Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
Advertisements

Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Proposal Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Critical Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch Program University/Institution Team Members Date.
Comments on this template -Leave time for questions -Leave time for demonstration (at the final LRR) -Use your actual hardware in the presentation -Practice.
RockSat-C 2012 LRR Launch Readiness Review University/Institution Team Members Date.
Univ. of XXXXXXXXX 1 Things To Include: Team Photo Team Logo/Name.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Virginia Space Grant Consortium 1 University A University B Team # Logo 1 Logo 2.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date.
RockSat-C 2011 SITR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Fall 2010 Rev A
University of Wyoming Charles Galey, Nicholas Roder, Peter J. Jay, William Ryan 10/14/
RockSat-C 2011 ISTR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report Universities/Institutions Team Members Date.
Good Vibrations Conceptual Design Review University of Wyoming James Richey, Justin Thornton, Luke Voss, Jake Thatcher, Tony Allais Oct 27, 2008.
Team Name Critical Design Review Team Members Date Fall 2011 Rev A
Full Mission Simulation Test Report Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Comments on this template -Leave time for questions -Leave time for demonstration -Use your actual hardware in the presentation -Practice your presentation.
Space Cowboys. Mission Overview Objective – Accurately measure flight parameters including ambient and skin temperatures, pressure, acceleration, spin.
Team Name Launch Readiness Review Team Members Date Fall 2011 Rev A
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Rev
2011 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
GloboGym Fighting Cobras Conceptual Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards September 21, 2006 Project.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date. User notes –You may reformat to fit your design but make sure you cover the following points –You may.
Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report Team Name 1 Team Name 2 Team Name N Universities/Institutions Team Members Date.
Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley
LSU 10/09/2007Drawing a System Diagram1 How to draw a system diagram Project Management Unit #2a.
Full Mission Simulation Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Ethan Hayon, Mark Siembab, Mike.
(PDR ) University of Northern Colorado Nathan and Casey 11/14/08.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Miscellaneous Notes: This is a bare-bones template – make it fancier if you wish, but be sure to address at least the items listed here. Basically this.
New Mexico Space Grant Consortium Student Launch Program Provide annual access to space for student experiments from Spaceport America.
2014 CDR Team Name Critical Design Review CDR CDR Delieverables 1.Mechanical drawings in pdf format 2.Electrical schematics in pdf format 3.Completed.
RamRack Preliminary Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
MINNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Tom Thoe Bryce Doug Carlson 11/14/2008.
Team Name Flight Readiness Review (this is a bare-bones template – make it fancier if you wish, but be sure to address at least the items listed here)
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
User notes: –Please use this template to create your Proposal Analysis Review –You may reformat this to fit your design, but make sure you cover the information.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Hy-V.1 Skin Friction Sensor Experiment Presenters: Ryan F. Johnson Mitchell Foral-Systems November 24, 2008 University of Virginia.
User notes: –The purpose of the flight readiness review is to determine if your experiment is ready to fly. If it is not ready – it will not fly –You must.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium with Rutgers University Stevens Institute of Technology 2/13/2012.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report Harding University William Waldron, Joshua Griffith, Drew Cancienne, Edmond Wilson, David Stair 22 April.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date. User notes –You may reformat to fit your design but make sure you cover the following points –You may.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
MNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Bryce Schaefer Tom Thoe 11/3/2008.
Launch Readiness Review
2013 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
RockSat-C 2013 FMSTR Full Mission Simulation Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Section 2: The Payload! User’s Guide Compliance Beta Prototype Testing Section 3: Check-In.
RockSat-C 2012 LRR Launch Readiness Review University of Minnesota Alex Richman, Jacob Schultz, Justine Topel, Will Thorson 5/27/2012.
Notes on this template You may reformat this to fit your design, but make sure you cover the information requested in this template. Presentations should.
2014 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/College Team Members Date.
Simplifying Customer Software Integration Tim Myers April 9 th, 2011 Colorado Undergraduate Space Research Symposium Payload Configuration GUI.
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review College of Menominee Nation Conceptual Design Review College of Menominee Nation Marilyn Madosh, Larry.
RamRack Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
RockSat-C 2013 SITR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Critical Design Review Team Name
Team Members Class and Date
Launch Readiness Review
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
FRIDAY SLIDES TEMPLATE
Launch Readiness Report West Virginia University
Command and Data Handling
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Presentation transcript:

Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date

User notes This readiness tool is the last step before flight. There will be a final report due at a later date, but we want to know the following final analysis: –Mission Overview –Subsystem Requirements

Mission Overview What is your objective? What do you expect to prove, discover, or learn from your experiment? Brief overview of underlying science/theory What other related research/experimentation has been done in the past? –Results? Mission Requirements

Subsystem Requirements -What subsystems do you have: power, C&DH, thermal, etc. -What requirements do you have for each subsystem. -What requirements do each subsystem impose on each other. -You should have quantifiable requirements in this section. -Power subsystem shall supply 2W to… -Power subsystem shall remain at or above 72 F at all times during the flight. -Which requirements are design drivers?

Block Diagrams -Block Diagrams of each of the major subsystems shall be included. -Use these as visual queues to explain the connections between subsystems -Don’t skimp on details… if there is a power switch or a g-switch, make sure that it is included -This is where you explain the design of you system and how it operates.

Schematic/Drawings/Analysis -This section is reserved for electrical schematic and mechanical drawings. -These show the reviewers that you have taken the design to the next level and understand the physical dimensions of the system as well as the electrical characteristics -Any analysis that has been completed so far shall also be contained in this section. -Computer models -Any component tests or research that may have been completed

Commands and Sensors -This section contains charts that show the flow of data and commands. -What states can your payload be in? -Active, Active/Safe, Idle… etc. -The key items that we are looking for are data flow diagrams and budgets -Memory budgets -How many samples, how long, do you have enough memory? -Where is data stored? -How does the data get there? -What commands queue data acquisition? -General software flow chart for “main” code -Be sure to include sensor specifications -Will they meet your need?

Test Plans -What type of testing can be performed on your payload pre-flight? -What is required to complete testing?: -Support Hardware -Purchase/produce? -Software -Purchase/in-house? -Potential points of failure -Testing/Troubleshooting/Modifications/Re-Testing Schedule

Parts List MAJOR Components lists Not at the nut and bolt level… just major hardware that will be purchased or built in house Lead times (This can make or break a project) Distributors Manufacturers Cost (Don’t forget to consider shipping and tax)

Spaceloft XL Payload Canister User Guide Compliance Mass, Volume –Estimated fraction of allotment vs. assigned fraction Payload activation? –What have you planned for? –How does it comply with Wallops “no volt” requirement Rocket Interface –Shorting wires

Shared Can Logistics Plan Update us since DTR If not a shared can, just leave out –Institutions/Universities in can –Plan for collaboration on interfacing Know relative locations in can –Especially important for payloads needing ports –Structural interfacing to each other To the top and bottom bulkheads

Management Updated Organizational Chart Updated Schedule Updated mass/monetary budgets

Protocol & Testing What protocol will you be using to test your materials? –How will you go about testing your materials? What test procedures will you utilize? –How will you carry out the protocol? How will you analyze your results? NOTE: A Functional and Flyable Payload is the driving element of an FRR. Prove to the reviewers that your design is finished and Ready to Fly.

Protocol & Testing Pictures of Protocol –Power on system test (POST) visual –Full system integration visual –Video of POST

Protocol & Testing Bench Test Results Changes since original design –Why changes were necessary? Vibration testing results –Please include the documentation that vibration testing had been accomplished on protocol. (Very Important)

Results Explain what your data results are –Provide graphs, etc

Conclusions What does your data imply about your instruments –Make several inferences

Revised Hypothesis Now that you have bench test results, how do you expect your instruments to handle in the suborbital environment? If your hypotheses have changed, please note why you have made the changes. If your hypotheses have not change, please indicate why they have not.

Conclusions Issues and concerns Closing remarks