1 Rural Broadband Network Development Analytical Model Overview General Overview of Key Elements of an Analytical Model to support subsidized deployment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bhutan, April 27-29, 2005 The experience of the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation in application of the Data Envelopment Analysis methodology.
Advertisements

Presented by: Denise Sjahkit SURINAME. Introduction Overview of the main policy issues Scope Current compilation practices Data-sources Requirements for.
UNIT 1 CONCEPT OF MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS (continue)
Greater Minnesota Transit Investment Plan PAC December 14, 2010.
1 Budgets and Budgetary Control Prepared and Presented By Gladstone K. Hlalakuhle.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
An Overview of Preparation Program Effectiveness Measures Georgia Assessment Directors’ Association Fall 2013 Meeting Chuck McCampbell.
Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Cost Issues in International Settlements March 1998 DNTA David N. Townsend & Associates
Bridging the Gaps Industry Forum – Launch of ICT Access Gap Clusters Lagos, Nigeria. 19 th December 2014.
Lecture(3) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
The Business Environment
Developing the Marketing Plan
Introduction ► This slide deck provides a suggested framework for the financial evaluation of an investment project. When evaluating any such project,
Network and Operational Planning
Project Planning and Capital Budgeting
Overview of the Mississippi Legislature’s Efforts to Revitalize Performance Budgeting June 11, 2015.
Chapter 8: Problem Solving
Performance Measurement and Analysis for Health Organizations
Chapter 8 Architecture Analysis. 8 – Architecture Analysis 8.1 Analysis Techniques 8.2 Quantitative Analysis  Performance Views  Performance.
With the financial support of MAFAP project overview.
Leapfrog Hospital Rewards Program™: Implementation Options Catherine Eikel February 6, 2006.
Arizona Rural Transit Needs Study Arizona Department of Transportation Public Transportation Division November 2007.
An Online Knowledge Base for Sustainable Military Facilities & Infrastructure Dr. Annie R. Pearce, Branch Head Sustainable Facilities & Infrastructure.
Coordination and Net Working on DRR Rapid Emergency Assessment and Coordination Team (REACT) Bishkek November, 2009.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act March 23, 2010.
The aim / learning outcome of this module is to understand how to gather and use data effectively to plan the development of recycling and composting.
Prof Max Munday The E4G Toolkit. What is an E4G project expected to do/collect in terms of visitor numbers and related information? When you need to deliver.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin CHAPTER 13: Operation Analysis.
Introduction A GENERAL MODEL OF SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION.
Urban geography The fundamental task of the student of urban geography is to make sense of the ways that towns and cities have changed and are changing.
1 Electricity Industry – Municipal Tariff Issues and NERSA Approval Processes Compiled by Nhlanhla Ngidi.
Greater Minnesota Transit Investment Plan TAC November 17, 2010.
VVSG: Usability, Accessibility, Privacy 1 VVSG, Part 1, Chapter 3 Usability, Accessibility, and Privacy December 6, 2007 Dr. Sharon Laskowski
ADAP programs & the ACA Marketplace; how can we make them work together? Strategies from the Florida experience Joey Wynn – Co Chair, FHAAN Community Relations.
Evaluating Ongoing Programs: A Chronological Perspective to Include Performance Measurement Summarized from Berk & Rossi’s Thinking About Program Evaluation,
1 Differentiation: Where Are We? GOVERNMENT FUNDING AND DIFFERENTIATION Ian Bunting CHET seminar 10 February 2012 Franschhoek.
USAASA & USAF Programmes Presentation to the Select Committee on Communications & Public Public Enterprises 2 September, 2015.
VALUE/Multi-State Collaborative (MSC) to Advance Learning Outcomes Assessment Pilot Year Study Findings and Summary These slides summarize results from.
Feasibility Study.
GOS Economic Model (GEM) Overview Uses the same underlying simulation software (Stella) which was used in developing TNM Economic Model (NB-Sim) Provides.
Applications of Cost Proxy Models Universal Service William W. Sharkey* and D. Mark Kennet** November 2000 * FCC and The World Bank ** George Washington.
1. Overarching Question “to what extent have IFAD financed interventions in market access met the institutional objectives of IFAD?” Overview and Methodology.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Team Leader, Technology Policy and Strategy, UNFCCC Mr Andrew Higham THE CANCUN AGREEMENTS, THE TECHNOLOGY MECHANISM AND TECHNOLOGY NEEDS ASSESSMENTS UNFCCC.
UNIT No. 3 Capital Budgeting Nature Significance Technique of Capital Budgeting Pay back Method Accounting Rate of Return Net Present Value Profitability.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND MARKETING CONCEPT Friday, November 19.
National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic Service Collaboratives ( HRSA – ) Joan A. Scott, MS CGC, Chief, Genetics Services Branch Division.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
NFM: Modular Template Measurement Framework: Modules, Interventions and Indicators LFA M&E Training February
Challenge Grant Funding And SB  The Challenge Grant program is authorized by section (4), Florida Statutes, to provide grant funding to.
AUDIT QUALITY AND ASSURANCE 2 ND AND 3 RD OCTOBER 2014 HILTON HOTEL MATERIALITY IN PLANNING AND PERFORMING THE AUDIT (ISA 320) 1.
The No Wrong Door System Management Tool: Supporting Governance, Performance Measurement, and Reporting 1.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 12 Marketing Profitability Analysis.
Gathering Information and Scanning the Environment Chapter 3.
Licensing Rules for Communications Networks and Services CONSULTATION DRAFT FEBRUARY 2014.
4/16/2010 Regional Planning Group Meeting Long-Term Planning Study of the ERCOT Interconnection Warren Lasher Manager, System Assessment.
REVISED HUD FORM DISCUSSION 2016 MTW CONFERENCE APRIL 22, 2016 April Buzby, Keene Housing Sheryl Stansell, Tacoma Housing Authority Martha Tai, Cambridge.
Introduction and Overview
Working with your AoA Project Officer
Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian ENIC/NARI Baku, 2017
Software Measurement Process ISO/IEC
Introduction and Overview
FY09 UPK Program Components and Proposed Expansion
Business Retention and Expansion
Incentives for electricity infrastructure – ERGEG view
Wiesbaden, 24 October, 2007 Svetlana Shutova Statistics Estonia
Presentation transcript:

1 Rural Broadband Network Development Analytical Model Overview General Overview of Key Elements of an Analytical Model to support subsidized deployment of Rural Broadband networks in commercial non-viable locations April 2009 David N. Townsend & Associates DNTA

2 Rural Broadband Network Development Analytical Model Overview Key Requirements from Recovery Act: Define, identify “unserved” and “underserved” areas; Develop a mechanism for evaluating the appropriate levels of subsidy payments needed to provide service in such areas; The system must be broad and flexible enough to respond to applications from States and other government entities, non- profits, and to support at least one grant in each of 50 states; Demonstrate for each grant “that the project would not have been implemented during the grant period without Federal grant assistance.” (Section 6001(e)(3)) DNTA

3 Rural Broadband Network Development Analytical Model Overview Underlying Concepts: For private, commercial network operators, infrastructure deployment and service provision decisions are based on evaluation of the potential profitability (ROI) of each project; The market will provide coverage up to some boundary, known as the “Market Efficiency Frontier”, beyond which further deployment would be unprofitable (see diagrams); The location of this Frontier is constantly shifting, but is typically well beyond the point of current service availability, especially in a growing market. DNTA

4 Rural Broadband Network Development Analytical Model Overview Analytical Framework, the “Gaps” concept: DNTA

5 Rural Broadband Network Development Analytical Model Overview Simplified depiction of Market Frontier concept: Market Frontier Sustainability Frontier DNTA

6 Rural Broadband Network Development Analytical Model Overview Illustrative Evaluation and Decision Process: DNTA Develop standardized application requirements Applicants submit required data Model estimates expected ROI of project If consistent with application: approve Profitable Application must be manually reviewed, needs further info, or rejected Model calculates subsidy needed to make project viable Unprofitable If substantially below application

7 Rural Broadband Network Development Analytical Model Overview Model Objectives: Quantitative economic assessment of market structure for broadband service in any given location; Focus on determination of Market Frontier, and cost/benefit Business Case for broadband deployment; High-level “macro” analysis that can be applied on a statewide or region-wide basis for comparative purposes; Detailed “micro”-level mechanism to serve as a tool to analyze and validate specific network development subsidy proposals across many locations, sizes, market conditions. DNTA

8 Model Approach and Methodology: Evaluate the underlying economic costs to provide access to broadband service in locations not currently served; Collect data to represent the market structure and factors determining average network deployment costs for various technology platforms under different conditions; Methodology is geographically-based, focusing primarily upon rural areas where current networks are not available; Forward-looking technology and cost assumptions, recognizing that the market will take time to implement these; Key assumptions regarding potential service revenues, based upon demonstrated market trends and benchmarks. Rural Broadband Network Development Analytical Model Overview DNTA

9 Model Structure and Components: Data Inputs  Detailed inputs on market-specific characteristics (see next) Cost Assumptions  Estimated unit costs of each type of network facility and technology Network Development  Algorithms to represent infrastructure buildout, based upon geography, population, penetration, etc. Revenue Assumptions  Trend data and correlations of RPU to income, penetration, other factors based on market research Net Revenue Calculations  Difference between average (annual) costs and expected revenues to introduce new service, expressed on a per-location (e.g., town) basis Results: Market and access gaps, by geographic area, and net subsidy cost to close access gap. Rural Broadband Network Development Analytical Model Overview DNTA

10 Data Requirements: Geographic and demographic data which define the structure of each defined area (state, region, etc.) its current broadband market, according to the exact specified format required for the model’s calculations:  Distribution of towns and/or neighborhoods by population; also geographic size (sq. km).  Accurate data on current degree (%) of availability of broadband networks/services within each geographic/population group. Other market and economic factors: income, overall penetration, etc. Rural Broadband Network Development Analytical Model Overview DNTA