1 Arts Faculty, Macquarie University Foundations in e Learning & Teaching, 9 September 2009 Team/Group Work & Assessment Assessment is ‘the senior partner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peer-Assessment. students comment on and judge their colleagues work.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
A Masters in Education in eLearning The University of Hull.
Consortium members Central School of Speech and Drama Dartington College of Arts Goldsmiths College University of Leeds University of Salford University.
Deena Sue Fuller Tennessee State University Adapted from a presentation by Brenda Marsteller Kowalewski at Weber State.
Developing Our Leaders – Creating a Foundation for Success
LEARNER CENTERED LEARNER DESIGNED Learning & Preparation Objectives Learning Resources and Strategies Evidence of Accomplishment of Objectives Criteria.
Elizabeth Deane WIL symposium July One definition: The broad skills that a University expects that graduates will have acquired and be able to demonstrate.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The key characteristics of an autonomous learner at Sheffield Hallam in 2010 Ivan Moore.
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
Assessment of Group Work University of Warwick 27/28 March 2003 Cordelia Bryan Project Director
D EVELOPING G RADUATE A TTRIBUTES T HROUGH T HE S USTAINABILITY A GENDA A ND P ROBLEM - BASED L EARNING Workshop Friday 30 th November 2012 Keele Hub for.
Making Sense of Assessments in HE Modules (Demystifying Module Specification) Jan Anderson University Teaching Fellow L&T Coordinator SSSL
Models of work-based learning. Dr. Lesley Moore Director of work-based learning and Shell Awards.
LIFE SKILLS: ASSESSMENT IN THE THREE STUDY AREAS PERSONAL AND SOCIAL WELL-BEING (PSW) PHYSICAL EDUCATION (PE) CREATIVE ARTS (CA)
Introducing Assessment
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
Teaching Quality Indicators Project Ian Solomonides Excellence is as low as we go or When is good, good enough?
Critical Partnerships: Using Peer Support to Develop Skills in Writing at Masters Level Sue Forsythe Maarten Tas School of Education
OCTOBER ED DIRECTOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 10/1/14 POWERFUL & PURPOSEFUL FEEDBACK.
Principles of Assessment
External Examiners’ Briefing Day Assessment Policy Tuesday 6 th January 2015.
Patient and Public Engagement Purpose and People David Gilbert Director, InHealth Associates Co-Director, Centre for Patient Leadership 19 th March 2013.
Assessing Student Performance in Practice Colin Bright – Solent University June Tilling – Soton University.
Develop your Leadership skills
Foundations of Educating Healthcare Providers
How many balls can you juggle at one time?. Identify 7 balls extension middle managers juggle every day in leading the extension program Identify strategies.
Marion Webb January  By the end of the session, participants will be able to:  Discuss the role of assessment for learning  Describe key assessment.
PSYC3010 Applied Group Dynamics Natasha Malcolm
ENGAGING LEADERS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION ADEA CCI 2011 Summer Liaison Meeting San Diego, CA June 27-29, 2011 Janet M. Guthmiller, DDS, PhD University.
Assessed and Supported Year in Employment ( ASYE )
California State University East Bay
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
Classroom Assessment LTC 5 ITS REAL Project Vicki DeWittDeb Greaney Director Grant Coordinator.
LECTURE 2 - DTLLS Assessment. Research into the impact of assessment tells us that students learn best when assessment is:  Evenly timed  Represents.
WHOLE SCHOOL APPROACHES TO HABITS OF MIND WEAC Conference 2004 Gill Hubble and Graham Watts St Cuthbert’s College.
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment LO 1.1&1.2&1.3.
1 Ideas of Problem-based Learning As a learner-centred process, problem- based learning meets the learners' interests and as such gives room for developing.
EDUCATE ALABAMA & PROFESSIONAL LEARNING PLAN Oak Mountain High School
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Effective Learning Support: The key to quality and success Enhancement of Learning Support.
Standard 1 School Library Media Coordinators Demonstrate Leadership Staff development documentation Newsletters Conference documentation Websites School.
What should we expect from 2 nd year students? A realistic approach. Tuesday 25 th February 2014 Tutor CPD Seminar.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
PBL for the 21 st century. Getting Started Planning & Preparing Managing Reflect Perfect & Planning and Preparing Entry event Culminating products/rubrics.
Susan A. Ambrose Senior Vice Provost, Undergraduate Education & Experiential Learning Professor of Education & History NEASC Annual Meeting & Conference.
Personalised Learning NOCN Level 2. Induction Welcome and introductions Completion of enrolment forms Qualification Initial assessment Personalised learning.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
Project Based Learning “If I can learn the way you teach, why can’t you teach the way I learn”
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Effective Assessment: Do students learn what we are teaching? Tricia Munn.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
Strategic and School Improvement Plans: WPS 2021 Wareham Wakes up the World! Every Student Every Day.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
AQF, TEQSA, Learning Outcomes…. what’s the connection? Theresa Winchester-Seeto, Learning and Teaching Centre.
Assessment for Learning Centre for Academic Practice Enhancement, Middlesex University.
Task Design in Undergraduate Mathematics Leigh Wood Chair, Standing Committee on Mathematics Education Australian Mathematical Society Associated Dean,
Devising Assessment Tasks PGCE CS IT. Objectives To consider how to plan for assessment To consider progression To think about collaborative learning.
Footer to be inserted here 1 ASSESSMENT of REFLECTION in Participation Units Theresa Winchester-Seeto & Marina Harvey with Debra Coulson & Jacqueline Mackaway.
Subject specialist teaching
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
How did WE work? Assessing Collaborative Projects in the Online or Hybrid Classroom
teachers The English Language Centre EPORTFOLIOS!
February 21-22, 2018.
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
Presentation transcript:

1 Arts Faculty, Macquarie University Foundations in e Learning & Teaching, 9 September 2009 Team/Group Work & Assessment Assessment is ‘the senior partner in learning and teaching. Get it wrong, and the rest collapses.’ (Biggs,1999:160). Penelope Watson Macquarie Law School

2 Why team/group work? Experiential model – active L, student centred, peer tutoring, learner managed learning (LML) Promotes engagement Promotes wellbeing and community - connectedness Enhances content learning (K) Develops co-op learning/ working skills – grad caps (S) Promotes learner autonomy - indep /interdepend – LLL (A) Well-being /affective benefits – mentoring /peer tutoring / reduce isolation & alienation - retention Specify in learning outcomes

3 Generic skills/ graduate capabilities Communication Leadership – distributed/ shared best Goal setting, planning, decision making Project management - Work flow, process, co-ordination Problem solving Personal & time management, meeting skills Conflict management /utilization Self & peer evaluation Reflective practice ie indiv & co-op learning & working skills/caps –lifelong learning

4 Assessment – start here What? Why? How? Align with learning outcomes – KSA incl LLL Align with MQ Assessment Policy & Procedure Summative & formative Process & product Criteria – set by teacher? negotiated? Must specify Balance team & indiv - choice where poss (LML) Fully embed in unit/ program ie teach + practise + assess + feedback & repeat - cycle Check logistics Make it challenging!

5 Summative Assessment – Who? 1. Teacher assessed: – same mark for each team member – students divide team mark betw selves as appropriate (effort/ ability/ commitment) – indiv marks 2. Self assessed – team/ indiv 3. Peer assessed – team/ indiv/ whole class

6 Summative Assessement – How? Team oral presentation and/or written work – all aspects done collaboratively – same mark Stdts work collaboratively on same task, peer tutor, but write own final product and assessed individually Stdts work collaboratively on indiv but similar/ related tasks – eg diff probs on same topic – peer tutoring - submit indiv assignmts - half of mark indiv, half team average Stdts prepare collaboratively, peer tutor, teacher selects one at random to take test for all

7 Marking process not just product TW = experiential learning Criteria must be explicit Reflective – DATA model Related to theory/ literature? How demonstrated? Journals, learning logs, critical incident reports – encourage diversity of format/ creativity What did they learn? About what?

8 Summative Assessment - example 1. Team project30/40% research + 2 hr oral presentatn + written – choice format/ topic - 4 Is - OR authentic (workplace related) eg brief 2. Peer & self assessment10/20% team observations x 2 + verbal feedback + written rep’t (journal) 3. Reflective assignment10/20% indiv journal, various formats 4. Indiv task40/50% NB Complies with MQ Assessment policy – diversity, min 3 tasks, feedback, promotes self assessment skills, promotes grad caps, LML

9 Grad caps & formative assess Set readings on specific skills – I team p/wk Readings on reflective practice - DATA In class practice and/ or discussion team observations In class formative tasks eg De Bono 6 hat Thinking exercises Brain storming Group mind mapping De- briefing team experiences Outdoor experiential learning – games, physical challenges etc

10 Social loafing & conflict Important ethical issues Set up teams properly – students choose - agree ground rules, learning contracts, conflict plan Build checks into assessment eg teacher /stdt conferences, journals, team observations – reliable, transparent, fair Set readings on conflict management Teacher ADR – negotiation etc Teacher action as last resort ESCAPE clause – MUST build into assessment

11 Last word Do it carefully or don’t do it at all! Thorough preparation – learning outcomes, assessment & KSAs, planning, resources, logistics, institutional req’mts Staff learning (PD) implications Communicate clear expectations & rules Careful monitoring Timely intervention where necessary Who you gonna call? Good luck!