard” Physics ? In this case we would like to trigger on the full 10 Hz b  J/  X rate Bandwith for B-physics at LHC start-up will also depend on actual luminosity –Lower luminosity at startup  higher B-bandwith From DAQ-TDR (CERN/LHCC )

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 33 Conclusions CMS is a competitive detector for B-physics, even if it is not designed specifically for it Low-p T dimuon L1 Trigger and use of Fast Tracking at HLT are fundamental for B-decay selection We should profit from LHC starting conditions: Low luminosity for a while  lots of B physics In only a few months: the Physics TDR Vol. 2 will address in deeper detail the CMS B-physics potential, with a chapter dedicated to the full analysis for the B 0 s  J/  benchmark  channel and sections on the other topics

Back-up slides

Parma, 19/01/06Fisica del B in CMSN. Magini 35 Transverse IP resolution ~ 20  m for tracks with P t ~ 10GeV CMS Tracker Pixel detector: 3 layers 4.2 – 15 cm radii cm in z Radius ~ 110cm, Length/2 ~ 270cm 3 disks TID 6 layers TOB 4 layers TIB 9 disks TEC Occupancy ~ Pixel is used for seeding Silicon strip :  R  =  m, cell size ~ 10 cm 2 Pixel:  R , z =  m, cell size ~ 150  m 2