Design the Moving and Handling Fixture for the DECAM Imager Edward Chi Fermilab November 17, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Formula 1 Group Members: Quinn Collett Steve Godlewski Tobiah Halter Jeff Swanson Academic Advisor: Dr. Chien Wern June 4, 2003.
Advertisements

Ion source maintenance on the MAT 253
Deviations from fiducial locations are unacceptable in areas despite high accuracy at alignment points.
C T A Camera Mechanics Rich Northrop University of Chicago 1 Design Review Argonne May 9, 2014 Final.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
The Effect of T-Stiffener Web and Flange Tilt on Frame Stress Evaluated using Finite Element Analysis by Dean Pasquerella MASTER OF ENGINEERING Major Subject:
1 Grating Mount Requirements Weight:< 75 Lbs including grating (43.1 Lbs) Size:Fit within structural envelope. 1.5” for cell behind grating. Alignment:Adjust.
More Discussions of the Flip Axle (Continued on “Flip Axle” Report #1 by Andy Stefanik) PPD/MD/ME September 08, 2008 Edward Chi.
FDR Station 3 lift fixture, laser screens and brackets T. Brown and L. Morris with analysis support from A. Brooks December 3, 2007.
MICE Collaboration Meeting at Frascati, Jun 26~29, 2005 Iron Shield Mounting Design Stephanie Yang.
CEA DSM Irfu - Bernard GASTINEAU - R3B Technical Board Meeting -April 4, Reactions with Relativistic Radioactive ions Beams GSI Large Acceptance.
Mechanical Engineering Dept.
MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Integration Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 27, 2004.
Tracker Solenoid Module Design Update Steve VirostekStephanie Yang Mike GreenWing Lau Lawrence Berkeley National LabOxford Physics MICE Collaboration Meeting.
Development of a Joule-Thomson Micro Compressor
1 RF-Structures Mock-Up FEA Assembly Tooling V. Soldatov, F. Rossi, R. Raatikainen
A Preliminary Design of the Rotator for the DES Simulator Stand February 28, 2008 Edward Chi Fermilab/PPD/MD.
1 The Support Structural System for Sicbar and EC Detector of SciBooNE FermiLab/PPD/MD May 08, 2006 Edward Chi.
K. Alam, CLIC workshop, October 16-18, CLIC workshop, October 2007 Working group “ Two beam hardware and integration” Test module in the two.
TIS Review 13 Dec Bill Elliott IR ABSORBER STATUS1 Bill Elliott LBNL Presented at the TIS SAFETY REVIEW 13 Dec Berkeley,CA brookhaven - fermilab.
ZTF Cryostat Finite Element Analysis Andrew Lambert ZTF Technical Meeting 1.
Group 1: Material Testing Device Jobe Dyson Brie Witherspoon John Chandler Brett Newstead.
COMPOSITE BODIES (Section 9.3) Today’s Objective: Students will be able to determine the location of the center of gravity, center of mass, or centroid.
18 November 2010 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) SVD Mechanics IDM.
FNAL Meeting, July 2006 Basti, Bedeschi, Raffaelli, INFN-Pisa 1 ILC cryomodule mechanical work at INFN-Pisa  Ongoing work  Near term future  Manpower.
Ron Madaras, LBL U.S. Pixel Meeting, SCIPP, July 9-10, 2003 Patch Panel 1 (PP1) Brief Review Cost and Effort Estimate.
EBD existing crane details and future bridge crane upgrade Alev Ibrahimov June
NCSX Modular Coil Turning Fixture FDR. Background Modular Coil winding forms are cast structures which provide the foundation on which the coils are constructed.
24 January 2014 LARP VTF Follow-up Meeting P. Kovach VTF 1 LARP Vertical Test Facility Vertical Dewar Design, Magnet Prep And Installation Paul Kovach.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnet and Girder Integration Lewis Doom, NSLS-II Project National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS-II) will.
1 LHC-DFBX Shipping Specification Steve Virostek LBNL Presented at the DFBX RFP Review October 2002, LBNL Brookhaven - Fermilab - Berkeley US LHC.
Stress and Cool-down Analysis Yun HE MLC Internal Review 9/5/2012Yun HE, MLC Internal Review1.
1 COMPTON POLARIMETER PRELIMINARY MAGNET DESIGN 06/03/08 Christopher Vidal, Senior Mechanical Designer Ernie Ihloff, P.E., Engineering Group Leader EE.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 17, 2007 T. Brown.
Cooling Pipes: Force Analysis Thermal forces Disc deflections Manufacturing tolerance forces Glue joint analysis Friction forces.
PRY Implementation - Contents l Fit with Experimental Devices (& services connections) l Fit with Tracker Cryo l Fit with Floor & Trench l Fit with Mezzanine.
NSTX NSTX Center Stack Upgrade Ensure fatigue resistant Welds: minimum # of locations shown, could be more. Various Weld Reinforcements & Hardware Replacement.
Brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley US LHC ACCELERATOR PROJECT LHC IRQ Inner Triplet Review Q1, Q2, and Q3 Mechanics T. Nicol April 24-25, 2007.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus January 27, 2010 Umbrella Leg Sliding Blocks TF OOP Support to the Vessel Seismic (Static.
Cold Magnetic Shield Update
An Analysis of Shell Structure for Dead Load H.M. Fan PPPL September 16, 2005.
January 5, 2006 at Fermilab1 LAr TPC Wire Experiments B. Hansen.
SBS Magnet and Infrastructure Status Robin Wines July 2015.
Kapton module ass. Spacers for pins 3.6 m m 1.25 mm.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 13, 2007 T. Brown.
C. Garion Presentation Outline  Overview of the inner triplet interconnections  Q1/Q2, Q2/Q3 interconnections  General view  Working conditions  Compensation.
MICE RF Coupling Coil Magnets Update Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory October 6, 2010 Sofia, Bulgaria.
H. Katajisto RE EDR 10/10/02 Enclosures for the RPC Link Boards Outline Introduction Periphery General Services Components, materials Manufacture, Assembly.
A View of NCSX Structural System and Load Path for the Base Support Structure.
DON LYNCH NOVEMBER 6, AGENDA November 4, BABAR Magnet Update Global Design Concept – Update Outer HCal Structural Analysis (2 nd pass) sPHENIX.
S1-Global status report KEK Norihito Ohuchi 2008/11/171ILC08-GDE-Meeting-Chicago.
Tim Abbott & Brenna Flaugher, CTIO Integration Meeting 1 The DECam Project Closeout, Action Items Hexapod Optical Lenses CCD Readout Filters Shutter 2008.
SPS movable table Joanna Swieszek, Kurt Artoos (EN-MME) 14/04/2016.
1 VV Support Fixture FPA Stage 1 PDR Review August 10, 2005 T. Brown.
14-Jun-161 Status of Horizontal Test Stand (HTS-2) Development Efforts Pradeep Kush, Prashant Khare, RRCAT, India Team Members: S.Gilankar, Rupul Ghosh,
Camera Motion System Requirement Design Details FEA.
Cryomodule Safety Approvals Jay Theilacker LCLS-II Production Cryomodule Final Design Review May 12-14, 2015.
SPHENIX Mechanical Don Lynch & Rich Ruggiero April 10, 2014.
Radiation Shutter Re-Purposing Roy Preece STFC RAL 18 th December 2014.
Development of a low material endplate for LP1 and ILD Dan Peterson, Cornell At previous meetings, , showed the carbon fiber molded.
DECAM LN2 PUMP REMOVAL - CHECKLIST
Pipe Integrity Check using Finite Element Analysis
Meeting for S1-Global module design Cryomodule and Cryogenics
MICE Partial Return Yoke Mechanical Design
Endcap shielding senarios:
SHMS Downstream Beamline Large SHMS/HMS Angles (Config-1)
Cryomodule Assembly Plan
Michail Anastasopoulos Lead Detector – Design Engineer
Status of QQXF cryostat
JLAB CHL 2K COLD BOX REPLACEMENT
Presentation transcript:

Design the Moving and Handling Fixture for the DECAM Imager Edward Chi Fermilab November 17, 2008

2 Fixture for the Decam Imager Decam Imager: ~1,300 lbs. Center of the gravity: ~8.63” from the edge of the back cover flange. View of the Fixture connects with the Imager together Main function of the Fixture: Supports the Imager; Disconnects the Imager from the telescope; Moves the Imager to the designated location.

3 Main Design Criteria of the Fixture Retrofits the existing Imager design configuration and the usage of the existing equipments. The size, weight and the configuration of the fixture must consider the availability of operation. Meets the applicable codes for a structurally sound design. Minimizes the material, fabrication and other design related cost and time. + =

4 The overall view of the Imager at the northwest location (tilting degree with Blanco floor level)

5 View of the interferences between the crates (4) and the PF cage ring Movable Stand of the platform carriage View of the Imager from carriage stand direction

6 The initial vessel back flange The modified vessel back flange

7 Views with the modified vessel back flange, moving off the camera io module, ion pump controller, cooling piping, pump, ac distribute box and the heat shields of the crates. Notice of the clearance between the PF cage ring and the crates

8 Half circle angle shape connect ring design for retrofitting the existing Imager configuration, also for the handling & structural consideration. (~23.5 lbs. mass weight per connect ring) Installed it in the designated location.

9 Both half connect rings (2) installed in position

10 Connects the stud, 39” x 1.75” (overall), ~23 lbs. to the designated location with the appropriate torque value.

11 Install all 6 connecting studs one by one to the connect rings in the designated location. About 9.25” circular gap (space) between two studs for operating access.

12 Installs the reinforcing connect ring to the designated location

13 Installs the octagon shape mounting plate to the carriage stand, adjusts it to the designated position. Installs the connect plate (round) to the octagon plate, aligns it to the designated position.

14 Moves the carriage stand to the designated location, assemble the counterweight octagon connecting plate with the 6 studs together. Another view before the carriage stand connect with the Imager through the fixture.

15 The Imager supported by the carriage stand through the fixture, moved away from the PF Cage assemble area for 40”. An FEM and the analysis results can be found from slides #18 to #23. Another view of the Imager connect with the carriage stand through the fixture, before disconnecting and moving out from the PF Cage assemble area.

16 The view of the fixture with the Imager, moved away from the PF Cage area by the carriage stand. See the angle between the ctr. Line of the fixture and the Blanco floor (~6.32 deg.) Using the turnbuckle device of the carriage to adjust the angle between the imager-fixture and the Blanco floor to about zero degree.

17 Installed the hoist rings to the designated location, the Imager is ready to disconnect from the carriage stand, or from the fixture per experimental further detail specification.

18 Brief of the FEA results from the simulating model of the Fixture with the Decam Imager Simulating the Decam Imager with a more conservative boundary condition: a). ~1,475 lbs force with the ctr. away from edge of the back cover flange. b). Less restraint location than the actual application of the fixture connects with the platform carriage stand. Maximum calculated working tensile/compressive) stress: f y = ksi < F t = 21.6 ksi Maximum calculated working shear stress: f v = 7.58 ksi < F v = 14.4 ksi The maximum deflection: ∆ y = ~ 0.041” (~1.04 mm). Where: F t is the allowable tensile/compressive stress of the fixture material. F v is the allowable shear stress of the fixture material.

19 Simulating the imager with similar weight and gravity ctr. Fixture with the Decam Imager The simulator of the fixture and imager for FEM

20 The FEA display picture for the model to simulate the Fixture connecting with the Decam Imager

21 I-DEAS 12 NX Series m2: Simulation 04-Nov-08 14:07:12 C:\PPD_IDM_PPD106547\ECC_DES_FIXTURE5_IMAGER_1108.mf1 Group ID : None Result Set : 3 - B.C. 1,STRESS_3,LOAD SET 1 Report Type : Contour Units : IN Result Type : STRESS Frame of Reference: Part Data Component: Y-Component Stress-XX Stress-XY Stress-YY Stress-XZ Stress-YZ Stress-ZZ Noda Maximum 4.541E E E E E E+03 Noda Minimum E E E E E E+03 Average 2.039E E E E E E+00 The calculated working stresses of the Fixture under the boundary condition 2

22 I-DEAS 12 NX Series m2: Simulation 04-Nov-08 15:39:48 C:\PPD_IDM_PPD106547\ECC_DES_FIXTURE5_IMAGER_1108.mf1 Group ID : None Result Set : 1 - B.C. 1, DISPLACEMENT_1,LOAD SET 1 Report Type: Contour Units : In Result Type: Displacement Frame of Reference: Part Data Component: Y-Component Displa-X Displa-Y Displa-Z Displa-RX Displa-RY Displa-RZ Maximum 6.290E E E E E E Minimum E E E E E E+00 Average E E E E E E+00 The calculated working deflections of the Fixture under the boundary condition 2 Maximum deflection

23 I-DEAS 12 NX Series m2: Simulation 04-Nov-08 15:37:11 C:\PPD_IDM_PPD106547\ECC_DES_FIXTURE5_IMAGER_1108.mf1 Stresses under BC2 Group ID : None Result Set : 2 - B.C. 1,REACTION FORCE_2,LOAD SET 1 Report Type : Contour Units : IN Result Type : REACTION FORCE Frame of Reference: Part Data Component: Y-Component Reacti-X Reacti-Y Reacti-Z Reacti-RX Reacti-RY Reacti-RZ Total 9.155E E E E E E Maximum 3.448E E E E E E Minimum E E E E E E+00 Average 4.578E E E E E E+00 The calculated total reaction forces of the Fixture under the boundary condition 2 The total reaction force = the total mass weight

24 More Imager Fixture modifications can and will make upon: Your comments; Your Inputs; Your applications; And your…