Changes in Library Usage, Usability, & User Support Denise A. Troll Distinguished Fellow, Digital Library Federation Associate University Librarian, Carnegie.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation Mary Rowlatt MDR Partners. Definition of project evaluation Evaluation focuses on whether the project was effective, achieved its objectives,
Advertisements

August 2013 School of Medicine Strategic Planning Community Engagement Committee.
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
YouAndMe University Library Strategic Plan Recommendations Group 6 Vision: “We aspire to become the leading academic library on Nearby Island, providing.
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
Update from the UNC General Education Council [presented to the UNC Board of Governors’ Educational Planning, Programs, and Policies Committee on February.
S-STEM Program Evaluation S-STEM PI Meeting Arlington, VA October 2012.
Workforce Planning Training for Supervisors Presentation Subtitle/Description Presenter’s Name Date.
Apples to Oranges to Elephants: Comparing the Incomparable.
Assessment of Student Affairs Initiatives for First-Year Students National Conference on First-Year Assessment October 12-14, 2008 San Antonio, Texas Jennifer.
CONTEXT Evaluation of Information Services. Topics of Day Mission Vision Goals and Objectives Standards Types of Metrics  Input  Output  Performance.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
DEVELOPING DEPARTMENTAL OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLANS Jerry Rackoff Lois Huffines Kathy Martin.
The Subject Librarian's Role in Building Digital Collections: Where Information Management and Subject Expertise Meet Ruth Vondracek Oregon State University.
Usage & Usability Denise A. Troll Distinguished Fellow, Digital Library Federation Associate University Librarian, Carnegie Mellon June 16, 2001 – LRRT,
IIBA Denver | may 20, 2015 | Kym Byron , MBA, CBAP, PMP, CSM, CSPO
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Business Driven Technology CHAPTER 01 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Presented by Beverly Choltco-Devlin Reference and Electronic Resources Consultant Mid-York Library System September 25, 2009 REVVED UP FOR REFERENCE CONFERENCE.
African Librarianship and the Academic Enterprise Prepared By: Kay Raseroka Director: Library Services University of Botswana.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Molly Chamberlin, Ph.D. Indiana Youth Institute
MGT-555 PERFORMANCE AND CAREER MANAGEMENT
An online information literacy program: the case of a Greek academic library Ilias Nitsos, Aphrodite Malliari Library, Alexander Technological Educational.
Chapter 5 Training Discuss how training can contribute to companies’ business strategy. Explain the role of the manager in identifying training needs and.
Embedding information literacy into the curriculum - How do we know how well we are doing? Katharine Reedy (Open University) Cathie Jackson (Cardiff University)
Emerging Best Practices and Trends in Succession Planning
Product Evaluation the outcome phase. Do the magic bullets work? How do you know when an innovative educational program has “worked”? How do you know.
Library User Studies Hsin-liang Chen SLIS, Indiana University.
The Integration of Embedded Librarians at Tuskegee University Juanita M. Roberts Director Library Services Ford Motor Company Library/Learning Resources.
of Research Libraries Assessing Library Performance: New Measures, Methods, and Models 24 th IATUL Conference 2-5 June 2003 Ankara,
Library Assessment in North America Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia American Library Association Mid-Winter.
The Assessment Environment in North American Research Libraries Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia 7th Northumbria.
Washington State Library OBE Retreat October 20, 2006 Matthew Saxton & Eric Meyers.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
The role of the research practitioner Dr Graham Walton, Head of Planning and Resources, Library and Honorary Research Fellow, Department of Information.
Denise Troll Covey Associate University Librarian, Carnegie Mellon NERCOMP Library/IT SIG Workshop – April 2002 versus Count-Ability.
Outcome Based Evaluation for Digital Library Projects and Services
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
1 Conducting a needs assessment - 7 Barbie E. Keiser University of Vilnius May 2007.
The Process of Conducting Research
ROLE OF INFORMATION IN MANAGING EDUCATION Ensuring appropriate and relevant information is available when needed.
Don Dodson, Senior Vice Provost Diane Jonte-Pace, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies Carol Ann Gittens, Director, Office of Assessment Learning Assessment.
College Library Statistics: Under Review Teresa A. Fishel Macalester College Iowa Private Academic Libraries March 22, 2007 Mount Mercy College, Iowa.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Putting Assessment into Practice - Library Websites Steve Burks, LIS Web Developer Saint Michael’s College Library
Evaluation of Reference Services Dr. Dania Bilal IS 530 Spring 2006.
Assessment: Research in Context Allison Sivak University of Alberta Libraries June 13, 2008.
Training and Development Prof R K Singh AIMA CME.
© 2007 SRI International CPATH Principal Investigators Meeting: Program Evaluation Update March 26, 2010 By the Center for Education Policy Dr. Raymond.
Project 3 Supporting Technology. Project Proposal.
Business Analysis. Business Analysis Concepts Enterprise Analysis ► Identify business opportunities ► Understand the business strategy ► Identify Business.
Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,
ANALYSIS 1 WEEK 2. WHY ANALYZE? to determine what the root cause is between the way things are and they way they should/could be. ADDIE Model Explained.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Effecting institutional change through the evaluation of e-learning Richard Walker & Rose Papworth E-Learning Development Team, University of York eLearning.
Practical Library Assessment Stephen Spohn. About me Academic libraries University of Maryland - George Mason University - Northern Essex Community.
Denise Troll Covey Associate University Librarian, Carnegie Mellon NERCOMP Workshop – April 2002 versus Count-Ability.
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
Quantifying the value of our libraries. Are our systems ready?
Tunica County School District Budget Planning for the Librarians
Assessing Library Performance:
Mary Moser Learning Commons Librarian
Tell a Vision: 3 Vignettes
What is Planning? Start at 9:15—10 minutes to do this. Finish at 9:25.
Presentation transcript:

Changes in Library Usage, Usability, & User Support Denise A. Troll Distinguished Fellow, Digital Library Federation Associate University Librarian, Carnegie Mellon 4 th Northumbria International Conference August 12-16, 2001

The Assessment Problem  Libraries are changing  How & why?  Traditional measures are inadequate  Assessing HOW library use is changing, will not explain WHY library use is changing, or HOW libraries are or should be changing in response to changes in library use

Like a Ship on the Sea of Change We experience, but do not control, the changing sea & weather around us. Understanding is crucial to navigating the changes & staying afloat.

 Study usage & usability assessments  Study assessment priorities Facilitate future research The DLF Initiative

 What data are being gathered & analyzed?  Why, how, & by whom?  Who uses the results?  Why, how, & to what effect?  What are the issues, problems, & lessons learned? Usage & Usability Assessments SURVEYContactedParticipatedRate Institutions262492% Individuals837186%

Purpose of the Study To identify trends in leading digital libraries that are likely to inform library practice Not to be exhaustive, representative, or predictive

Full Report – Sept / Oct 2001  Common ground  Why to conduct assessments  Instructions to use popular methods  Issues, problems, & lessons learned  Bibliography  Appendices  Sample instruments  Other methods & measures

Common Ground  Focus on (diverse) users  Useful & usable Web user interfaces  Guidance for undergraduates  Continuous marketing of library resources  Focus on assessment  Inputs, outputs, & composite measures  Service quality & user satisfaction  Usability, outcomes, & impacts  Cost effectiveness & cost benefits

How & Why to Conduct...  Surveys  Focus groups  Usability tests  Transaction log analysis What the methods are good for. What they’re not good for. What to look out for.

Issues That Cross Methods  Sampling – cost-benefit analysis  Permission & Privacy – informed consent & working with the Institutional Review Board  Observational research – what to observe, how to record it, & training the observer  Study design – start early, use multiple methods to identify problems, figure out how to solve them, & verify they’ve been solved

Assessment Challenges  Defining & measuring things that are changing  Collecting meaningful, purposeful data  Acquiring the requisite knowledge & skills  Managing the data cost effectively  Organizing the library appropriately

Critical Problems  Useless data collection  Individually, libraries aren’t organized internally to collect, analyze, or use data strategically  Duplicated efforts  Collectively, libraries haven’t developed the methods, standard definitions, & guidelines needed

 Survey aims, audiences, & methods  Identify highest priority  Design & facilitate research to fill gaps Assessment Priorities Academic Library Directors Colleges, mid-size & large universities

Assessment Aims  To meet user needs & expectations  To allocate expenditures to meet user needs & expectations cost-effectively  To validate expenditures of existing funds & strategic planning requests for more funds  To recruit & retain competent librarians & staff Many audiences

Top Priority Assessment  Study information use in a broader context  What resources do students & faculty use?  How do they locate, evaluate, & use them?  Do the resources & activities differ across user groups, disciplines, or type of institution?  What needs are not being met?  Target for report – February 2002 DLF & Outsell, Inc.

Purpose of the Study  Provide context for interpreting usage trends  Evaluate the library’s current role  Focus efforts appropriately  Improve planning  Strategies  Organization  Human resources  Financial resources

Tentative Plans  Survey aims, audiences, & methods of librarians in different departments & different levels of the organizational hierarchy  Commonalities may suggest areas for collective effort  Discrepancies may suggest areas for improved communication, coordination, & planning

Smoother Sailing On the Sea of Change