Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 1 ECSE-6600: Internet Protocols Informal Quiz #11 Shivkumar Kalyanaraman: GOOGLE: “Shiv RPI”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality of Service CS 457 Presentation Xue Gu Nov 15, 2001.
Advertisements

Spring 2003CS 4611 Quality of Service Outline Realtime Applications Integrated Services Differentiated Services.
Spring 2000CS 4611 Quality of Service Outline Realtime Applications Integrated Services Differentiated Services.
Tiziana Ferrari Differentiated Services Test: Report1 Differentiated Service Test REPORT TF-TANT Tiziana Ferrari Frankfurt, 1 Oct.
CS640: Introduction to Computer Networks Aditya Akella Lecture 20 – QoS.
TCP/IP Protocol Suite 1 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Chapter 25 Multimedia.
CSE Computer Networks Prof. Aaron Striegel Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of Notre Dame Lecture 20 – March 25, 2010.
CNDS 2001, Phoenix, AZ Simulating the Smart Market Pricing Scheme on Differentiated- Services Architecture Murat Yuksel and Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer.
1 Providing Quality of Service in the Internet Based on Slides from Ross and Kurose.
High Speed Networks and Internets : Multimedia Transportation and Quality of Service Meejeong Lee.
Real-Time Protocol (RTP) r Provides standard packet format for real-time application r Typically runs over UDP r Specifies header fields below r Payload.
CPSC Topics in Multimedia Networking A Mechanism for Equitable Bandwidth Allocation under QoS and Budget Constraints D. Sivakumar IBM Almaden Research.
Differentiated Services. Service Differentiation in the Internet Different applications have varying bandwidth, delay, and reliability requirements How.
A Case for Relative Differentiated Services and the Proportional Differentiation Model Constantinos Dovrolis Parameswaran Ramanathan University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 1 Informal Quiz 6 T F  Video is different from data only because it requires larger bandwidth.
Better-than-best-effort: QoS, IntServ, DiffServ, RSVP, RTP
CSE 401N Multimedia Networking-2 Lecture-19. Improving QOS in IP Networks Thus far: “making the best of best effort” Future: next generation Internet.
Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 1 Informal Quiz 7 T F  Strong authentication involves sending shared secrets on the wire 
Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 1 Informal Quiz 7 T F  Strong authentication involves sending shared secrets on the wire 
Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 1 Better-than-best-effort: QoS, Int-serv, Diff-serv, RSVP, RTP Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer.
Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 1 Informal Quiz 6: IPv6, QoS T F  Given a constant set of resources, the bandwidth and delay.
1 Quality of Service Outline Realtime Applications Integrated Services Differentiated Services.
Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 1 ECSE-6600: Internet Protocols Exam 3 Time: 90 min (strictly enforced) Points: 50 YOUR NAME: Be.
School of Information Technologies IP Quality of Service NETS3303/3603 Weeks
Internet QoS Syed Faisal Hasan, PhD (Research Scholar Information Trust Institute) Visiting Lecturer ECE CS/ECE 438: Communication Networks.
CSc 461/561 CSc 461/561 Multimedia Systems Part C: 3. QoS.
Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 1 Quality of Service (QoS) Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Spring 2002CS 4611 Quality of Service Outline Realtime Applications Integrated Services Differentiated Services.
Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 1 ECSE-6600: Internet Protocols Informal Quiz 2 Shivkumar Kalyanaraman: Informal.
24-1 Chapter 24. Congestion Control and Quality of Service part Quality of Service 23.6 Techniques to Improve QoS 23.7 Integrated Services 23.8.
Integrated Services Advanced Multimedia University of Palestine University of Palestine Eng. Wisam Zaqoot Eng. Wisam Zaqoot December 2010 December 2010.
CIS679: Scheduling, Resource Configuration and Admission Control r Review of Last lecture r Scheduling r Resource configuration r Admission control.
Integrated Services (RFC 1633) r Architecture for providing QoS guarantees to individual application sessions r Call setup: a session requiring QoS guarantees.
IntServ / DiffServ Integrated Services (IntServ)
CSE679: QoS Infrastructure to Support Multimedia Communications r Principles r Policing r Scheduling r RSVP r Integrated and Differentiated Services.
CS Spring 2011 CS 414 – Multimedia Systems Design Lecture 23 - Multimedia Network Protocols (Layer 3) Klara Nahrstedt Spring 2011.
CSE QoS in IP. CSE Improving QOS in IP Networks Thus far: “making the best of best effort”
IP QoS for 3G. A Possible Solution The main focus of this network QoS mechanism is to provide one, real time, service in addition to the normal best effort.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.3: Selecting an Appropriate QoS Policy Model.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 3: Introduction to IP QoS.
QOS مظفر بگ محمدی دانشگاه ایلام. 2 Why a New Service Model? Best effort clearly insufficient –Some applications need more assurances from the network.
CSC 336 Data Communications and Networking Lecture 8d: Congestion Control : RSVP Dr. Cheer-Sun Yang Spring 2001.
1 Internet Quality of Service (QoS) By Behzad Akbari Spring 2011 These slides are based on the slides of J. Kurose (UMASS)
CONGESTION CONTROL and RESOURCE ALLOCATION. Definition Resource Allocation : Process by which network elements try to meet the competing demands that.
1 Quality of Service Outline Realtime Applications Integrated Services Differentiated Services MPLS.
© Jörg Liebeherr, Quality-of-Service Architectures for the Internet Integrated Services (IntServ)
Network Support for QoS – DiffServ and IntServ Hongli Luo CEIT, IPFW.
Bjorn Landfeldt, The University of Sydney 1 NETS3303 Networked Systems.
CS640: Introduction to Computer Networks Aditya Akella Lecture 20 - Queuing and Basics of QoS.
CS Spring 2011 CS 414 – Multimedia Systems Design Lecture 22 – Multimedia Extensions to Existing IP Protocols Klara Nahrstedt Spring 2011.
EE 122: Lecture 15 (Quality of Service) Ion Stoica October 25, 2001.
1 Lecture, November 27, 2002 TCP Other Internet Protocols; Internet Traffic Scalability of Virtual Circuit Networks QoS.
Ch 6. Multimedia Networking Myungchul Kim
T. S. Eugene Ngeugeneng at cs.rice.edu Rice University1 COMP/ELEC 429 Introduction to Computer Networks Lecture 18: Quality of Service Slides used with.
Integrated Services & Differentiated Services
Queue Scheduling Disciplines
Chapter 6 outline r 6.1 Multimedia Networking Applications r 6.2 Streaming stored audio and video m RTSP r 6.3 Real-time, Interactive Multimedia: Internet.
Spring Computer Networks1 Congestion Control Sections 6.1 – 6.4 Outline Preliminaries Queuing Discipline Reacting to Congestion Avoiding Congestion.
Univ. of TehranIntroduction to Computer Network1 An Introduction Computer Networks An Introduction to Computer Networks University of Tehran Dept. of EE.
Data and Computer Communications Tenth Edition by William Stallings Data and Computer Communications, Tenth Edition by William Stallings, (c) Pearson Education.
Providing QoS in IP Networks
1 Lecture 15 Internet resource allocation and QoS Resource Reservation Protocol Integrated Services Differentiated Services.
Multicast and Quality of Service Internet Technologies and Applications.
Internet Quality of Service
Chapter 25 Multimedia TCP/IP Protocol Suite
CIS679: Two Planes and Int-Serv Model
Real-Time Protocol (RTP)
Real-Time Protocol (RTP)
Presentation transcript:

Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 1 ECSE-6600: Internet Protocols Informal Quiz #11 Shivkumar Kalyanaraman: GOOGLE: “Shiv RPI” Informal Quiz #11 Shivkumar Kalyanaraman: GOOGLE: “Shiv RPI”

Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 2 QoS (Slide set #12): Informal Quiz

Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 3 QoS T F  A flat priced, undifferentiated best-effort service offering is a solid long-term non-commodity business  Better-than-best-effort services would help spur new performance-hungry applications to be deployed on the Internet  QoS, broadly speaking, is a spectrum of performance capabilities (specified or measured) ranging from best-effort to that of a leased line.  A metric is specified “ a priori” and “parameters” are measured “a posteriori” in a QoS system  QoS is considered to be better if fewer parameters are specified at coarse granularity  A FIFO service discipline can provide isolation between flows.  Given a constant set of resources, the bandwidth and delay allocations is a zero- sum game irrespective of the scheduling approaches chosen  Signaling is an example of a data-plane QoS mechanism  An SLA is a control plane building block used to specify the service performance level, and may have other economic and legal agreements specified.  Scheduling refers to the choice of packet to transmit, whereas buffer management refers to the decision to enqueue or drop a particular packet  RTP is an example of a network-level QOS mechanism that raises the performance offered to applications.

Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 4 QoS (contd)  A token bucket bounds the characteristics of inbound traffic into a QoS network (I.e. creates a predictable traffic envelope)  An arrival curve and service curves are cumulative functions of the number of bits arrived or serviced at a network element respectively.  Arrival and service curves are useful to understand QoS performance parameters such as the worst case delay, buffer reqts, average service rates etc  Priority queuing provides service isolation only for the highest priority flow, whereas round robin provides isolation for every flow.  A delay guarantee can be provided by only using WFQ at the routers  Service isolation and differentiation still does not guarantee avoidance of congestion collapse (which is an end-to-end problem)  RED (the buffer management scheme) can provide service isolation between a mix of TCP and UDP flows  Virtual time refers to the service that backlogged flow with weight = 1 would receive in a GPS scheduler.  In a work-conserving GPS scheduler, every flow receives the same normalized service (service normalized by weights), which is also equal to the normalized average service (total service normalized by sum of weights).  GPS scheduler provides weighted max-min fair allocations to competing flows

Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 5 QoS …  FQ and WFQ transmit packets in the order of their finish times in an ideal bit- by-bit round robin or GPS scheduler  FQ isolates/protects a flow against a misbehaving flow when RED would not  Int-serv is an example of a stateless QoS architecture  Diffserv is an example of a stateless QoS architecture  Admission control is a function performed in the data-plane  RSVP provides QoS routing capabilities  RSVP PATH messages are used to identify the reverse path from receivers to any sender   RSVP provides signaling for both unicast and multicast flows.  In the differentiated services model, interior routers must handle fine-grained signaling and policy functionality  Differentiated services would provide better-than-best-effort service in a scalable manner.  Differentiated services architecture fully specifies the service semantics in a manner similar to int-serv’s guaranteed and controlled load services  The expedited forwarding PHB in diff-serv can be used to create a guaranteed bandwidth, low jitter service.

Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 6  The DPS approach moves state from the edge to the core of the network  The DPS approach or edge-based closed-loop building blocks can be used to compose QoS services over multiple autonomous systems.  One reason TCP is not best suited for video is because it can’t handle multicast   RTP provides useful transport functions for multimedia applications, but the network services are provided by RSVP, integrated services and differentiated services  H.323 provides call control and codecs in addition to RTP  A content delivery network is like a reverse web cache, paid for by the content provider to bring content close to the user, and hence impact performance